Counterfactual reasoning, responsibility and blame for serial murders: the perception and prevention of violent crimes / Razonamiento contrafáctico, responsabilidad y culpa de los asesinatos en serie: la percepción y prevención de los crímenes violentos

References / Referencias

• Benn, P. (1999). Freedom, resentment, and the psychopath. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 6, 29–39.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J., Segura, S., Culhane, R., Tasso, A., & Berrocal, P. (2000). The temporality effect in counterfactual thinking about what might have been. Memory & Cognition, 28, 264–281. doi:10.3758/BF03213805
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, R. M. J., & Tasso, A. (1999). Deductive reasoning with factual, possible, and counterfactual conditionals. Memory & Cognition, 27, 726–740. doi:10.3758/BF03211565
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Catellani, P., & Milesi, P. (2001). Counterfactuals and roles: Mock victims’ and perpetrators’ accounts of judicial cases. European Journal of Social Psychology, 31, 247–264. doi:10.1002/ejsp.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaikin, A. L., & Darley, J. M. (1973). Victim or perpetrator?: Defensive attribution of responsibility and the need for order and justice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 268–275. doi:10.1037/h0033948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daftary-Kapur, T., Dumas, R., & Penrod, D. (2010). Jury decision-making biases and methods to counter them. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 15, 133–154. doi:10.1348/135532509X465624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, C. G., Lehman, D. R., Wortman, C. B., Silver, R. C., & Thompson, S. C. (1995). The undoing of traumatic life events. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 109–124. doi:10.1177/0146167295212002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devos-Comby, L., & Devos, T. (2001). Social norms, social value, and judgments of responsibility. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 60, 35–46. doi:10.1024//1421-0185.60.1.35
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etxebarria, I. (2000). Guilt: An emotion under suspicion. Psicothema, 12, 101–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. St. B. T., Newstead, S. E., & Byrne, R. M. J. (1993). Human reasoning: The psychology of deduction. Hove: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Feather, N. T. (1996). Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 571–587. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.571
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Girotto, V., Legrenzi, P., & Rizzo, A. (1991). Event controllability in counterfactual thinking. Acta Psychologica, 78, 111–133. doi:10.1016/0001-6918(91)90007-M
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. L. (1978a). Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Social Psychology, 41, 316–328. doi:10.2307/3033584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. L. (1978b). Obedience and responsibility: A jury simulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 126–146. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.2.126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, V. L. (1986). Chains of command: Responsibility attribution in hierarchies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 16, 118–138. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1986.tb02283.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hart, H. L., & Honoré, A. M. (1985). Causation in the law (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hilton, D., McClure, J., & Sutton, R. M. (2010). Selecting explanations from causal chains: Do statistical principles explain preferences for voluntary causes?. European Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 383–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoerl, K. (2001). Pain and public deliberation: Citizens, victims, advocates, activists. In Conference Proceedings-National Comunication Association/American Forensic Association (Alta Conference on Argumentation, pp. 2422–2427).
   Google Scholar
• Hoerl, K. (2002). Monstrous youth in suburbia: Disruption and recovery of the American dream. Southern Communication Journal, 67, 259–275. doi:10.1080/10417940209373235
   Google Scholar
• Iglesias-Río, M. A. (2003). La eximente de “anomalía o alteración psíquica”. Una problemática abierta hacia el futuro científico. Anuario de Derecho Penal y Ciencias Penales, LVI(MMIII), 151–173.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, B. T., & Heide, K. M. (1995). Serial murder: A more accurate and inclusive definition. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 39, 298–306.
   Google Scholar
• Lagnado, D. A., & Channon, S. (2008). Judgments of cause and blame: The effects of intentionality and foreseeability. Cognition, 108, 754–770. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2008.06.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2008a). The responsibility of the psychopath revisited. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 14, 129–138. doi:10.1353/ppp.0.0003
   Google Scholar
• Levy, N. (2008b). Norms, conventions, and psychopaths. Philosophy, Psychiatry & Psychology, 14, 163–170. doi:10.1353/ppp.0.0002
   Google Scholar
• Lickel, B., Schmader, T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2003). A case of collective responsibility: Who else was to blame for the Columbine high school shootings?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 194–204. doi:10.1177/0146167202239045
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R. (2003a). Effect of counterfactual and factual thinking on causal judgements. Thinking and Reasoning, 9, 245–265. doi:10.1080/13546780343000231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R. (2003b). Judgment dissociation theory: An analysis of differences in causal, counterfactual, and covariational reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 132, 419–434. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.132.3.419
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandel, D. R., & Lehman, D. R. (1996). Counterfactual thinking and ascriptions of cause and preventability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 450–463. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.3.450
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., Gavanski, I., Sherman, S. J., & McMullen, M. N. (1995). The impact of perceived control on the imagination of better and worse possible worlds. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 588–595. doi:10.1177/0146167295216005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markman, K. D., & Tetlock, P. E. (2000). “I couldn’t have known”: Accountability, foreseeability and counterfactual denials of responsibility. The British Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 313–325. doi:10.1348/014466600164499
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCloy, R., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2000). Counterfactual thinking about controllable events. Memory & Cognition, 28, 1071–1078. doi:10.3758/BF03209355
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEleney, A., & Byrne, R. M. J. (2006). Spontaneous counterfactual thoughts and causal explanations. Thinking and Reasoning, 12, 235–255. doi:10.1080/13546780500317897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGill, A. L., & Klein, J. G. (1993). Contrastive and counterfactual reasoning in causal judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 897–905. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meindl, J. R., Ehrlich, S. B., & Dukerich, J. M. (1985). The romance of leadership. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 78–102. doi:10.2307/2392813
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. T., & Gunasegaram, S. (1990). Temporal order and the perceived mutability of events: Implications for blame assignment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1111–1118. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris, M. W., Moore, P. C., & Sim, D. L. (1999). Choosing remedies after accidents: Counterfactual thoughts and the focus on fixing human error. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 579–585. doi:10.3758/BF03212966
   Google Scholar
• Parkinson, B., & Illingworth, S. (2009). Guilt in response to blame from others. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1589–1614. doi:10.1080/02699930802591594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pérez-Abellán, F. (2005). ¿Mató Tony King a Rocio Wanninkhof?. Madrid: Martínez Roca.
