References
- Chua, C., Chew, J., & Lim, W. (2023). “I have to be brave” – parents’ experiences of caring for a child with eczema. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2236063
- Dong, L. (2023). Collaborative practice research in a community - based home visiting program. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2213897
- Epstein, I., Fisher, M., Julkunen, I., Uggerhoj, L., Austin, M. J., & Sim, T. (2015). The New York Statement on the evolving definition of practice research designed for continuing dialogue: A bulletin from the 3rd international conference on practice research (2014). Research on Social Work Practice, 25(6), 711–714. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731515582250
- Feldman, R. A. (2010). Critical infrastructures for social work practice research – pondering the past, framing the future. In A. E. Fortune, P. McCallion, & K. Briar-Lawson (Eds.), Social work practice research for the twenty-first century (pp. 3–22). Columbia University Press.
- Henley, L., Stanley-Clarke, N., Appanna, A., Thompson, E., Chhay, Y., & Kea, S. (2023). Differing perceptions of risk and the implications for the delivery of harm prevention programmes in Cambodia. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 278–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2246946
- Joubert, L., Webber, M., Uggerhøj, L., Julkunen, I., Yliruka, L., Hampson, R., Simpson, G., Sim, T., Manguy, A., & Austin, M. J. (2023). The Melbourne statement on practice research in social work: Practice meets research. Research on Social Work Practice, 33(4), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315221139835
- Julkunen, I., Austin, M. J., Fisher, M., & Uggerhoj, L. (2014). Helsinki Statement on social work practice research. Nordic Social Work Research, 4(sup1), 7–13.
- Liu, D., Woo, P., Chia, E. Y. M., Pek, J. H., & Yu, X. (2023). Bringing strengths and differences to the table - challenges and opportunities in practitioner-researcher collaborations. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2227978
- Müller, M., Nirmalarajan, L. Y., Wisti, P., & Uggerhøj, L. (2023). Co-production between researchers, service users, and practitioners in practice research – barriers and possibilities. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 312–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2233490
- Salisbury Forum Group. (2011). The Salisbury Statement. Social Work & Society, 9(1), 4–9.
- Sim, T., Austin, M., Abdullah, F., Chan, T. M. S., Chok, M., Ke, C., Epstein, I., Fisher, M., Joubert, L., Julkunen, I., Ow, R., Uggerhøj, L., Wang, S., Webber, M., Wong, K., & Yliruka, L. (2019). The Hong Kong statement on practice research 2017: Contexts and challenges of the far east. Research on Social Work Practice, 29(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731518779440
- Teo, S. M., Koh, J. H. N., & Kwan, J. Y. (2023). “Beyond a practice-research bridge”: Project conceptualisation, implementation, and dissemination by an internal social work intermediary in Singapore. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development, 33(4), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2023.2238686