Semi-parametric adjustment to computer models

References

• Wu CFJ, Hamada MS. Experiments: planning, analysis, and optimization. Vol. 552. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Craig PS, Goldstein M, Rougier JC, et al. Bayesian forecasting for complex systems using computer simulators. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2001;96(454):717–729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukouvalas A, Gosling JP, Maruri-Aguilar H. An efficient screening method for computer experiments. Technometrics. 2014;56(4):422–431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drignei D. Fast statistical surrogates for dynamical 3D computer models of brain tumors. J Comput Graph Stat. 2008;17(4):844–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Chen W, Tsui K-L. Bayesian validation of computer models. Technometrics. 2009;51(4):439–451.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plumlee M, Joseph VR, Yang H. Calibrating functional parameters in the ion channel models of cardiac cells. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2015;111:500–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roache PJ. Verification and validation in computational science and engineering. Albuquerque (NM): Hermosa; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Trucano TG, Swiler LP, Igusa T, et al. Calibration, validation, and sensitivity analysis: what's what. Reliab Engn Syst Safety. 2006;91(10):1331–1357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiong Y, Chen W, Tsui K-L, et al. A better understanding of model updating strategies in validating engineering models. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng. 2009;198(15):1327–1337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph VR, Melkote SN. Statistical adjustments to engineering models. J Qual Technol. 2009;41(4):362.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marzouk Y, Xiu D. A stochastic collocation approach to bayesian inference in inverse problems. Commun Comput Phys. 2009;6:826–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, CK and Rasmussen CE. Gaussian processes for machine learning. Cambridge (MA): MIT press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy MC, O'Hagan A. Bayesian calibration of computer models. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2001;63(3):425–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higdon D, Kennedy M, Cavendish JC, et al. Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2004;26(2):448–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayarri M, Berger JO, Paulo R, et al. A framework for validation of computer models. Technometrics. 2007;49:138–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayarri M, Berger JO, Cafeo J, et al. Computer model validation with functional output. Ann Stat. 2007;35:1874–1906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qian PZ, Wu CFJ. Bayesian hierarchical modeling for integrating low-accuracy and high-accuracy experiments. Technometrics. 2008;50(2):192–204.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang C-J, Joseph VR. Model calibration through minimal adjustments. Technometrics. 2014;56(4):474–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph VR, Yan H. Engineering-driven statistical adjustment and calibration. Technometrics. 2015;57(2):257–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuo R, Wu CFJ. A theoretical framework for calibration in computer models: parametrization, estimation and convergence properties. SIAM/ASA J Uncertainty Quant. 2016;4(1):767–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuo R, Wu CFJ. Efficient calibration for imperfect computer models. Ann Stat. 2015;43(6):2331–2352.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santner TJ, Williams BJ, Notz WI. The design and analysis of computer experiments. New York (NY): Springer; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Stein ML. Interpolation of spatial data: some theory for kriging. New York (NY): Springer; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Tuo R, Wu CJ. Prediction based on the Kennedy-O'hagan calibration model: asymptotic consistency and other properties. Stat Sin. 2018;28:743–759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R, The elements of statistical learning. Berlin; 2001. (Springer series in statistics Springer. Vol. 1).
   Google Scholar
• Donoho DL. High-dimensional data analysis: the curses and blessings of dimensionality. AMS Math Challenges Lecture. 2000;1:32.
   Google Scholar
• Wahba G. Spline models for Observational data. Vol. 59. Philadelphia (PA): Siam; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Schölkopf B, Herbrich R, Smola AJ, A generalized representer theorem. In International Conference on Computational Learning Theory. Springer; 2001. p. 416–426.
   Google Scholar
• Gramacy RB, Lee HKH. Bayesian treed gaussian process models with an application to computer modeling. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2008;103(483):1119–1130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramacy RB, Lee HKH. Adaptive design and analysis of supercomputer experiments. Technometrics. 2009;51(2):130–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xiu D. Numerical methods for stochastic computations: A spectral method approach. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wendland H. Scattered data approximation. Vol. 17. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Steinwart I, Hush D, Scovel C. An explicit description of the reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces of gaussian rbf kernels. IEEE Trans Inf Theory. 2006;52(10):4635–4643.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Vaart AW. Asymptotic statistics. Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Wong RK, Storlie CB, Lee T. A frequentist approach to computer model calibration. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2017;79:635–648.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li R, Tsai C-L. Tuning parameter selectors for the smoothly clipped absolute deviation method. Biometrika. 2007;94(3):553–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon LCW, Szegö GP. Towards global optimisation. Amsterdam: North-Holland; 1978.
   Google Scholar
• Singh RK, Joseph VR, Melkote SN. A statistical approach to the optimization of a laser-assisted micromachining process. Int J Adv Manufact Technol. 2011;53(1–4):221–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Vaart AW, Wellner JA. Weak convergence and empirical processes. New York (NY): Springer; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Kosorok MR. Introduction to empirical processes and semiparametric inference. New York (NY): Springer; 2007.
   Google Scholar