Estimation of a common mean vector in bivariate meta-analysis under the FGM copula

References

• Gleser LJ, Olkin L. Stochastically dependent effect sizes. In the Handbook of research Synthesis. New York: Russel Sage Foundation; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Riley RD. Multivariate meta-analysis: the effect of ignoring within-study correlation. J R Statist Soc Ser A. 2009;172:789–811. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-985X.2008.00593.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burzykowski T, Molenberghs G, Buyse M, et al. Validation of surrogate end points in multiple randomized clinical trials with failure time end points. Appl Stat. 2001;50:405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotolo F, Paoletti X, Michiels S. Surrosurv: An R package for the evaluation of failure time surrogate endpoints in individual patient data meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2018;155:189–198. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.12.005
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Nakatochi M, Matsui S, et al. Personalized dynamic prediction of death according to tumour progression and high-dimensional genetic factors: meta-analysis with a joint model. Stat Methods Med Res. 2018;27(9):2842–2858. doi: 10.1177/0962280216688032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Matsui S, Rondeau V. Survival analysis with Correlated Endpoints, joint Frailty-copula models, JSS research Series in statistics. Singapore: Springer; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Berkey CS, Hoaglin DC, Antczak-bouckoms A, et al. Meta-analysis of multiple outcomes by regression with random effects. Stat Med. 1998;17:2537–2550. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19981130)17:22<2537::AID-SIM953>3.0.CO;2-C
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mavridis D, Salanti G. A practical introduction to multivariate meta-analysis. Stat Method Med Res. 2013;22:133–158. doi: 10.1177/0962280211432219
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgenstern D. Einfache Beispiele zweidimensionaler Verteilungen. Mitteilungsblatt für Mathematishe Statistik. 1956;8:34–235.
   Google Scholar
• Eyraud H. (1936). Les principes de la mesure des correlations, Ann Univ Lyon III Ser Sect A1, 30-47.
   Google Scholar
• Farlie DJG. The performance of some correlation coefficients for a general bivariate distribution. Biometrika. 1960;47:307–323. doi: 10.1093/biomet/47.3-4.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumbel EJ. Bivariate exponential distributions. J Amer Statist Assoc. 1960;55:698–707. doi: 10.1080/01621459.1960.10483368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JS, Kotz S. Correlation structure in iterated Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions. Biometrika. 1984;71:633–636.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R. An order-statistics-based method for constructing multivariate distributions with fixed marginals. J Multivariate Anal. 2008;99:2312–2327. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2008.02.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairamov I, Bayramoglu K. From the Huang-Kotz FGM distribution to Baker’s bivariate distribution. J Multivariate Anal. 2013;113:106–115. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2011.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JS, Dou X, Kuriki S, et al. Dependence structure of bivariate order statistics with applications to Bayramoglu’s distributions. J Multivariate Anal. 2013;114:201–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jmva.2012.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genest C, Favre AC. Everything you always wanted to know about copula modeling but were afraid to ask. J Hydrol Eng. 2007;12:347–368. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2007)12:4(347)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim JM, Jung YS, Soderberg T. Directional dependence of genes using survival truncated FGM type modification copulas. Commun Stat – Simul Comput. 2009;38:1470–1484. doi: 10.1080/03610910903009336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinez EZ, Achcar JA. Bayesian bivariate generalized Lindley model for survival data with a cure fraction. Comput Method Programs Biomed. 2014;117:145–157. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2014.07.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozaki N. A note on estimating the common mean of k normal distributions and the stein problem. Commun Stat – Theory Methods. 1978;7:1421–1432. doi: 10.1080/03610927808827724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann EL. Elements of large-sample theory. New York: Springer; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Genest C, Nešlehová J. Copulas and copula models, Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. 2nd ed Chichester: Wiley; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Schucany WR, Parr WC, Boyer JE. Correlation structure in Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions. Biometrika. 1978;65:650–653. doi: 10.1093/biomet/65.3.650
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelsen RB. An Introduction to copulas. (2nd ed.) New York: Springer; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical inference. (2nd ed.) Australia: Duxbury Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley RA, Gart JJ. The asymptotic properties of ML estimators when sampling from associated populations. Biometrika. 1962;49:205–214. doi: 10.1093/biomet/49.1-2.205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Hu YH, Konno Y. Asymptotic inference for maximum likelihood estimators under the special exponential family with double-truncation. Stat Pap. 2017a;58:877–909. doi: 10.1007/s00362-015-0730-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao J. Mathematical statistics. New York: Springer; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• van der Vaart AW. Asymptotic statistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann EL, Casella G. Theory of point estimation. (2nd ed.) New York: Springer; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Riley RD, Ensor J, Jackson D, et al. 2017. Deriving percentage study weights in multi-parameter meta-analysis models: with applications to meta-regression, network meta-analysis and one-stage individual participant data models, Stat Method Med Res. doi:10.1177/0962280216688033.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kontopantelis E, Reeves D. Performance of statistical methods for meta-analysis when true study effects are non-normally distributed: A simulation study. Stat Method Med Res. 2012;21:409–426. doi: 10.1177/0962280210392008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang JS, Kotz S. Modifications of the Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions. A tough hill to climb. Metrika. 1999;49:135–145. doi: 10.1007/s001840050030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairamov I, Kotz S, Bekci M. New generalized Farlie-Gumbel-Morgenstern distributions and concomitants of order statistics. J Appl Stat. 2001;28:521–536. doi: 10.1080/02664760120047861
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bairamov I, Kotz S. Dependence structure and symmetry of Huang-Kotz FGM distributions and their extensions. Metrika. 2002;56:55–72. doi: 10.1007/s001840100158
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amblard C, Girard S. A new extension of bivariate FGM copulas. Metrika. 2009;70:1–17. doi: 10.1007/s00184-008-0174-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hürlimann W. A comprehensive extension of the FGM copula. Stat Pap. 2017;58:373–392. doi: 10.1007/s00362-015-0703-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emura T, Nakatochi M, Murotani K, et al. A joint frailty-copula model between tumour progression and death for meta-analysis. Stat Method Med Res. 2017b;26:2649–2666. doi: 10.1177/0962280215604510
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng M, Xiang L, Wang S. Semiparametric regression analysis of clustered survival data with semi-competing risks. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2018;124:53–70. doi: 10.1016/j.csda.2018.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schepsmeier U, Stöber J. Derivatives and Fisher information of bivariate copulas. Stat Pap. 2014;55:525–542. doi: 10.1007/s00362-013-0498-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shih JH, Emura T. Likelihood-based inference for bivariate latent failure time models with competing risks under the generalized FGM copula. Comput Stat. 2018;33:1293–1323. doi: 10.1007/s00180-018-0804-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar