En defensa de una aproximación a los conceptos emocionales desde la perspectiva de los prototipos

Referencias

• Abelson, R. P. (1981). Psychological status of the script concept. American Psychologist, 36, 715–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong, S. L;., Gleitman, H., y Gleitman, L. R. (1983). What some concepts might not be. Cognition, 13, 263–308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Averill, J. R. (1980). A constructivist view of emotion. En R. Plutchik y H. Kellerman (Eds.), Theories of emotion, Vol. 1. Nueva York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlarg.
   Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1985). Ideals, central tendency, and frequency of instantiation as determinants of graded structure in categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 11, 629–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barsalou, L. W. (1987). The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. En U. Neisser (Ed.), Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization (pp. 101–140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bormann Kischkel, C; Hildebrand-Pascher, S., y Stegbauer, G. (1990). The development of emotion concepts: A replication with a German sample. Unpublished manuscript, Max Planck Institute for Psychiatry, Munch, FRG.
   Google Scholar
• Broughton, R. (1984). A prototype strategy for construction of personality scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1.334–1.346.
   Google Scholar
• Bullock, M., y Russell, J. A. (1986). Concepts of emotion in developmental psychology. En C. E. Izard y P. B. Read (Eds.), Measuring emotions in infants and children, Vol. II (pp. 203–237). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, J. W., y Pishkin, V. (1984). Family resemblance—Category structure of joy and shame. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 40, 1.136–1.143.
   Google Scholar
• Buss, D. M., y Craik, K. H. (1983). The act frequency approach to personality. Psychological Review, 90, 105–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, N., y Mischel, W. (1979). Prototypes in person perception. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 38–48.
   Google Scholar
• Cantor, N; Mischel, W., y Schwartz, J. C. (1982). A prototype analysis of psychological situations. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 45–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, N; Smith, E. E; French, R. D., y Mezzich. J. (1980). Psychiatric diagnosis as prototype categorization. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 89, 181–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaplin, W. F; John, O. P., y Goldberg, L. R. (1988). Conceptions of states and traits; Diemsional attributes with ideals as prototypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 541–557.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L. y Ortony, A. (1988). The semantics of the affective lexicon. En V. Hamiltion, G. H. Bower y N. H. Frijda (Eds.), Cognitive perspectives on emotion and motivation (pp. 367–397). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A. (in press). Conceptual representation of emotions: The role of autobiographical memories. En Gilhooly, Keane, Logie, y Erbos (Eds.), Lines of thinking: Reflections on the psychology of thought. Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Conway, M. A., y Bekerian, D. A. (1987). Situational knowledge and emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 1, 145–191.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, E. (1934). Emotion: An example of the need for reorientation in psychology. Psychological Review, 41, 184–198.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, E. (1941). An explanation of «emotional» phenomena without the use of the concept «emotion» The Journal of General Psychology, 25, 283–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P; Friesen, W. V., Ysimons, R. C. (1985). Is the startle reaction an emotion? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 1.416–1.426.
   Google Scholar
• Ferh, B. (1982). Prototype categorization of emotion. Unpublished master's thesis, University of British Columbi, Vancouver, Canadá.
   Google Scholar
• Ferhr, B. (1988). Prototype analysis of the concepts of love and commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 557–579.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., y Russell, J. A. (1984). Concepts of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 464–486.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., y Russell, J. A. (1989). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Unpublished manuscript. University of Winnipeg.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., y Russell, J. A., y Ward, L. M. (1982). Prototypicality of emotions: A reaction time study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20, 253–254.
   Google Scholar
• Gurtman, M. B. (1987, August). What is an affective prototype? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Nueva York.
   Google Scholar
• Harnad, S. (1987). Category induction and representation. En S. Hamad (Ed.), Categorical perception (pp. 535–565). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horowitz, L. M; Wright, J. C; Lowenstein, E., y Parad, H. W. (1981). The prototype as a construct in abnormal psychology: I. A method for deriving prototypes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 90, 586–574.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hume, D. (1978). A treatise of human nature. In L. A. Selby-Bigge (Ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. (Original work published, 1.739–1.740)
   Google Scholar
• Iaccino, V. (1989). Understanding the concept emotion: Support for a prototype perspective. ERIC-CAPS: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Communication and Reading Skills Database, #ED299–637, filmed April 13, 1989, 90 pp. (On microfiche).
   Google Scholar
• Izard, C. E. (1977). Human emotions. Nueva York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1950) The principles of psychology. Nueva York Dover. (Original work published, 1.890)
   Google Scholar
• James, W. (1929). The varieties of religious experience: A study in human nature. Nueva York: Longmans, Green y Co. (Original work published, 1.902).
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P.N., y Oatley, K. (1986). The meaning of emotions: A cognitive theory and a semantic analysis. Unpublished manuscript. Cambridge University.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., y Oatley, K. (1988). Il significato delle emozioni: una teoria e un'analisi semantica. En V. D'urso e R. Trentin (Eds.), Psicologia delle emozioni (pp. 119–158). Bologna: Il Mulino.
   Google Scholar
• Johnson-Laird, P. N., y Oatley, K. (1989). The language of emotions: An analysis of a semantic field. Cognition and Emotion, 3, 81–123.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan J. (1978). On emotion and its development: A working paper. En M. Lewis y L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The development of affect (pp. 11–42). Nueva York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D. y Miller, D. T (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, P., y Mcdaniel, C. (1978). The linguistic significance of the meanings of basic color terms. Language, 54, 610–646.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1973). The boundaries of words and their meanings. En C. J. N. Bailey y R. W. Shuy (Eds.), New ways of analysing variation in English (pp. 340–373). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, C. (1985). Cultural patterns and individual differences in the child's emotional meaning system. En M. Lewis y C. Saarni (Eds.), The socialization of emotions (pp. 37–53). Nueva York: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Lyons, W. (1980). Emotion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lysak, H; Rule, B. G., y Dobbs, A. R. (1989). Conceptions of aggression: Prototype or definign features? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 233–243.
   Google Scholar
• Mascolo, M. F., y Mancuso, J. C. (1988). The structure and content of emotion knowledge: A prototype approach. Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L. (1989). Concepts and conceptual structure. American Psychologist, 44, 1.469–1.481.
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., y Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objetcs,. Annual Review of psychology, 32, 89–115.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1979). The concept of intelligence. Intelligence, 3, 217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Neisser, U. (1987). Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ortony, A; Clore, G. L., y Foss, M. A. (1987). The referential structure of the affective lexicon. Cognitive Science, 11, 341–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osherson, D. N., y Smith, E. E. (1981). On the adequacy of prototype theory as a theory of concepts. Cognition, 9, 35–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panksepp, V. (1982). Toward a general psychobiological theoy of emotions. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 5, 407–467.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., y Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rombouts, H. (1988). Emoties gezien vanuit een prototype-perspectief, En G. Mulder & R. J. Takens (Eds.), Nederlands Psychologisch Onderzoek I: Bijdragen aan de klinische psychologie en het emotie-onderzoek (pp. 37–50). Amsterdam/Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, R. (1977). Human categorization. En N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (pp. 1–49). Londres: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1989). Culture, scripts, and children's understanding of emotion. En C. Saarni y P. Harris (Eds.), Children's understanding of emotion (pp. 293–318). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., y Bullock, M. (1986). Fuzzy concepts and the perception of emotion in facial expressions. Social Cognition, 4, 309–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A., y Fehr, B. (1989). The concept of anger viewed from a prototype perspective. Unpublished manuscript, University of British Columbia.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. Nueva York: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schachter, S., y Singer, J. E. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physicological determinants of emotional state. Psychological Review, 69, 379–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, P; Schwartz, J; Kirson, D; O'connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 1.061–1.086.
   Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (1984). Distinguishing between emotion and nonemotion: Judgments about experience. Motivation and Emotion, 8, 335–369.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, E. E., y Medin, D. L. (1981). Categories and concepts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tiller, D. K., y Harris, P. L. (1984). Prototypicality of emotion concepts: A discussion of normative data. Unpublished manuscript, Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, B., y Hemenway, K. (1983). Categories of environmental scenes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 121–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1972). Semantic primitives. Frankcfort: Athenum.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1973). The semantic structure of words for emotions. En R. Jakobson, D.H. van schooneveld, y D. S. Worth (Eds.), Slavic poetics: Essays in honor of Kiril Taranovsky. The Hague: Mouton.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1984). Cups and mugs: Lexicography and conceptual analysis. Australian Journal of Linguistics.
   Google Scholar
• Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophical investigations. Nueva York: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8, 338–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar