A survey on simulation optimization for the manufacturing system operation

References

• Negahban A, Smith JS. Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: literature review and analysis. J Manuf Syst. 2014;33:241–261.10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tekin E, Sabuncuoglu I. Simulation optimization: a comprehensive review on theory and applications. IIE Trans. 2004;36(11):1067–1081.10.1080/07408170490500654
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan FTS, Chan HK. A comprehensive survey and future trend of simulation study on FMS scheduling. J Intell Manuf. 2004;15(1):87–102.10.1023/B:JIMS.0000010077.27141.be
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahdavi I, Shirazi B. A review of simulation-based intelligent decision support system architecture for the adaptive control of flexible manufacturing systems. J Artif Intell. 2010;3(4):201–219.
   Google Scholar
• Chtourou H, Jerbi A, Maalej A. The cellular manufacturing paradox: a critical review of simulation studies. J Manuf Technol Manage. 2008;19(5):591–606.10.1108/17410380810877276
   Google Scholar
• Chiang TC. Enhancing rule-based scheduling in wafer fabrication facilities by evolutionary algorithms: Review and opportunity. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;64(1):524–535.10.1016/j.cie.2012.08.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban A, Smith JS. Simulation for manufacturing system design and operation: literature review and analysis. J Manuf Syst. 2014;33:241–261.10.1016/j.jmsy.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alrabghi A, Tiwari A. A novel framework for simulation-based optimisation of maintenance systems. Int J Simul Model. 2016;15(1):16–28.10.2507/IJSIMM
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu M, editor. The handbook of simulation optimization. New York: Springer; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Butler J, Morrice DJ, Mullarkey PW. A multiple attribute utility theory approach to ranking and selection. Manage Sci. 2001;47(6):800–816.10.1287/mnsc.47.6.800.9812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekki JM, Fowler JW, Mackulak GT, et al. Using quantiles in ranking and selection procedures. In: Henderson SG, Biller B, Hsieh MH, et al., editors. Proceedings of the 2007 Winter Simulation Conference. Piscataway (NJ): IEEE; 2007. p. 1722–1728.
   Google Scholar
• Chen CH, He DH, Fu M, et al. Efficient simulation budget allocation for selecting an optimal subset. Inf J Comput. 2008;20(4):579–595.10.1287/ijoc.1080.0268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi P, Haleh H, Alidoost M. The selection of the best control rule for a multiple-load AGV system using simulation and fuzzy MADM in a flexible manufacturing system. Model Simul Eng. 2010;2010, 7–17.
   Google Scholar
• Onyeocha CE, Wang J, Khoury J, et al. A comparison of HK-CONWIP and BK-CONWIP control strategies in a multi-product manufacturing system. Oper Res Perspect. 2015;2:137–149.10.1016/j.orp.2015.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho YC, Sreenivas RS, Vakili P. Ordinal optimization of DEDS. Discret Event Dyn Syst. 1992;2(1):61–88.10.1007/BF01797280
   Google Scholar
• Song DP, Hicks C, Earl CF. An ordinal optimization based evolution strategy to schedule complex make-to-order products. Int J Prod Res. 2006;44(22):4877–4895.10.1080/00207540600620922
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Chiang WC, Wu C. Investigating the impact of operational variables on manufacturing cost by simulation optimization. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;147:634–646.10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.04.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang HA, Lv YY, Xia CK, et al. Optimal computing budget allocation for ordinal optimization in solving stochastic job shop scheduling problems. Math Probl Eng. 2014;10 pages.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng SC, Lin SS, Yang FY. Evolutionary algorithm for stochastic job shop scheduling with random processing time. Expert Sys Appl. 2012;39(3):3603–3610.10.1016/j.eswa.2011.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng SC, Lin SS. Integrating ant colony system and ordinal optimization for solving stochastic job shop scheduling problem. The 6th International Conference on Intelligent Systems, Modelling and Simulation; Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: 2015. p. 70–75.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh BW, Chang SC, Chen CH. Efficient composition of good enough dispatching policies for semiconductor manufacturing. IEEE International Symposium on Semiconductor Manufacturing; San Jose, CA: 2003. p. 67–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh BW, Chen CH, Chang SC. Efficient simulation-based composition of scheduling policies by integrating ordinal optimization with design of experiment. IEEE Trans. 2007;4(4):553–568.
