Discrete empirical interpolation and unfitted mesh FEMs: application in PDE-constrained optimization

References

• Aretaki A, Karatzas EN. Random geometries for optimal control PDE problems based on fictitious domain FEMS and cut elements. 2022. Available from: https://arxiv.org/abs/2003.00352.
   Google Scholar
• Dedé L. Reduced basis method and a posteriori error estimation for parametrized linear- quadratic optimal control problems. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2010;32:997–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lions JL. Optimal Control of Systems Governed by Partial Differential Equations. Vol. 170. Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 1971.
   Google Scholar
• Tröltzsch F. Optimal control of partial differential equations: theory, methods and applications. Vol. 112. Graduate Studies in Mathematics, AMS, Providence; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Negri F, Manzoni A, Rozza G. Reduced basis approximation of parametrized optimal flow control problems for the Stokes equations. Comput & Math with Appl. 2015;69:319–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kärcher M, Grepl MA. A certified reduced basis method for parametrized elliptic optimal control problems. ESAIM Control Optim Calc Var. 2014;20:416–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negri F, Rozza G, Manzoni A, et al. Reduced basis methods for parametrized elliptic optimal control problems. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2013;35:A2316–A2340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dihlmann M, Haasdonk B. Certified PDE-constrained parameter optimization using reduced basis surrogate models for evolution problems. Comput Optim Appl. 2015;60:753–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunisch K, Volkwein S. Proper orthogonal decomposition for optimality systems. ESAIM MAth Model Numer Anal. 2008;42:1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tonn T, Urban K, Volkwein S. Comparison of the reduced basis and a posteriori error estimators for an elliptic linear-quadratic optimal control problem. Math Comput Model Dynam Syst. 2011;17:355–369.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strazzullo M, Ballarin F, Mosetti R, et al. Model reduction for parametrized optimal control problems in environmental marine sciences and engineering. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2018;40(4):B1055–B1079.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman E, Clauss S, Hansbo P, et al. CutFEM: discretizing geometry and partial differential equations. Int J Numer Meth Engn. 2005;104:472–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peskin CS. Flow patterns around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys. 1972;10:252–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu CH, Faltinsen OM, Chen BF. Time-Independent finite difference and ghost cell method to study sloshing liquid in 2D and 3D tanks with internal structures. Commun Comput Phys. 2013;13(3):780–800.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasquariello V, Hammerl G, 'Orley F, et al. A cut-cell finite volume-finite element coupling approach for fluid-structure interaction in compressible flow. J Comput Phys. 2016;307:670–695.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kolahdouz EM, Bhalla APS, Craven BA, et al. An Immersed Interface Method for Faceted Surfaces. preprint (2018). Available from: arXiv:1812.06840v2.
   Google Scholar
• Bo W, Grove JW. A volume of fluid method based ghost fluid method for compressible multi-fluid flows. Comput Fluids. 2014;90:113–122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Main A, Scovazzi G. The shifted boundary method for embedded domain computations part I: Poisson and Stokes problems. J Comput Phys. 2018;372:972–995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duprez M, Lozinski A. ϕ-FEM: a finite element method on domains defined by level-sets. preprint 2019. Available from: arXiv: 1901.03966v3.
   Google Scholar
• Burman E, Hansbo P. Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements: I. A stabilized Lagrange multiplier method. Comput Meth Appl Mech Engrg. 2010;199(41-44):2680–2686.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burman E, Hansbo P. Fictitious domain finite element methods using cut elements II. A stabilized Nitsche method. Appl Num Math. 2012;62(4):328–341.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lozinski A. CutFEM without cutting the mesh cells: a new way to impose Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions unfitted meshes. preprint 2019. Available from: arXiv: 1901.03966.
   Google Scholar
• Hansbo A, Hansbo P. An unfitted finite element method, based on Nitsche's method, for elliptic interface problems. Computer Meth Appl Mech Engrg. 2002;191(47–48):5537–5552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Rozza G. A reduced order model for a stable embedded boundary parametrized Cahn–Hilliard phase-field system based on cut finite elements. J Sci Comput. 2021;89(9): DOI: 10.1007/s10915-021-01623-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mittal R, Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech. 2005;37(1):239–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Ballarin F, Rozza G. Projection-based reduced order models for a cut finite element method in parametrized domains. Computers & Math Appl. 2020;79:833–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Stabile G, Atallah N, et al. A reduced order approach for the embedded shifted boundary FEM and a heat exchange system on parametrized geometries. In: Fehr J, Haasdonk B, editors. IUTAM Symposium on Model Order Reduction of Coupled Systems. Stuttgart, Germany, May 22–25, 2018; Cham: Springer; 2020. (IUTAM Bookseries; 36).
   Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Stabile G, Nouveau L, et al. A reduced basis approach for PDEs on parametrized geometries based on the shifted boundary finite element method and application to a Stokes flow. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2019;347:568–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Stabile G, Nouveau L, et al. A reduced-order shifted boundary method for parametrized incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Comput Methods Appl Mech Engrg. 2020;370:113–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rozza G, Huynh DBP, Patera AT. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error estimation for affinely parametrized elliptic coercive partial differential equations. Arch Comput Methods Eng. 2008;15:229–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaturantabut S, Sorensen DC. Nonlinear model reduction via discrete empirical interpolation. SIAM J Sci Comput. 2010;32:2737–2764.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antil H, Heinkenschloss M, Sorensen DC. Application of the discrete empirical interpolation method to reduced order modeling of nonlinear and parametric systems. In: Quarteroni A, Rozza G, editors. Reduced order methods for modeling and computational reduction. Milan: Springer Italia; 2014. p. 101–136. (MS&A. Model. Simul. Appl.; 9).
   Google Scholar
• Tiso P, Rixen DJ. Discrete empirical interpolation method for finite element structural dynamics. In Kerschen G, Adams D, Carrella A, editors. Topics in nonlinear dynamics. Vol. 1, Vol. 35, New York: Springer; 2013. p. 203–212. (Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series).
   Google Scholar
• Quarteroni A, Manzoni A, Negri F. Reduced basis methods for partial differential equations: an introduction. UNITEXT, La Matematica per il 3+2, 92, Springer International Publishing Switzerland; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Gräßle C, Hinze M, Scharmacher N. POD for optimal control of the Cahn-Hilliard system using spatially adapted snapshots. In: Radu FA, Kumar K, Berre I, et al., editors. Numerical mathematics and advanced applications ENUMATH 2017. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 703–711.
   Google Scholar
• Schöberl A, Arnold J, Erb JM, et al. C++11 implementation of finite elements in NGSolve. Tech. Rep., Institute for Analysis and Scientific Computing, Vienna University of Technology, ASC Report 30/2014, (2014).
   Google Scholar
• Karatzas EN, Nonino M, Ballarin F, et al. A reduced order cut finite element method for geometrically parameterized steady and unsteady Navier-Stokes problems. Comput Math Appl. 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.camwa.2021.07.016.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar