Alleviate cascade with fault pair in interdependent smart grid: a communication view

References

• Widyan MS. Operational performance stability of grid-connected photovoltaic generator via DC–DC converter and 48-pulse voltage source inverter. Int J Model Simul. 2017;37(2):96–107.
   Google Scholar
• Wanjekeche T, Nicolae DV, Jimoh AA. Operating strategies and capacitor voltage balance strategies for a cascaded ‘3-5-9’ hybrid inverter for grid interface application. Int J Model Simul. 2014;34(1):1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Aristizábal AJ, Páez CA, Chica AdJ. Parameters identification of photovoltaic modules for estimating the power generated under non-standard conditions. Int J Model Simul. 2017;37(4):252–261.
   Google Scholar
• Vani E, Rengarajan N. Improving the power quality of the wind power system using low cost topology. Int J Model Simul. 2017;37(2):108–115.
   Google Scholar
• Sameti M, Ghasemipour SS. Thermodynamic study and performance simulation of a renewable-based Kalina cycle in distributed generation. Int J Model Simul. 2017;37(1):54–66.
   Google Scholar
• Widyan MS, Al Tarabsheh AI, Etier IY, et al. Dynamic and steady-state characteristics of dc machines fed by photovoltaic systems. Int J Model Simul. 2010;30(3):353–360.
   Google Scholar
• Charki A, Logerais PO, Bigaud D, et al. Lifetime assessment of a photovoltaic system using stochastic Petri nets. Int J Model Simul. 2017;37(3):149–155.
   Google Scholar
• Buldyrev SV, Parshani R, Paul G, et al. Catastrophic cascade of failures in interdependent networks. Nature. 2010;464(7291):1025–1028.10.1038/nature08932
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parshani R, Buldyrev SV, Havlin S. Interdependent networks: reducing the coupling strength leads to a change from a first to second order percolation transition. Phys Rev Lett. 2010;105(4):4680.10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.048701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu X, Wang W, Ma J, et al. Domino of the smart grid: an empirical study of system behaviors in the interdependent network architecture. In: IEEE International Conference on SmartGridComm; Vancouver, Canada; 2013. p. 612–617.
   Google Scholar
• In-Jae K, Barthel Brian P, Yuyoung P, et al. Network analysis for active and passive propagation models. Networks. 2014;63(2):160–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wafler J, PE Heegaard. Structural dependability analysis in smart grid under simultaneous failures. In: IEEE SmartGridComm; Vancouver, Canada; 2013. p. 67–72.
   Google Scholar
• Mingkui W, Wenye W. Greenbench: A benchmark for observing power grid vulnerability under data-centric threats. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM; Toronto, Canada; 2014. p. 2625–2633.
   Google Scholar
• Parandehgheibi M, Modiano E. Robustness of interdependent networks: the case of communication networks and the power grid. In: IEEE GLOBECOM; Atlanta (GA); 2013. p. 2164–2169.
   Google Scholar
• Falahati B, Fu Y. Reliability assessment of smart grids considering indirect cyber-power interdependencies. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2014;5(4):1677–1685.10.1109/TSG.2014.2310742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vellaithurai C, Srivastava A, Zonouz S.. CPIndex: cyber-physical vulnerability assessment for power-grid infrastructures. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2015;6(2):566–575.10.1109/TSG.2014.2372315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen DT, Shen Y, Thai MT. Detecting critical nodes in interdependent power networks for vulnerability assessment. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2013;4(1):151–159.10.1109/TSG.2012.2229398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen H, Wang C, Stojmenovic M, et al. Balancing system survivability and cost of smart grid via modeling cascading failures. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput. 2013;1(1):45–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeranz I, Reddy SM. Equivalence, dominance, and similarity relations between fault pairs and a fault pair collapsing process for fault diagnosis. IEEE Trans Comput. 2010;59(2):150–158.10.1109/TC.2009.112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi-Man V, Pak-Kin W, Weng-Fai I. A new framework of simultaneous-fault diagnosis using pairwise probabilistic multi-label classification for time-dependent patterns. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2013;60(8):3372–3385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong L, Zhi-Ming X, Sheng L, et al. A survey on information diffusion in online social networks. Chin J Comput. 2014;37(1):189–206.
   Google Scholar
• Bush SF. Network theory and smart grid distribution automation. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun. 2014;32(7):1451–1459.10.1109/JSAC.2014.2332132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koc Y, Warnier M, Kooij RE, et al. A robustness metric for cascading failures by targeted attacks in power networks. In: 10th IEEE ICNSC; Evry, France; 2013. p. 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Yihai Z, Yan S, Haibo H. Load distribution vector based attack strategies against power grid systems. In: IEEE GLOBECOM; Anaheim, CA. 2012. p. 935–941.
   Google Scholar
• Chengdi L, Low SH. The redistribution of power flow in cascading failures. In: 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton). Monticello (VA); 2013. p. 1037–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Neumayer S, Modiano E. Assessing the effect of geographically correlated failures on interconnected power-communication networks. In: IEEE SmartGridComm; Vancouver, Canada; 2013. p. 366–371.
   Google Scholar
• Rampurkar V, Pentayya P, Mangalvedekar HA. Cascading failure analysis for Indian power grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2016;7(4):1951–1960.10.1109/TSG.2016.2530679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ming Y, Ansari N. Smart grid communications: modeling and validation. J Network Comput Appl. 2016;59:247–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fateh B, Govindarasu M, Ajjarapu V. Wireless network design for transmission line monitoring in smart grid. IEEE Trans Smart Grid. 2013;4(2):1076–1086.10.1109/TSG.2013.2241796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinhard D. Graph theory: the basics. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Wei W, Kim D, An MK, et al. On construction of quality fault-tolerant virtual backbone in wireless networks. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw. 2013;21(5):1499–1510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mets K, Ojea JA, Develder C. Combining power and communication network simulation for cost-effective smart grid analysis. IEEE Commun Surv Tut. 2014;16(3):1771–1796.10.1109/SURV.2014.021414.00116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NetworkX. Available from: http://networkx.github.io/
   Google Scholar
• Watts JD, Strogatz SH. Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’networks. Nature. 1998; 393(6684):440–442.10.1038/30918
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IEEE standard communication delivery time performance requirements for electric power substation automation. IEEE Std 1646–2004. 2005.
   Google Scholar