Co-production between researchers, service users, and practitioners in practice research – barriers and possibilities

References

• Ahmed, S. (2012). On being included. In Racism and diversity in institutional life. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780822395324
   Google Scholar
• Aldridge, J. 2016. Participatory research. Working with vulnerable groups in research and practice. Policy Press. https://doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781447305644.001.0001.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. L., Brandt, L. I., Henriksen, K., Mejlvig, K., Nirmalarajan, L., Rømer, M., Uggerhøj, L., & Wisti, P. (2020a). Different approaches in practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 105–114). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Andersen, M. L., Brandt, L. I., Henriksen, K., Mejlvig, K., Nirmalarajan, L., Rømer, M., Uggerhøj, L., & Wisti, P. (2020b). Underlying theoretical positions, perceptions, and foundations in practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 57–68). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 85(1), 24–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2018.1559388
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin, M. J. (2020). Identifying the conceptual foundations of practice research. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 15–31). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P. (2012). Service user involvement. In M. Gray, J. Midgley & S.A. Webb (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of social work (pp. 693–706). SAGE. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446247648.n45
   Google Scholar
• Beresford, P., & McLaughlin, H. (2020). Service user involvement in research: What difference does it make? In H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, C. Cameron, H. Casey, & J. Duffy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of service user involvement in human services research and education (pp. 515–520). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M. & Fors, V. (2017). Workshops as nodes of knowledge co-production: Beyond ideas of automagical synergies. In V. Fors & T. O’Dell (Eds.), Theoretical scholarship and applied practice pink (Vol. 11, pp. 53–72). Berghahn Books. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw04bkj.7
   Google Scholar
• Børnerådet. (2016) . Håndbog i Børneinddraggelse.
   Google Scholar
• Boydell, L. (2007). Partnerships: A literary review. Institute of Public Health in Ireland.
   Google Scholar
• Burke, B., & Newman, A. (2020). Ethical involvement of service users. In H. McLaughlin, P. Beresford, C. Cameron, H. Casey, & J. Duffy (Eds.), The routledge handbook of service user involvement in human services research and education (pp. 54–63). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Carpentier, N. (2016). Beyond the ladder of participation: An analytical toolkit for the critical analysis of participatory media processes. Javnost - the Public, 23(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2016.1149760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2011). Breaking methodological boundaries? Exploring visual, participatory methods with adults and young children. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 9(3), 321–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350293X.2011.597964
   Google Scholar
• Collins, K., & Ison, R. (2006). Dare we jump off Arnstein’s ladder? Social learning as a new policy paradigm. In: Proceedings of PATH (Participatory Approaches in Science & Technology) Conference, 4-7 Jun 2006, Edinburgh
   Google Scholar
• Denvall, V., & Skillmark, M. (2021, October). Bridge over troubled water—closing the research–practice gap in social work. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(7), 2722–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa055
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Digitaliseringsstyrelsen and KL. (2021). Digital inklusion i det digitaliserede samfund. https://digst.dk/media/24389/digital-inklusion-i-det-digitaliserede-samfund.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Farr, M. (2013). Citizens and the co-creation of public service innovations. In S. P. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 445–458). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grower, S. (2004). Why won’t they listen to us? On giving power and voice to children participants in social research. Childhood, 11(1), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568204040186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jæger, B. (2013). User involvement in public services innovation. In S. P. Osborne & L. Brown (Eds.), Handbook of innovation in public services (pp. 432–444). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Jungk, R., & Müllert, N. (1989). Håndbog i fremtidsværksteder (2nd ed.). Politisk revy.
   Google Scholar
• Knorr-Cetina, K. K., & Reichmann, W. (2015). Epistemic Cultures. In J. D. Wright (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences 2nd ed., pp. 873–880. Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.10454-4
   Google Scholar
• Korsbek, L. (2016). Corecovery: Mental health recovery in a dynamic interplay between humans in a relationship. American Journal of Psychiatric Rehabilitation, 19(3), 196–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1197863
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, R. (1984). Praxisportrait sozialer Arbeit und Erziehung. In K. Bader (Ed.), Sozialarbeit: unbegriffene Theorie - begriffslose Praxis? (pp. 22–33). Verlag Arbeiterbewegung und Gesellschaftswiss.
   Google Scholar
• Kwan, C. K., & Reupert, A. (2019). The relevance of social workers’ personal experiences to their practices. The British Journal of Social Work, 49(1), 256–271. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcy017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthies, A. (2010). Participation and citizenship. In M. Gray & S. A. Webb (Eds.), Ethics and value perspectives in social work (pp. 173–182). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McBeath, B., Austin, M. J., Carnochan, S., & Chuang, E. (2022). Practice research methods in social work: Processes, applications and implications for social service organisations. The British Journal of Social Work, 52(6), 3328–3346. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcab246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, M., & Pihl-Tinghvad, S. (2019). User involvement in social work innovation: A systematic and narrative review. Journal of social work, 20(6), 730–750. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017319837519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabatchi, T., Sancino, A., & Sicilia, M. (2017). Varieties of participation in public services: The who, when, and what of coproduction. Public Administration Review, 77(5), 766–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Co-production, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production and third sector social services in Europe: Some concepts and evidence. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary & Nonprofit Organizations, 23(4), 1102–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9308-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Salisbury Forum Group. 2011. The Salisbury Statement. Social work and society (Vol. 9, pp. 1). Practice Research.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson, P., & Bengtsson, L. (2010). Users’ influence in social-service innovations: Two swedish case studies. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2010.511813
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, M. F., Pooley, J. A., & Carragher, G. (2016). A systematic review of current data collection techniques used to enhance involvement of “hard to reach” adolescents in research studies. In K. Bhopal & R. Deuchar (Eds.), Researching marginalized groups (pp. 149–166). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Theyyan, B. (2015). Arnstein’s Ladder of citizen participation. A critical discussion. Asian Academic Research Journal of Multidisciplinary, 2(7).
   Google Scholar
• Thomsen, R. (2016). The practice portrait – a method for promoting social justice in practice. Journal of the National Institute for Career Education and Counselling, 36(1), 30–37. https://doi.org/10.20856/jnicec.3604
   Google Scholar
• Tortzen, A. (2019). Samskabelse af velfærd – muligheder og faldgruber. Hans Reitzels Forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L. (2014). Learning from each other - collaboration processes in practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/2156857X.2014.928647
   Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L., Henriksen, K., & Andersen, M. (2018). Particiaptory practice research and action research: Birds of a feather? China Journal of Social Work, 11(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2018.1537086
   Google Scholar
• Uggerhøj, L., & Wisti, P. (2020). Social work practice research developments. Four statements and ten years later. In L. Joubert & M. Webber (Eds.), The routledge handbook of social work practice research (pp. 32–42). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2014). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wisti, P., & Nirmalarajan, L. (2017). Indflydelse på magt. Uden for nummer, 35, 16–25.
   Google Scholar