141
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Symposium on Democratic Governance

Can we satisfactorily gauge the socio-political trends of our own age? Mark Bevir’s views on governance and changing democracy

References

  • Albrow, M. (1996). The Global Age: State and Society beyond Modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Bell, D. (1961). The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: Collier Books.
  • Bellah, R. M., Madsen, R., Sullivan, W. M., Swidler, A. and Tipton, S. M. (1996). Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bentley, A. F. ([1908] 1995). The Process of Government: A Study of Social Pressures. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  • Berlin, I. (1993). The Magus of the North: J.G. Hamann and the Origins of Modern Irrationalism, ed. by Henry Hardy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
  • Berlin, I. (1996). ‘The romantic revolution. A crisis in the history of modern thought’ in I. Berlin, The Sense of Reality: Studies in Ideas and their History, ed. by Henry Hardy. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux, pp. 168–193.
  • Bevir, M. (1999). The Logic of the History of Ideas. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bevir, M. (2013). A Theory of Governance. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Bok, D. C. (1996). The State of the Nation. Government and the Quest for a Better Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Cantelli, F. (2011). ‘Promises and challenges for democratic research agenda’, American Review of Public Administration, 41(2): 224–230. doi: 10.1177/0275074010365182
  • Carpenter, D. P. (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Chhotray, V. and Stoker, G. (2009). Governance Theory and Practice. A Cross-disciplinary Approach. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Christensen, T. and Laegreid, P. (2007). ‘The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform’, Public Administration Review, 67(6): 1059–1066. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
  • Croly, H. ([1909] 1963). The Promise of American Life. Hamden, CT: Archon Books.
  • Delli, C. M. X., Hook, F. L. and Jacobs, L. R. (2004). ‘Public deliberation, discursive participation, and citizen engagement: a review of the empirical literature’. Annual Review of Political Science, 7: 315–344. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.7.121003.091630
  • De Long, B. J. (1988). ‘Productivity growth, convergence, and welfare: comment’, American Economic Review, 78(5): 1138–1159.
  • Follett, M. P. ([1918] 1920). The New State: Group Organization, the Solution of Popular Government. New York: Longmans, Green.
  • Fukuyama, F. (1991). The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Free Press.
  • Furlong, S. R. (2003). ‘Bureaucratic agencies, Evolution of delegation of authority/power to’, in J. Rabin (ed.), Encyclopedia of Public Administration and Public Policy. New York: Marcel Dekker, pp. 130–134.
  • Giddens, A. (1984). The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Goodnow, F. (1900). Politics and Administration: A Study in Government. New York: MacMillan.
  • Gordon, S. (1999). Controlling the State: Constitutionalism from Ancient Athens to Today. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Hobbes, T. ([1651] 1987). Leviathan. London: Pelican Books.
  • Hume, D. (1967 [1738–1740]). A Treatise of Human Nature. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
  • Huntington, S. (1996). The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of the World Order. New York: Simon and Schuster.
  • Knoke, D. (2001). Changing Organizations. Business Networks in the New Political Economy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Kant, I. (1988 [1800]). Logic ( translated with introduction, R.S. Hartman and W. Schwartz). New York: Dover Publications, Inc.
  • Lasch, C. (1978). The Culture of Narcissism: American Life in an Age of Diminishing Expectations. New York: W. W. Norton.
  • Leys, W. A. R. (1943). ‘Ethics and administrative discretion’, Public Administration Review, 3(1): 10–23. doi: 10.2307/973098
  • Lindblom, C. E. (1990). Inquiry and Change. The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lippmann, W. (1955). Essays in the Public Philosophy. Boston: Little, Brown.
  • Lippmann, W. ([1929] 1957). A Preface to Morals (with new introduction by S. Hook). New York: Time-Life Books.
  • Lippmann, W. ([1914] 1961). Drift and Mastery. An Attempt to Diagnose the Current Unrest (with introduction and notes by W. E. Leuchtenburg). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Locke, J. ([1690] 1986). Two Treatises of Government. London: Dent.
  • Loving, C. C. (1991). ‘The scientific theory profile: a philosophy of science model for science teachers’, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(9): 823–838. doi: 10.1002/tea.3660280908
  • Luskin, R. C. and Fishkin, J. S. (2003). ‘Deliberation and “better citizens”’. Unpublished manuscript, Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford. Available at: http://cdd.stanford.edu/research/papers/2002/bettercitizens.pdf
  • Mead, L. M. (1986). Beyond Entitlement. The Social Obligations of Citizenship. New York/London: Free Press/Collier McMillan.
  • Nisbet, R. (1975). Twilight of Authority. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Page, E. C. (2001). Government by Numbers: Delegated Legislations and Everyday Policy-making. Oxford: Hart.
  • Page, E. C. and Jenkins, B. (2005). Policy Bureaucracy: Governing with a Cast of Thousands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Page, E. C. and Wright, V. (eds) (2007). From the Active to the Enabling State. The Changing Role of Top Officials in European Nations. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Piketty, T. (2014). Capital in the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
  • Powell, W. W. (1990). ‘Neither market nor hierarchy. Network forms of organizations’, Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336.
  • Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival; of American Community. New York: Simon & Schuster.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2010). ‘Is American public administration detached from historical context? On the nature of time and the need to understand it in government and its study’, American Review of Public Administration, 40(3): 235–260. doi: 10.1177/0275074009341663
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011a). Public Administration: The Interdisciplinary Study of Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N. (2011b). ’The study of public administration: Epistemological considerations about its nature and future’, Public Administration Review, 71(6): 917–925.
  • Raadschelders, J.C.N. (2016). ‘The United States of America as Rechtsstaat: on the need for state and administrative law in research and teaching’, Public Administration Review.
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N. and Lee, K. H. (2011). ’Trends in the study of public administration: empirical and qualitative observations from Public Administration Review, 2000–2009′, Public Administration Review, 71(1): 19–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2010.02303.x
  • Raadschelders, J. C. N., Toonen, T. A. J. and van der Meer, F. M. (eds) (2007). The Civil Service in the 21st Century. Comparative Perspectives. Houndmills: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Samuelson, R. J. (1995). The Good Life and its Discontents. The American Dream in the Age of Entitlement 1945–1995. New York: Random House.
  • Simon, H. (1957). Models of Man: Social and Rational. New York: Wiley.
  • Skocpol, T. (2003). Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
  • Suleiman, E. (2003). Dismantling Democratic States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Sykes, C. J. (1992). A Nation of Victims. The Decay of American Character. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Weber, M. (1980). Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der Verstehenden Soziologie [Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology]. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr.
  • Weber, M. (1985). ’Die “Objektivität” socialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’ in M. Weber, Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Wissenschaftslehre. Tübingen: J. C. B. Mohr, pp. 146–214.
  • Yankelovich, D. (1991). Coming to Public Judgment. Making Democracy Work in a Complex World. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.