Donor proliferation to what ends? New donor countries and the search for legitimacy

References

• Alesina, A., and D. Dollar. 2000. “Who Gives Foreign Aid to Whom and Why?” Journal of Economic Growth 5 (1): 33–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AMEXCID, and GIZ. 2014. “Experiences of Middle-Income Countries in International Development Cooperation.” https://www.giz.de/en/downloads/giz2014-en-Experiences_of_Middle_Income_Countries_in_IDC.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barder, O., P. Krylova, and T. Talbot. 2016. “How Much and How Well: Revisiting the Aid Component of the Commitment to Development Index CGD.” Center for Global Development Policy Paper 85. May 2016. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Benn, J., and W. Luijkx. 2017. “Emerging Providers’ International Co-operation for Development.” OECD Development Co-operation Working Paper. No. 33, April. http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/content/workingpaper/15d6a3c7-en.
   Google Scholar
• Birdsall, N., H. Kharas, A. Mahgoub, and R. Perakis. 2010. Quality of Official Development Assistance Assessment. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution and Centre for Global Development.
   Google Scholar
• Bracho, G. 2015. In Search of a Narrative for Southern Providers: The Challenge of the Emerging Economies to the Development Cooperation Agenda. Bonn: German Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, S., and L. Swiss. 2013. “The Hollow Ring of Donor Commitment: Country Concentration and the Decoupling of Aid Effectiveness Norms from Donor Practice.” Development Policy Review 31 (6): 737–755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bry, S. 2015. “The Production of Soft Power: Practising Solidarity in Brazilian South–South Development Projects.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 36 (4): 442–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandy, L., and H. Kharas. 2011. “Why Can’t We All Just Get Along? The Practical Limits to International Development Cooperation.” Journal of International Development 23 (5): 739–751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, R. 2010. “Technical and Institutional States: Loose Coupling in the Human Rights Sector of the World Polity.” Sociological Quarterly 51 (1): 65–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clemens, M. A., and T. J. Moss. 2007. “The Ghost of 0.7 per cent: Origins and Relevance of the International Aid Target.” International Journal of Development Issues 6 (1): 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, W. M., and F. O. Ramirez. 2013. “Conditional Decoupling Assessing the Impact of National Human Rights Institutions, 1981 to 2004.” American Sociological Review 78 (4): 702–725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Custer, S., Z. Rice, T. Masake, R. Latourell, and B. Parks. (2015). Listening to Leaders: Which Development Partners Do They Prefer and Why? Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary.
   Google Scholar
• DAC High-level Panel. 2017. “A New DAC in a Changing World: Setting a Path for the Future.” Report of the High Level Panel (HLP) 1 (January 2017): 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• de Renzio, P., and J. Seifert. 2014. “South–South Cooperation and the Future of Development Assistance: Mapping Actors and Options.” Third World Quarterly 35 (10): 1860–1875.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DiMaggio, P. J., and W. W. Powell. 1983. “The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields.” American Sociological Review 48 (2): 147–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., A. Fuchs, and P. Nunnenkamp. 2013. “New Donors.” International Interactions 39 (3): 402–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreher, A., P. Nunnenkamp, and R. Thiele. 2011. “Are ‘New’ Donors Different? Comparing the Allocation of Bilateral Aid Between non-DAC and DAC Donor Countries.” World Development 39 (11): 1950–1968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easterly, W., and C. R. Williamson. 2011. “Rhetoric versus Reality: The Best and Worst of Aid Agency Practices.” World Development 39 (11): 1930–1949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R. 2012. “Struggles in Paris: The DAC and the Purposes of Development Aid.” European Journal of Development Research 25 (1): 1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyben, R., and L. Savage. 2013. “Emerging and Submerging Powers: Imagined Geographies in the New Development Partnership at the Busan Fourth High Level Forum.” The Journal of Development Studies 49 (4): 457–469.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejerskov, A. M. 2015. “From Unconventional to Ordinary? The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Homogenizing Effects of International Development Cooperation.” Journal of International Development 27 (7): 1098–1112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fejerskov, A. M., E. Lundsgaarde, and S. Cold-Ravnkilde. 2017. “Recasting the ‘New Actors in Development’ Research Agenda.” The European Journal of Development Research 29 (5): 1070–1085.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. 1996a. “Norms, Culture, and World Politics: Insights from Sociology’s Institutionalism.” International Organization 50 (2): 325–347.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M. 1996b. “Constructing Norms of Humanitarian Intervention.” In The Culture of National Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, edited by P. J. Katzenstein, 153–185. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Finnemore, M., and K. Sikkink. 2001. “Taking Stock: The Constructivist Research Program in International Relations and Comparative Politics.” Annual Review of Political Science 4: 391–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuda-Parr, S., and H. Shiga. 2016. “Normative Framing of Development Cooperation: Japanese Bilateral Aid between the DAC and Suthern Donors.” JICA Working Paper No. 130. Tokyo: Japanese International Cooperation Agency Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gavas, M., T. Hart, S. Mustapha, and A. Rogerson. 2017. Donor Resilience Index. London: Overseas Development Institute. https://www.odi.org/opinion/10423-donor-resilience-index.
   Google Scholar
• Gore, C. 2013. “The New Development Cooperation Landscape: Actors, Approaches, Architecture.” Journal of International Development 25 (1): 769–786.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhill, R., and G. Rabinowitz. 2016. “Why Do Donors Delegate to Multilateral Organisations?” ODI Working Paper. London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Gulrajani, N. 2016. Bilateral versus Multilateral Aid Channels: Strategic Choices for Donors. London: Overseas Development Insitute.
   Google Scholar
• Harmer, A., and L. Cotterrell. 2005. “Diversity in Donorship: The Changing Landscape of Official Humanitarian Aid.” HPG Research Briefing (Vol. 20). London: Overseas Development Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Kanbur, R., and A. Sumner. 2012. “Poor Countries or Poor People? Development Assistance and the New Geography of Global Poverty.” Journal of International Development 24 (6): 686–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilby, C., and A. Dreher. 2010. “The Impact of Aid on Growth Revisited: Do Donor Motives Matter?” Economics Letters 107 (3): 338–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and K. Gray. (2016). “Overseas Development Aid as Spatial Fix? Examining South Korea's Africa Policy.” Third World Quarterly 37 (2), 649–664. http://doi.org/10.1080/01436597.2015.1108162
   Google Scholar
• Kim, S., and S. Lightfoot. 2011. “Policy Arena: Does ‘DAC-Ability’ Really Matter? The Emergence of Non-DAC Donors: Introduction to Policy Arena.” Journal of International Development 23 (5): 711–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knack, S., F. Rogers, and N. Eubank. 2011. “Aid Quality and Donor Rankings.” World Development 39 (11): 1907–1917.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kot-Majewska, K. 2015. “Role of Non-Traditional Donors in Humanitarian Action: How Much Can They Achieve?” In The Humanitarian Challenge: 20 Years European Network on Humanitarian Action, edited by P. Gibbon, and H.-J. Heintze, 121–134. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kragelund, P. 2015. “Towards Convergence and Cooperation in the Global Development Finance Regime: Closing Africa’s Policy Space?” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 28 (2): 246–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kühl, S. 2015. “The Diffusion of Organizations: The Role of Foreign Aid.” In From Globalization to World Society. Neo-Institutional and Systems-Theoretical Perspectives, edited by H. Boris, K. Fatima, and W. Tobias, 258–278. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, C. 2007. Foreign Aid: Diplomacy, Development, Domestic Politics. London: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, W. C. 1993. “Taiwan’s Foreign Aid Policy.” Asian Affairs: An American Review 20 (1): 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, D. 1993. Moral Vision in International Politics: The Foreign Aid Regime 1949-1989. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lumsdaine, D., and J. C. Schopf. 2007. “Changing Values and the Recent Rise in Korean Development Assistance.” The Pacific Review 20 (2): 221–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, R. 2006. “Will ‘Emerging Donors’ Change the Face of International Co-Operation?” Development Policy Review 24 (4): 371–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. 2014. “Human Rights and South-South Development Cooperation: Reflections on the “Rising Powers” as International Development Actors.” Human Rights Quarterly 36 (3): 630–652.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E. 2017. “Development Geography 1: Cooperation, Competition and Convergence between ‘North’ and ‘South’.” Progress in Human Geography 41 (1): 108–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mawdsley, E., L. Savage, and S. M. Kim. 2013. “A ‘Post-Aid World’? Paradigm Shift in Foreign Aid and Development Cooperation at the 2011 Busan High Level Forum.” The Geographical Journal 180 (1): 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McEwan, C., and E. Mawdsley. 2012. “Trilateral Development Cooperation: Power and Politics in Emerging Aid Relationships.” Development and Change 43 (6): 1185–1209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., J. Boli, G. M. Thomas, and F. O. Ramirez. 1997. “World Society and the Nation-State.” American Journal of Sociology 103 (1): 144–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. W., and B. Rowan. 1977. “Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony.” American Journal of Sociology 83 (2): 340–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milward, B., L. Jensen, A. Roberts, M. I. Dussauge-Laguna, V. Junjan, R. Torenvlied, A. Boin, H. K. Colebatch, D. Kettl, and R. Durant. 2016. “Is Public Management Neglecting the State?” Governance 29 (3): 311–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenthau, H. 1962. “A Political Theory of Foreign Aid.” American Political Science Review 56 (2): 301–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munro, L. T. 2018. “Strategies to Shape the International Order: Exit, Voice and Innovation versus Expulsion, Maintenance and Absorption.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 39 (2): 310–328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. 1996. Shaping the 21st Century: The Contribution of Development Co-operation. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://www1.oecd.org/dac/gender/pdf/GENDGE.PDF.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2015. Multilateral Aid 2015: Better Partnerships for a Post-2015 World. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. 2016. Joining the Development Assistance Committee (DAC). http://www.oecd.org/dac/dac-global-relations/joining-the-development-assistance-committee.htm.
   Google Scholar
• Paulo, S., and H. Reisen. 2010. “Eastern Donors and Western Soft Law: Towards a DAC Donor Peer Review of China and India?” Development Policy Review 28 (5): 535–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rist, G., and P. Camiller. 2002. The History of Development: From Western Origins to Global Faith. 2nd ed. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Rowlands, D. 2012. “Individual BRICS or a Collective Bloc? Convergence and Divergence amongst ‘Emerging Donor’ Nations.” Cambridge Review of International Affairs 25 (4): 629–649.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samy, Y., and M. Aksli. 2015. “An Examination of Bilateral Donor Performance and Progress under the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness.” Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement 36 (4): 516–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seifert, J., and P. de Renzio. 2014. “Beyond the North-South Divide: Triangular Cooperation in the New Development Cooperation.” Rio de Janeiro. BPC Policy Brief 4 (4). Rio de Janeiro: BRICS Policy Center.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, K., T. Y. Fordelone, and F. Zimmermann. 2010. “Beyond the DAC: The Welcome Role of Other Providers of Development Co-Operation.” DCD Issues Brief, May 2010. Paris: OECD Development Co-operation Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Sumner, A. 2013. Global Poverty, Aid, and Middle-Income Countries: Are the Country Classifications Moribund or is Global Poverty in the Process of ‘Nationalizing’?” WIDER Working Paper No. 2013/062. Helsinki: UNU/WIDER.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2009. “Decoupling Values from Action: An Event-History Analysis of the Election of Women to Parliament in the Developing World, 1945–90.” International Journal of Comparative Sociology 50 (1): 69–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2011. “Security Sector Reform and Development Assistance: Explaining the Diffusion of Policy Priorities Among Donor Agencies.” Qualitative Sociology 34 (2): 371–393.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2012. “The Adoption of Women and Gender as Development Assistance Priorities: An Event History Analysis of World Polity Effects.” International Sociology 27 (1): 96–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2016a. “A Sociology of Foreign Aid and the World Society.” Sociology Compass 10 (1): 65–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2016b. “World Society and the Global Foreign Aid Network.” Sociology of Development 2 (4): 342–374.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, L. 2018. The Globalization of Foreign Aid: Developing Consensus. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Swiss, L., and S. Brown. 2015. “The Aid Orphan Myth.” Third World Quarterly 36 (2): 240–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofejevs Henriksson, P. 2014. “Europeanization of Foreign-Aid Policy in Central and East Europe: The Role of EU, External Incentives and Identification in Foreign-Aid Policy Adoption in Latvia and Slovenia 1998–2010.” Journal of European Integration 37 (4): 433–449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP), and Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation (CAITEC). 2016. Mix and Match? How Countries Deliver Development Cooperation and Lessons for China. Beijing: UNDP and CAITEC.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2016). Making Development Co-operation More Effective: 2016 Progress Report. Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation (GPEDC). Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations General Assembly. 1945. UN Charter. http://www.un.org/aboutun/charter/.
   Google Scholar
• Verschaeve, J., and J. Orbie. 2018. “Ignoring the Elephant in the Room? Assessing the Impact of the European Union on the Development Assistance Committee’s Role in International Development.” Development Policy Review 36 (S1): O44–O58. doi:10.1111/dpr.12216.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, N. 2008. “Whose Aid? Whose Influence? China, Emerging Donors and the Silent Revolution in Development Assistance.” International Affairs 84 (6): 1205–1221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmermann, F., and K. Smith. 2011. “More Actors, More Money, More Ideas for International Development Co-operation.” Journal of International Development 23 (5): 722–738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. G. 1977. “The Role of Institutionalization in Cultural Persistence.” American Sociological Review 42 (5): 726–743.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar