An inverse optimization model for imprecise data envelopment analysis

References

• Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1978;2:429–444.10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banker RD, Charnes A, Cooper WW. Some methods for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manage. Sci. 1984;30:1078–1092.10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amirteimoori A, Kordrostami S. An alternative clustering approach: a DEA-based procedure. Optimization. 2013;62:227–240.10.1080/02331934.2011.585466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmaeilzadeh A, Hadi-Vencheh A. A new method for complete ranking of DMUs. Optimization. 2013. doi:10.1080/02331934.2013.848860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei QL, Zhang J, Zhang X. An inverse DEA model for input/output estimate. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2000;121:151–163.10.1016/S0377-2217(99)00007-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi-Vencheh A. Inverse data envelopment analysis. Heidelberg: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Yan H, Wei Q, Hao G. DEA models for resource reallocation and production input/output estimation. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002;136:19–31.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00046-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi-Vencheh A, Foroughi A, Soleimani-damaneh M. A DEA model for resource allocation. Econ. Modell. 2008;25:983–993.10.1016/j.econmod.2008.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, Tohidi G, Razavyan S. The outputs estimation of a DMU according to improvement of its efficiency. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004a;147:409–413.10.1016/S0096-3003(02)00734-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, Tohidi G, Razavyan S. Input estimation and identification of extra inputs in inverse DEA models. Appl. Math. Comput. 2004b;156:427–437.10.1016/j.amc.2003.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahanshahloo GR, Hosseinzadeh Lotfi F, Shoja N, Tohidi G, Razavyan S. Sensitivity of efficiency classifications in the inverse DEA models. Appl. Math. Comput. 2005;169:905–916.10.1016/j.amc.2004.09.093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hadi-Vencheh A, Foroughi AA. A generalized DEA model for inputs/outputs estimation. Math. Comput. Modell. 2006;43:447–457.10.1016/j.mcm.2005.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lertworasirikul S, Charnsethikul P, Fang S. Inverse data envelopment analysis model to preserve relative efficiency values: the case of variable returns to scale. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2011;61:1017–1023.10.1016/j.cie.2011.06.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatami-Marbini A, Emrouznejad A, Tavana M. A taxonomy and review of the fuzzy data envelopment analysis literature: two decades in the making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2011;214:457–472.10.1016/j.ejor.2011.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G. IDEA and AR-IDEA: models for dealing with imprecise data in DEA. Manage. Sci. 1999;45:597–607.10.1287/mnsc.45.4.597
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper WW, Park KS, Yu G. An illustrative application of idea (imprecise data envelopment analysis) to a Korean mobile telecommunication company. Oper. Res. 2001;49:807–820.10.1287/opre.49.6.807.10022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Entani T, Maeda Y, Tanaka H. Dual models of interval DEA and its extension to interval data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002;136:32–45.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00055-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Despotis DK, Smirlis YG. Data envelopment analysis with imprecise data. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2002;140:24–36.10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00200-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang YM, Greatbanks R, Yang J. Interval efficiency assessment using data envelopment analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 2005;153:347–370.10.1016/j.fss.2004.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shokouhi AH, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Saati S. A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Comput. Ind. Eng. 2010;59:387–397.10.1016/j.cie.2010.05.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad A, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M, Aghayi N. An overall profit Malmquist productivity index with fuzzy and interval data. Math. Comput. Modell. 2011;54:2827–2838.10.1016/j.mcm.2011.07.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emrouznejad A, Rostamy-Malkhalifeh M, Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M. General and multiplicative non-parametric corporate performance models with interval ratio data. Appl. Math. Modell. 2012;36:5506–5514.10.1016/j.apm.2011.12.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell M. The measurement of productive efficiency. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. A. 1957;120:253–281.10.2307/2343100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lovell CAK. The measurement of efficiency of production. Boston, MA: Kluwer/Nijhoff; 1985.10.1007/978-94-015-7721-2
   Google Scholar
• Steuer RE. Multiple criteria optimization: theory, computation, and application. New York (NY): Wiley; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Hwang CL, Masud ASM. Multiple objective decision making–methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer; 1979.10.1007/978-3-642-45511-7
   Google Scholar