Statistical inference for oscillation processes

References

• Hannan EJ. The estimation of frequency. J Appl Probab. 1973;10:513–519. doi: 10.1017/S0021900200042145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TH. Time series with mixed spectra. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn BG, Hannan EJ. The estimation and tracking of frequency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Schuster A. On lunar and solar periodicities of earthquakes. Proc R Soc. 1897;61:455–465. doi: 10.1098/rspl.1897.0060
   Google Scholar
• Paraschakis K, Dahlhaus R. Frequency and phase estimation in time series with quasi periodic components. J Time Ser Anal. 2012;33:13–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2011.00736.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumont T, LeCorff S, Nonparametric regression on hidden Φ-mixing variables: identifiability and consistency of a pseudo-likelihood based estimation procedure. 2014. arXiv:1209.0633.
   Google Scholar
• Olsson J, Cappe O, Douc R, et al. Sequential Monte Carlo smoothing with application to parameter estimation in nonlinear state space models. Bernoulli. 2008;14:155–179. doi: 10.3150/07-BEJ6150
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douc R, Moulines E, Stoffer DS. Nonlinear time series: theory, methods and applications with R examples. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Pikovsky A, Rosenblum M, Kurths J. Synchronization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fell J, Axmacher N. The role of phase synchronization in memory processes. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12(2):105–118. doi: 10.1038/nrn2979
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen R-R, Koetter R, Madhow U, et al. Joint noncoherent demodulation and decoding for the block fading channel: a practical framework for approaching Shannon capacity. IEEE Trans Commun. 2003;51:1676–1689. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2003.818087
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang NE, Shen Z, Long SR, et al. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis. Proc R Soc London A. 1998;454:903–995. doi: 10.1098/rspa.1998.0193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossmann A, Kronland-Martinet R, Morlet J, Reading and Understanding Continuous Wavelet Transforms. In: Combes JM, editor. Wavelets, time-frequency methods and phase space. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Tsakonas EE, Sidiropoulos ND, Swami A. Optimal particle filters for tracking a time-varying harmonic or chirp signal. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 2008;56(10):4598–4610. doi: 10.1109/TSP.2008.927462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amblard PO, Brossier JM, Moisan E. Phase tracking: what do we gain from optimality? Particle filtering versus phase-locked loops. Signal Process. 2003;83:151–167. doi: 10.1016/S0165-1684(02)00386-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubois C, Davy M. Joint detection and tracking of time-varying harmonic components: a flexible Bayesian approach. IEEE Trans Audio Speech Lang Process. 2007;15(4):1283–1295. doi: 10.1109/TASL.2007.894522
   Google Scholar
• Kneip A, Gasser Th. Statistical tools to analyze data representing a sample of curves. Ann Stat. 1992;20:1266–1305. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176348769
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang K, Gasser Th. Alignment of curves by dynamic time warping. Ann Stat. 1997;25:1251–1276. doi: 10.1214/aos/1069362747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engle RF, Russell JR. Autoregressive conditional duration: a new model for irregularly spaced transaction data. Econometrica. 1998;66:1127–1162. doi: 10.2307/2999632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet A, De Freitas N, Murphy K, et al. Rao-Blackwellised particle filtering for dynamic Bayesian networks. Proceedings of the Sixteenth Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. 2000 June. p. 176–183.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet A, DeFreitas N, Gordon N, editors. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York: Springer Verlag; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon NJ, Salmond DJ, Smith AFM. Novel approach to nonlinear/non-Gaussian Bayesian state estimation. IEE Proc F-Radar Signal Process. 1993;140(2):107–113. doi: 10.1049/ip-f-2.1993.0015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitagawa G. Monte Carlo filter and smoother for non-Gaussian nonlinear state space models. J Comput Graph Stat. 1996;5(1):1–25.
   Google Scholar
• Kong A, Liu JS, Wong WH. Sequential imputations and Bayesian missing data problems. J Am Stat Assoc. 1994;89:278–288. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1994.10476469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douc R, Cappé O, Moulines E, Comparison of resampling schemes for particle filtering. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Image and Signal Processing and Analysis. 2005 September. p. 64–69.
   Google Scholar
• Doucet A, Godsill S, Andrieu C. On sequential Monte Carlo sampling methods for Bayesian filtering. Stat Comput. 2000;10:197–208. doi: 10.1023/A:1008935410038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godsill SJ, Doucet A, West M. Monte Carlo smoothing for nonlinear time series. J Am Stat Assoc. 2004;99:156–168. doi: 10.1198/016214504000000151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doucet A, Gordon NJ, Krishnamurthy V. Particle filters for state estimation of jump Markov linear systems. IEEE Trans Signal Process. 1999;49:613–624. doi: 10.1109/78.905890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shumway RH, Stoffer DS. Time series analysis and its applications: with R examples. 3rd ed. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Dempster AP, Laird NM, Rubin DB. Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. J R Stat Soc Ser B. 1977;39:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Shumway RH, Stoffer DS. An approach to time series smoothing and forecasting using the EM algorithm. J Time Series Anal. 1982;3:253–264. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.1982.tb00349.x
   Google Scholar
• Wei GCG, Tanner MA. A Monte Carlo implementation of the EM algorithm and the poor man's data augmentation algorithms. J Am Stat Assoc. 1990;85:699–704. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1990.10474930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner MA. Tools for statistical inference: methods for the exploration of posterior distributions and likelihood functions, 2nd ed. New York; 1993. (Springer Series in Statistics).
   Google Scholar
• Lepski OV, Mammen E, Spokoiny VG. Optimal spatial adaptation to inhomogeneous smoothness: an approach based on kernel estimates with variable bandwidth selectors. Ann Stat. 1997;25:929–947. doi: 10.1214/aos/1069362731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blasius B, Huppert A, Stone L. Complex dynamics and phase synchronization in spatially extended ecological systems. Nature. 1999;399:354–359. doi: 10.1038/20676
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lloyd AL, May RM. Synchronicity, chaos and population cycles: spatial coherence in an uncertain world. Trends Ecol Evol. 1999;14:417–418. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(99)01717-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pikovsky AS, Rosenblum MG, Osipov GV, et al. Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators by external driving. Phys D. 1997;104:219–238. doi: 10.1016/S0167-2789(96)00301-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblum MG, Pikovsky AS, Kurths J. Phase synchronization of chaotic oscillators. Phys Rev Lett. 1996;76:1804–1807. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.76.1804
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Press WH, Teukolsky SA, Vetterling WT, et al. Numerical recipes in C. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Clifford GD, Azuaje F, McSharry PE. Advanced methods and tools for ECG data analysis. Norwood: Artech House; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Fort G, Moulines E. Convergence of the Monte Carlo expectation maximization for curved exponential families. Ann Stat. 2003;31(4):1220–1259. doi: 10.1214/aos/1059655912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Corff S, Fort G. Online expectation maximization based algorithms for inference in hidden Markov models. Electron J Stat. 2013;7:763–792. doi: 10.1214/13-EJS789
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delyon B, Lavielle M, Eric Moulines E. Convergence of a stochastic approximation version of the EM algorithm. Ann Stat. 1999;27:94–128. doi: 10.1214/aos/1018031103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürzeler M, Künsch H, Approximating and maximising the likelihood for a general state-space model. In: Doucet A, de Freitas N, Gordon N, editors. Sequential Monte Carlo methods in practice. New York (NY): Springer; 2001. p. 159–175.
   Google Scholar
• Myers CS, Rabiner LR. A comparative study of several dynamic time-warping algorithms for connected word recognition. Bell Syst Tech J. 1981;60:1389–1409. doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1981.tb00272.x
   Google Scholar