‘We will show our strength!’: the independentists’ support for group-based hierarchy to guarantee and legitimate ingroup status-enhancement (‘¡Mostraremos nuestra fuerza!’: el apoyo de los independentistas a la jerarquía basada en el grupo para garantizar y legitimar la mejora del estatus del endogrupo)

References / Referencias

• Barón, A. (2015). Why public finance matters: Evolution of independence movements in Catalonia and the Basque country during the twenty-first century. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 35(2), 91–103. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/sais.2015.0025
   Google Scholar
• Baughn, C. C., & Yaprak, A. (1996). Economic nationalism: Conceptual and empirical development. Political Psychology, 17(4), 759–778. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3792137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, J. C. (2020). Ideology and the promotion of social change. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 6–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2019.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blanz, M., Mummendey, A., Mielke, R., & Klink, A. (1998). Responding to negative social identity: A taxonomy of identity management strategies. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(5), 697–729. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199809/10)28:5<697::AID-EJSP889>3.0.CO;2-#
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caricati, L., & Sollami, A. (2017). Perceived legitimacy follows in-group interests: Evidence from intermediate-status groups. British Journal of Social Psychology, 56(1), 197–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12174
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvajal, C. C. (2010). Validación de la escala de nacionalismo de Terhune en una muestra de población chilena. Salud & Sociedad, 1(3), 205–221. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.22199/S07187475.2010.0003.00005
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, C. L., Pinto, I. R., Costa-Lopes, R., Páez, D., Miranda, M. P., & Marques, J. M. (2021). Social dominance orientation boosts collective action among low-status groups. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.681302
   Google Scholar
• Cuadras-Morató, X. (2017, May). The Catalan economy: Crisis, recovery and policy challenges. In mBank-CASE Seminar Proceedings (No. 0145). CASE-Center for Social and Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Dalle Mulle, E. (2017). The nationalism of the rich. Discourses and strategies of separatist parties in Catalonia, Flanders, Northern Italy and Scotland. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dowsett, S. (2017, October 9). The Basque country: Spain’s effective but expensive antidote to secession. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/
   Google Scholar
• Duckitt, J., & Sibley, C. (2009). A dual-process motivational model of ideology, politics, and prejudice. Psychological Inquiry, 20(2–3), 98–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10478400903028540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fritz, M. S., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2007). Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychological Science, 18(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01882.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonzalez, C. (2016). The Catalan National Identity and Catalonia’s bid for independence. Connecticut Journal of International Law, 32(1), 115–145. https://heinonline.org/HOL/LandingPage?handle=hein.journals/conjil32&div=7&id=&page=
   Google Scholar
• Guimond, S., Dambrun, M., Michinov, N., & Duarte, S. (2003). Does social dominance generate prejudice? Integrating individual and contextual determinants of intergroup cognitions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(4), 697–721. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022–3514.84.4.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ho, A. K., Sidanius, J., Kteily, N., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Pratto, F., Henkel, K. E., Foels, R., & Stewart, A. L. (2015). The nature of social dominance orientation: Theorizing and measuring preferences for intergroup inequality using the new SDO₇ scale. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(6), 1003–1028. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Instituto Nacional de Estadística. (2020, December). Spanish regional accounts. Statistical review 2019. Press release. https://www.ine.es/en/prensa/cre_2019_2_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, J. W. (1993). Realistic group conflict theory: A review and evaluation of the theoretical and empirical literature. The Psychological Record, 43(3), 395–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jetten, J., & Iyer, A. (2010). Different meanings of the social dominance orientation concept: Predicting political attitudes over time. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 385–404. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/014466609X435723
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, H. (1995). The trajectory of nationalist movements: Catalan and Basque comparisons. JPMS: Journal of Political and Military Sociology, 23(2), 231–249. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45294069
   Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Becker, J., Osborne, D., & Badaan, V. (2017). Missing in (collective) action: Ideology, system justification, and the motivational antecedents of two types of protest behavior. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26(2), 99–108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417690633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., & Hunyady, O. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 260–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00377.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kosterman, R., & Feshbach, S. (1989). Toward a measure of patriotic and nationalistic attitudes. Political Psychology, 10(2), 257–274. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/3791647
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmiller, J. J., & Schmitt, M. T. (2007). Group domination and inequality in context: Evidence for the unstable meanings of social dominance and authoritarianism. European Journal of Social Psychology, 37, 704–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.383
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S., & Sidanius, J. (1999). Social dominance and social identity in the United States and Israel: Ingroup favoritism or outgroup derogation? Political Psychology, 20(1), 99–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/0162-895X.00138
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J. H., Huang, L. L., & McFedries, C. (2008). Cross‐sectional and longitudinal differences in social dominance orientation and right-wing authoritarianism as a function of political power and societal change. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 11(2), 116–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-839X.2008.00249.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mummendey, A., Klink, A., & Brown, R. (2001). Nationalism and patriotism: National identification and out‐group rejection. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164740
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., Jost, J. T., Becker, J. C., Badaan, V., & Sibley, C. G. (2018). Protesting to challenge or defend the system? A system justification perspective on collective action. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(2), 244–269. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2522
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, D., Milojev, P., & Sibley, C. G. (2017). Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(8), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167217704196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., & Spears, R. (2018). Addressing evidential and theoretical inconsistencies in system-justification theory with a social identity model of system attitudes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27(2), 91–96. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721417737136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owuamalam, C. K., Rubin, M., Spears, R., & Weerabangsa, M. M. A. (2017). Why do people from low-status groups support class systems that disadvantage them? A test of two mainstream explanations in Malaysia and Australia. Journal of Social Issues, 73(1), 80–98. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., & Levin, S. (2006). Social dominance theory and dynamics of intergroup relations: Taking stock and looking forward. European Review of Social Psychology, 17(1), 271–320. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10463280601055772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L. M., & Malle, B. F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741–763. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.4.741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pratto, F., Stallworth, L. M., & Conway-Lanz, S. (1998). Social dominance orientation and the ideological legitimization of social policy. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(20), 1853–1875. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01349.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, M., Badea, C., & Jetten, J. (2014). Low status groups show in-group favoritism to compensate for their low status and compete for higher status. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 17(5), 563–576. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213514122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, M. T., Branscombe, N. R., & Kappen, D. M. (2003). Attitudes toward group-based inequality: Social dominance or social identity? British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 161–186. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1348/014466603322127166
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Cotterill, S., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Kteily, N., & Carvacho, H. (2017). Social dominance theory: Explorations in the psychology of oppression. In C. G. Sibley & F. K. Barlow (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of prejudice (pp. 149–187). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316161579.008
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sidanius, J., Pratto, F., & Mitchell, M. (1994). In-group identification, social dominance orientation, and differential intergroup social allocation. Journal of Social Psychology, 134(2), 151–167. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1994.9711378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stürmer, S., & Simon, B. (2004). The role of collective identification in social movement participation: A panel study in the context of the German gay movement. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(3), 263–277. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203256690
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. (1978). Differentiation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Terhune, K. W. (1964). Nationalism among foreign and American students: An exploratory study. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 8(3), 256–270. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/002200276400800304
   Google Scholar