Lecturer teaching styles and student learning involvement in large classes: a Taiwan case study

References

• Akalu, A.G. (2017). Higher education ‘massification’ and challenges to the professoriate: Do academics’ conceptions of quality matter? Quality in Higher, 22(3), 260–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alevriadou, A., Nessipbayeva, O., & Egger, R. (2015). 7th world conference on educational sciences a comparative study of teaching style and infrastructure of learning of higher education in Austria and Kazakhstan. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 197, 1271–1277.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.J., Anderson, R., Vandegrift, T., Wolfman, S., & Yasuhara, K. (2003). Promoting Interaction in Large Classes with. In C.-M. Feedback, B. Wasson, S. Ludvigsen, & U. Hoppe (Eds.), Designing for change in networked learning environments. Computer-supported collaborative learning. vol 2 (pp. 119–123). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in college?: Four critical years revisited. (Vol. 1). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V., & Rasul, I. (2010). Heterogeneous class size effects: New evidence from a panel of university students. The Economic Journal, 120(549), 1365–1398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, R.M., & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator -mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Behar-Horenstein, L.S., Mitchell, G.S., Notzer, N., Penfield, R., & Eli, I. (2006). Teaching style beliefs among US and Israeli faculty. Journal of Dental Education, 70(8), 851–856.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Blackenburg, K. (2018). Intellectual capital in German non-profit organisations: An empirical study. The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62655-0_4.
   Google Scholar
• Cassar, V., & Debono, E. (2000). Influences of empowerment dimensions in an educational context: An empirical investigation amongst Maltese Teachers. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 5(1), 177–189.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, C. (1988). Matching teaching styles and learning styles and verification of students’ learning adaptation model. Bulletin of Educational Psychology, 15, 113–172.
   Google Scholar
• Chang, D.-F., Wu, C.-T., Ching, G.S., & Tang, C.-W. (2009). An evaluation of the dynamics of the plan to develop first-class universities and top-level research centers in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Education Review, 10(1), 47–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, M.C., Nguyen, H.T., Bray, C., & Levine, R.E. (2008). Team-based learning in an undergraduate nursing course. Journal of Nursing Education, 47(3), 111–117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cole, J.S., & Spence, S.W. (2012). Using continuous assessment to promote student engagement in a large class. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(5), 508–525.
   Google Scholar
• Cotner, S., Fall, B., Wick, S., Walker, J., & Baepler, P. (2008). Rapid Feedback Assessment Methods: Can We Improve Engagement and Preparation for Exams in Large-enrollment Courses? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(5), 437–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, A. (2015). Virtual reality simulation: An innovative teaching tool for dietetics experiential education. The Open Nutrition Journal, 9(1), 65–75.
   Google Scholar
• de Guzman, A.B., Torres, R.K.C., Uy, M.M., Tancioco, J.B.F., Siy, E.Y., & Hernandez, J.R. (2008). From teaching with a heart to teaching with a heart: Segmenting Filipino college students’ views of their teachers’ caring behavior and their orientations as cared-for individuals. Asia-Pacific Education Review, 9(4), 487–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dean, A., Lee-Post, A., & Hapke, H. (2017). Universal design for learning in teaching large classes. Journal of Marketing Education, 39(1), 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Exeter, D.J., Ameratunga, S., Ratima, M., Morton, S., Dickson, M., Hsu, D., & Jackson, R. (2010). Student engagement in very large classes: The teachers’ perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 35(7), 761–775.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franklin, J., & Theall, M. (1992). Disciplinary differences: Instructional goals and activities, measures of student performance, and student ratings of instruction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the AERA, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Fu, M.L. (2008). New hope for education-the practice of corporal punishment is prohibited on campus. Educators and Professional Development, 25(1), 9–18.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. (2009). Pragmatics and pluralism in explaining human action. Behavior and Philosophy, 37(1), 127–133.
   Google Scholar
• Gifford, C., & Mullaney, J. (1999). From rhetoric to reality: Applying the communication standards to the classroom. Nectfl Review, 46, 12–18.
   Google Scholar
• Grasha, A.F. (2002). Teaching with style: A practical guide to enhancing learning by understanding teaching and learning styles. PA: Alliance Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gregorc, A.F. (1979). Learning/teaching styles: Potent forces behind them. Educational Leadership, 10, 234–237.
   Google Scholar
• Harfitt, G.J. (2012). An examination of teachers’ perceptions and practice when teaching large and reduced-size classes: Do teachers really teach them in the same way? Teaching and Teacher Education, 281(1), 132–140.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2006). The paradox of reducing class size and improved learning outcomes. International Journal of Educational Research, 43(6), 387–425.
   Google Scholar
• Hornsby, D.J., & Osman, R. (2014). Massification in higher education: Large classes and student learning. Higher Education, 67(6), 711–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, D.C. (2007). Statistical methods in psychology (6th ed. ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, C.C., & Wang, C.M. (2011). A study on the impact of elementary School Principals’ distributed leadership and Teachers’ organizational citizenship behaviors on the Students’ learning achievement. Educational Journal of NHCUE, 28(1), 35–66.
   Google Scholar
• Huang, K.J. (2003). Teacher in-service education and professional development. Bulletin of Educational Resources and Research, 28, 241–258.
   Google Scholar
• Jacob, S. (2018). Massification and the public financing of higher education in Haiti: Issues and challenges. International Review of Administrative Sciences. doi:10.1177/0020852318781457
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, K. (2013). Teaching approaches and Student involvement in learning to write. Gap between Korean Students’ expectations and teaching approaches. In SAGE Open, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, K. (2005). Understanding and promoting student engagement in university learning communities. Paper presented as keynote address: Engaged, inert or otherwise occupied, 21–22.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G.D. (2003). What we’re learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 35(2), 24–32.
   Google Scholar
• Lambrechts, A. (2020). The super-disadvantaged in higher education: Barriers to access for refugee background students in England. Higher Education, 80, 803–822.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leese, M. (2009). Out of class – Out of mind? The use of a virtual learning environment to encourage student engagement in out of class activities. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(1), 70–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2000). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational conditions and student engagement with school. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(2), 112–129.
   Google Scholar
• Lin., S.H., & Huang, Y.C. (2012). Analysis of learning involvement and Burnout among college Students in Central Taiwan. The Journal of Guidance & Counseling, 34(1), 51–67.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, J. (2007). Investigation report on rural primary and secondary teachers’ level of concerns about the implementation of the new curriculum in a county in East Sichuan Province (part I). Educational Theories and Practices, 8, 47–50.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, P.F., & Bai, Y.F. (2012). Teaching excellence mainly focuses on quality learning: The connection between program for promoting teaching excellence and quality learning. Taiwan Educational Review Monthly, 1(4), 11–17.
   Google Scholar
• Lopus, J., & Hoff, J. (2009). Is there a disconnect between teaching styles and learning styles in High School Economics classes? Journal of Private Enterprise, 24(2), 157.
   Google Scholar
• Lu, H.K., & Lin, P.C. (2012). Toward an extended behavioral intention model for e-learning: Using learning and teaching styles as individual differences. 2012 Consumer Electronics, Communications and Networks (CECNet) International Conference, pp. 3673–3676. Yichang, China.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J.P. (2015). Moving up in the U.S. news and world report rankings. Change The Magazine of Higher Learning, 47(2), 52–61.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez-Torres, M.R., Toral, S.L., Barrero, F., & Gallardo, S. (2007). Improving learning performance in laboratory instruction by means of SMS messaging. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(4), 409–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministry of Education (MOE). (2018). Educational statistics. Retrieved July 3, 2019, from http://stats.moe.gov.tw/files/ebook/Education_Statistics/108/108edu.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mosenthal, P.B. (1999). Understanding engagement: Historicaland political contexts. In J.T. Guthrie & D.E. Alvermann (Eds.), Engaged reading: Processes, practices, and policy implications (pp. 1–16). New York,NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mulryan-Kyne, C. (2010). Teaching large classes at college and university level: Challenges and opportunities. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(2), 175–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naimie, Z., Siraj, S., Piaw, C.Y., Shagholi, R., & Abuzaid, R.A. (2010). Do you think your match is made in heaven? Teaching styles/learning styles match and mismatch revisited. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 349–353.
   Google Scholar
• Nair, C.S., Adams, P., & Mertova, P. (2008). Student engagement: The key to improving survey response rates. Quality in Higher Education, 14(3), 225–232.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, C., Pignal, J., & Lipps, G. (2003). Measuring school engagement. Education Quarterly Review, 9(2), 25–34.
   Google Scholar
• Olson-Strom, S., & Rao, N. (2020). Higher Education for Women in Asia. In C. Sanger & N. Gleason (Eds.), Diversity and inclusion in global higher education, (pp. 263–282). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Organ, D.W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior-the good soldier syndrome (1st ed.). Lexington, Massachusetts/Toronto: D.C. Heath and Company.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). Education at a glance 2014: OECD indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pascarella, E., & Terenzini, P. (2005). How college affects students. Volume2. A third decade of research (vol. 2). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Prosser, M., & Trigwell, K. (2014). Qualitative variation in approaches to university teaching and learning in large first-year classes. Higher Education, 67(6), 783–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raymond, W.R. (2012). Engaged: Making large classes feel small through blended instructional strategies that promote increased student performance. Journal of College Teaching and Learning, 9(2), 147–152.
   Google Scholar
• Saevi, T. (2011). Lived relationality as a Fulcrum for Pedagogical Practice. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 30(5), 455–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2012). Research methods for business students. Pearson Education Ltd., Harlow.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, A., & Sidney, M. (2009). What is next for policy design and social construction theory? Policy Studies Journal, 37(1), 103–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shulman, L.S. (2005). Signature pedagogies in the professions. Daedalus;, 134(3), 52–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sitthiworachart, J., & Joy, M. (2008). Computer support of effective peer assessment in an undergraduate programming class. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(3), 217–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smeby, J. (2003). The impact of massification on university research. Tertiary Education and Management, 9, 131–144.
   Google Scholar
• Teaching and Development Institute. (2002). Report on survey of large class teaching in Australia. Retrieved October 28, 2018, from http://www.tedi.uq.edu.au/largeclasses/pdfs/Resources_2ReportonSurvey.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Manen, M. (1994). Pedagogy, virtue and narrative identity in teaching. Curriculum Inquiry, 24(2), 135–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstone, N., & Millward, L. (2012). Reframing perceptions of the lecture from challenges to opportunities: Embedding active learning and formative assessment into the teaching of large classes. Psychology Teaching Review, 18(2), 31–41.
   Google Scholar
• Woollacott, L., Booth, S., & Cameron, A. (2014). Knowing your students in large diverse classes: A phenomenographic case study. Higher Education, 67(6), 747–760.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, M.C., Bergom, I., & Bartholomew, T. (2019). Decreased class size, increased active learning? Active Learning in Higher Education, 20(1), 51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, C.T., Tang, C.W., & Lo, C.S. (2007). The verification of a structural equation model on psychological contract, organizational justice, organizational trust and organizational citizenship behavior: An example of the junior high school organizations. Educational Policy Forum, 10(1), in Chinese, 45–64.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, T.M., Hsieh, P.L., & Wu, C.H. (2013). The effects of teachers’ job stress, and job involvement on teaching quality-the personality trait as a moderating variable. Management Science Research, 9(2), 35–51.
   Google Scholar