A simulation-based optimization approach for external trucks appointment scheduling in container terminals

References

• Imo.org [Internet]. London, United Kingdom: IMO Publishing [cited 2017 Feb 23]. Available from: http://www.imo.org/en/Publications/
   Google Scholar
• Stahlbock R, Voß S. Operations research at container terminals: a literature update. OR Spectr. 2008;30:1–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange A, Schwientek A, Jahn C. Reducing truck congestion at ports – classification and trends. Hamburg International Conference of Logistics; Hamburg, Germany; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Giuliano G, O’Brien T. Reducing port-related truck emissions: the terminal gate appointment system at the ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2007;12:460–473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ports of Long Beach. PierPass terminals embrace appointment systems at ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach to control congestion [WWW Document]. California (USA): PierPass Inc; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Murty KG, Wan YW, Liu J, et al. Hongkong international terminals gain elastic capacity using a data-intensive decision-support system. Interfaces (Providence). 2005;35:61–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh NN, Walton CM, River R. Methodologies for reducing truck turn time at marine container terminals. Cent Transp Res Univ Texas Austin. 2005;7:1–144.
   Google Scholar
• Namboothiri R, Erera AL. Planning local container drayage operations given a port access appointment system. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2008;44:185–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan C, Liu R. Modeling gate congestion of marine container terminals, truck waiting cost, and optimization. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board. 2009;2100:58–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Yang Z. Optimizing time windows for managing export container arrivals at Chinese container terminals. Marit Econ Logist. 2010;12:111–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X, Zhou X, List GF. Using time-varying tolls to optimize truck arrivals at ports. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2011;47:965–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zeng Q, Chen W. Optimization model for truck appointment in container terminals. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2013;96:1938–1947.
   Google Scholar
• Chen G, Govindan K, Yang ZZ, et al. Terminal appointment system design by non-stationary M(t)/E k/c(t) queueing model and genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Econ. 2013c;146:694–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azab AE, Eltawil AB. A simulation based study of the effect of truck arrival patterns on truck turn time in container terminals. In: editors Claus T, Herrmann F, Manitz M. ECMS 2016 proceedings. Regensburg (Germany): Oliver Rose European Council; 2016. Vol. 2. 7.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Goodchild AV. The impact of truck arrival information on container terminal rehandling. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2010;46:327–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao W, Goodchild AV. Using the truck appointment system to improve yard efficiency in container terminals. Marit Econ Logist. 2013;15:101–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• González-Ramírez ARRG, Smith NR, Stefan RG. Impact on yard efficiency of a truck appointment system for a port terminal. Ann Oper Res. 2016. DOI:10.1007/s10479-016-2384-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Govindan K, Yang Z. Managing truck arrivals with time windows to alleviate gate congestion at container terminals. Int J Prod Econ. 2013b;141:179–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Jiang L. Managing customer arrivals with time windows: a case of truck arrivals at a congested container terminal. Ann Oper Res. 2016;1–17. DOI:10.1007/s10479-016-2150-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Govindan K, Golias MM. Reducing truck emissions at container terminals in a low carbon economy: proposal of a queueing-based bi-objective model for optimizing truck arrival pattern. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2013a;55:3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulte F, González RG, Voß S. Reducing port-related truck emissions: coordinated truck appointments to reduce empty truck trips. International Conference on Computational Logistics; Delft, The Netherlands; 2015. p. 495–509.
   Google Scholar
• Li N, Chen G, Govindan K, et al. Disruption management for truck appointment system at a container terminal: A green initiative. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ. 2015. DOI:10.1016/j.trd.2015.12.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan MH, Kim KH. Negotiating truck arrival times among trucking companies and a container terminal. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev. 2015;75:132–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phan MH, Kim KH. Collaborative truck scheduling and appointments for trucking companies and container terminals. Transp Res Part B Methodol. 2016;86:37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azab A, Karam A, Eltawil A. A dynamic and collaborative truck appointment management system in container terminals. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Operations Research and Enterprise Systems - Volume 1. Porto (Portugal): ICORES; 2017. ISBN 978-989-758-218-9, p. 85–95. DOI: 10.5220/0006188100850095
   Google Scholar
• Ilati G, Sheikholeslami A, Hassannayebi E. A simulation-based optimization approach for integrated port resource allocation problem. PROMET-Traffic&Transportation. 2014;26(3):243–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Wang W, Xu X, et al. A simulation-based dynamic programming method for interchange scheduling of port collecting and distributing network. J Adv Transp. 2018;2018:1–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou C, Li H, Lee BK, et al. A simulation-based vessel-truck coordination strategy for lighterage terminals. Transp Res Part C Emerging Technol. 2018;95:149–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azab A, Karam A, Eltawil A. Impact of collaborative external truck scheduling on yard efficiency in container terminals. In: editors, Parlier G, Liberatore F, Demange M. Operations research and enterprise systems. ICORES 2017. Communications in computer and information science. Vol. 884. Cham: Springer; 2018. p. 105–128.
   Google Scholar
• Heilig L, Lalla-Ruiz E, Voß S. Digital transformation in maritime ports: analysis and a game theoretic framework. NETNOMICS: Econ Res Electron Networking. 2017a;18(2–3):227–254.
   Google Scholar
• Ferretti M, Schiavone F, Manlio Del Giudice P. Internet of Things and business processes redesign in seaports: the case of Hamburg. Bus Process Manage J. 2016;22(2):271–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heilig L, Lalla-Ruiz E, Voß S. port-IO: an integrative mobile cloud platform for real-time inter-terminal truck routing optimization. Flex Serv Manuf J. 2017b;29(3–4):504–534.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xia F, Yang LT, Wang L, et al. Internet of things. Int J Commun Syst. 2012;25(9):1101–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar