References

• Amáncio, L. (1989a) Factores psicossociológicos da discriminação da mulher no trabalho. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, ISCTE, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Amâncio, L. (1989b) Social differentiation between “dominant” and “dominated” groups: Toward an integration of social stereotypes and social identity. European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 1–10.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amâncio, L. (1990) Defining the limits of feminine behaviour—The asymmetrical functions of gender stereotypes. Paper presented at the VIIIth general meeting of the European Association of Experimental Social Psychology, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Amâncio, L., and soczka, L. (1988) Social identity and implicit theories about sex discrimation at work. In D. Canter; J. Correia Jesuino, L. Soczka and G.M. Stephenson (Eds.) Environmental Social Psychology, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R.D. (1981) Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory. In D. L. Hamilton (Ed.) Cognitive Processes in Stereotyping and Intergroup Behaviour, Hillsdale, N.J: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ashmore, R.D., and delboca, F.K. (1979) Sex stereotypes and implicit personality theory: Toward a cognitive-social psychological conceptualization, Sex Roles, 5, 2, 219–248.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S.L. (1974) The measurement of psychological androgyny. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 42, 2, 155–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S.L. (1975) Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgyny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 634–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (1985) Experimental research and social policy: must it be rigor verses relevance? Journal of Social Issues, 41, 4, 159–176.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, M. (1988) A dual process model of impression formation. In T.K. Srull and R.S. Wyer, Jr. (Eds.) Advances in Social Cognition, vol. I, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Broverman, I.K.; Vogel, S.R.; Broverman, D.M.; Clarkson, F.E., and rosenkrantz, P.S. (1972) Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal. Journal of Social Issues, 28, 2, 59–78.
   Google Scholar
• Clifton, A.K.; Mcgrath, D., and dewick, B. (1976) Stereotypes of woman: A single category? Sex Roles, 2, 135–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. (1984) From individual differences to social categories. Analysis of a decade's research on gender. American Psychologist, 39, 105–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., and kite, M.E. (1985) Gender stereotypes: Some thoughts on the cognitive organization of gender-related information. Academic Psychology Bulletin, 7, 123–144.
   Google Scholar
• Deaux, K. (1985). Sex and gender. Annual Review of psychology, 36, 49–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deaux, K., and lewis, L.L. (1984) Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 5, 991–1.004.
   Google Scholar
• Deaux, K.; Winton, W.; Crowley, M., and lewis, L.L. (1985) Levels of categorization and content of gender stereotypes. Social Cognition, 3, 145–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H. (1987) Sex Differences in Social Behaviour: A Social-Role Interpretation, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H., and kite, M.E. (1987) Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 3, 451–462.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H., and mladinic, A. (1989) Gender stereotypes and attitudes toward women and men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 15, 4, 543–558.
   Google Scholar
• Eagly, A.H., and wood, W. (1982) Inferred sex differences in status as a determinant of gender stereotypes about social influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 5, 915–928.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Higgins, E.T., and bargh, J.A. (1987) Social cognition and social perception. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 369–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huici, C. (1984) The individual and social functions of sex role stereotypes. In H. Tajfel (Ed.) The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology, vol. 2, London/Paris: Cambridge University press/Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, W.H.; Chernovetz, M.E., and hansson, R.D. (1978) The enigma of androgyny: Differential implications for males and females? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 46, 298–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Locksley, A., and cohen, M.E. (1979) Psychological androgyny: A case of mistaken identity? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 6, 1.017–1.031.
   Google Scholar
• Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1988) Individus Dominants et Groupes Dominés, Images Masculines et Féminines, Grenoble: Presses Universitaires.
   Google Scholar
• Maccoby, E.E. (1988) Gender as a social category. Developmental Psychology, 24, 6, pp. 755–765.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1956a) The american family. In T. Parsons and R.F. Bales (Eds.) Family, Socialization and the Interaction Process, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parsons, T. (1956b) Family structure and the socialization of the child. In T. Parsons and R.F. Bales (Eds.) Family, Socialization and the Interaction Process, London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenkrantz, P.S.; Bee, H.; Vogel, S.R., and broverman, I.K. (1968) Sex-role stereotypes and self-concepts in college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 32, 3, 287–295.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J., and alwin, D.F. (1989) Gender differences in parental strain: Parental role or gender role? Journal of Family Issues, 10, 4, 482–503.
   Google Scholar
• Sousa, E., and leyens, J.-P. (1987) A prion vs. spontaneous models of attribution: The case of gender and achievement. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 281–292.
   Google Scholar
• Sence, J.; Deaux, K., and helmreich, R.L. (1985) Sex-roles in contemporary american society. In G. Lindzey and E. Aronson (Eds.) Handbook of Social Psychology, 3rd Edition, vol. II, 149–178.
   Google Scholar
• Sence, J.; Helmreich, R., and stapp, J. (1975) Ratings of self and peers on sex role attributes and their relation to self-esteem and conceptions of masculinity and femininity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32, 1, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, V.J., and eagly, A.H. (1985) Implicit theories about influence style: The effects of status and sex. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 2, 191–205.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978) Social categorization, social identity and social comparison. In H. Tajfel (Ed.) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Psychology of Intergroup Relations, European Monographs in Social Psychology, 14, London/Paris: Academic Press/Maison des Sciences de l'Homme.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1981) Human Groups and Social Categories, London: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1982) Social psychology of intergroup relations. Annual Review of Psychology, 33, 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widiger, T.A., and settle, S.A. (1987) Broverman et al. revisited: An artifactual sex bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 463–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J.E., and best, D.L. (1986) Sex stereotypes and intergroup relations. In W. Austin e P. Worchel (Eds.) Psychology of Intergroup Relations, Chicago: Nelson Hall.
   Google Scholar