Complex dynamical behaviour of a delayed prey-predator model with square root functional response in presence of fear in the prey

References

• Shigesada N, Kawasaki K, Teramoto E. Spatial segregation of interacting species. J Theor Biol. 1989;79:83–99.
   Google Scholar
• Meng X, Liu R, Zhang T. Adaptive dynamics for a non-autonomous Lotka–Volterra model with size-selective disturbance. Nonlin Anal: Real World Appl. 2014;16:202–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Das S, Mahato SK, Mahato P. Biological control of infection pervasive via pest: a study of prey–predator model incorporating prey refuge under fuzzy impreciseness. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(4):628–652.
   Google Scholar
• Perumal R, Muniyagounder S, Mohd HM, et al. Stability analysis of the fractional-order prey-predator model with infection. Int J Model Simulat. 2021;41(6):434–450.
   Google Scholar
• Malthus TR. An essay on the principle of population as it affects the future improvement of society, with remarks on the speculations of Mr. Goodwin, M. condorcet and other writers. The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd. 1798.
   Google Scholar
• Panja P. Combine effects of square root functional response and prey refuge on predator–prey dynamics. Int J Model Simulat. 2020;41(6):426–433.
   Google Scholar
• Lotka AJ. Elements of physical biology. Baltimore: Williams and Wilkins. 1925.
   Google Scholar
• Volterra V. Variazioni e fluttuazioni del numero dindividui in specie animali conviventi. Mem R Accad Naz Lincei Ser. 1926;VI(2):31–113.
   Google Scholar
• Das A, Roy SK. Dynamics of stage-structured prey–predator model with prey refuge and harvesting. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;1–19. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2021.2007321
   Google Scholar
• Jana DK, Panja P. Effects of supplying additional food for a scavenger species in a prey-predator-scavenger model with quadratic harvesting. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang G, Lu Q, Qian L. Complex dynamics of a Holling type II prey–predator system with state feedback control. Chaos solit fract. 2007;31:448–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pal PJ, Saha T, Sen M, et al. A delayed predator–prey model with strong Allee effect in prey population growth. Nonlinear Dyn. 2011;68(1):23–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kar TK, Matsuda H. Global dynamics and controllability of a harvested prey–predator system with Holling type III functional response. Nonlin Anal: Hybrid Syst. 2007;1:59–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar P, Debnath S, Sarkar S, et al. The complex dynamical behavior of a prey-predator model with holling type-III functional response and non-linear predator harvesting. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(2):287–304.
   Google Scholar
• Tripathi JP, Tyagi S, Abbas S. Global analysis of a delayed density dependent predator–prey model with Crowley–Martin functional response. Commun Nonlin Sci Numer Simulat. 2016;30:45–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majumdar P, Bhattacharya S, Sarkar S, et al. On optimal harvesting policy for two economically beneficial species mysida and herring: a clue for conservation biologist through mathematical model. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;1–23. DOI:10.1080/02286203.2022.2064708
   Google Scholar
• Jana A, Roy SK. Holling-Tanner prey-predator model with Beddington-DeAngelis functional response including delay. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(1):86–100.
   Google Scholar
• Debnath S, Ghosh U, Sarkar S. Global dynamics of a tritrophic food chain model subject to the Allee effects in the prey population with sexually reproductive generalized-type top predator. Comp and Math Methods. 2019;2(2):e1079.
   Google Scholar
• Xiao Y, Chen L. Modeling and analysis of a predator–prey model with disease in the prey. Math Biosci. 2001;171:59–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu C, Li Z. Influence of intraspecific density dependence on a three-species food chain with and without external stochastic disturbances. Ecol Model. 2002;155:71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddington JR. Mutual interference between parasites or predators and its effect on searching efficiency. J Anim Ecol. 1975;44(1):331–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morozov A, Petrovskii S, Li B. Bifurcations and chaos in a predator–prey system with the Allee effect. Proc Roy Soc London B: Biol Sci. 2004;271:1407–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chowdhury T, Chakraborty S, Chattopadhyay J. Migratory effect of middle predator in a tritrophic food chain model. Math Meth Appl Sci. 2010;33:1699–1711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song Z, Zhen B, Xu J. Species coexistence and chaotic behavior induced by multiple delays in a food chain system. Ecol Compl. 2014;19:9–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor RJ. “Predation”. 1984. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zanette L, Zou X. Modeling the fear effect in predator–prey interactions. J Math Biol. 2016;73(5):1179–1204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadim SS, Samanta S, Pal N, et al. Impact of predator signals on the stability of a predator–prey system: a Z-control approach. Diff Eqs Dyn Syst. 2022;30:451–467. DOI:10.1007/s12591-018-0430-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukherjee D. Dynamical study of non-integer order predator–prey system with fear effect. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(3):441–449.
   Google Scholar
• Altendorf KB, Laundre JW, Gonzalez CAL, et al. Assessing effects of predation risk on foraging behavior of mule deer. J Mammal. 2001;82:430–439.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel S, Christianson D, Liley S, et al. Predation risk affects reproductive physiology and demography of elk. Science. 2007;315:960.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creel S, Christianson D. Relationships between direct predation and risk effects. Trends Ecol Evol. 2008;23:194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zanette LY, White AF, Allen MC, et al. Perceived predation risk reduces the number of offspring songbirds produce per year. Science. 2011;334:1398–1401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suraci JP, Clinchy M, Dill LM, et al. Fear of large carnivores causes a trophic cascade. Nat Commun. 2016;7:10698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candolin U. Reproduction under predation risk and the trade-off between current and future reproduction in the threespine stickleback. Proc Roy Soc London Ser B: Biol Sci. 1998;265:1171–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holling CS. The functional response of predators to prey density and its role in mimicry and population regulation. The Memoirs of the Entomological Society of Canada. 1965;97(S45):5–60.
   Google Scholar
• Holling CS. The components of predation as revealed by a study of small-mammal predation of the European pine sawfly1. Can Entomol. 1959;91(5):293–320.
   Google Scholar
• Panday P, Pal N, Samanta S, et al. Stability and bifurcation analysis of a three-species food chain model with fear. Int J Bifurc Chaos. 2018;28:1850009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brehmer P, Gerlotto F, Laurent C, et al. Schooling behaviour of small pelagic fish: phenotypic expression of independent stimuli. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007;334:263–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ajraldi V, Pittavino M, Venturino E. Modelling herd behavior in population systems. Nonlinear Anal R W A. 2011;12:2319–2338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braza PA. Predator-prey dynamics with square root functional responses. Nonlinear Anal R W A. 2012;13:1837–1843.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salman SM, Yousef AM, Elsadany AA. Stability, bifurcation analysis and chaos control of a discrete predator-prey system with square root functional response. Chaos Soliton Fract. 2016;93:20–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulai IM, Venturino E. Shape effects on herd behavior in ecological interacting population models. Math Comput Simul. 2017;141:40–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maiti A, Sen P, Samanta GP. Deterministic and stochastic analysis of a prey-predator model with herd behaviour in both. Syst Sci Control Eng. 2016;4:259–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang W. Analysis on existence of bifurcation solutions for a predator-prey model with herd behavior. Appl Math Model. 2017;53:433–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng Y, Zhang G. Dynamics analysis of a predator-prey model with herd behavior and nonlocal prey competition. Math Comput Simul. 2019;170:366–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Djilali S. Impact of prey herd shape on the predator-prey interaction. Chaos Soliton Fract. 2019;120:139–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman B, Ghosh B. Dynamics of a spatially coupled model with delayed prey dispersal. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(3):400–414.
   Google Scholar
• Kuang Y, Beretta E. Global qualitative analyses of a ratio-dependent predator–prey system. J Math Biol. 1998;36:389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li H, Meng G, She Z. Stability and Hopf bifurcation of a delayed density-dependent predator–prey system with Beddington–DeAngelis functional response. Int J Bifurcation and Chaos. 2016;26:1650165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi JP, Abbas S, Thakur M. A density dependent delayed predator–prey model with Beddington–DeAngelis type function response incorporating a prey refuge. Commun Nonlin Sci Numer Simulat. 2015;22:427–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li K, Wei J. Stability and Hopf bifurcation analysis of a prey–predator system with two delays. Chaos Solit Fract. 2009;42:2606–2613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kundu S, Maitra S. Dynamical behaviour of a delayed three species predator–prey model with co-operation among the prey species. Nonlin Dyn. 2018;92:627–643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinchy M, Sheriff MJ, Zanette LY. Predator-induced stress and the ecology of fear. Funct Ecol. 2013;27:56–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barman B, Ghosh B. Role of time delay and harvesting in some predator–prey communities with different functional responses and intra-species competition. Int J Model Simulat. 2021;1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mondal S, Samanta GP. Provision of additional food as a tool of biological control in a delayed predator–prey interaction with prey refuge. Int J Model Simulat. 2022;42(4):570–594.
   Google Scholar
• Wiggins S, Stephen W, Martin G. Introduction to applied nonlinear dynamical systems and chaos. Vol. 2, No. 3. New York: Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• LaSalle J. The stability of dynamical systems. Siam. 1976.
   Google Scholar
• Perko L. Differential equations and dynamical systems. In: Springer. Vol. 7. New York; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Hassard BD, Hassard BD, Kazarinoff ND, Wan YH, Wan YW. Theory and applications of Hopf Bifurcation. Vol. 41. Cambridge: CUP Archive; 1981.
   Google Scholar