References
- Akkerman, S.F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169.
- Barrett, M., & Oborn, E. (2018). Bridging the research-practice divide: Harnessing expertise collaboration in making a wider set of contributions. Information and Organization, 28(1), 44–51.
- Baumfield, V., & Butterworth, M. (2007). Creating and translating knowledge about teaching and learning in collaborative school–university research partnerships: An analysis of what is exchanged across the partnerships, by whom and how. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 411–427.
- Bell, J.S. (2002). Narrative inquiry: More than just telling stories. TESOL Quarterly, 36(2), 207–213.
- Benade, L. (2015). Teaching as inquiry: Well intentioned, but fundamentally flawed. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 107–120.
- Brady, L. (2002). School university partnerships: What do the schools want. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 1–8.
- Bruce, B.C., & Easley, J.A., Jr. (2000). Emerging communities of practice: Collaboration and communication in action research. Educational Action Research, 8(2), 243–259.
- Clandinin, D.J. (1985). Personal practical Knowledge: A Study of Teachers‘ Classroom Images. Curriculum Inquiry, 15(4), 361–385.
- Clandinin, D.J., & Huber, J. (2002). Narrative inquiry: Toward understanding life’s artistry. Curriculum Inquiry, 32(2), 161–169.
- Clandinin, D.J., Pushor, D., & Orr, A.M. (2007). Navigating sites for narrative inquiry. Journal of Teacher Education, 58(1), 21–35.
- Coburn, C.E., & Penuel, W.R. (2016). Research–practice partnerships in education: Outcomes, dynamics, and open questions. Educational Researcher, 45(1), 48–54.
- Coburn, C.E., Penuel, W.R., & Geil, K.E. (2013). Practice Partnerships: A strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement in school districts [White paper]. William T. Grant Foundation. Accessed 13 Mar 2022. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED568396
- Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 61(3), 279–311.
- Cochran-Smith, M. (2012). Composing a research life. Action in Teacher Education, 34(2), 99–110.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2–11.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. New York: Teachers College Press.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1993). Inside/outside: Teacher research and knowledge. Teachers College Press.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
- Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S.L. (2009). Teacher research as stance. In S. Noffke & B. Somekh (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Educational Action Research (pp. 39–49). Sage Publications.
- Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative inquiry. Educational Researcher, 19(5), 2–14.
- Connelly, F.M., & Clandinin, D.J. (2006). Narrative Inquiry. In J.L. Green, G. Camilli, P.B. Elmore, A. Skukauskaiti, & E. Grace (Eds.), Handbook of Complementary Methods in Education Research, (pp. 375–385). Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203874769.ch28
- Craig, C.J., You, J., Zou, Y., Verma, R., Stokes, D., Evans, P., & Curtis, G. (2018). The embodied nature of narrative knowledge: A cross-study analysis of embodied knowledge in teaching, learning, and life. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 329–340.
- Dana, N.F., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2019). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. California: Corwin.
- Darder, A. (2015). Freire and education. London: Routledge.
- Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. In D.C. Heath, J. Co Dewey, & A.F. Bentley (Eds.), Knowing and the known, (pp. 1–13). Beacon Press.
- Edwards, E. (2021). The ecological impact of action research on language teacher development: A review of the literature. Educational Action Research, 29(3), 396–413.
- Elliott, J. (1983). A Curriculum for the study of human affairs: The contribution of Lawrence Stenhouse. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15(2), 105–123.
- Elliott, J. (1987). Educational theory, practical philosophy and action research. British Journal of Educational Studies, 35(2), 149–169.
- Elliott, J. (1989). Action-Research and the Emergence of Teacher Appraisal in the UK. Paper presented to the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco.
- Elliott, J. (1991). A model of professionalism and its implications for teacher education. British Educational Research Journal, 17(4), 309–318.
- Elliott, J. (1993). What Have We Learned from Action Research in School-based Evaluation? Educational Action Research, 1(1), 175–186.
- Elliott, J. (1994). Research on teachers‘ knowledge and action research. Educational Action Research, 2(1), 133–137.
- Elliott, J. (2004). The struggle to redefine the relationship between «knowledge» and «action» in the academy: Some reflections on action research. Educar, 34, 011–024.
- Elliott, J. (2005). Becoming critical: The failure to connect. Educational Action Research, 13(3), 359–374.
- Elliott, J. (2006). Educational research as a form of democratic rationality. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 40(2), 169–185.
- Elliott, J. (2007). Assessing the quality of action research. Research Papers in Education, 22(2), 229–246.
- Elliott, J. (2012). Developing a science of teaching through lesson study. International Journal for Lesson and Learning Studies, 1(2), 108–125.
- Elliott, J.(2019). Some critical issues posed by ‘Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics’ from a Western Perspective. In R. Huang, A. Takahashi, & J.P. da Ponte (Eds.), Theory and Practice of Lesson Study in Mathematics: An International Perspective (pp. 785–801). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04031-4
- Ermeling, B.A. (2010). Tracing the effects of teacher inquiry on classroom practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(3), 377–388.
- Evans, M., Lomax, P., & Morgan, H. (2000). Closing the circle: Action research partnerships towards better learning and teaching in schools. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(3), 405–419.
- Fitts Fulmer, D.E. (2012). Autobiographical meaning making, practitioner inquiry, and white teachers in multicultural education ( Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 3535033).
- Fransman, J., & Newman, K. (2019). Rethinking research partnerships: Evidence and the politics of participation in research partnerships for international development. Journal of International Development, 31(7), 523–544.
- Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. (M.B. Ramos). New York: Continuum. Trans.
- Grundy, S. (1982). Three Modes of Action Research. In S. Kemmis & R. McTaggert (Eds.), The Action Research Reader (3rd, pp. 23–34). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
- Grundy, S., & Kemmis, S. (1981). Educational Action Research in Australia: The state of the Art. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education. Adelaide
- Hairon, S. (2017). Action research in Singapore: Where are we now? Asia-Pacific Science Education, 3(1), 1–18.
- Hamza, K., Palm, O., Palmqvist, J., Piqueras, J., & Wickman, P.-O. (2018). Hybridization of practices in teacher–researcher collaboration. European Educational Research Journal, 17(1), 170–186.
- Herr, K., & Anderson, G. L. (2014). The action research dissertation: A guide for students and faculty. Sage Publications.
- Kemmis, S., & McTaggert, R. (1990). The Action Research Planner. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
- Klar, H.W., Huggins, K.S., Buskey, F.C., Desmangles, J.K., & Phelps-Ward, R.J. (2018). Developing social capital for collaboration in a research-practice partnership. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 3(4), 287–305.
- Lambirth, A., Cabral, A., McDonald, R., Philpott, C., Brett, A., & Magaji, A. (2021). Teacher-led professional development through a model of action research, collaboration and facilitation. Professional Development in Education, 47(5), 815–833.
- Li, J., & Craig, C.J. (2019). A narrative inquiry into a rural teacher’s emotions and identities in China: Through a teacher knowledge community lens. Teachers and Teaching, 25(8), 918–936.
- Lytle, S.L., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1989). Teacher research: Toward clarifying the concept. National Writing Project Quarterly, 11(2), 1–3.
- Lytle, S., & Cochran-Smith, M. (1992). Teacher research as a way of knowing. Harvard Educational Review, 62(4), 447–475.
- Masters, J. (1995). The History of Action Research. In I. Hughes (Ed.), Action Research Electronic Reader. The University of Sydney (pp. 1-8) Accessed 2 Jul 2021 . on. online http://www.behs.cchs.usyd.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm
- McCutcheon, G., & Jung, B. (1990). Alternative perspectives on action research. Theory into Practice, 29(3), 144–151.
- McKernan, J. (1991). Curriculum action research: A handbook of methods and resources for the reflective practitioner. London: Kogan Page.
- Mitchell, W.T. (1981). On narrative. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
- Penuel, W.R., Allen, A.-R., Coburn, C.E., & Farrell, C. (2015). Conceptualizing research–practice partnerships as joint work at boundaries. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk (JESPAR), 20(1–2), 182–197.
- Pinnegar, S., & Daynes, J.G. (2007). Locating narrative inquiry historically. In D.J. Clandinin, Ed., Handbook of narrative inquiry: Mapping a methodology, pp. 3–34. Sage Publications doi:https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452226552.
- Polkinghorne, D.E. (1988). Narrative knowing and the human sciences. Suny Press.
- Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass
- Skilbeck, M. (1983). Lawrence Stenhouse: Research methodology “Research is systematic inquiry made public”. British Educational Research Journal, 9(1), 11–20.
- Stenhouse, L. (1971). The humanities curriculum project: The rationale. Theory into Practice, 10(3), 154–162.
- Stenhouse, L. (1988). Artistry and teaching: The teacher as focus of research and development. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 4(1), 43–51.
- Stokols, D., Harvey, R., Gress, J., Fuqua, J., & Phillips, K. (2005). In vivo studies of transdisciplinary scientific collaboration: Lessons learned and implications for active living research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28(2), 202–213.
- Suleiman, A.B., Ballard, P.J., Hoyt, L.T., & Ozer, E.J. (2021). Applying a developmental lens to youth-led participatory action research: A critical examination and integration of existing evidence. Youth & Society, 53(1), 26–53.
- Tipa, G., Panelli, R., & Team, M.S. (2009). Beyond ‘someone else’s agenda’: An example of indigenous/academic research collaboration. New Zealand Geographer, 65(2), 95–106.
- Vaughan, S. (2020). Exploring teachers’ experiences of action research. London Review of Education, 18(3), 408–422.
- Wang, C.C., & Geale, S.K. (2015). The power of story: Narrative inquiry as a methodology in nursing research. International Journal of Nursing Sciences, 2(2), 195–198.
- Xu, S., & Connelly, M. (2010). Narrative inquiry for school-based research. Narrative Inquiry, 20(2), 349–370. doi:10.1075/ni.20.2.06xu
- Zhong, L., & Craig, C. (2020). A narrative inquiry into the cultivation of self and identity of three novice teachers in Chinese colleges—through the evolution of an online knowledge community. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(5), 646–663.