A generalized stochastic condensation mechanism for inducing underdispersion in count models

References

• Barron DN. The analysis of count data: overdispersion and autocorrelation. Sociol Methodol. 1992;22:179–220.
   Google Scholar
• Xekalaki E. Under- and overdispersion. Vol. 1. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2014. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Kokonendji CC. Over- and underdispersion models. Methods and applications of statistics in clinical trials: planning, analysis, and inferential methods. Vol. 2. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2014. p. 506–526.
   Google Scholar
• Dean CB, Lundy ER. Overdispersion. Vol. 1. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons, Inc.; 2014. p. 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Crawley M. The R book. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley Online Library; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• King G. Variance specification in event count models: from restrictive assumptions to a generalized estimator. Am J Pol Sci. 1989;33(3):762–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilbe JM. Negative binomial regression. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison XA. Using observation-level random effects to model overdispersion in count data in ecology and evolution. PeerJ. 2014;2:1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zha L, Lord D, Zou Y. The Poisson inverse Gaussian (PIG) generalized linear regression model for analyzing motor vehicle crash data. J Transp Saf Secur. 2016;8(1):18–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smithson M, Shou Y. Randomly stopped sums: models and psychological applications. Front Psychol. 2014;5:1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Victor H, Govindarajulu Z. A note on second moment of a randomly stopped sum of independent variables. Stat Probab Lett. 1992;14(4):275–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sellers KF, Morris DS. Underdispersion models: models that are ‘under the radar’. Commun Stat - Theory Methods. 2017;46(24):12075–12086.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astor T, Strengbom J, Berg MP, et al. Underdispersion and overdispersion of traits in terrestrial snail communities on islands. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(11):2090–2102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ridout MS, Besbeas P. An empirical model for underdispersed count data. Stat Model. 2004;4(1):77–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiß CH. Integer-valued autoregressive models for counts showing underdispersion. J Appl Stat. 2013;40(9):1931–1948.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morse PM. Queues, inventories, and maintenance. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Jewell WS. The properties of recurrent-event processes. Oper Res. 1960;8(4):446–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesey JR, Haight FA. Counting distributions for an Erlang process. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1961;13(1):91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Chatfield C, Goodhardt GJ. A consumer purchasing model with Erlang inter-purchase times. J Am Stat Assoc. 1973;68(344):828–835.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alanko T. Modelling the true intake distribution from recall data with measurement/response errors. In: The Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute Proceedings of the 58th World Statistics Congress; 2011 Aug 21–26; Vol. 1. The Hague (The Netherlands): International Statistical Institute; Dublin Convention Centre; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher RA. The effect of methods of ascertainment upon the estimation of frequencies. Ann Eugen. 1934;6(1):13–25.
   Google Scholar
• Tovissodé CF, Honfo SH, Doumatè JT, et al. On the discretization of continuous probability distributions using a probabilistic rounding mechanism. Mathematics. 2021;9(5):555.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Consul PC, Jain GC. A generalization of the Poisson distribution. Technometrics. 1973;15(4):791–799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonat WH, Jørgensen B, Kokonendji CC, et al. Extended Poisson–Tweedie: properties and regression models for count data. Stat Model. 2018;18(1):24–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conway RW, Maxwell WL. A queuing model with state dependent service rates. J Ind Eng. 1962;12(2):132–136.
   Google Scholar
• Efron B. Double exponential families and their use in generalized linear regression. J Am Stat Assoc. 1986;81(395):709–721.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagmark PE. On construction and simulation of count data models. Math Comput Simul. 2008;77(1):72–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodman LA. On the Poisson-gamma distribution problem. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1951;3(1):123–125.
   Google Scholar
• Huang A. Mean-parametrized Conway–Maxwell–Poisson regression models for dispersed counts. Stat Model. 2017;17(6):359–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáez-Castillo A, Conde-Sánchez A. A hyper-Poisson regression model for overdispersed and underdispersed count data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2013;61:148–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross SM. Stochastic processes. 2nd ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc.; 1996. Available from: http://gen.lib.rus.ec/book/index.php?md5=8d39388f64c18163b7b7967a9c4a927d
   Google Scholar
• Stack-Overflow. What is the probability of getting an even number from a Poisson random draw? 2016 [cited 2021 Mar 9]. Available from: https://math.stackexchange.com/questions/2007238/what-is-the-probability-of-getting-an-even-number-from-a-poisson-random-draw
   Google Scholar
• Stefan-Engineering. Probability of even/odd using probability generating functions; 2020 [cited 2021 Mar 9]. Available from: https://stefanengineering.com/2020/05/15/probability-of-even-generating-functions
   Google Scholar
• Serfling R. The variance function of the Erlang process. Ann Inst Stat Math. 1970;22(1):327–337.
   Google Scholar
• Abramowitz M, Stegun I. Stirling Numbers of the Second Kind. In: Abramowitz M, Stegun I, editors. Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. New York: Dover; 1972. Chapter 24; p. 824–825.
   Google Scholar
• Philipson C. A note on moments of a Poisson probability distribution. Scand Actuar J. 1963;1963(3-4):243–244.
   Google Scholar
• R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2021. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/
   Google Scholar
• Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, et al. GLM and GAM for count data. In: Zuur AF, Ieno EN, Walker NJ, et al., editors. Mixed effects models and extensions in ecology with R. New York City (NY): Springer; 2009. p. 209–243.
   Google Scholar
• Schmittlein DG, Morrison DG. Prediction of future random events with the condensed negative binomial distribution. J Am Stat Assoc. 1983;78(382):449–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall MG. Presidential address: natural law in the social sciences. J R Stat Soc Ser A. 1961;124(1):1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Sellers K, Lotze T, Raim A. COMPoissonReg: Conway-Maxwell Poisson (COM-Poisson) Regression; 2019. R package version 0.7.0. Available from: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=COMPoissonReg
   Google Scholar
• Rigby RA, Stasinopoulos DM. Generalized additive models for location, scale and shape, (with discussion). Appl Stat. 2005;54:507–554.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaehler J. Laws of iterated expectations for higher order central moments. Stat Pap. 1990;31(1):295–299.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan W. Ordinary differential equations. Reading (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1958.
   Google Scholar
• Knapp MP. Sines and cosines of angles in arithmetic progression. Math Mag. 2009;82(5):371–372.
   Google Scholar
• Riordan J. Moment recurrence relations for binomial, Poisson and hypergeometric frequency distributions. Ann Math Stat. 1937;8(2):103–111.
   Google Scholar
• Brand L. Advanced calculus: an introduction to classical analysis. 3rd ed. New York City (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 1955.
   Google Scholar