Singapore’s School Excellence Model and student learning: evidence from PISA 2012 and TALIS 2013

References

• Balyer, A., & Gunduz, Y. (2012). Effects of structured extracurricular facilities on students’ academic and social development. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4803–4807.
   Google Scholar
• Bamburg, J.D., & Andrews, R.L. (1991). School goals, principals, and achievement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 2(3), 175–191.
   Google Scholar
• Caldwell, B.J. (2016). Impact of school autonomy on student achievement: Cases from Australia. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1171–1187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camp, W.G. (1990). Participation in student activities and achievement: A covariance structural analysis. Journal of Educational Research, 83(5), 272–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, I. (2011). A study of the relationships between distributed leadership, teacher academic optimism and student achievement in Taiwanese elementary schools. School Leadership & Management, 31(5), 491–515.
   Google Scholar
• Chappelear, T.C., & Price, T. (2012). Teachers’ perceptions of high school principal’s monitoring of student progress and the relationship to student achievement. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 7(2), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, Y.C. (1993). Profiles of organizational culture and effective schools. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 4(2), 85–110. doi:10.1080/0924345930040201
   Google Scholar
• Chia, Y.T. (2011). The elusive goal of nation building: Asian/Confucian values and citizenship education in Singapore during the 1980s. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(4), 383–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craft, S.W. (2012). The impact of extracurricular activities on student achievement at the high school level. The University of Southern Mississippi. The Aquila Digital Community Dissertations, Spring(5), 1–79.
   Google Scholar
• Crum, K.S., & Sherman, W.H. (2008). Facilitating high achievement: High school principals’ reflections on their successful leadership practices. Journal of Educational Administration, 46(5), 562–580.
   Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darling-Hammond, L. (2004). Standards, accountability, and school reform. Teachers College Record, 106(6), 1047–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2016). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 52(2), 221–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Grauwe, A. (2005). Improving the quality of education through school-based management: Learning from international experiences. International Review of Education, 51(4), 269–287.
   Google Scholar
• Deng, A., & Gopinathan, S. (2016). PISA and high-performing education systems: Explaining Singapore’s education success. Comparative Education, 52(4), 449–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dude, D.J. (2012). Organizational commitment of principals: The effects of job autonomy, empowerment, and distributive justice (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.
   Google Scholar
• Feldman, A.F., & Matjasko, J.L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fredricks, J.A., & Eccles, J.S. (2006). Extracurricular involvement and adolescent adjustment: Impact of duration, number of activities, and breadth of participation. Applied Developmental Science, 10(3), 132–146.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, T., & Wößmann, L. (2007). What accounts for international differences in student performance? A re-examination using PISA data. Empirical Economics, 32(2–3), 433–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullan, M. (2011). Choosing the wrong drivers for whole system reform. Retrieved from http://michaelfullan.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/13396088160.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fullan, M., & Watson, N. (2000). School-based management: Reconceptualizing to improve learning outcomes. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 11(4), 453–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, J. (2004). Relation of principal transformational leadership to school staff job satisfaction, staff turnover, and school performance. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(3), 333–356.
   Google Scholar
• Hackman, J., & Wageman, R. (2007). Asking the right questions about leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 43–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P. (2018). Bringing context out of the shadows of leadership. Educational. Management Administration & Leadership, 46(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., Bickman, L., & Davis, K. (1996). School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. The Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 527–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (1998). Exploring the principal’s contribution to school effectiveness: 1980–1995. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(2), 157–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallinger, P., & Heck, R.H. (2010). Collaborative leadership and school improvement: Understanding the impact on school capacity and student learning. School Leadership and Management, 30(20), 95–110.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A. (2002). Teacher quality. In L.T. Izumi & W.M. Evers (Eds.), Teacher quality (pp. 1–12). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., Link, S., & Woessmann, L. (2013). Does school autonomy make sense everywhere? Panel estimates from PISA. Journal of Development Economics, 104, 212–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanushek, E.A., & Woessmann, L. (2011). The economics of international differences in educational achievement. In E. Hanushek, S. Machin, & L. Woessmann (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of education (Vol. 3, pp. 89–200). Amsterdam, North Holland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Hargreaves, D.H. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 6(1), 23–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsen, D.M., Larson, R.W., & Dworkin, J.B. (2003). What adolescents learn in organized youth activities: A survey of self-reported developmental experiences. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 13, 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses in education. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heck, R.H. (1992). Principals’ instructional leadership and school performance: Implications for policy development. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 14(1), 21–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (2009). Assessing the contribution of distributed leadership to school improvement and growth in math achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 46(3), 659–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hotton, G., Devos, D., Bouckenooghe, D., & Aelterman, A. (2008). Principals in schools with a positive school culture. Educational Studies, 34(3), 159–174.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, A.K., & Ziomek-Daigle, J. (2009). School bonding, academic achievement, and participation in extracurricular activities. Georgia School Counsellors Association Journal, 16(1), 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes, E.C. (1984). The sociological eye. London: Transaction.
