Lagrange multiplier rules for weak approximate Pareto solutions to constrained vector optimization problems with variable ordering structures

References

• Götz A, Jahn J. The Lagrange multiplier rule in set-valued optimization. SIAM J Optim. 1999;10:331–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu QJ. Hamiltonian necessary conditions for a multiobjective optimal control problem with endpoint constraints. SIAM J Control Optim. 2000;39:97–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS, Wang BW. Necessary suboptimality and optimality conditions via variational principles. SIAM J Control Optim. 2001;41:623–640.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huynh Van Ngai, Théra M. A fuzzy necessary optimality condition for non-Lipschitz optimization in Asplund spaces. SIAM J Optim. 2002;12:656–668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XY, Ng KF. The Lagrange multiplier rule for multifunctions in Banach space. SIAM J Optim. 2006;17:1154–1175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao TQ, Mordukhovich BS. Relative Pareto minimizers for multiobjective problems: existence and optimality conditions. Math Program. 2010;122:301–347.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbig S, Pateva D. On several concepts for ε-efficiency. OR Spektrum. 1994;16:179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez C, Jiménez B, Novo V. A unified approach and optimality conditions for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems. SIAM J Optim. 2006;17:688–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez C, Jiménez B, Novo V. On approximate efficiency in multiobjective programming. Math Methods Oper Res. 2006;64:165–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engau A, Wiecek MM. Cone characterizations of approximate solutions in real vector optimization. J Optim Theory Appl. 2007;134:499–513.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng XY, Ng KF. A unified separation theorem for closed sets in a Banach space and optimality conditions for vector optimization. SIAM J Optim. 2011;21:886–911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G. Optimal elements in vector optimization with a variable ordering structure. J Optim Theory Appl. 2011;151:217–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G, Ha TXD. Optimality conditions for vector optimization problems with variable ordering structures. Optimization. 2013;62:597–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G. Variable ordering structures in vector optimization. Heidelberg: Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G. Numerical procedures in multiobjective optimization with variable ordering structures. J Optim Theory Appl. 2014;162:489–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G, Kasimbeyli R. Properly optimal elements in vector optimization with variable ordering structures. J Global Optim. 2014;60:689–712.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani B. Characterization of approximate solutions of vector optimization problems with a variable order structure. J Optim Theory Appl. 2014;162:605–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soleimani B, Tammer C. Concepts for approximate solutions of vector optimization problems with variable order structures. Vietnam J Math. 2014;42:543–566.
   Google Scholar
• Bao TQ, Mordukhovich BS. Necessary nondomination conditions in set and vector optimization with variable ordering structures. J Optim Theory Appl. 2014;162:350–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao TQ, Mordukhovich BS, Soubeyran A. Fixed points and variational principles with applications to capability theory of wellbeing via variational rationality. Set-Valued Var Anal. 2015;23:375–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao TQ, Mordukhovich BS, Soubeyran A. Minimal points, variational principles, and variable preferences in set optimization. J Nonlinear Convex Anal. 2015;16:1511–1537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durea M, Strugariu R, Tammer C. On set-valued optimization problems with variable ordering structure. J Global Optim. 2015;61:745–767.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eichfelder G, Gerlach T. Characterization of properly optimal elements with variable ordering structures. Optimization. 2016;65:571–588.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florea EA. Coderivative necessary optimality conditions for sharp and robust efficiencies in vector optimization with variable ordering structure. Optimization. 2016;65:1417–1435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu PL. Cone convexity, cone extreme points, and nondominated solutions in decision problems with multiobjectives. J Optim Theory Appl. 1974;14:319–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu PL. Multiple-criteria decision making: concepts, techniques and extensions. New York: Plenum Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Engau A. Variable preference modeling with ideal-symmetric convex cones. J Global Optim. 2008;42:295–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bao TQ, Eichfelder G, Soleimani B, et al. Ekeland's variational principle for vector optimization with variable ordering structure. J Convex Anal. 2017;24:393–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouza G, Tammer C. Nonlinear scalarizing functionals for computing minimal points under variable ordering structures. Appl Anal Optim. 2017;1:67–97.
   Google Scholar
• Khan AA, Soleimani B, Tammer C. Second-order optimality conditions in set-valued optimization with variable ordering structure. Pure Appl Funct Anal. 2017;2:305–316.
   Google Scholar
• Köbis E. Set optimization by means of variable order relations. Optimization. 2017;66:1991–2005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis E, Le TT, Tammer C, et al. A new scalarizing functional in set optimization with respect to variable domination structures. Appl Anal Optim. 2017;1:301–326.
   Google Scholar
• Köbis E, Tammer C. Robust vector optimization with a variable domination structure. Carpathian J Math. 2017;33:343–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köbis E, Le TT, Tammer C. A generalized scalarization method in set optimization with respect to variable domination structures. Vietnam J Math. 2018;46:95–125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florea EA. Vector optimization problems with generalized functional constraints in variable ordering structure setting. J Optim Theory Appl. 2018;178:94–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khanh PQ, Tung NM. Existence and boundedness of second-order Karush-Kuhn-Tucker multipliers for set-valued optimization with variable ordering structures. Taiwanese J Math. 2018;22:1001–1029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahbeyk S, Soleimani-damaneh M, Kasimbeyli R. Hartley properly and super nondominated solutions in vector optimization with a variable ordering structure. J Global Optim. 2018;71:383–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD. On the local surjection property. Nonlinear Anal TMA. 1987;11:565–592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD. Penot JP. Subdifferentials of performance functions and calculus of coderivatives of setvalued mappings. Serdica Math J. 1996;22:257–282.
   Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD. Fuzzy principles and characterization of trustworthiness. Set-Valued Anal. 1998;6:265–276.
   Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD. Variational analysis of regular mappings. New York: Springer; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Ioffe AD. Metric regularity and subdifferential calculus. Russian Math Surveys. 2000;55:501–558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS. Variational analysis and generalized differentiation I. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zheng XY, Li R. Lagrange multiplier rules for weak approximate Pareto solutions of constrained vector optimization problems in Hilbert spaces. J Optim Theory Appl. 2014;162:665–679.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mordukhovich BS, Treiman JS, Zhu QJ. An extended extremal principle with applications to multiobjective optimization. SIAM J Optim. 2003;14:359–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar