Penalized empirical likelihood inference for the GINAR(p) model

References

• Al-Osh MA, Alzaid AA. First-order integer-valued autoregressive (INAR(1)) process. J Time Ser Anal. 1987;8:261–275.
   Google Scholar
• Alzaid AA, Al-Osh M. An integer-valued pth-order autoregressive structure (INAR(p)) process. J Appl Probab. 1990;27:314–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du JG, Li Y. The integer-valued autoregressive (INAR(p)) model. J Time Ser Anal. 1991;12:129–142.
   Google Scholar
• Cardinal M, Roy R, Lambert J. On the application of integer-valued time series models for the analysis of disease incidence. Stat Med. 1999;18:2025–2039.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim HY, Park Y. A non-stationary integer-valued autoregressive model. Statist Papers. 2008;49:485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang D, Zhu F. Inference for INAR(p) processes with signed generalized power series thinning operator. J Stat Plan Inference. 2010;140:667–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Zhang H. Some estimation and forecasting procedures in Possion-Lindley INAR(1) process. Commun Statist Simul Comput. 2018;50(1):49–62. doi:10.1080/03610918.2018.1547402 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotto MG, Weiß CH, Möller TA, et al. The max–INAR(1) model for count processes. Test. 2018;27:850–870.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreto-Souza W. Mixed Poisson INAR(1) processes. Statist Papers. 2019;60:2119–2139.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shirozhan M, Mohammadpour M. A dependent counting INAR model with serially dependent innovation. J Appl Stat. 2020;48:1975–1997. doi:10.1080/02664763.2020.1783521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie E. Discrete variate time series. Handb Statist. 2003;21:573–606.
   Google Scholar
• Weiß CH. Thinning operations for modeling time series of counts–a survey. Adv Stat Anal. 2008;92:319–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotto MG, Weiß CH, Gouveia S. Thinning-based models in the analysis of integer-valued time series: a review. Stat Model. 2015;15:590–618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owen AB. Empirical likelihood. London: Chapman & Hall; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Qin J, Lawless J. Empirical likelihood and general estimating equations. Ann Statist. 1994;22:300–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitamura Y. Empirical likelihood methods with weakly dependent processes. Ann Statist. 1997;25:2084–2102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monti AC. Empirical likelihood confidence regions in time series models. Biometrika. 1997;84:395–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qin G, Jing BY. Empirical likelihood for censored linear regression. Scandinavian J Statist. 2001;28:661–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan NH, Ling S. Empirical likelihood for GARCH models. Econ Theory. 2006;22:403–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan NH, Peng L, Zhang R. Interval estimation of the tail index of a GARCH(1, 1) model. Test. 2012;21:546–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang D, Zhu F. The empirical likelihood for first-order random coefficient integer-valued autoregressive processes. Commun Statist Theory Methods. 2011a;40:492–509.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang D, Zhu F. Empirical likelihood inference for random coefficient INAR(p) process. J Time Ser Anal. 2011b;32:195–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding X, Wang D. Empirical likelihood inference for INAR(1) model with explanatory variables. J Korean Stat Soc. 2016;45:623–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Li H, Wang D. Estimation of parameters in the self-exciting threshold autoregressive processes for nonlinear time series of counts. Appl Math Model. 2018;57:226–247.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang K, Ding X, Yuan X. Bayesian empirical likelihood inference and order shrinkage for autoregressive models. Statist Papers. 2021;63:97–121. doi:10.1007/s00362-021-01231-6 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordman DJ, Lahiri SN. A review of empirical likelihood methods for time series. J Stat Plan Inference. 2014;155:1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang CY, Leng C. Penalized high-dimensional empirical likelihood. Biometrika. 2010;97:905–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang J, Liu W, Lu X. Penalized empirical likelihood for semiparametric models with a diverging number of parameters. J Stat Plan Inference. 2017;186:42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leng C, Tang CY. Penalized empirical likelihood and growing dimensional general estimating equations. Biometrika. 2012;99:703–716.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan X, Yan L. Penalized empirical likelihood for generalized linear models with longitudinal data. Commun Statist Simul Comput. 2019;50:608–623. doi:10.1080/03610918.2019.1565583 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang S, Xiang L. Penalized empirical likelihood inference for sparse additive hazards regression with a diverging number of covariates. Stat Comput. 2017;27:1347–1364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang H, Wang D, Sun L. Regularized estimation in GINAR(p) process. J Korean Stat Soc. 2017;46:502–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang D, Zhang H. Poisson autoregressive process modeling via the penalized conditional maximum likelihood procedure. Statist Papers. 2020;61:245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour A. Existence and stochastic structure of a non-negative integer-valued autoregressive process. J Time Ser Anal. 1998;19:439–455.
   Google Scholar
• Borges P, Molinares FF, Bourguignon M. A geometric time series model with inflated-parameter Bernoulli counting series. Stat Probab Lett. 2016;119:264–272.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chuang CS, Chan NH. Empirical likelihood for autoregressive models, with applications to unstable time series. Stat Sin. 2002;12:387–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mykland PA. Dual likelihood. Ann Statist. 1995;23:396–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fan J, Li R. Variable selection via nonconcave penalized likelihood and its oracle properties. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2001;96:1348–1360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou H. The adaptive lasso and its oracle properties. J Amer Statist Assoc. 2006;101:1418–1429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casella G, Berger RL. Statistical Inference: Second Edition. Belmont: Brooks/ColeCengage Learning; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Wang H, Li B, Leng C. Shrinkage tuning parameter selection with a diverging number of parameters. J R Statist Soc Ser B. 2009;71:671–683.
   Google Scholar
• Ferland R, Latour A, Oraichi D. Integer-valued GARCH process. J Time Ser Anal. 2006;27:923–942.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F. A negative binomial integer-valued GARCH model. J Time Ser Anal. 2011;32:54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu F. Modeling overdispersed or underdispersed count data with generalized Poisson integer-valued GARCH models. J Math Anal Appl. 2012;389:58–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen CW, Khamthong K, Lee S. Markov switching integer-valued generalized auto-regressive conditional heteroscedastic models for dengue counts. J R Statist Soc Ser C. 2019;68:963–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Truong BC, Chen CW, Sriboonchitta S. Hysteretic Poisson INGARCH model for integer-valued time series. Stat Model. 2017;17:401–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng H, Basawa IV, Datta S. Inference for pth-order random coefficient integer-valued autoregressive processes. J Time Ser Anal. 2006;27:411–440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar