A symplectic pseudospectral method for constrained time-delayed optimal control problems and its application to biological control problems

References

• Huo H, Chen R, Wang X. Modelling and stability of HIV/AIDS epidemic model with treatment. Appl Math Model. 2016;40(13-14):6550–6559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misra OP, Sinha P, Singh C. Stability and bifurcation analysis of a prey–predator model with age based predation. Appl Math Model. 2013;37(9):6519–6529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wangari IM, Davis S, Stone L. Backward bifurcation in epidemic models: problems arising with aggregated bifurcation parameters. Appl Math Model. 2016;40(2):1669–1675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zakary O, Rachik M, Elmouki I. A multi-regional epidemic model for controlling the spread of Ebola: awareness, treatment, and travel-blocking optimal control approaches. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2017;40(4):1265–1279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Apreutesei NC. An optimal control problem for a prey–predator system with a general functional response. Appl Math Lett. 2009;22(7):1062–1065.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ledzewicz U, Naghnaeian M, Schättler H. Optimal response to chemotherapy for a mathematical model of tumor–immune dynamics. J Math Biol. 2012;64(3):557–577.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shu H, Hu X, Wang L, et al. Delay induced stability switch, multitype bistability and chaos in an intraguild predation model. J Math Biol. 2015;71(6-7):1269–1298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu R. Global stability of a delayed epidemic model with latent period and vaccination strategy. Appl Math Model. 2012;36(11):5293–5300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bashier EBM, Patidar KC. Optimal control of an epidemiological model with multiple time delays. Appl Math Comput. 2017;292:47–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha D, Silva CJ, Torres DFM. Stability and optimal control of a delayed HIV model. Math Methods Appl Sci. 2016;41(6):2251–2260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg D, Patterson MA, Hager WW. A unified framework for the numerical solution of optimal control problems using pseudospectral methods. Automatica (Oxf). 2010;46(11):1843–1851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross IM, Karpenko M. A review of pseudospectral optimal control: from theory to flight. Annu Rev Control. 2012;36(2):182–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki M, Hashim I. Adaptive pseudospectral methods for solving constrained linear and nonlinear time-delay optimal control problems. J Franklin Inst. 2014;351(2):811–839.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maleki MA, Hashim IA, Abbasbandy SB. Solution of time-varying delay systems using an adaptive collocation method. Appl Math Comput. 2012;219(4):1434–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göllmann L, Kern D, Maurer H. Optimal control problems with delays in state and control variables subject to mixed control-state constraints. Optim Contr Appl Met. 2009;75(30):341–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Peng H, Shi B, et al. Optimal vaccination strategy of a constrained time-varying SEIR epidemic model. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2019;67:37–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betts JT. Practical methods for optimal control using nonlinear programming. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson AE, Ho YC. Applied optimal control. New York: Hemisphere; 1975.
   Google Scholar
• Fabien BC. Numerical solution of constrained optimal control problems with parameters. Appl Math Comput. 1996;80(1):43–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park C, Scheeres D, Guibout V. Solving optimal continuous Thrust Rendezvous problems with generating functions. J Guid Contr Dynam. 2013;37(29):396–401.
   Google Scholar
• Jajarmi A, Hajipour M. An efficient finite difference method for the time-delay optimal control problems with time-varying delay. Asian J Control. 2017;19(2):554–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng K, Qin M. Symplectic Geometric algorithms for Hamiltonian systems. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Peng H, Gao Q, Wu Z, et al. Symplectic approaches for solving two-point boundary-value problems. AIAA J Guid Contr Dynam. 2012;35(2):653–659.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li M, Peng H, Zhong W. A symplectic Sequence iteration approach for nonlinear optimal control problems with state-control constraints. J Franklin Inst. 2015;352(6):2381–2406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Gao Q, Wu Z, et al. Efficient Sparse approach for solving Receding-Horizon control problems. AIAA Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 2013;36(6):1864–1872.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Gao Q, Wu Z, et al. Symplectic adaptive algorithm for solving nonlinear two-point boundary value problems in astrodynamics. Celest Mech Dyn Astron. 2011;110(4):319–342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Wang X, Li M, et al. An hp symplectic pseudospectral method for nonlinear optimal control. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2017;42:623–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Szmuk M, Açıkmeşe B. Successive convexification of non-convex optimal control problems and its convergence properties. IEEE Conference on Decision & Control. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Mao Y, Szmuk M, Acikmese B. Successive Convexification: A Superlinearly Convergent Algorithm for Non-convex Optimal Control Problems. arXiv:1804.06539.
   Google Scholar
• Jaddu H. Direct solution of nonlinear optimal control problems using quasilinearization and Chebyshev polynomials. J Franklin Inst. 2002;339(4):479–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellman R, Kalaba R. Quasilinearization and nonlinear boundary value problems. New York: Elsevier; 1965.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Peng H, Zhang S, et al. A symplectic pseudospectral method for nonlinear optimal control problem with inequality constraints. ISA Transaction. 2017;68:335–352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng H, Wang X, Sheng Z, et al. An iterative symplectic pseudospectral method to solve nonlinear state-delayed optimal control problems. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul. 2017;48:95–114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Peng H, Zhang S, et al. A symplectic local pseudospectral method for solving nonlinear state-delayed optimal control problems with inequality constraints. Int J Robust Nonlinear Control. 2018;28:2097–2120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen J, Tang T, Wang L. Spectral methods: algorithms, analysis and applications. Heidelberg: Springer; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cottle RW, Pang J, Stone RE. The linear complementarity problem. Boston: SIAM; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Tomlin JA. Robust implementation of Lemke’s method for the linear complementarity problem. Math Program Stud. 1978;7:55–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biswas MHA, Paiva LT, Pinho dD. A SEIR model for control of infectious diseases with constraints. Math Biosci Eng. 2014;11(4):761–784.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Ma M. Impact of prevention in a tuberculosis model with latent delay. Adv Differ Equ. 2016;1:220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee S, Chowell G. Exploring optimal control strategies in seasonally varying flu-like epidemics. J Theor Biol. 2017;412:36–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okosun KO, Makinde OD. Modelling the impact of drug resistance in malaria transmission and its optimal control analysis. Int J Phys Sci. 2011;6(6):6479–6487.
   Google Scholar
• Ledzewicz U, Brown T, Schttler H. Comparison of optimal controls for a model in cancer chemotherapy with L1 and L2 type objectives. Optim Methods Softw. 2004;19(3):339–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bara O, Djouadi SM, Day JD, et al. Immune therapeutic strategies using optimal controls with L1 and L2 type objectives. Math Biosci. 2017;290:9–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar