A robust optimization method with successive linear programming for intensity-modulated radiation therapy

References

• Cancer Research UK. Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). [cited 2022 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.cancerresearchuk.org/about-cancer/cancer-in-general/treatment/radiotherapy/external/types/intensity-modulated-radiotherapy-imrt.
   Google Scholar
• Liu HH, Jauregui M, Zhang X, et al. Beam angle optimization and reduction for intensity-modulated radiation therapy of non–small-cell lung cancers. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;65(2):561–572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang X, Zhang X, Dong L, et al. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for imrt using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy. Int J Rad Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;60(4):1325–1337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt M, Zhang Y, Liu H, et al. A successive linear programming approach to IMRT optimization problem. University of Texas; 2002. (Technical report).
   Google Scholar
• Tuncel AT, Preciado F, Rardin RL, et al. Strong valid inequalities for fluence map optimization problem under dose-volume restrictions. Ann Oper Res. 2012;196(1):819–840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeijn HE, Ahuja RK, Dempsey JF, et al. A novel linear programming approach to fluence map optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Phys Med Biol. 2003;48(21):3521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kishimoto S, Yamashita M. A successive LP approach with C-VaR type constraints for IMRT optimization. Oper Res Health Care. 2018;17:55–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, et al. IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM task group 119. Med Phys. 2009;36(11):5359–5373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romeijn HE, Ahuja RK, Dempsey JF, et al. A new linear programming approach to radiation therapy treatment planning problems. Oper Res. 2006;54(2):201–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TC, Bortfeld T, Tsitsiklis JN. A robust approach to IMRT optimization. Phys Med Biol. 2006;51(10):2567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan TC, Mišić VV. Adaptive and robust radiation therapy optimization for lung cancer. Eur J Oper Res. 2013;231(3):745–756.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemkens B, Tijssen RH, De Senneville BD, et al. Image-driven, model-based 3d abdominal motion estimation for mr-guided radiotherapy. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(14):5335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S. Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk. 2000;2:21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ben-Tal A, El Ghaoui L, Nemirovski A. Robust optimization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Özmen A, Kropat E, Weber G-W. Robust optimization in spline regression models for multi-model regulatory networks under polyhedral uncertainty. Optimization. 2017;66(12):2135–2155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tirkolaee EB, Dashtian Z, Weber G-W, et al. An integrated decision-making approach for green supplier selection in an agri-food supply chain: threshold of robustness worthiness. Mathematics. 2021;9(11):1304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orrego S, Montes C, Restrepo HI, et al. Modeling height growth for teak plantations in colombia using the reducible stochastic differential equation approach. J For Res. 2021;32(3):1035–1045.
   Google Scholar
• Salmanmahiny A, Erfani M, Danehkar A, et al. Image texture indices and trend analysis for forest disturbance assessment under wood harvest regimes. J For Res. 2021;32(2):579–587.
   Google Scholar
• Soyster AL. Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Oper Res. 1973;21(5):1154–1157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalinin E, Deasy J. A method for fast 3-D IMRT dose calculations: the quadrant infinite beam (QIB) algorithm. Med Phys. 2003;30(6):1348–1349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shan J, An Y, Bues M, et al. Robust optimization in impt using quadratic objective functions to account for the minimum mu constraint. Med Phys. 2018;45(1):460–469.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chvatal V. Linear programming. New York: Macmillan; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Dempe S. Foundations of bilevel programming. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2002. (Nonconvex optimization and its applications; 61).
   Google Scholar
• Deasy JO, Blanco AI, Clark VH. CERR: a computational environment for radiotherapy research. Med Phys. 2003;30(5):979–985.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onak ON, Dogrusoz YS, Weber GW. Effects of a priori parameter selection in minimum relative entropy method on inverse electrocardiography problem. Inverse Probl Sci Eng. 2018;26(6):877–897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bortfeld T, Chan TC, Trofimov A, et al. Robust management of motion uncertainty in intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Oper Res. 2008;56(6):1461–1473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engberg L, Forsgren A, Eriksson K, et al. Explicit optimization of plan quality measures in intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning. Med Phys. 2017;44(6):2045–2053.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Iida E, Yamashita M. An infeasible interior-point arc-search method with nesterov's restarting strategy for linear programming problems. 2023. arXiv:2303.01666.
   Google Scholar
• Yamashita M, Iida E, Yang Y. An infeasible interior-point arc-search algorithm for nonlinear constrained optimization. Numer Algorithms. 2021;89:249–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Yamashita M. An arc-search O(nL) infeasible-interior-point algorithm for linear programming. Opt Lett. 2018;12(4):781–798.
   Google Scholar