Layout optimization of injection process by considering integrated resilience engineering: a fuzzy-DEA approach

References

• Ranjbar M, Razavi MN. A hybrid metaheuristic for concurrent layout and scheduling problem in a job shop environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2012;62(9–12):1249–1260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemke H-J, Schmidt F, Schroder A. Modelling and identification of injection moulding process. Int J Model Simul. 1982;2(4):201–204.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Motevali Haghighi S, Asadzadeh SM. A novel algorithm for layout optimization of injection process with random demands and sequence dependent setup times. J Manuf Syst. 2014;33(2):287–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods DD, Hollnagel E. Epilogue: resilience engineering precepts. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N, editors. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. CRC Press;. 2006. p. 347–358.
   Google Scholar
• Keller B, Buscher U. Single row layout models. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;245(3):629–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amaral ARS. A parallel ordering problem in facilities layout. Comput Oper Res. 2013;40(12):2930–2939.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Srinivas C, Satyanarayana B, Ramji K, et al. Modeling and simulation of row based flexible manufacturing systems. Int J Appl Eng Res. 2011;6(8):989–997.
   Google Scholar
• Jithavech I, Krishnan KK. A simulation-based approach for risk assessment of facility layout designs under stochastic product demands. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2010;49(1–4):27–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu R, Xie X, Yu K, et al. A survey on simulation optimization for the manufacturing system operation. Int J Model Simul. 2018;38(2):116–127.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari R, Ghosh D. Insertion based Lin-Kernighan heuristic for single row facility layout. Comput Oper Res. 2013;40(1):129–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Datta D, Amaral ARS, Figueira JR. Single row facility layout problem using a permutation-based genetic algorithm. Eur J Oper Res. 2011;213(2):388–394.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palubeckis G. Fast local search for single row facility layout. Eur J Oper Res. 2015;246(3):800–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Lin G. A multi-start local search algorithm for the single row facility layout problem. Int J Inovative Comouting Inf Control. 2016;12(3):859–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palubeckis G. Fast simulated annealing for single-row equidistant facility layout. Appl Math Comput. 2015;263:287–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ou-Yang C, Utamima A. Hybrid estimation of distribution algorithm for solving single row facility layout problem. Comput Ind Eng. 2013;66(1):95–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guan J, Lin G. Hybridizing variable neighborhood search with ant colony optimization for solving the single row facility layout problem. Eur J Oper Res. 2016;248(3):899–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi-Vencheh A, Mohamadghasemi A. An integrated AHP–NLP methodology for facility layout design. J Manuf Syst. 2013;32(1):40–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu JC, Chiu PL. Fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS integrated multicriteria decision-making scheme employing Chinese environmental esthetics for facility layout design evaluation. J Ind Prod Eng. 2015;32(8):473–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang T, Hung C. Multiple-attribute decision making methods for plant layout design problem. Robot Comput Integr Manuf. 2007;23(1):126–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li S, Jahanshahloo GR, Khodabakhshi M. A super-efficiency model for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Comput. 2007;184(2):638–648.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sueyoshi T. Stochastic DEA for restructure strategy: an application to a japanese petroleum company. Omega (Westport). 2000;28(4):385–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodabakhshi M, Asgharian M, Gregoriou GN. An input-oriented super-efficiency measure in stochastic data envelopment analysis: evaluating chief executive officers of US public banks and thrifts. Expert Syst Appl. 2010;37(3):2092–2097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ertay T, Ruan D, Tuzkaya UR. Integrating data envelopment analysis and analytic hierarchy for the facility layout design in manufacturing systems. Inf Sci. 2006;176(3):237–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahiri B, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Rezaei-Malek M. An MCDA-DEA approach for mixed-model assembly line balancing problem under uncertainty. J Intell Fuzzy Syst. 2016;30(5):2737–2748.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Moghaddam M, Nazari T, et al. Optimization of facility layout design with ambiguity by an efficient fuzzy multivariate approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. 2016;84(1–4):565–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee HY, Tseng HH. A hybrid system for facility layout by integrating simulation and ant colony optimization. Appl Math Inf Sci. 2012;6(2 SUPPL.):387S–396S.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Motevali Haghighi S, Asadzadeh SM, et al. A new approach for layout optimization in maintenance workshops with safety factors: the case of a gas transmission unit. J Loss Prev Process Ind. 2013;26(6):1457–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Heydari R, Yazdanparast R, et al. An integrated fuzzy simulation-mathematical programming approach for layout optimization by considering resilience engineering factors: a gas transmission unit. World J Eng. 2016;13(6):547–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao Y, Wallace SW. Appraising redundancy in facility layout. Int J Prod Res. 2016;54(3):665–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Hasannia Kolaee M, Salehi V. The impact of redundancy on resilience engineering in a petrochemical plant by data envelopment analysis. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab. 2016;230(3):285–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Salehi V, Kianpour M. Performance evaluation of rail transportation systems by considering resilience engineering factors: Tehran railway electrification system. Transp Lett. 2016;10(1):12–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrin M, Azadeh A. Simulation optimization of lean production strategy by considering resilience engineering in a production system with maintenance policies. Simulation. 2017;93(1):49–68.
   Google Scholar
• Wreathall J. Properties of resilient organizations: an initial view. In: Hollnagel E, Woods DD, Leveson N, editors. Resilience engineering: concepts and precepts. CRC Press; 2006. p. 275–285.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Salehi V, Ashjari B, et al. Performance evaluation of integrated resilience engineering factors by data envelopment analysis: the case of a petrochemical plant. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2014;92(3):231–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A. RE. Cooper W.W. measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. Eur J Oper Res. 1978;2(6):429–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Banker RD. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage Sci. 1984;30(9):1078–1092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Salehi V, Salehi R. A resilience-based model for performance evaluation of information systems: the case of a gas company. Enterp Inf Syst. 2017;11(9):1337–1351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Kokabi R, Z-number DEA. A new possibilistic DEA in the context of Z-numbers. Adv Eng Informatics. 2016;30(3):604–617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson TW, Darling DA. A test of goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc. 1954;49(268):765–769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petritr AN. Testing the normality of several independent samples using the Anderson-Darling Statistic. Wiley R. Stat. Soc. Stable. 1977;26(2):156–161.
   Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Salmanzadeh-Meydani N, Motevali-Haghighi S. Performance optimization of an aluminum factory in economic crisis by integrated resilience engineering and mathematical programming. Saf Sci. 2017;91:335–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azadeh A, Salehi V. Modeling and optimizing efficiency gap between managers and operators in integrated resilient systems: the case of a petrochemical plant. Process Saf Environ Prot. 2014;92(6):766–778.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar