Dynamics of stage-structured prey–predator model with prey refuge and harvesting

References

• Lotka A. Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins; 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Volterra V. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero dindividui in specie conviventi. Mem Acad Lin Roma. 1926;2:31–113.
   Google Scholar
• Barman B, Ghosh B. Dynamics of a spatially coupled model with delayed prey dispersal. Int J Model and Simul. 2021. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1926048
   Google Scholar
• Jana A, Roy SK. Behavioural analysis of two prey-two predator model. Ecol Complex. 2021;47:100942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jana A, Roy SK. Holling-Tanner prey-predator model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response including delay. Int J Model Simul. 2020;1–15. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2020.1839168
   Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D. Dynamical study of non-integer order predator-prey system with fear effect. Int J Model Simul. 2021. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1926049
   Google Scholar
• Panja P. Dynamics of a fractional order predator-prey model with intraguild predation. Int J Model Simul. 2019;39(4):256–268.
   Google Scholar
• Perumal R, Munigounder S, Mohd MH, et al. Stability analysis of the fractional-order prey-predator model with infection. Int J Model Simul. 2020;1–17. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2020.1783131.
   Google Scholar
• Roy B, Roy SK. Analysis of prey-predator three species models with vertebral and invertebral predators. Int J Dyn Cont. 2015;3(3):306–312.
   Google Scholar
• Roy B, Roy SK, Biswas M. Effects on prey-predator with different functional responses. Int J Biom. 2017;10(8):1750113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang W, Chen L. A predator-prey system with stage-structure for predator. Comp Math Appl. 1997;33(8):83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Georgescu P, Hsieh YH. Global dynamics of a predator-prey model with stage structure for the predator. SIAM J Appl Math. 2007;67(5):1379–1395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khajanchi S. Dynamic behavior of a Beddington-DeAngelis type stage structured predator-prey model. Appl Math Comp. 2014;244:344–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aiello WG, Freedman H, Wu J. Analysis of a model representing stage-structured population growth with state-dependent time delay. SIAM J Appl Math. 1992;52(3):855–869.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun XK, Huo HF, Ma CC. Hopf bifurcation and stability in predator-prey model with a stage-structure for prey. Appl Math Comp. 2013;219(20):10313–10324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naji RK, Majeed SJ. The dynamical analysis of a prey-predator model with a refuge-stage structure prey population. Int J Diff Equ. 2016;2010464. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/2010464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei F, Fu Q. Hopf bifurcation and stability for predator-prey systems with Beddington-DeAngelis type functional response and stage structure for prey incorporating refuge. Appl Math Model. 2016;40(1):126–134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devi S. Effects of prey refuge on a ratio-dependent predator-prey model with stage-structure of prey population. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(6):4337–4349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar TK. Stability analysis of a prey-predator model incorporating a prey refuge. Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2005;10(6):681–691.
   Google Scholar
• Huang Y, Chen F, Zhong L. Stability analysis of a prey-predator model with Holling type III response function incorporating a prey refuge. Appl Math Comp. 2006;182(1):672–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Mahato SK, Mahato P. Biological control of infection pervasive via pest: a study of prey-predator model incorporating prey refuge under fuzzy impreciseness. Int J Model Simul. 2021;1–25. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1964060
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Samanta GP. Provision of additional food as a tool of biological control in a delayed predator-prey interaction with prey refuge. Int J Model Simul. 2021;1–25. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1949233
   Google Scholar
• Panja P. Combine effects of square root functional response and prey refuge on predator–prey dynamics. Int J Model Simul. 2020;1–8. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2020.1772615
   Google Scholar
• Ma Z, Li W, Zhao Y, et al. Effects of prey refuges on a predator-prey model with a class of functional responses: the role of refuges. Math Bios. 2009;218(2):73–79.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar P, Debnath S, Sarkar S, et al. The complex dynamical behavior of a prey-predator model with holling type III functional response and non-linear predator harvesting. Int J Model Simul. 2021;1–18. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.1882148.
   Google Scholar
• Purohit D, Chaudhuri KS. A bioeconomic model of nonselective harvesting of two competing fish species. ANZIAM. 2004;46(2):299–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy B, Roy SK, Gurung DB. Holling-Tanner model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response and time delay introducing harvesting. Math Comp Simul. 2017;142:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roy SK, Roy B. Analysis of prey-predator three species fishery model with harvesting including prey refuge and migration. Int J Bifurc Chaos. 2016;26(2):1650022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddington JR. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol. 1975;44(1):331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis DL, Goldstein R, O’Neill RV. A model for tropic interaction. Ecology. 1975;56(4):881–892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nagumo M. Über die lage der integralkurven gewöhnlicher differentialgleichungen. Proceedings of the Physico-Mathematical Society of Japan, 3rd Series. Physical Society of Japan, The Mathematical Society of Japan.1942;24:551–559.
   Google Scholar
• Perko L. Differential equations and dynamical systems. New York: springer; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Venkatasubramanian V, Schattler H, Zaborszky J. Local bifurcations and feasibility regions in differential-algebraic systems. IEEE Trans Autom Contr. 1995;40(12):1992–2013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontryagin LS, Boltyanskii VG, Gamkrelidze RV, et al. The mathematical theory of optimal processes. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1962.
   Google Scholar
• Dhooge A, Govaerts W, Kuznetsov YA. MATCONT: a MATLAB package for numerical bifurcation analysis of ODEs. ACM Trans Math Soft. 2003;29(2):141–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghosh J, Sahoo B, Poria S. Prey-predator dynamics with prey refuge providing additional food to predator. Chaos Solit Fract. 2017;96:110–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li MY, Muldowney JS. A geometric approach to global-stability problems. SIAM J Mathe Analy. 1996;27(4):1070–1083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin RH Jr. Logarithmic norms and projections applied to linear differential systems. J Math Analy Appl. 1974;45(2):432–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar