The modeling of coalition for environmental protection within co-utility framework

References

• Chander P, Tulkens H. The core of an economy with multilateral environmental externalities. Int J Game Theory. 1997;26(3):379–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyckmans J, Tulkens H. Simulating coalitionally stable burden sharing agreements for the climate change problem. Res Energy Econ. 2003;25:299–327.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chander P. The gamma-core and coalition formation. Int J Game Theory. 2007;35(4):379–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett S. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements. Oxford Econ Pap. 1994;46:878–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett S. Environment and statecraft: the strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Botteon M, Carraro C. Environmental coalitions with heterogeneous countries: burden-sharing and carbon leakage. In: Ulph A, editor. Environmental policy, international agreements, and international trade. Oxford: OUP; 2001. p. 38–66.
   Google Scholar
• Finus M, van Ierland E, Dellink R. Stability of climate coalitions in a cartel formation game. Econ Gov. 2006;7:271–291.
   Google Scholar
• Rubio JS, Ulph U. Self-enforcing international environmental agreements revisited. Oxford Econ Pap. 2006;58:223–263.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGinty M. International environmental agreements among asymmetric nations. Oxford Econ Pap. 2007;59:45–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmani D, Tol RSJ. The case of two self-enforcing international environmental agreements for environmental protection with asymmetric countries. Comput Econ. 2010;36(2):93–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Domingo-Ferrer J, Soria-Comas J, Ciobotaru O. Co-utility: self-enforcing protocols without coordination mechanisms. In: International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. Dubai, United Arab Emirates; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani D, Tol RSJ. Towards farsightedly stable international environmental agreements. J Public Econ Theory. 2009;11(3):455–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osmani D, Tol RSJ. Towards farsightedly stable international environmental agreements: part two (revised version). Working Paper, FNU-149; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Osmani D. A note on computational aspects of farsighted coalitional stability (revised version). Working Paper, FNU-194; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Chwe M. Farsighted coalitional stability. J Econ Theory. 1994;63:299–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harsanyi J. An equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition. Manage Sci. 1974;20:1472–1495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chander P, Tulkens H. A core-theoretic solution for the design of cooperative agreements on transfrontier pollution. Int Tax Public Finance. 1995;2:279–293.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr E, Gaechter S. Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. Am Econ Rev. 2000;90:980–994.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom E. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J Econ Perspect. 2000;14(3):137–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Kyoto, efficiency, and cost-effectiveness. An Application of FUND. Energy Journal Special Issue on the Costs of the Kyoto Protocol: A Multi-Model Evaluation; 1999. p. 130–156.
   Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Spatial and temporal efficiency in climate change. An Application of FUND. Environ Res Econ. 1999;58(1):33–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Equitable cost-benefit analysis of climate change. Ecol Econ. 2001;36(1):71–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Welfare specifications and optimal control of climate change. An Application of FUND. Energy Econ. 2002;24:367–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aubin JP. Cooperative fuzzy games. Math Oper Res. 1981;6:1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azrieli Y, Lehrer E. On some families of cooperative fuzzy games. Int J Game Theory. 2007;36:1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change -- part 1: benchmark estimates. Environ Res Econ. 2002;21:47–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change -- part 2: benchmark estimates. Environ Res Econ. 2002;21:135–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Link PM, Tol RSJ. Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of fund. Port Econ J. 2004;3:99–114.
   Google Scholar
• Tol RSJ. Multi-gas emission reduction for climate change policy. An Application of FUND. Energy J. in Volume: Multi-Greenhouse Gas Mitigation and Climate Policy: Special Issue 3.
   Google Scholar
• Batjes J, Goldewijk C. The IMAGE 2 hundred year (1890–1990) database of the global environment (HYDE). Bilthoven: RIVM; 1994. (Report No. 410100082).
   Google Scholar
• W.R.I. World resources database. Washington (DC): World Resources Institute; 2000--2001.
   Google Scholar
• Leggett J, Pepper WJ, Swart R. Emissions scenarios for the IPCC: an update. In: Houghton JT, Callander BA, Varney SK, editors. Climate change 1992: the supplementary report to the IPCC scientific assessment. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992. p. 69–97.
   Google Scholar
• Maier-Reimer E, Hasselmann K. Transport and storage of carbon dioxide in the ocean: an inorganic ocean circulation carbon cycle model. Clim Dyn. 1987;2:63–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammitt JK, Lempert RJ, Schlesinger ME. A sequential-decision strategy for abating climate change. Nature. 1992;357:315–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shine KP, Derwent RG, Wuebbles DJ, Morcrette JJ. Radiative forcing of climate in climate change. In: Houghton JT, Jenkins GJ, Ephraums JJ, editors. The IPCC scientific assessment. 1st ed. Vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1990. p. 41–69.
   Google Scholar
• Mendelsohn R, Morrison W, Schlesinger ME, Andronova NG. Country-specific market impacts of climate change. Clim Change. 2000;45:553–569.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kattenberg A, Giorgi F, Grassl H, Meehl GA, Mitchell JFB, Stouffer RJ, Tokioka T, Weaver AJ, Wigley TML. Climate models -- projections of future climate, in climate change 1995: the science of climate change. In: Houghton JT, Meira Filho LG, Callander BA, Harris N, Kattenberg A, Maskell K, editors. Contribution of working group I to the second assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. 1st ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996. p. 285–359.
   Google Scholar