High school students’ sexist beliefs about academic abilities and women’s roles: the influence of school specialization (Creencias sexistas de los estudiantes de enseñanza secundaria sobre las aptitudes académicas y el rol de las mujeres: la influencia de la especialización escolar)

References / Referencias

• Bradley-Geist, J. C., Rivera, I., & Geringer, S. D. (2015). The collateral damage of ambivalent sexism: Observing sexism impacts bystander self-esteem and career aspirations. Sex Roles, 73(1–2), 29–42. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-015-0512-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, B. S., & Krendl, A. C. (2019). A crisis of competence: Benevolent sexism affects evaluations of women’s competence. Sex Roles, 81(7–8), 505–520. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-1011-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dasgupta, N., & Asgari, S. (2004). Seeing is believing: Exposure to counter stereotypic women leaders and its effect on the malleability of automatic gender stereotyping. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(5), 642–648. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2009). Who am I and what am I going to do with my life? Personal and collective identities as motivators of action. Educational Psychologist, 44(2), 78–89. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520902832368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2007). Where are all the women? Gender differences in participation in physical science and engineering. In S. J. Ceci & W. M. Williams (Eds.), Why aren’t more women in science? Top researchers debate the evidence (pp. 199–210). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/11546-016
   Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2021). Women in science and engineering. Retrieved October 18, 2021, from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/edn-20210210-1
   Google Scholar
• Expósito, F., Moya, M., & Glick, P. (1998). Sexismo ambivalente: Medición y correlatos. Revista de Psicología Social, 13(2), 159–169. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1174/021347498760350641
   Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 491–512. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.49
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: Hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.56.2.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Fiske, S. T., Mladinic, A., Saiz, J. L., Abrams, D., Masser, B., Adetoun, B., Osagie, J. E., Akande, A., Alao, A., Annetje, B., Willemsen, T. M., Chipeta, K., Dardenne, B., Dijksterhuis, A., Wigboldus, D., Eckes, T., Six-Materna, I., Expósito, F., & López, W. (2000). Beyond prejudice as simple antipathy: Hostile and benevolent sexism across cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 763–775. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.763
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glick, P., Wilkerson, M., & Cuffe, M. (2015). Masculine identity, ambivalent sexism, and attitudes toward gender subtypes: Favoring masculine men and feminine women. Social Psychology, 46(4), 210–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guimond, S., & Roussel, L. (2001). Bragging about one’s school grades: Gender stereotyping and students. Perception of their abilities in science, mathematics, and language. Social Psychology of Education, 4(3/4), 275–293. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011332704215
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins-Doyle, A., Sutton, R. M., Douglas, K. M., & Calogero, R. M. (2019). Flattering to deceive: Why people misunderstand benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(2), 167–192. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000135
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K., Stewart, K., King, E., Botsford Morgan, W., Gilrane, V., & Hylton, K. (2014). Negative consequence of benevolent sexism on efficacy and performance. Gender in Management, 29(3), 171–189. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/GM-07-2013-0086
   Google Scholar
• Kilianski, S. E., & Rudman, L. A. (1998). Wanting it both ways: Do women approve of benevolent sexism? Sex Roles, 39(5/6), 333–352. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018814924402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuchynka, S. L., Salomon, K., Bosson, J. K., El-Hout, M., Kiebel, E., Cooperman, C., & Toomey, R. (2018). Hostile and benevolent sexism and college women’s STEM outcomes. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 42(1), 72–87. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0361684317741889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lameiras, M., Rodríguez, Y., Calado, M., Foltz, M. L., & González, M. (2006). Sexism, vocational goals, and motivation as predictors of men’s and women’s career choice. Sex Roles, 55(3–4), 267–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-006-9079-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, S. J., Cimpian, A., Meyer, M., & Freeman, E. (2015). Expectations of brilliance underlie gender distributions across academic disciplines. Science, 6219(6219), 262–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1261375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Sáez, M., Puertas, S., & Sáinz, M. (2011). Why don’t girls choose technological studies? Adolescents’ stereotypes and attitudes towards studies related to Medicine or Engineering. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(1), 71–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n1.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional [MEFP]. (2019). Estadísticas Universitarias. Retrieved November 21, 2019, from http://www.educacionyfp.gob.es/serviciosalciudadano/estadisticas/universitaria/estadisticas.html
   Google Scholar
• Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. (2002). Math = male, me = female, therefore math ≠ me. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(1), 44–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.1.44
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plante, I., Théoret, M., & Eizner Favreau, O. (2009). Student gender stereotypes: Contrasting the perceived maleness and femaleness of mathematics and language. Educational Psychology, 29(4), 385–405. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410902971500
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramos, M. R., Barreto, M., Ellemers, N., Moya, M., Ferreira, L., & Calanchini, J. (2016). Exposure to sexism can decrease implicit gender stereotype bias. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(4), 455–466. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rudman, L. A., & Glick, P. (2010). Content and origins of gender stereotypes. In L. A. Rudman & P. Glick (Eds.), The social psychology of gender. How power and intimacy shape gender relations (pp. 81–104). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Eccles, J. S. (2012). Self-concept of computer and math ability: Gender implications across time and within ICT studies. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(2), 486–499. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., Martínez, J. L., & Meneses, J. (2020). Gendered patterns of coping responses with academic sexism in a group of Spanish secondary students. International Journal of Social Psychology, 35(2), 246–281. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2020.1721049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Meneses, J. (2018). Brecha y sesgos de género en la elección de estudios y profesiones en la educación secundaria. Panorama Social, 27, 23–31. https://www.funcas.es/articulos/brecha-y-sesgos-de-genero-en-la-eleccion-de-estudios-y-profesiones-en-la-educacion-secundaria/
   Google Scholar
• Sáinz, M., & Upadyaya, K. (2016). Accuracy and bias in Spanish secondary school students’ self-concept of ability: The influence of gender and parental educational level. International Journal of Educational Research, 77, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2016.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sibley, C. G., & Wilson, M. S. (2004). Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexist attitudes toward positive and negative female subtypes. Sex Roles, 51(11–12), 687–696. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-004-0718-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, S., & Skaalvik, E. S. (2004). Gender differences in math and verbal self-concept, performance expectations, and motivation. Sex Roles, 50(3/4), 241–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:SERS.0000015555.40976.e6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoet, G., & Geary, D. (2018). The gender-equality paradox in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education. Psychological Science, 29(4), 581–593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2017). Cracking the code: Girls’ and women’s education in science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM). https://en.unesco.org/unesco-international-symposium-and-policy-forum-cracking-code-girls-education-stem
   Google Scholar
• Zell, E., Strickhouser, J. E., Lane, T. N., & Teeter, S. R. (2016). Mars, Venus, or Earth? Sexism and the exaggeration of psychological gender differences. Sex Roles, 75(7–8), 7–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0622-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar