Complementary gender stereotypes and system justification: the moderating role of essentialist lay theories for group differences / Estereotipos de género complementarios y justificación del sistema: el papel moderador de las teorías populares esencialistas sobre las diferencias grupales

References / Referencias

• Abele, A. E. (2003). The dynamics of masculine-agentic and feminine-communal traits: Findings from a prospective study. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 85, 768–776. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.4.768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakalaki, A. (1994). Gender-related discourses and representations of cultural specificity in nineteenth-century and twentieth-century Greece. Journal of Modern Greek Studies, 12, 75–106. doi:10.1353/mgs.2010.0186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastian, B., & Haslam, N. (2006). Psychological essentialism and stereotype endorsement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 228–235. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2005.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauvois, J. L., & Joule, R. V. (1996). A radical dissonance theory. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1981). Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. Psychological Review, 88, 354–364. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.88.4.354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, C., Hong, Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19–30. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.73.1.19
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, E. R., Jayaratne, T. E., Cecchi, L. A., Feldbaum, M., & Petty, E. M. (2007). Vive la difference? Genetic explanations for perceived gender differences in nurturance. Sex Roles, 57, 211–222. doi:10.1007/s11199-007-9248-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway, M., Pizzamiglio, M. T., & Mount, L. (1996). Status, communality, and agency: Implications for stereotypes of gender and other groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 25–38. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.25
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuddy, A. J. C., Fiske, S. T., & Glick, P. (2008). Stereotype content model and the BIAS map. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 61–149.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demoulin, S., Leyens, J.-P., & Yzerbyt, V. (2006). Lay theories of essentialism. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 25–42. doi:10.1177/1368430206059856
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C.-Y., & Hong, -Y.-Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6, 267–285. doi:10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figgou, L. (2013). Essentialism, historical construction, and social influence: Representations of pomakness in majority talk in western Thrace (Greece). British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 686–702. doi:10.1111/bjso.2013.52.issue-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). Ambivalent stereotypes as legitimizing ideologies: Differentiating paternalistic and envious prejudice. In J. T. Jost & B. Mayor (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 278–306). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hafer, C. L., & Choma, B. L. (2009). Belief in a just world, perceived fairness, an justification of the status quo. In J. T. Jost, A. C. Kay, & H. Thorisdottir (Eds.), Social and psychological bases of ideology and system justification (pp. 107–125). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, P. (2002). ‘It’s not a choice, it’s the way we’re built’: Symbolic beliefs about sexual orientation in the US and Britain. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 12, 153–166. doi:10.1002/casp.669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffman, C., & Hurst, N. (1990). Gender stereotypes: Perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 197–208. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iatridis, T., & Fousiani, K. (2009). Effects of status and outcome on attributions and just-world beliefs: How the social distribution of success and failure may be rationalized. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 415–420. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2008.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackman, M. R. (1994). The velvet glove: Paternalism and conflict in gender, class, and race relations. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jayaratne, T. E., Ybarra, O., Sheldon, J. P., Brown, T. N., Feldbaum, M., Pfeffer, C. A., & Petty, E. M. (2006). White Americans’ genetic lay theories of race differences and sexual orientation: Their relationship with prejudice toward blacks, and gay men and lesbians. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 9, 77–94. doi:10.1177/1368430206059863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Hamilton, D. L. (2005). Stereotypes in our culture. In J. Dovidio, P. Glick, & L. Rudman (Eds.), On the nature of prejudice: Fifty years after Allport (pp. 208–224). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2002). The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology. European Review of Social Psychology, 13, 111–153. doi:10.1080/10463280240000046
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Kay, A. C. (2005). Exposure to benevolent sexism and complementary gender stereotypes: Consequences for specific and diffuse forms of system justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 498–509. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.3.498
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., & Jost, J. T. (2003). Complementary justice: Effects of “poor but happy” and “poor but honest” stereotype exemplars on system justification and implicit activation of the justice motive. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 823–837. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.823
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., Jost, J. T., Mandisodza, A. N., Sherman, S. J., Petrocelli, J. V., & Johnson, A. L. (2007). Panglossian ideology in the service of system justification: How complementary stereotypes help us to rationalize inequality. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 305–358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, J. (2005). In genes we trust: The biological component of psychological essentialism and its relationship to mechanisms of motivated social cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 686–702. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.4.686
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, M., & Miller, D. (1978). Just world research and the attribution process: Looking back and ahead. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 1030–1051. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.85.5.1030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalingam, R. (2003). Essentialism, culture, and beliefs about gender among the aravanis of Tamil Nadu, India. Sex Roles, 49, 489–496. doi:10.1023/A:1025828606094
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, C. L., & Parker, S. (1995). Folk theories about sex and race differences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 45–57. doi:10.1177/0146167295211006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Medin, D. L., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. In S. Vosniadou & A. Ortony (Eds.), Similarity and analogical reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., Postmes, T., Haslam, S. A., & Hornsey, M. J. (2009). Theorizing gender in the face of social change: Is there anything essential about essentialism? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 653–664. doi:10.1037/a0012966
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moscovici, S. (1984). The phenomenon of social representations. In R. M. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.), Social representations (pp. 3–69). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moskowitz, D. S., Suh, E. J., & Desaulniers, J. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.66.4.753
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papastamou, S. (1993). Valeur stratégique et émergence de la psychologisation comme resistance a l’innovation. In J. L. Beauvois, R. V. Joule, & J. M. Monteil (Eds.), Perspectives cognitives et conduites sociales (Vol. 4, pp. 175–194). Neuchâtel: Delachaux et Niestlé.
   Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., & Walker, A. (2004). The bases of gendered power. In A. E. Beall, R. J. Sternberg, & A. H. Eagly (Eds.), The psychology of gender (2nd ed., pp. 242–268). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (2007). Psychological essentialism of human categories. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 202–206. doi:10.1111/cdir.2007.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangel, U., & Keller, J. (2011). Essentialism goes social: Belief in social determinism as a component of psychological essentialism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 1056–1078. doi:10.1037/a0022401
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reicher, S., Hopkins, N., & Condor, S. (1997). Stereotype construction as a strategy of influence. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, N. Ellemers, & S. A. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 99–118). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgeway, C. L., & Correl, S. J. (2006). Consensus and the creation of status beliefs. Social Forces, 85, 431–453. doi:10.1353/sof.2006.0139
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothbart, M., & Taylor, M. (1992). Category labels and social reality: Do we view social categories as natural kinds? In G. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction, and social cognition (pp. 11–36). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, Z., & Peplau, L. (1975). Who believes in a just world? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 65–89. doi:10.1111/josi.1975.31.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (1975). Functionalism, darwinism, and the psychology of women: A study in social myth. American Psychologist, 30, 739–754. doi:10.1037/h0076948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shields, S. A. (2007). Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century. History of Psychology, 10, 92–110. doi:10.1037/1093-4510.10.2.92
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1673–1682. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1673
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkuyten, M. (2003). Discourses about ethnic group (de-)essentialism: Oppressive and progressive aspects. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42, 371–391. doi:10.1348/014466603322438215
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, W., & Eagly, A. H. (2012). Biosocial construction of sex differences and similarities in behavior. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 46, 55–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V., Rocher, S., & Schadron, G. (1997). Stereotypes as explanations: A subjective essentialistic view of group perception. In R. Spears, P. J. Oakes, S. A. Ellemers, & N. Haslam (Eds.), The social psychology of stereotyping and group life (pp. 20–50). Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Yzerbyt, V., & Rogier, A. (2001). Blame it on the group: Entitativity, subjective essentialism, and social attribution. In J. T. Jost & B. Major (Eds.), The psychology of legitimacy: Emerging perspectives on ideology, justice, and intergroup relations (pp. 103–134). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zárate, M. A., Garcia, B., Garza, A. A., & Hitlan, R. T. (2004). Cultural threat and perceived realistic group conflict as dual predictors of prejudice. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 99–105. doi:10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00067-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar