Robust projection twin support vector machine via DC programming

References

• Cortes C, Vapnik V. Support vector networks. Mach Learn. 1995;20:273–297.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng N, Tian Y, Zhang C. Support vector machines: optimization based theory, algorithms, and extensions. New York: CRC Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado S, López J. Alternative second-order cone programming formulations for support vector classification. Inf Sci. 2014;268:328–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bai YQ, Niu BL, Chen Y. New SDP models for protein homology detection with semi-supervised SVM. Optimization. 2013;62(4):561–572.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Ju X, Qi Z. Efficient sparse nonparallel support vector machines for classification. Neural Comput Appl. 2014;24(5):1089–1099.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burges CJ. A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Min Knowl Discov. 1998;2(2):121–167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangasarian OL, Wild EW. Multisurface proximal support vector machine classification via generalized eigenvalues. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2005;28(1):69–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khemchandani R, Chandra S. Twin support vector machines for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2007;29(5):905–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar MA, Gopal M. Application of smoothing technique on twin support vector machines. Pattern Recognit Lett. 2008;29(13):1842–1848.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng X. TPMSVM: a novel twin parametric-margin support vector machine for pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit. 2011;44(10–11):2678–2692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Q, Zhao C, Zhang H, et al. Distance difference and linear programming nonparallel plane classifier. Expert Syst Appl. 2011;38(8):9425–9433.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao YH, Zhang CH, Wang XB, et al. Improvements on twin support vector machines. IEEE Trans neural Networks. 2011;22(6):962–968.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li CN, Shao YH, Deng NY. Robust L1-norm non-parallel proximal support vector machine. Optimization. 2016;65(1):169–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumar MA, Gopal M. Least squares twin support vector machines for pattern classification. Expert Syst Appl. 2009;36(4):7535–7543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian Y, Qi Z, Ju X, et al. Nonparallel support vector machines for pattern classification. IEEE Trans Cybern. 2013;44(7):1067–1079.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li GQ, Yang LX, Wu ZY, et al. D.C. programming for sparse proximal support vector machines. Inf Sci. 2021;547(2021):187–201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XB, Yang J, Ye QL, et al. Recursive projection twin support vector machine via within-class variance minimization. Pattern Recognit. 2011;44(2011):2643–2655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shao YH, Wang Z, Chen WJ, et al. A regularization for the projection twin support vector machine. Knowlage Based Syst. 2013;37(2013):203–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen WJ, Shao YH, Li CN, et al. v-projection twin support vector machine for pattern classification. Neurocomputing. 2020;376(2020):10–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nath JS, Bhattacharyya C. Maximum margin classifiers with specified false positive and false negative error rates. In: Proceedings of the 2007 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. Minnesota: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2007 Apr. p. 35–46.
   Google Scholar
• Maldonado S, López J, Carrasco M. A second-order cone programming formulation for twin support vector machines. Appl Intell. 2016;45(2):265–276.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López J, Maldonado S, Carrasco M. Robust nonparallel support vector machines via second-order cone programming. Neurocomputing. 2019;364:227–238.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng D, Zhao Q, Xu Z. Improve robustness of sparse PCA by L1-norm maximization. Pattern Recognit. 2012;45(1):487–497.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peng X, Xu D, Kong L, et al. L1-norm loss based twin support vector machine for data recognition. Inf Sci (Ny). 2016;340:86–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu Z, Zhang Z, Sun J, et al. Robust image recognition by L1-norm twin-projection support vector machine. Neurocomputing. 2015;223:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang T. Analysis of multi-stage convex relaxation for sparse regularization. J Mach Learn Res. 2010;11(3):1081–1107.
   Google Scholar
• Le Thi HA, Dinh TP. DC programming and DCA: thirty years of developments. Math Program. 2018;169(1):5–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu C, Li C, Long Q. A DC programming approach for sensor network localization with uncertainties in anchor positions. J Ind Manage Optim. 2014;10(3):817.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López J, Maldonado S, Carrasco M. Double Regularization methods for robust feature selection and SVM classification via DC programming. Inf Sci (Ny). 2018;429:377–389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tao PD, An LTH. Convex analysis approach to DC programming: theory, algorithms and applications. Acta Math Vietnamica. 1997;22(1):289–355.
   Google Scholar
• Qi Z, Tian Y, Shi Y. Robust twin support vector machine for pattern classification. Pattern Recognit. 2013;46(1):305–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye Q, Zhao C, Gao S, et al. Weighted twin support vector machines with local information and its application. Neural Netw. 2012;35:31–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding S, Hua X, Yu J. An overview on nonparallel hyperplane support vector machine algorithms. Neural Comput Appl. 2014;25(5):975–982.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ripley B. Pattern recognition and neural networks. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Bache K, Lichman M. UCI machine learning repository, 2013. [Online]. Available at: http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/.
   Google Scholar