Understanding the use of technology-enhanced learning spaces in Hong Kong: an exploratory study

References

• Astin, A.W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baepler, P., & Walker, J.D. (2014). Active learning classrooms and educational alliances: Changing relationships to improve learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2014(137), 27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Barak, M., Lipson, A., & Lerman, S. (2006). Wireless laptops as means for promoting active learning in large lecture halls. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 38(3), 245–263.
   Google Scholar
• Beichner, R.J., Saul, J.F., Allain, R.J., Deardorff, D.L., & Abbott, D.S. (2000). Introduction to SCALE-UP: Student-centered activities for large enrollment university physics. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED459062).
   Google Scholar
• Bines, J.E., & Jamieson, P. (2013). Designing new collaborative learning spaces in clinical environments: Experiences from a children‘s hospital in Australia. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 27(S2), 63–68.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J.A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, 10(3), 25–29.
   Google Scholar
• Bransford, J.D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britnell, J.C., Andriati, R., & Wilson, L. (2009). Learning space design with an inclusive planning process promotes user engagement. Educause Quarterly, (4). Retrieved from http://er.educause.edu/articles/2009/12/learning-space-design-with-an-inclusive-planning-process-promotes-user-engagement
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, P.H.P. (2016). A technology-enriched active learning space for a new gateway education programme in Hong Kong: A platform for nurturing student innovations. Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Chiu, P.H.P., & Cheng, S.H. (2017). Effects of active learning classrooms on student learning: A two-year empirical investigation on student perceptions and academic performance. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(2), 269–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y.J., & Belcher, J. (2005). How does technology-enabled active learning affect undergraduate students’ understanding of electromagnetism concepts? The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 14(2), 243–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dori, Y.J., Belcher, J., Bessette, M., Danziger, M., McKinney, A., & Hult, E. (2003). Technology for active learning. Materialstoday, 6(12), 44–49.
   Google Scholar
• Egdorf, R.L. (2013). Student engagement and student characteristics as predictors of student academic achievement at Illinois community colleges. ( Graduate Theses and Dissertations). Iowa State University. Retrieved from http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4579&context=etd.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, K. (2010). Technology-enabled active learning environments: An appraisal (CELE Exchange, Centre for Effective Learning Environments, No. 2010/07). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Garland, D., & Martin, B.N. (2005). Do gender and learning style play a role in how online courses should be designed? Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 4(2), 67–81.
   Google Scholar
• Gonyea, R.M. (2006). The relationship between student engagement and selected desirable outcomes in the first year of college. Retrieved from http://120.52.72.39/nsse.indiana.edu/c3pr90ntcsf0/pdf/research_papers/Gonyea_AIR2006.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J., Ludlum, J., & Hoey, J.J. (2006). Validating the national survey of student engagement against student outcomes: Are they related? Online Submission, 36. Retrieved from http://120.52.72.41/files.eric.ed.gov/c3pr90ntcsf0/fulltext/ED493829.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guba, E.G. (1981). Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 29(2), 75–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handelsman, M.M., Briggs, W.L., Sullivan, N., & Towler, A. (2005). A measure of college student course engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 184–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan, N.F., Puteh, S., & Buhari, R. (2015). Student understanding through the application of technology enabled active learning in practical training. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 318–325.
   Google Scholar
• Henshaw, R.G., Edwards, P.M., & Bagley, E.J. (2011). Use of swivel desks and aisle space to promote interaction in mid-sized college classrooms. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(1). Retrieved from https://libjournal.uncg.edu/index.php/jls/article/view/277/170
   Google Scholar
• Hofstede, G. (2007). Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24(4), 411–420.
   Google Scholar
• Horne, S.V., Murniati, C., Gaffney, J.D.H., & Jesse, M. (2012). Promoting active learning in technology-infused TILE classrooms at the university of Iowa. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2). Retrieved from http://www.partnershipsjournal.org/index.php/jls/article/view/344/286
   Google Scholar
• Imms, W., & Byers, T. (2016). Impact of classroom design on teacher pedagogy and student engagement and performance in mathematics. Learning Environments Research, 20(1), 139–152.
   Google Scholar
• JISC. (2006). Designing spaces for effective learning: a guide to 21st century learning space design. Retrieved from http://www.jisc.ac.uk/media/documents/publications/learningspaces.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Komarraju, M., Karau, S.J., & Ramayah, T. (2007). Cross-cultural differences in the academic motivation of university students in Malaysia and the United States. North American Journal of Psychology, 9(2), 275–292.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D., & Gonyea, R.M. (2008). Unmasking the effects of student engagement on first-year college grades and persistence. Journal of Higher Education, 79(5), 540–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. (2013). Chinese university students’ motivation and engagement: their antecedents and outcomes. HKU ThesesOnline Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/183060/1/FullText.pdf?accept=1
   Google Scholar
• Maher, E., & Lahart, O. (2004). Student Centered Learning in a Studio Classroom Environment. Retrieved from http://staffweb.itsligo.ie/staff/bmulligan/EdTech2004/papers/lahart.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, G., White, B., White, M. B., Pospisil, M. R., Killey, S., Liu, C. J., & Matthews, G. (2010). Retrofitting University Learning Spaces. Retrieved from http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/resources/PP8-921%20QUT%20Mitchell%20Final%20Report%202010.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Morris, T.J. (2012). Improving undergraduate education through active learning spaces. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=dberspeakers
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, D. (2014). Qualitative research in educational communications and technology: A brief introduction to principles and procedures. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(1), 69–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oblinger, D. (2005). Leading the transition from classrooms to learning spaces. Educause Quarterly, 28(1), 14–18.
   Google Scholar
• The Open University of Hong Kong. (2017). Active Learning Space. Retrieved from http://www.ouhk.edu.hk/wcsprd/Satellite?pagename=OUHK/tcAdmWeb&l=C_LIB&lid=1385185902070&sch=LIB
   Google Scholar
• Park, E.L., & Choi, B.K. (2014). Transformation of classroom spaces: Traditional versus active learning classroom in colleges. Higher Education, 68(5), 749–771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perks, T., Orr, D., & Alomari, E. (2016). Classroom re-design to facilitate student learning: A case study of changes to a university classroom. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning, 16(1), 53. Retrieved from http://josotl.indiana.edu/article/download/19190/27134
   Google Scholar
• Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? a review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, D.A. (2009). Pedagogy-Space-Technology (PST) framework for designing and evaluating learning places. In B. Tibbetts (Ed.), Proceedings of the next generation learning spaces 2008 colloquium (pp. 11–16). Brisbane: The University of Queensland.
   Google Scholar
• Riddle, M.D., & Souter, K. (2012). Designing informal learning spaces using student perspectives. Journal of Learning Spaces, 1(2). Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/index.php/jls/article/view/282/277
   Google Scholar
• Rodgers, T. (2008). Student engagement in the e-learning process and the impact on their grades. International Journal of Cyber Society & Education, 1(2), 143–156.
   Google Scholar
• Salter, D., Thomson, D.L., Fox, B., & Lam, J. (2013). Use and evaluation of a technology-rich experimental collaborative classroom. Higher Education Research & Development, 32(5), 805–819.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sawers, K.M., Wicks, D., Mvududu, N., Seeley, L., & Copeland, R. (2016). What drives student engagement: is it learning space, instructor behavior, or teaching philosophy? Journal of Learning Spaces, 5(2). Retrieved from http://libjournal.uncg.edu/jls/article/download/1247/968
   Google Scholar
• Shieh, R.S., Chang, W., & Liu, E.Z. (2011). Technology enabled active learning (TEAL) in introductory physics: Impact on genders and achievement levels. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(7), 1082–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skinner, E.A., Wellborn, J.G., & Connell, J.P. (1990). What it takes to do well in school and whether I’ve got it: A process model of perceived control and children’s engagement and achievement in school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 22–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soneral, P.A.G., & Wyse, S.A. (2017). A scale-up mock-up: Comparison of student learning gains in high- and low-tech active-learning environments. CBE Life Sciences Education, 16(1). Retrieved from http://www.lifescied.org/content/16/1/ar12.full.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stark, S., & Torrance, H. (2005). Case study. In B. Somekh & C. Lewin (Eds.), Research methods in the social sciences (pp. 33–39). London: SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Stoltzfus, J.R., & Libarkin, J. (2016). Does the room matter? active learning in traditional and enhanced lecture spaces. CBE Life Sciences Education, 15(4). Retrieved from http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC5132365?pdf=render
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge, UK: University of Cambridge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tom, J.S.C., Voss, K., & Scheetz, C. (2008). The Space is the message: First assessment of a learning studio. Educause Quarterly, 31(2). Retrieved from http://www.educause.edu/EDUCAUSE+Quarterly/EDUCAUSEQuarterlyMagazineVolum/TheSpaceIstheMessageFirstAsses/162874
   Google Scholar
• Tondeur, J., Bruyne, E.D., Driessche, M.V.D., Mckenney, S., & Zandvliet, D. (2015). The physical placement of classroom technology and its influences on educational practices. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(4), 537–556.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C.O., & Greene, B.A. (2009). The relations between student motivational beliefs and cognitive engagement in high school. Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 63–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, G., & Randall, M. (2012). The implementation and evaluation of a new learning space: A pilot study. Research in Learning Technology, 20, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Woolley, M., Rose, R.A., & Orthner, D.K. (Jan, 2012). The Mediational role of student engagement in middle school on the effect of career relevant instruction on academic achievement. Presented at Society for Social Work and Research “Research that Makes a Difference: Advancing Practice and Shaping Public Policy”, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang,, & Chen. (2010). The Main Position of Instruction：A study of the Future Classroom. Modern Educational Technology, 10, 41–50. in Chinese.
   Google Scholar