   Google Scholar
• Robbennolt, J. K. (2000). Outcome severity and judgments of “responsibility”: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 2575–2609. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02451.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodríguez-Ramos, L. (2011). Código penal. Madrid: Wolters Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Counterfactual thinking: A critical overview. In N. J. Roese, & J. M. Olson (Eds.), What might have been: The social psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 1–59). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Roese, N. J., & Summervile, A. (2005). What we regret most... and Why. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1273–1285. doi:10.1177/0146167205274693
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Lázaro, F. G. (2006). Un problema de peligrosidad postdelictual: Reflexiones sobre las posibilidades y límites de la denominada custodia de seguridad. Revista Penal, 17, 142–165.
   Google Scholar
• Schlenker, B. R., Britt, T. W., Pennington, J., Murphy, R., & Doherty, K. (1994). The triangle model of responsibility. Psychological Review, 101, 632–652. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.101.4.632
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segura, S., & McCloy, R. (2003). Counterfactual thinking in everyday life situations: Temporal order effects and social norms. Psicológica, 24, 1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Segura, S., & Morris, M. W. (2005). Scenarios simulations in learning. In D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 94–109). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, K. G. (1970). Defensive attribution: Effects of severity and relevance on the responsibility assigned for an accident. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14, 101–113. doi:10.1037/h0028777
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaver, K. G. (1985). The attribution of blame. Causality, responsibility, and blameworthiness. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shultz, T. R., Jaggi, C., & Schleifer, M. (1987). Assigning vicarious responsibility. European Journal of Social Psychology, 17, 377–380. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2420170314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shultz, T., Schleifer, M., & Altman, I. (1981). Judgments of causation, responsibility, and punishment in cases of harm-doing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science/Revue Canadienne des Sciences du Comportement, 13, 238–253. doi:10.1037/h0081183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A. (1997). Crediting causality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 126, 323–348. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.126.4.323
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., & Kincannon, A. (2001). The relation between counterfactual (“but for”) and causal reasoning: Experimental findings and implications for jurors’ decisions. Law and Contemporary Problems, 64, 241–264. doi:10.2307/1192297
   Google Scholar
• Spellman, B. A., Kinncanon, A., & Stose, S. J. (2005). The relation between counterfactual and causal reasoning. In D. R. Mandel, D. J. Hilton, & P. Catellani (Eds.), The psychology of counterfactual thinking (pp. 28–43). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tangney, J. P., & Dearing, R. L. (2002). Shame and guilt. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vassileva, J., Kosson, D., Abramowitz, C., & Conrod, P. (2005). Psychopathy versus psychopathies in classifying criminal offenders. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 10, 27–43. doi:10.1348/135532504X15376
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vormbaum, M. (2007). El desarrollo de la Unión Europea y su influencia sobre el derecho penal europeo. Revista Penal, 19, 99–106.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, G. L., & Gavanski, I. (1989). Mental simulation of causality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 161–169. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.161
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. (2007). Serial killers: Hunting Britons and their victims 1960–2006. Winchester: Waterside Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wright, K. A., Pratt, T. C., & De Lisi, M. (2008). Examining offending specialization in a sample of male multiple homicide offenders. Homicide Studies, 12, 381–398. doi:10.1177/1088767908323930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeelenberg, M., Van Dijk, W. W., & Manstead, A.S.R (1998). Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254–272. doi:10.1006/obhd.1998.2780
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zemba, Y., Young, M. J., & Morris, M. W. (2006). Blaming leaders for organizational accidents: Proxy logic in collective-versus individual-agency cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 101, 36–51. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.04.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, H., Zhou, L., & Luo, Y. (2009). The influence of responsibility on the regret intensity: An ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 41, 454–463. doi:10.3724/SP.J.1041.2009.00454
   Google Scholar