Empowerment through articulations between post-neoliberal politics and neoliberalism: value chain alliances in Bolivia

References

• Andersson, V., and H. Haarstad. 2009. “Citizenship and State-Building in Contemporary Bolivia: Politization of Cultural Identity.” GDS Research Series, Working Paper No. 2. Aalborg, Denmark: Aalborg University.
   Google Scholar
• Assies, W. 2005. “Some Notes on Citizenship, Civil Society and Social Movements.” In Citizenship, Political Culture and State Transformation in Latin America, edited by W. Assies, M.A. Calderón, & T. Salman, 93–110. Amsterdam: Dutch University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., and D. Humphreys-Bebbington. 2010. “An Andean Avatar: Post-neoliberal and Neoliberal Strategies for Securing the Unobtainable.” New Political Economy 16 (1): 131–145. doi: 10.1080/13563461003789803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bebbington, A., D. Lewis, S. Batterbury, E. Olson, and M. S. Siddiqi. 2007. “Of Texts and Practices: Empowerment and Organisational Cultures in World Bank-funded Rural Development Programmes.” Journal of Development Studies 43 (4): 597–621. doi: 10.1080/00220380701259665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canessa, A. 2014. “Conflict, Claim and Contradiction in the New ‘Indigenous’ State of Bolivia.” Critique of Anthropology 34 (2): 153–173. doi: 10.1177/0308275X13519275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, T. 2009. ““Social Development” as Neoliberal Trojan Horse: The World Bank and the Kecamatan Development Program in Indonesia.” Development and Change 40 (3): 447–466. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7660.2009.01561.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collion, M. H., and M. Friedman. 2010. Rural Productive Alliance Tour of Bolivia and Colombia: Lessons Learned and Scope for Improvement. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Collion, M. H., and M. Friedman. n.d. Overcoming Barriers to Entry through Creation of Producer Organizations and Rural Productive Alliances: The Rural Productive Alliance Model. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., and U. Kothari. 2001. Participation: The New Tyranny? London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba, D. 2012. “Procesos de intervención con enfoque de cadena productiva y su contribución a la articulación a mercados de productores de pequeña escala.” In Las relaciones internacionales de la pobreza en América Latina y el Caribe, edited by CLACSO, 369–396. Buenos Aires: CLACSO/CROP.
   Google Scholar
• Córdoba, D., and K. Jansen. 2014. “The Return of the State: Neocollectivism, Agrarian Politics and Images of Technological Progress in the MAS Era in Bolivia.” Journal of Agrarian Change 14 (4): 480–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Córdoba, D., and K. Jansen. 2016. “Realigning the Political and the Technical: NGOs and the Politicization of Agrarian Development in Bolivia.” The European Journal of Development Research. doi:10.1057/ejdr.2015.12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo, P. 2009. “Evo Morales, the MAS, and a Revolution in the Making.” In Governance after Neoliberalism in Latin America, edited by J. Grugel, & P. Riggirozzi, 113–146. Basingstoke: Palgrave-Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Enríquez, L. 2013. “The Paradoxes of Latin America’s ‘Pink Tide’: Venezuela and the Project of Agrarian Reform.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 40 (4): 611–638. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2012.746959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. 2011. Ley No. 144: Ley de Revolución Productiva Comunitaria Agropecuaria. La Paz: Gaceta oficial de Bolivia.
   Google Scholar
• “Evo culpa al Banco Mundial y FMI de problemas económicos en Sudamérica.” 19 October 2011. Opinión. Accessed March 4 2016. http://www.opinion.com.bo/opinion/articulos/2011/1029/noticias.php?id = 30164.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricant, N. 2012. Mobilizing Bolivia’s Displaced: Indigenous Politics and the Struggle Over Land. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
   Google Scholar
• Farthing, L., and B. Kohl. 2013. “Mobilizing Memory: Bolivia’s Enduring Social Movements.” Social Movement Studies 12 (4): 361–376. doi: 10.1080/14742837.2013.807728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farthing, L., and B. Kohl. 2014. Evo’s Bolivia: Continuity and Change. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. 2010. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Freire, P. 1970. Pedagogía del Oprimido. México, SA: Siglo veintiuno.
   Google Scholar
• Gianotten, V. 2006. CIPCA y poder campesino indígena: 35 años de historia (Vol. 66). La Paz: CIPCA.
   Google Scholar
• Gómez, T. 2012. La Redistribución del Excedente del Sector Hidrocarburos dentro de la Estrategia de Poder del Movimiento al Socialismo. Cochabamba: ASDI-Universidad de San Simón.
   Google Scholar
• Green, M., and D. Hulme. 2005. “From Correlates and Characteristics to Causes: Thinking about Poverty from a Chronic Poverty Perspective.” World Development 33 (6): 867–879. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2004.09.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harriss, J. 2002. De-politicizing Development: The World Bank and Social Capital. London: Anthem.
   Google Scholar
• Jaldín, R. 2013. “¿Municipio Modelo? Sinergias Productivas y Ambientales en el Municipio de Comarapa.” In ¿Comer de Nuestra Tierra? Estudios de Caso sobre Tierra y Producción de Alimentos, edited by J. P. Chumacero, 5–38. La Paz: Fundación Tierra.
   Google Scholar
• Jansen, K. 2003. “Crisis Discourses and Technology Regulation in a Weak State: Responses to a Pesticide Disaster in Honduras.” Development and Change 34 (1): 45–66. doi:10.1111/1467-7660.00296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jansen, K. 2015. “The Debate on Food Sovereignty Theory: Agrarian Capitalism, Dispossession and Agroecology.” The Journal of Peasant Studies 42 (1): 213–232. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.945166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph, J. 2012. The Social in the Global: Social Theory, Governmentality and Global Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaup, B. Z. 2010. “A Neoliberal Nationalization? The Constraints on Natural-gas-led Development in Bolivia.” Latin American Perspectives 37 (3): 123–138. doi:10.1177/0094582X10366534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, C. 2004. “Pobreza rural y estrategias de desarrollo rural en Bolivia.” In Evaluación y Monitoreo de las Estrategias de Reducción de la Pobreza (ERP) en América Latina, 5–38. The Hague: Asdi-Institute of Social Studies (ISS).
   Google Scholar
• Kennemore, A. M. Y., and G. Weeks. 2011. “Twenty-first Century Socialism? The Elusive Search for a Post-neoliberal Development Model in Bolivia and Ecuador.” Bulletin of Latin American Research 30 (3): 267–281. doi: 10.1111/j.1470-9856.2010.00496.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kohl, B., and L. Farthing. 2006. Impasse in Bolivia: Neoliberal Hegemony and Popular Resistance. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• La Razón Digital. 15 August 2012. “ Presidente dice que ahora la tarea “es potenciarnos económicamente.’” La Razón. Accessed March 4 2016. http://www.la-razon.com/nacional/Presidente-ahora-tarea-potenciarnos-economicamente_0_1669633075.html.
   Google Scholar
• Labaste, P., and M. Webber. 2010. Building Competitiveness in Africa’s Agriculture: A Guide to Value Chain Concepts and Applications. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S. 2008. El Alto, Rebel City: Self and Citizenship in Andean Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, T. 2001. “The Birth of Bio-politics: Michel Foucault’s Lecture at the Collège de France on Neo-liberal Governmentality.” Economy and Society 30 (2): 190–207. doi: 10.1080/03085140120042271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. 2007. The Will to Improve: Governmentality, Development, and the Practice of Politics. Durham: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• MAS. 2005. MAS Party Presidential Campaign Slogan. Accessed March 31 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4r7kT-NlRU.
   Google Scholar
• MDRyT. 2010. Plan Sectorial de Desarrollo Agropecuario 2011–2015. Accessed March 31 2016. http://faolex.fao.org/docs/pdf/bol148581.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Novo, C. M. 2014. “Managing Diversity in Postneoliberal Ecuador.” The Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Anthropology 19 (1): 103–125. doi:10.1111/jlca.12062.
   Google Scholar
• Nuijten, M. 2003. Power, Community and the State: The Political Anthropology of Organisation in Mexico. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, G. 2007. “Review Article: Class or Identity Politics? A False Dichotomy.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 48 (1): 73–80. doi:10.1177/0020715207076370.
   Google Scholar
• Petras, J., and H. Veltmeyer. 2009. What’s Left in Latin America? Regime Change in New Times. Surrey, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Postero, N. 2007. Now We Are Citizens: Indigenous Politics in Post-multi-cultural Bolivia. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Postero, N. 2013. “Bolivia’s Challenge to Colonial Neoliberalism.” In Neoliberalism, Interrupted: Social Change and Contested Governance in Contemporary Latin America, edited by M. Goodale, & N. Postero, 25–52. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, S. A. 2012. “Development for a Postneoliberal Era? Sumak kawsay, Living Well and the Limits to Decolonisation in Ecuador.” Geoforum 43 (2): 240–249. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Cusicanqui, S. 1990. “Liberal Democracy and Ayllu Democracy in Bolivia: The Case of Northern Potosi.” Journal of Development Studies 26 (4): 97–121. doi: 10.1080/00220389008422175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojas, J. C. 2012. “Ley de Revolución Productiva Comunitaria Agropecuaria. Abriendo brecha en la construcción del Estado Plurinacional: entre los deseos y la realidad.” Umbrales 23: 121–148.
   Google Scholar
• Valdivia, G. 2005. “On Indigeneity, Change, and Represaentation in the Northeastern Ecuadorian Amazon.” Environment and Planning A 37 (2): 285–303. doi: 10.1068/a36182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanderley, F. 2009. “Personalidade jurídica e cidadania coletiva na Bolívia: uma etnografia da identificação jurídica ea formação de espaços públicos.” Dados-Revista de Ciências Sociais 52 (3): 581–619.
   Google Scholar
• Webber, J. 2011. From Rebellion to Reform in Bolivia: Class Struggle, Indigenous Liberation, and the Politics of Evo Morales. London: Haymarket Books.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2005. “Bolivia Rural Alliances Project: Social Analysis for Inclusion, Cohesion and Accountability.” Social Development 31. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2009. Bolivia – Additional Financing for Rural Alliances Project. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2011. “What is Empowerment?” Accessed March 4 2016. http://go.worldbank.org/V45HD4P100.
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. 2014. “Implementation Completion and Results Report on a Credit.” Accessed March 4 2016. http://www-wds.worldbank.org/external/default/WDSContentServer/WDSP/IB/2015/02/17/000477144_2015021143722/Rendered/PDF/ICR33880P0830510Box385439B00OUO090.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Yashar, D. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zoomers, A. 2006. “La ruta del Inca: Perspectivas y ambivalencias del desarrollo turístico en los andes Bolivianos y Peruanos.” In La ruta andina: Turismo y desarrollo sostenible en Perú y Bolivia, edited by A. Ypeij and A. Zoomers, 259–286. Lima: Abya-Yala.
   Google Scholar