A multiobjective portfolio rebalancing model incorporating transaction costs based on incremental discounts

References

• Markowitz H. Portfolio selection. J. Finance. 1952;7:77–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anagnostopoulos KP, Mamanis G. A portfolio optimization model with three objectives and discrete variables. Comput. Oper. Res. 2010;37:1285–1297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arenas-Parra M, Bilbao-Terol A, Rodríguez-Uría MV. A fuzzy goal programming approach to portfolio selection. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2001;133:287–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya R, Kar S, Majumder DD. Fuzzy mean-variance-skewness portfolio selection models by interval analysis. Comput. Math. Appl. 2011;61:126–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrgott M, Klamroth K, Schwehm C. An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2004;155:752–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Lai KK, Wang S-Y. Portfolio rebalancing model with transaction costs based on fuzzy decision theory. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2006;175:879–893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang Y, Lai KK, Wang S-Y. Fuzzy portfolio optimization: theory and methods. Vol. 609, Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems.New York (NY): Springer-Verlag; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Saxena A. Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming. Inform. Sci. 2008;178:1734–1755.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Saxena A. A hybrid approach to asset allocation with simultaneous consideration of suitability and optimality. Inform. Sci. 2010;180:2264–2285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Inuiguchi M, Mehlawat MK. A hybrid approach for constructing suitable and optimal portfolios. Expert. Syst. Appl. 2011;38:5620–5632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Mittal G. Asset portfolio optimization using support vector machines and real-coded genetic algorithm. J. Global Optim. 2012;53:297–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi UJ, Jang BG, Koo HK. An algorithm for optimal portfolio selection problems with transaction costs and random lifetimes. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007;191:239–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozhan R, Schmid W. Asset allocation with distorted beliefs and transaction costs. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2009;194:236–249.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu JR, Lee WY. Portfolio rebalancing model using multiple criteria. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011;209:166–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacob NL. A limited-diversification portfolio selection model for the small investor. J. Finance. 1974;29:847–856.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao JCT. Essentials of portfolio diversification strategy. J. Finance. 1970;25:1109–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton AJ, Pliska SR. Optimal portfolio management with fixed transaction costs. Math. Financ. 1995;5:337–356.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang W-G, Zhang X-L, Xu W-J. A risk tolerance model for portfolio adjusting problem with transaction costs based on possibilistic moments. Insur. Math. Econ. 2010;46:496–499.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang W-G, Zhang X, Chen Y. Portfolio adjusting optimization with added assets and transaction costs based on credibility measures. Insur. Math. Econ. 2011;49:353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang X, Zhang W-G, Cai R. Portfolio adjusting optimization under credibility measures. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 2010;234:1458–1465.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chunhachinda P, Dandapani K, Hamid S, Prakash AJ. Portfolio selection and skewness: evidence from international stock market. J. Bank. Finance. 1997;21:143–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markowitz H. Portfolio selection: efficient diversification of investments. New York (NY): Wiley; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Mao JCT, Brewster JF. An E-Sh model of capital budgeting. Eng. Economist. 1970;15:103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Markowitz H, Todd P, Xu G, Yamane Y. Computation of meansemivariance efficient sets by the critical line algorithm. Ann. Oper. Res. 1993;45:307–317.
   Google Scholar
• Rom BM, Ferguson KW. Post-modern portfolio theory comes of age. J. Invest. 1994;2:27–33.
   Google Scholar
• Grootveld H, Hallerbach W. Variance vs downside risk: is there really much difference? Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999;114:304–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Speranza MG. Linear programming model for portfolio optimization. Finance. 1993;14:107–123.
   Google Scholar
• Chellathurai T, Draviam T. Dynamic portfolio selection with nonlinear transaction costs. Proc. R. Soc. A. 2005;461:3183–3212.
   Google Scholar
• Holland JH. Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Coello CAC, Van Veldhuizen DA, Lamont GB. Evolutionary algorithms for solving multi-objective problems. New York (NY): Kluwer; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Deb K. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. New York (NY): Wiley; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Gen M, Cheng R. Genetic algorithm and engineering optimization. New York (NY): Wiley; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Murata T, Ishibuchi H. MOGA: multi-objective genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE International Conference on Evolutionary Computation; 1995. p. 289–294.
   Google Scholar
• Michalewicz Z. Genetic algorithms + data structures = evolution programs. 2nd ed. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 1994.
   Google Scholar