151
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Bringing strengths and differences to the table - challenges and opportunities in practitioner-researcher collaborations

, , , &
Pages 295-312 | Received 03 Jan 2023, Accepted 12 Jun 2023, Published online: 25 Jun 2023

References

  • Alonzo, C. N., Komesidou, R., Wolter, J. A., Curran, M., Ricketts, J., & Hogan, T. P. (2022). Building sustainable models of research–practice partnerships within educational systems. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 31(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_AJSLP-21-00181
  • Andersen, M. L., Brandt, L. I., Henriksen, K., Mejlvig, K., Nirmalarajan, L., Rømer, M., Uggerhøj, L., & Wisti, P. (2020b). Different approaches in practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of social work practice research (1st ed., pp. 105–114). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199486-11
  • Anderson , 2020a - Andersen, M. L., Brandt, L. I., Henriksen, K., Mejlvig, K., Nirmalarajan, L., Romer, M., Uggerhoj, L., & Wisti, P. et al (). Underlying theoretical positions, perceptions and foundations in practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Social Work Practice Research (1st ed., pp. 57–68). Routledge. 10.4324/9780429199486-6
  • Austin, M. J., Fisher, M., & Uggerhøj, L. (2014). Helsinki statement on social work practice research*. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(Sup1), 7–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.981426
  • Austin, M. J., & McBeath, B. (2022). Conducting practice research. China Journal of Social Work, 15(3), 270–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2087705
  • Begun, A. L., Berger, L. K., Otto-Salaj, L. L., & Rose, S. J. (2010). Developing effective social work university--community research collaborations. Social Work, 55(1), 54–62. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/55.1.54
  • Carnochan, S., McBeath, B., & Austin, M. J. (2017). Managerial and frontline perspectives on the process of evidence-informed practice within human service organizations. Human Service Organizations, Management, Leadership & Governance, 41(4), 346–358. https://doi.org/10.1080/23303131.2017.1279095
  • Das, C. (2010). Considering ethics and power relations in a qualitative study exploring experiences of divorce among British-Indian Adult Children (COMCAD Working Papers, 76). Universität Bielefeld, Fak. für Soziologie, Centre on Migration, Citizenship and Development (COMCAD). https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-367735
  • Denzin, N. K., & Giardina, M. D. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence. In Qualitative inquiry and the politics of evidence. Left Coast Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315421414
  • Epstein, I., Fisher, M., Julkunen, I., Uggerhøj, L., Austin, M. J., & Sim, T. (2015). The New York statement on the evolving definition of practice research designed for continuing dialogue: A bulletin from the 3rd International Conference on practice research (2014). Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515582250
  • Fisher, M. (2016). The social care institute for excellence and evidence-based policy and practice: Table 1. British Journal of Social Work, 46(2), 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu143
  • Fisher, M. (2020). From research question to practice research methodology. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of social work practice research (1st ed., pp. 43–56). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199486-5
  • Freire, P. (1972). Pedagogy of the oppressed (3rd ed.). Continuum.
  • Galinsky, M. J., Turnbull, J. E., Meglin, D. E., & Wilner Margaret, E. (1993). Confronting the reality of collaborative practice research: Issues of practice, design, measurement, and team development. Social Work, 38(4), 440–449. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/38.4.440
  • Hendricks, C. O., Finch, J. B., & Franks, C. L. (2013). Learning to teach, teaching to learn : A Guide for social work field education (2nd ed.). Council on Social Work Education Press.
  • Joubert, L., Webber, M., Uggerhøj, L., Julkunen, I., Yliruka, L., Hampson, R., Simpson, G., Sim, T., Manguy, A. M., & Austin, M. J. (2023). The Melbourne statement on practice research in social work: Practice meets research. Research on Social Work Practice, 33(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221139835
  • Julkunen, I. (2015). Practice-based research: The role of HUSK in knowledge development. Journal of Evidence-Informed Social Work, 12(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1080/15433714.2014.960217
  • Julkunen, I., & Uggerhøj, L. (2016). Negotiating practice research. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 36(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/08841233.2016.1119625
  • Korthagen, F. A. J. (2007). The gap between research and practice revisited. Educational Research & Evaluation, 13(3), 303–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/13803610701640235
  • Lee, J., Mathews, M., & Lim, A. (2021). Survey of the social service sector. IPS Exchange Series, 20. https://lkyspp.nus.edu.sg/docs/default-source/ips/ips-exchange-series-20.pdf
  • Loue, S. (2018). Legal issues in social work practice and research. In Legal issues in social work practice and research (1st ed., pp. 1–15). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77414-5
  • Lunt, N., Shaw, I., & Fouché, C. (2010). Practitioner research: Collaboration and knowledge production. Public Money and Management, 30(4), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.492185
  • Martin, S. (2010). Co-production of social research: Strategies for engaged scholarship. Public Money and Management, 30(4), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2010.492180
  • McBeath, B., Austin, M. J., Carnochan, S., & Chuang, E. (2022). Practice research methods in social work: Processes, applications and implications for social service organisations. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(6), 3328–3346. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab246
  • Melton, T. N., Agans, J. P., Lawhon, B., Mateer, T. J., Freeman, S., & Taff, B. D. (2022). “Pick your team wisely”: A case study of a long-standing research-practice partnership. Evaluation and Program Planning, 95, 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2022.102169
  • Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690200100202.
  • Osterling, K. L., & Austin, M. J. (2008). The dissemination and utilization of research for promoting evidence-based practice. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work, 5(1–2), 295–319. https://doi.org/10.1300/J394v05n01_11
  • Savin-Baden, M., & Major, C. M. (2012). Qualitative research: An essential guide to theory and practice. Routledge.
  • Secret, M., Abell, M. L., & Berlin, T. (2011). The promise and challenge of practice-research collaborations: Guiding principles and strategies for initiating, designing, and implementing program evaluation research. Social Work, 56(1), 9–20. https://doi.org/10.1093/sw/56.1.9
  • Shaw, I. (2020). Practice research as a collective enterprise. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of social work practice research (1st ed., pp. 69–77). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429199486-7
  • Shea, S. E. (2019). Field Note—Engaging social work interns in reflective practice: A specialized training series for field instructors. Journal of Social Work Education, 56(1), 193–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/10437797.2019.1633973
  • Sim, T., Austin, M., Abdullah, F., Chan, T. M. S., Chok, M., Ke, C., Epstein, I., Fisher, M., Joubert, L., Julkunen, I., Ow, R., Uggerhøj, L., Wang, S., Webber, M., Wong, K., & Yliruka, L. (2019). The Hong Kong statement on practice research 2017: Contexts and challenges of the Far East. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731518779440
  • Tracy, S. J. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis, communicating impact. Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Uggerhøj, L. (2011). What is practice research in social work - definitions, barriers and possibilities. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 45–59. https://ejournals.bib.uni-wuppertal.de/index.php/sws/article/view/6/19
  • Uggerhøj, L. (2014). Learning from each other: Collaboration processes in practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(sup1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.928647
  • Waterman, H., Tillen, D., Dickson, R., & de Koning, K. (2001). Action research: A systematic review and guidance for assessment methodology. Health Technology Assessment, 5(23). https://doi.org/10.3310/hta5230
  • Wellsmith, M., & Birks, D. J. (2008). Research on target: A collaboration between researchers and practitioners for a target hardening scheme. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 22(1–2), 181–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600860801925169
  • Williams, J., Craig, T. J., & Robson, D. (2020). Barriers and facilitators of clinician and researcher collaborations: A qualitative study. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-05978-w
  • Zych, M. M., Berta, W. B., & Gagliardi, A. R. (2020). Conceptualising the initiation of researcher and research user partnerships: A meta-narrative review. Health Research Policy and Systems, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-020-0536-9

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.