   Google Scholar
• Im, M.H., Hughes, J.N., Cao, Q., & Kwok, O. (2016). Effects of extracurricular participation during middle school on academic motivation and achievement at grade 9. American Educational Research Journal, 53(5), 1343–1375.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingersoll, R.M. (1996). Teachers’ decision-making power and school conflict. Sociology of Education, 69(2), 159–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Israeli, O.A. (2007). Shapley-based decomposition of the R-Square of a linear regression. Journal of Economic Inequality, 5, 199–212.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, B., Sonnemann, J., Roberts-Hull, K., & Hunter, A. (2016). Beyond PD: Teacher professional learning in high-performing systems. Washington, DC: National Center on Education and the Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Keat, H.S. (2013). Speech at the racial harmony day celebrations at pioneer secondary school. Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/speeches/2013/07/19/speech-by-mr-heng-swee-keat-at-the-racial-harmony-day-celebrations-at-pioneer-secondary-school.php.
   Google Scholar
• Ko, J., Cheng, Y.C., & Lee, T.H. (2016). The development of school autonomy and accountability in Hong Kong: Multiple changes in governance, work, curriculum, and learning. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1207–1230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, A. (2004). Singapore education in “new times”: Global/local imperatives. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 25(3), 335–349.
   Google Scholar
• Koh, J.N.S. (1987). Extra-curricular activities in schools: Getting the right perspective. Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 57–66.
   Google Scholar
• Koretz, D. (2017). The testing charade: Pretending to make schools better. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R.W., Hansen, D.M., & Moneta, G. (2006). Differing profiles of development experiences across types of organized youth activities. Developmental Psychology, 42, 849–863.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J., & Amo, L.C. (2017). International and interstate analyses of student- and school-targeted accountability policy effects. In D.K. Sharpes (Ed.), Handbook on comparative international studies in education (pp. 3–21). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C.P. (2004). The relation between extracurricular activities with academic and social competencies in school age children: A meta-analysis. ( PhD Dissertation). Texas A & M University, Austin, TX.
   Google Scholar
• MacNeil, A.J., Prater, D.L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J.L., Cairos, B.D., & Farwer, T.W. (2003). Promoting interpersonal competence and educational success through extra-curricular activity participation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95, 409–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, H.W., & Kleitman, S. (2002). Extracurricular school activities: The good, the bad, and the nonlinear. Harvard Educational Review, 72, 464–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maslowski, R., Scheerens, J., & Luyten, H. (2007). The effect of school autonomy and school internal decentralization on students’ reading literacy. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 18(3), 303–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education Singapore (2014). Co-curricular activities. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/programmes/co-curricular-activities.
   Google Scholar
• Moriana, J.A., Alós, F., Alcalá, R., Pino, M.J., Herruzo, J., & Ruiz, R. (2006). Extra-curricular activities and academic performance in secondary students. Electronic. Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(4), 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Morrow, P.C. (1993). The theory and measurement of work commitment. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newton, P., & Costa, J.D. (2016). School autonomy and 21st century learning: The Canadian context. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1279–1292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ng, P.T. (2003). The Singapore school and the school excellence model. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 2, 27–39.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, P.T. (2007). Quality assurance in the Singapore education system in an era of diversity and innovation. Educational Research for Policy and Practice, 6, 235–247.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, P.T. (2008). A comparative study of Singapore’s school excellence model with Hong Kong’s school-based management. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 488–505.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, P.T. (2017). Learning from Singapore: The power of paradox. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nir, A.E., & Hameiri, L. (2014). School principals’ leadership style and school outcomes: The mediating effect of powerbase utilization. Journal of Educational Administration, 52(2), 210–227.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2005). Teacher matter: Attracting, developing and retaining effective teachers (Overview). Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/edu/school/34990905.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/education/school/50293148.pdf
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Resource, policies and practices. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-IV.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Park, J.H., & Ham, S.H. (2016). Whose perception of principal instructional leadership? Principal-teacher perceptual (dis)agreement and its influence on teacher collaboration. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 36(3), 450–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polly, D., Mcgee, J., Wang, C., Martin, C., Lambert, R.G., & Pugalee, D. (2015). Linking professional development, teacher outcomes, and student achievement: The case of a learner-centered mathematics program for elementary school teachers. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 26–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Provan, K.G, & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance, 18(2), 229–252. doi:10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, P.J., & Briggs, K.L. (1998). Improving schools through school-based management: An examination of the process of change. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(1), 28–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, V.M., Lloyd, C.A., & Rowe, K.J. (2008). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: an analysis of the differential effects of leadership types. Educational Administration Quarterly, 44(5), 635–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarafidou, J., & Chatziioannidis, G. (2013). Teacher participation in decision making and its impact on school and teachers”. International Journal of Educational Management, 27(2), 170–183.
   Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Alcantara, V., Cervantes, L., Del Razo, J., López, R., & Perez, W. (2017). Getting to teacher ownership: How schools are creating meaningful change. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED574745.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Scheerens, J., & Demeuse, M. (2005). The theoretical bases of the effective school improvement model (ESI). School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 16(4), 373–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2012). Preparing teacher and developing school leaders for the 21st century: Lessons from around the world. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2014). Equity, excellence and inclusiveness in education: Policy lessons from around the world. Paris, Fr: OECD. Retrieved from https://www.ucy.ac.cy/equality/documents/Articles-Material/OECD_2014_Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2018). World class: How to build a 21st-century school system, strong performers and successful reformers in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Sealy, K.M., Perry, S.M., & DeNicola, T. (2016). Relationships and predictors of principal job satisfaction across multiple countries: A study using TALIS 2013 and PISA 2012. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2717056
   Google Scholar
• Shorrocks, A.F. (2013). Decomposition procedures for distributional analysis: A unified framework based on the Shapley value. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 11(1), 99–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education., 27(6), 1029–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2017). Motivated for teaching? Associations with school goal structure, teacher self-efficacy, job satisfaction and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 152–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soh, K.C. (2014). Finland and Singapore in PISA 2009: Similarities and differences in achievements and school management. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 44(3), 455–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stearns, E., & Glennie, E.J. (2010). Opportunities to participate: Extracurricular activities’ distribution across and academic correlates in high schools. Social Science Research, 39(2), 296–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, V. (2011). Singapore: A journey to the top, step by step. In M.S. Turker (Ed.), Surpassing Shanghai: An agenda for American education built on the world’s leading systems (pp. 113–140). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Supovitz, J., Sirinides, P., & May, H. (2010). How principals and peers influence teaching and learning. Education Administration Quarterly, 46(1), 31–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. (2006). Creating thinking schools through ‘Knowledge and Inquiry’: The curriculum challenges for Singapore. The Curriculum Journal, 17(1), 89–105.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C. (2008). Improving schools through reflection for teachers: Lessons from Singapore. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 19(2), 225–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. (2012). “Our shared values” in Singapore: A Confucian perspective. Educational Theory, 62(4), 449–463.
   Google Scholar
• Tan, C., & Ng, P.T. (2007). Dynamics of change: Decentralised centralism of education in Singapore. Journal of Educational Change, 8(2), 155–168.
   Google Scholar
• Toh, Y., Hung, L.D., Chua, M.H., He, S., & Jamaludin, A. (2016). Pedagogical reforms within a centralised-decentralised system. International Journal of Educational Management, 30(7), 1247–1267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, E. (2005). Teacher empowerment: Concepts, strategies, and implications for schools in Hong Kong. Teachers College Record, 107(4), 842–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wößmann, L. (2003). Schooling resources, educational institutions and student performance: The international evidence. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 65(2), 117–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu-Kwong, P.K., & Walker, A. (2010). Secondary school vice-principals: Commitment, challenge, efficacy and synchrony. British Educational Research Journal, 36(4), 531–548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar