Self-adaptive artificial bee colony

References

• Dorigo M, Di Caro G. Ant colony optimization: a new meta-heuristic. In: Proceedings of the 1999 Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 1999. CEC 99. Vol. 2. IEEE; 1999, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Kennedy J, Eberhart R. Particle swarm optimization. In: Neural networks, 1995. Proceedings IEEE international conference. Vol. 4. IEEE; 1995, Perth, Australia. p. 1942–1948.
   Google Scholar
• Price KV, Storn RM, Lampinen JA. Differential evolution: a practical approach to global optimization. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Vesterstrom J, Thomsen R. A comparative study of differential evolution, particle swarm optimization, and evolutionary algorithms on numerical benchmark problems. In: Congress on Evolutionary Computation, 2004. CEC2004. Vol. 2, IEEE; Denmark: Aarhus University; 2004. p. 1980–1987.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S-S, Byeon J-H, Liu H, Abraham A, McLoone S. Optimal job scheduling in grid computing using efficient binary artificial bee colony optimization. Soft Comput. 2013;17:867–882.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Passino KM. Biomimicry of bacterial foraging for distributed optimization and control. Control Syst. Mag. IEEE. 2002;22:52–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaboga D. An idea based on honey bee swarm for numerical optimization. Tech. Rep. TR06. Erciyes: Erciyes University Press; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Akay B. A comparative study of artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl. Math. Comput. 2009;214:108–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu G, Kwong S. Gbest-guided artificial bee colony algorithm for numerical function optimization. Appl. Math. Comput. 2010;217:3166–3173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banharnsakun A, Achalakul T, Sirinaovakul B. The best-so-far selection in artificial bee colony algorithm. Appl. Soft Comput. 2011;11:2888–2901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akay B, Karaboga D. A modified ABC algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Inf. Sci. 2012;192:120–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gao W, Liu S. A modified artificial bee colony algorithm. Comput. Oper. Res. 2011;9:687–697.
   Google Scholar
• Haijun D, Qingxian F. Bee colony algorithm for the function optimization. Science Paper Online. August 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Tsai PW, Pan JS, Liao BY, Chu SC. Enhanced artificial bee colony optimization. Int. J. Innovative Comput. Inf. Control. 2009;5:5081–5092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baykasoglu A, Ozbakir L, Tapkan. P. Artificial bee colony algorithm and its application to generalized assignment problem. In: Chan FTS, Tiwari MK, editors. Swarm intelligence: focus on ant and particle swarm optimization. Vienna: Itech Education and Publishing; 2007. p. 113–144.
   Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Akay B. A modified artificial bee colony (ABC) algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Appl. Soft Comput. 2011;11:3021–3031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalyanmoy Deb. An efficient constraint handling method for genetic algorithms. Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Eng. 2000;186:311–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alam MS, Ul Kabir MW, Islam MM. Self-adaptation of mutation step size in artificial bee colony algorithm for continuous function optimization. In: 13th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT), 2010; Dhaka: Ahsanullah University of Science & Technology; 2010. IEEE. p. 69–74.
   Google Scholar
• El-Abd M. A cooperative approach to the artificial bee colony algorithm. In: 2010 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC). IEEE; Canberra: University of New South Wales at ADFA; 2010. p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Kang F, Li J, Ma Z. Rosenbrock artificial bee colony algorithm for accurate global optimization of numerical functions. Inf. Sci. 2011;181:3508–3531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldberg DE. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Boston (MA): Addison-Wesley; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Storn R, Price K. Differential evolution – a simple and efficient adaptive scheme for global optimization over continuous spaces. J. Global Optim. 1997;11:341–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann K, Whiteson S, de Rijke M. Balancing exploration and exploitation in learning to rank online. Adv. Inf. Retrieval. 2011;5:251–263.
   Google Scholar
• Ali MM, Khompatraporn C, Zabinsky ZB. A numerical evaluation of several stochastic algorithms on selected continuous global optimization test problems. J. Global Optim. 2005;31:635–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suganthan PN, Hansen N, Liang JJ, Deb K, Chen YP, Auger A, Tiwari S. Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for the CEC 2005 special session on real-parameter optimization. In: CEC 2005; Australia: Queensland University; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Diwold K, Aderhold A, Scheidler A, Middendorf M. Performance evaluation of artificial bee colony optimization and new selection schemes. Memetic Comput. 2011;3:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• El-Abd M. Performance assessment of foraging algorithms vs. evolutionary algorithms. Inf. Sci. 2011;182:243–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaboga D, Basturk B. Artificial bee colony (ABC) optimization algorithm for solving constrained optimization problems. In: Foundations of fuzzy logic and soft computing; Cancun; 2007. p. 789–798.
   Google Scholar
• Rahnamayan S, Tizhoosh HR, Salama MMA. Opposition-based differential evolution. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 2008;12:64–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson DF, Parker RA, Kendrick JS. The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. Ann. Internal Med. 1989;110:916–921.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deep K, Thakur M. A new crossover operator for real coded genetic algorithms. Appl. Math. Comput. 2007;188:895–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar