Randomization tests in recursive response-adaptive randomization procedures

References

• Hu F, Rosenberger WF. The theory of response-adaptive randomization in clinical trials. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson AC, Biswas A. Randomised response-adaptive designs in clinical trials. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Flournoy N, Haines LM, Rosenberger WF. A graphical comparison of response-adaptive randomization procedures. Stat Biopharm Res. 2013;5:126–141. doi: 10.1080/19466315.2013.782822
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanova A. A play-the-winner-type urn design with reduced variability. Metrika. 2003;58:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu F, Zhang LX. Asymptotic properties of doubly adaptive biased coin designs for multitreatment clinical trials. Ann. Statist. 2004;32:268–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu F, Zhang L-X, He X. Efficient randomized-adaptive designs. Ann Statist. 2009;37:2543–2560. doi: 10.1214/08-AOS655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger WF, Lachin JM. Randomization in clinical trials: theory and practice. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Flournoy N, Galbete A, Moler JA, Plo F. Randomization based inference for the drop-the-loser rule. In: Ucinski D, Atkinson AC, Patan M, editors. mODa 10-advances in model-oriented design and analysis. Cham: Springer; 2013. p. 81–89.
   Google Scholar
• Galbete A, Moler JA, Plo F. A response-driven adaptive design based on the Klein urn. Methodol Comput Appl Probab. 2014;16:731–746. doi: 10.1007/s11009-013-9344-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg CB. On inferences from Wei's biased coin design for clinical trials. Biometrika. 1990;77:467–478. doi: 10.1093/biomet/77.3.467
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edgington ES. Randomization tests. New York: M. Dekker; 1987.
   Google Scholar
• Aickin M. Randomization, balance, and the validity and efficiency of design-adaptive allocation methods. J Statist Plann Inference. 2001;94:97–119. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(00)00228-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bélisle C, Melfi V. Independence after adaptive allocation. Statist Probab Lett. 2008;78:214–224. doi: 10.1016/j.spl.2007.05.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger WF, Flournoy N, Durham SD. Asymptotic normality of maximum likelihood estimators from multiparameter response-driven designs. J Statist Plann Inference. 1997;60:69–76. doi: 10.1016/S0378-3758(96)00120-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenkranz GK. The impact of randomization on the analysis of clinical trials. Stat Med. 2011;30:3475–3487. doi: 10.1002/sim.4376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao J, Yu X. Validity of tests under covariate-adaptive biased coin randomization and generalized linear models. Biometrics. 2013;69:960–969. doi: 10.1111/biom.12062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pesarin F, Salmaso L. Permutation tests for complex data: theory, applications and software. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Hollander M, E Peña. Nonparametric tests under restricted treatment-assignment rules. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1988;83:1144–1151. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1988.10478712
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta CR, Patel NR, Wei L. Constructing exact significance tests with restricted randomization rules. Biometrika. 1988;75:295–302. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.2.295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plamadeala V, Rosenberger WF. Sequential monitoring with conditional randomization tests. Ann Statist. 2012;40:30–44. doi: 10.1214/11-AOS941
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei LJ. Exact two-sample permutation tests based on the randomized play-the-winner rule. Biometrika. 1988;75:603–606. doi: 10.1093/biomet/75.3.603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger WF, Hu F. Maximizing power and minimizing treatment failures in clinical trials. Clin Trials. 2004;1:141–147. doi: 10.1191/1740774504cn016oa
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rosenberger WF. Asymptotic inference with response-adaptive treatment allocation designs. Ann Statist. 1993;21:2098–2107. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176349412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu F, Rosenberger WF. Optimality, variability, power: evaluating response-adaptive randomization procedures for treatment comparisons. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2003;98:671–678. doi: 10.1198/016214503000000576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efron B. Forcing a sequential experiment to be balanced. Biometrika. 1971;58:403–417. doi: 10.1093/biomet/58.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberger WF, Sverdlov O. Handling covariates in the design of clinical trials. Statist. Sci..2008;23:404–419. doi: 10.1214/08-STS269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao Q-B, Lin J-G, Zhu C-H, Wu Y-H. Asymptotic properties of maximum quasi-likelihood estimators in generalized linear models with adaptive designs. Statistics. 2012;46:833–846. doi: 10.1080/02331888.2010.543465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moler JA, Plo F, San Miguel M. A sequential design for a clinical trial with a linear prognostic factor. J Statist Plann Inference 2007;137:3964–3974. doi: 10.1016/j.jspi.2007.04.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneta E. Non-negative matrices and Markov chains. New York: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Yin C, Zhao L, Wei C. Asymptotic normality and strong consistency of maximum quasi-likelihood estimates in generalized linear models. Sci China Ser. A. 2006;49:145–157. doi: 10.1007/s11425-004-5169-x
   Google Scholar
• Cox DR. A remark on randomization in clinical trials. Util Math. 1982;21A:245–252.
   Google Scholar