   Google Scholar
• Smith DE. An empirical investigation of optimum-seeking in the computer simulation situation. Oper Res. 1973;21:475–497.10.1287/opre.21.2.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Sava A, Xie X. A simulation based optimization method for multi-stage production-distribution systems subject to non-analytical constraints. Control Conference (ECC), IEEE; Kos, Greece: 2007. p. 2799–2805.
   Google Scholar
• Earl C, Song DP, Hicks C. Planning complex engineer-to-order products. Recent Advances in Integrated Design and Manufacturing in Mechanical Engineering. Springer Netherlands; 2003. p. 463–472.10.1007/978-94-017-0161-7
   Google Scholar
• Matinnejad R, Nejati S, Briand L, et al. Search-based automated testing of continuous controllers: Framework, tool support, and case studies. Inf Softw Technol. 2015;57:705–722.10.1016/j.infsof.2014.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelder JA, Mead R. A simplex method for function minimization. Comput J. 1965;7(4):308–313.10.1093/comjnl/7.4.308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box MJ. A new method of constrained optimization and a comparison with other methods. Comput J. 1965;8(1):42–52.10.1093/comjnl/8.1.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghiasi H, Pasini D, Lessard L. Constrained globalized Nelder–Mead method for simultaneous structural and manufacturing optimization of a composite bracket. J Compos Mater. 2008;42(7):717–736.10.1177/0021998307088592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooke R, Jeeves TA. ‘Direct search’ solution of numerical and statistical problems. J Assoc Comput Mach. 1961;8:212–229.10.1145/321062.321069
   Google Scholar
• Chen MC, Tsai DM. Simulation optimization through direct search for multi-objective manufacturing systems. Prod Plan Control. 1996;7(6):554–565.10.1080/09537289608930389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Echeverría CD, Isebor OJ, Durlofsky LJ. Application of derivative-free methodologies to generally constrained oil production optimisation problems. Int J Math Model Numer Optim. 2011;2(2):134–161.
   Google Scholar
• Safizadeh MH, Signorile R. Optimization of simulation via quasi-newton methods. ORSA J Comput. 1994;6:398–408.10.1287/ijoc.6.4.398
   Google Scholar
• Theodore TA, Yu LY. Low-cost response surface methods from simulation optimization. Qual Reliab Eng Int. 2002;18(1):5–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noguera JH, Watson EF. Response surface analysis of a multi-product batch processing facility using a simulation metamodel. Int J Prod Econ. 2006;102(2):333–343.10.1016/j.ijpe.2005.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gharbi A, Kenne JP. Optimal production control problem in stochastic multiple-product multiple-machine manufacturing systems. IIE Trans. 2003;35(10):941–952.10.1080/07408170309342346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mosca R, Cassettari L, Revetria R, et al. Simulation as support for production planning in small and medium enterprise: a case study. Proceedings of the 37th Conference on Winter Simulation; Orlando, Florida: 2005. p. 2443–2448.
   Google Scholar
• Bouslah B, Gharbi A, Pellerin R. Joint optimal lot sizing and production control policy in an unreliable and imperfect manufacturing system. Int J Prod Econ. 2013;144(1):143–156.10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Jiang Z, Guo C. Simulation-based optimization of dispatching rules for semiconductor wafer fabrication system scheduling by the response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;41(1–2):110–121.10.1007/s00170-008-1462-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivera-Gómez H, Gharbi A, Kenné JP. Joint production and major maintenance planning policy of a manufacturing system with deteriorating quality. Int J Prod Econ. 2013;146(2):575–587.10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.08.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen T. The optimized-rule-fusion and certain-rule-first approach for multi-objective job scheduling in a wafer fabrication factory. Int J Innov Comput Inf Control. 2013;9(6):2283–2302.
   Google Scholar
• Hu H, Zhang H. A simulation-based two-stage scheduling methodology for controlling semiconductor wafer fabs. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(14):11677–11684.10.1016/j.eswa.2012.04.042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouslah B, Gharbi A, Pellerin R. Joint production and quality control of unreliable batch manufacturing systems with rectifying inspection. Int J Prod Res. 2014;52(14):4103–4117.10.1080/00207543.2012.746481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenne JP, Gharbi A. A simulation optimization approach in production planning of failure prone manufacturing systems. J Intell Manuf. 2001;12(5–6):421–431.10.1023/A:1012244218961
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenné JP, Gharbi A. Stohastic optimal production control problem with corrective maintenance. Comput Ind Eng. 2004;46(4):865–875.10.1016/j.cie.2004.05.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berthaut F, Gharbi A, Pellerin R. Joint hybrid repair and remanufacturing systems and supply control. Int J Prod Res. 2010;48(14):4101–4121.10.1080/00207540902933148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Assid M, Gharbi A, Dhouib K. Joint production and subcontracting planning of unreliable multi-facility multi-product production systems. Omega. 2015;50:54–69.10.1016/j.omega.2014.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan H, Yin G, Lou SXC. Using stochastic optimization to determine threshold values for the control of unreliable manufacturing systems. J Optim Theory Appl. 1994;83(3):511–539.10.1007/BF02207640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fu M, Xie XL. Perturbation analysis of two-stage continuous transfer lines subject to operation-dependent failures. Proceedings of the 37th IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control, Vol. 2; 1998 Dec; Tampa, FL; 1998. p. 1698–1703.
   Google Scholar
• Koltai T, Lozano S. Sensitivity calculation of the throughput of an FMS with respect to the routing mix using perturbation analysis. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;105(3):483–493.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00064-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasan CN, Spearman ML. Optimal material release times in stochastic production environments. Int J Prod Res. 1999;37(6):1201–1216.10.1080/002075499191210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang C, Zhao R, Tang W. Optimal run lengths in deteriorating production processes in random fuzzy environments. Comput Ind Eng. 2009;57(3):941–948.10.1016/j.cie.2009.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kacar NB, Uzsoy R. Estimating clearing functions for production resources using simulation optimization. Autom Sci Eng IEEE Trans. 2015;12(2):539–552.10.1109/TASE.2014.2303316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Homem-de-Mello T, Shapiro A, Spearman ML. Finding optimal material release times using simulation-based optimization. Manage Sci. 1999;45(1):86–102.10.1287/mnsc.45.1.86
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng JN, Chang KH, Chien CF. A simulation optimization-based framework for capacity planning under uncertainty. Computers and industrial engineering (CIE), 2010 40th International Conference, IEEE; Awaji, Japan: 2010. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mourani I, Hennequin S, Xie X. Simulation-based optimization of a single-stage failure-prone manufacturing system with transportation delay. Int J Prod Econ. 2008;112(1):26–36.10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsai CS. Evaluation and optimisation of integrated manufacturing system operations using Taguch's experiment design in computer simulation. Comput Ind Eng. 2002;43(3):591–604.10.1016/S0360-8352(02)00127-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feyzioğlu O, Pierreval H, Deflandre DA. A simulation-based optimization approach to size manufacturing systems. Int J Prod Res. 2005;43(2):247–266.10.1080/0020754042000264617
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrenberg C, Zimmermann J. Simulation-based optimization in make-to-order production: scheduling for a special-purpose glass manufacturer. Proceedings of the 2012 Winter Simulation Conference; IEEE; Berlin, Germany: 2012. p. 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Arakawa M, Fuyuki M, Inoue I. An optimization-oriented method for simulation-based job shop scheduling incorporating capacity adjustment function. Int J Prod Econ. 2003;85(3):359–369.10.1016/S0925-5273(03)00122-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weigert G, Horn S, Werner S. Optimization of manufacturing processes by distributed simulation. Int J Prod Res. 2006;44(18–19):3677–3692.10.1080/00207540600851774
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rey GZ, Bonte T, Prabhu V, et al. Reducing myopic behavior in FMS control: a semi-heterarchical simulation-optimization approach. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2014;46:53–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng HC, Chan DYK. Simulation optimization of part input sequence in a flexible manufacturing system. Proceedings of Winter Simulation Conference; Phoenix, AZ: 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck T, Schwefel HP. An overview of evolutionary algorithms for parameter optimization. Evol Comput. 1993;1:1–23.10.1162/evco.1993.1.1.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient heuristic for global optimization over continuous spaces. J Glob Optim. 1997;11(4):341–359.10.1023/A:1008202821328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Song SJ, Wu C. A hybrid differential evolution algorithm for job shop scheduling problems with expected total tardiness criterion. Appl Soft Comput. 2013;13:1448–1458.10.1016/j.asoc.2012.02.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geem Z, Kim J, Loganathan G. A new heuristic optimization algorithm: harmony search. Simulation. 2001;76(2):60–68.10.1177/003754970107600201
   Google Scholar
• Larranaga P, Lozano JA. Estimation of distribution algorithms: a new tool for evolutionary computation. Boston, MA: Kluwer Press; 2002.10.1007/978-1-4615-1539-5
   Google Scholar
• Tautou L, Pierreval H. Using evolutionary algorithms and simulation for the optimization of manufacturing systems. IIE Trans. 1997;29(3):181–189.
   Google Scholar
• Kämpf M, Köchel P. Simulation-based sequencing and lot size optimisation for a production-and-inventory system with multiple items. Int J Prod Econ. 2006;104:191–200.10.1016/j.ijpe.2006.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeong SJ, Lim SJ, Kim KS. Hybrid approach to production scheduling using genetic algorithm and simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2006;28:129–136.10.1007/s00170-004-2345-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan Z, Wang C, Huang J, et al. Optimization of manufacturing systems using genetic search and multi-resolution simulation. 8th IEEE International Conference (ICCA) on Control and Automation; Xiamen, China: 2010. p. 1473–1480.
   Google Scholar
• Lee H, Kim SS. Integration of process planning and scheduling using simulation based genetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2001;18:586–590.10.1007/s001700170035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Zhang L, Zheng DZ. A class of hypothesis-test-based genetic algorithms for flow shop scheduling with stochastic processing time. J Adv Manuf Technol. 2005;25:1157–1163.10.1007/s00170-003-1961-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durand GA, Mele FD, Bandoni JA. Determination of storage tanks location for optimal short-term scheduling in multipurpose/multiproduct batch-continuous plants under uncertainties. Ann Oper Res. 2012;199(1):225–247.10.1007/s10479-011-0970-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang T. An evolutionary simulation–optimization approach in solving parallel-machine scheduling problems – a case study. Comput Ind Eng. 2009;56(3):1126–1136.10.1016/j.cie.2008.09.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee CY, Piramuthu S, Tsai YK. Job shop scheduling with a genetic algorithm and machine learning. Int J Prod Res. 1997;35(4):1171–1191.10.1080/002075497195605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huyet AL. Optimization and analysis aid via data-mining for simulated production systems. Eur J Oper Res. 2006;173:827–838.10.1016/j.ejor.2005.07.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan Y, Wang GX. A job shop scheduling approach based on simulation optimization. IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management; 2007 Dec 2–4. p. 1816–1822.10.1109/IEEM.2007.4419506
   Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Song SJ, Wu C. A dispatching rule-based hybrid genetic algorithm focusing on non-delay schedules for the job shop scheduling problem. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2013;67:5–17.10.1007/s00170-013-4751-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gholami M, Zandieh M. Integrating simulation and genetic algorithm to schedule a dynamic flexible job shop. J Intell Manuf. 2008;20:481–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemmoe-Tchomte S, Lamy D, Tchernev N. A metaheuristic based on simulation for stochastic job-shop optimization. 2015 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management (IESM); Seville, Spain: 2015. p. 108–116.10.1109/IESM.2015.7380144
   Google Scholar
• Ca Garcia-Santiago, Del Ser J, Upton C, et al. A random-key encoded harmony search approach for energy-efficient production scheduling with shared resources. Eng Optim. 2015;47(11):1481–1496.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang R, Ong SK, Nee AYC. A simulation-based genetic algorithm approach for remanufacturing process planning and scheduling. Appl Soft Comput. 2015;37:521–532.10.1016/j.asoc.2015.08.051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabelo L, Yih Y, Jones A, et al. Intelligent scheduling for flexible manufacturing systems. Proceedings of 1993 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation. Vol. 3; 1993 May 2–6. p. 810–815.
   Google Scholar
• Chan FTS, Chung SH, Chan LY, et al. Solving distributed FMS scheduling problems subject to maintenance: Genetic algorithms approach. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2006;22:493–504.10.1016/j.rcim.2005.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang L, Wang SY, Liu M. A Pareto-based estimation of distribution algorithm for the multi-objective flexible job-shop scheduling problem. Int J Prod Res. 2012;51(12):3574–3592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemmt A, Horn S, Weigert G, et al. Simulations-based and solver-based optimization approaches for batch processes in semiconductor manufacturing. 2008 Winter Simulation Conference; Miami, Florida: 2008. p. 2041–2049.10.1109/WSC.2008.4736300
   Google Scholar
• Gao R, Qiao F, Ma Y, et al. A simulation based optimization approach for scheduling of a semiconductor manufacturing system. IEEE International Conference on System Science and Engineering (JCSSE); 2014 Jul 11–13; Shanghai.
   Google Scholar
• Ma YM, Qiao F, Yu W, et al. Parallel simulation-based optimization on scheduling of a semiconductor manufacturing system. Proceedings of the 2014 Winter Simulation Conference; 2014. p. 2571–2579.
   Google Scholar
• Lin JT, Chen CM. Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Simul Model Pract Theory. 2015;51:100–114.10.1016/j.simpat.2014.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ponsignon T, Mönch L. Simulation-based performance assessment of master planning approaches in semiconductor manufacturing. Omega. 2014;46:21–35.10.1016/j.omega.2014.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glover F. Future paths for integer programming and links to artificial intelligence. Comput Oper Res. 1986;13(5):533–549.10.1016/0305-0548(86)90048-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiang WC, Urban TL, Xu XJ. A bi-objective metaheuristic approach to unpaced synchronous production line-balancing problems. Int J Prod Res. 2012;50(1):293–306.10.1080/00207543.2011.571460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Maghsoudi A. Optimization of production systems through integration of computer simulation, design of experiment, and Tabu search: the case of a large steelmaking workshop. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;48(5–8):785–800.10.1007/s00170-009-2305-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang T, Kuo Y, Chang I. Tabu-search simulation optimization approach for flow-shop scheduling with multiple processors- a case study. Int J Prod Res. 2004;42(19):4015–4030.10.1080/00207540410001699381
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lutz CM, Davis KR, Sun M. Determining buffer location and size in production lines using tabu search. Eur J Oper Res. 1998;106(2–3):301–316.10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00276-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edis RS, Ornek MA. A tabu search-based heuristic for single-product lot streaming problems in flow shops. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2009;43:1202–1213.10.1007/s00170-008-1798-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengiz B, Alabas C. Simulation optimization using tabu search. Proceedings of the 2000 Winter Simulation Conference. Orlando: IEEE; 2000. p. 805−810.
   Google Scholar
• Moon I, Lee SH, Shin M, et al. Evolutionary resource assignment for workload-based production scheduling. J Intell Manuf. 2016;27:375–388.10.1007/s10845-014-0870-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang LP, Gao L, Li XY. A hybrid genetic algorithm and tabu search for a multi-objective dynamic job shop scheduling problem. Int J Prod Res. 2013;51(12):3516–3531.10.1080/00207543.2012.751509
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahzad A, Mebarki N. Data mining based job dispatching using hybrid simulation-optimization approach for shop scheduling problem. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2012;25:1173–1181.10.1016/j.engappai.2012.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manz EM, Haddock J, Mittenthal J. Optimization of an automated manufacturing system simulation model using simulated annealing. Proceedings of the 1989 Winter Simulation Conference. Washington, D.C.: 1989; p. 390–395.
   Google Scholar
• Cave A, Nahavandi S, Kouzani A. Schedule evaluation: simulation optimization for process scheduling through simulated annealing. Proceedings of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference. San Diego, California: 2002. p. 1909–1913.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Wang L, Tang F. Hypothesis-test based simulated annealing for stochastic flow shop scheduling. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics; 2003 Nov 2–5; Xi’an.
   Google Scholar
• Allaoui H, Artiba A. Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule a hybrid flow shop with maintenance constraints. Comput Ind Eng. 2004;47:431–450.10.1016/j.cie.2004.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nawaz M, Enscore E Jr, Ham I. A heuristic algorithm for the M-machine, N-job flow-shop sequencing problem. Omega. 1983;11:91–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safari E, Sadjadi SJ, Shahanaghi K. Scheduling flowshops with condition-based maintenance constraint to minimize expected makespan. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;46(5–8):757–767.10.1007/s00170-009-2151-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari H, Dadgar M. Scheduling optimization of a stochastic flexible job-shop system with time-varying machine failure rate. Comput Oper Res. 2015;61:31–45.10.1016/j.cor.2015.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morito S, Mizoguchi K, Lee KH. Exploration of a minimum tardiness dispatching priority for a flexible manufacturing system – a combined simulation/optimization approach. Proceedings of the 25th Winter Simulation Conference; Los Angeles, California: 1993. p. 829–837.
   Google Scholar
• Bard JF, Srinivasan K, Tirupati D. An optimization approach to capacity expansion in semiconductor manufacturing facilities. Int J Prod Res. 1999;37(15):3359–3382.10.1080/002075499190095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosen SL, Harmonosky CM. An improved simulated annealing simulation optimization method for discrete parameter stochastic systems. Comput Oper Res. 2005;32(2):343–358.10.1016/S0305-0548(03)00240-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deroussi L, Gourgand M, Tchernev N. Combining optimization methods and discrete event simulation: a case study in flexible manufacturing systems. Int Conf Serv Syst Serv Manage. 2006;1:495–500.
   Google Scholar
• Uhlig T, Rose O. Simulation-based optimization for groups of cluster tools in semiconductor manufacturing using simulated annealing. Proceedings of the 2011 Winter Simulation Conference; Phoenix, Arizona: 2011. p. 1852–1863.
   Google Scholar
• Alkhamis TM, Ahmed MA. Simulation-based optimization for repairable systems using particle swarm algorithm. Proceedings of the 2005 Winter Simulation Conference (WSC); 2005. p. 857–861.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao FQ, Tang JX, Wang JB. An improved particle swarm optimization with decline disturbance index (DDPSO) for multi-objective job-shop scheduling problem. Comput Oper Res. 2014;45:38–50.10.1016/j.cor.2013.11.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ahmadizar F, Ghazanfari M, Fatemi Ghomi SMT. Group shops scheduling with makespan criterion subject to random release dates and processing times. Comput Oper Res. 2010;37:152–162.10.1016/j.cor.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing LN, Chen YW, Yang KW. Multi-objective flexible job shop schedule: design and evaluation by simulation modeling. Appl Soft Comput. 2009;9:362–376.10.1016/j.asoc.2008.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xing LN, Chen YW, Yang KW. Multi-population Interactive coevolutionary algorithm for flexible job shop scheduling problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2009;48(1):39–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejtsky GJ. The improved sweep metaheuristic for simulation optimization and application to job shop scheduling. Proceedings of the 2008 Winter Simulation Conference; Miami, Florida: 2008. p. 731–739.
   Google Scholar
• Löhndorf N, Riel M, Minner S. Simulation optimization for the stochastic economic lot scheduling problem with sequence-dependent setup times. Int J Prod Econ. 2014;157:170–176.10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.05.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemmt A, Horn S, Weigert G, et al. Simulation-based optimization vs. mathematical programming: a hybrid approach for optimizing scheduling problems. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2009;25(6):917–925.10.1016/j.rcim.2009.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar