On the use of play theory in analyses of online public commentary

REFERENCES

• Ackerman, B. and J. Fishkin. 2003. Deliberation Day. In Debating deliberative democracy, ed. J. Fishkin and P. Laslett, 7–30. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Althaus, S. 2006. False starts, dead ends, and new opportunities in public opinion research. Critical Review 18(1-3): 75–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appadurai, A. 1990. Disjuncture and difference in the global cultural economy. Theory, Culture & Society 7(2): 295–310.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, A. 2008. Blogging America: The new public sphere. Westport: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L. and J. Fessenden. 2006. Citizenship through online communication. Social Education 70(3): 144–146.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, L.W. 2005. Social movements beyond borders: Understanding two eras of transnational activism. In Transnational protest and global activism, ed. D. della Porta and S. Tarrow, 203–226. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Berger, A.A. 1995. Essentials of mass communication theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. 2009. Simulation of spoken interaction in written online media texts. Brno Studies in English 35(2): 109–128.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. 2010. Online discussions and interaction: The case of live text commentary. In Cases on online discussion and interaction, ed. L. Shedletsky and J.A. Aitken, 234–251. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Chovanec, J. 2012. Conversational humour and joint fantsizing in online journalism. In Language and humour in the media, ed. J. Chovanec and I. Ermida, 139–161. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. 2001. The transformation of citizenship? In New media and politics, ed. B. Axford and R. Huggins, 109–127. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, S. and J.G. Blumler. 2009. The Internet and democratic citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Crespi, I. 1997. The public opinion process: How the people speak. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Dewey, J. 1927. The public and its problems. New York: Holt.
   Google Scholar
• Eldridge, J. and L. Eldridge. 1994. Raymond Williams: Making connections. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fairfield, P. 2009. Education after Dewey. New York: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Fishkin, J. and P. Laslett, eds. 2003. Debating deliberative democracy. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, T.L. 1982. Play, pleasure and the value of newsreading. Communication Quarterly 30(2): 101–107.
   Google Scholar
• Glasser, T.L. 2000. Play and the power of news. Journalism 1(1): 23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Goidel, K. 2011. Public opinion polling in a digital age: Meaning and measurement. In Political polling in the digital age, ed. K. Goidel, 11–27. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1996a. Cultural studies and the politics of internationalization: An interview with Stuart Hall. In Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, ed. D. Morley and K-H. Chen, 393–409. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hall, S. 1996b. The formation of a diasporic intellectual: An interview with Stuart Hall by Kuan-Hsing Chen. In Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, ed. D. Morley and K-H. Chen, 487–505. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hamel, P., H. Lustiger-Thaler, J. Pieterse and S. Roseneil. 2001. Introduction: The shifting frames of collective action. In Globalization and social movements, ed. P. Hamel, H. Lustiger-Thaler, J. Pieterse and S. Roseneil, 1–19. Houndmills: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Hardaker, C. 2010. Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research 6(2): 215–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hearn, F. 1976. Toward a critical theory of play. Telos 30: 145–160.
   Google Scholar
• Hermes, J. 2006. Citizenship in the age of the internet. European Journal of Communication 21(3): 295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herring, S. 2003. Computer-mediated discourse. In The handbook of discourse analysis, ed. D. Schiffrin, D. Tannen and H.E. Hamilton, 612–634. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Horkheimer, M. and T. Adorno. 2006. The culture industry: Enlightenment and mass deception. In Media and cultural studies: Keyworks, ed. M.G. Durham and D.M. Kellner, 41–72. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Huizinga, J. 1950. Homo ludens. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, D. and R. Kies. 2005. Online forums and deliberative democracy. Acta Politica 40(3): 317–335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly, J., D. Fisher and M. Smith. 2009. Friends, foes and fringe: Norms and structure in political discussion networks. In Online deliberation: Design, research and practice, ed. T. Davies and S. Gangadharan, 83–93. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, J., R. Wyatt and E. Katz. 1999. News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political Communication 16(4): 361–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozić, M. 2012. Framing communication as play in the sitcom: Patterning the verbal and the nonverbal in humour. In Language and humour in the media, ed. J. Chovanec and I. Ermida, 107–137. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Marcuse, H. 1955. Eros and civilization: Philosophical inquiry in Freud. Boston: Beacon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. 1999. Vote.com: How big-money lobbyists and the media are losing their influence, and the Internet is giving power back to the people. Los Angeles: Renaissance.
   Google Scholar
• Mossberger, K., C. Tolbert and R. McNeal. 2008. Digital citizenship: The internet, society and participation. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murdock, G. 1997. Communications and the constitution of modernity. In The media studies reader, ed. T. O'Sullivan and Y. Jewkes, 52–59. New York: St. Martin's Press.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, G. 2004. Matters of opinion: Talking about public issues. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nulens, G. 2003. The digital divide and development communication theory. Communicatio 29(1&2): 68–78.
   Google Scholar
• Oakeshott, M. 2004. What is history? And other essays, ed. L. O'Sullivan. Exeter: Imprint Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, T. and N. Rose 1999. Do social sciences create phenomena? The example of public opinion research. British Journal of Sociology 50(3): 367–396.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Price, V., L. Nir and J. Cappella. 2006. Normative and informational influences in online political discussions. Communication Theory 16(1): 47–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raessens, J. 2006. Playful identities, or the ludification of culture. Games and Culture 1(1): 52–57.
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, H. 2006. The playful and the serious: An approximation to Huizinga's Homo ludens. Game Studies 6(1). http://gamestudies.org/0601/articles/rodriges (accessed February 20, 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Roig, A., G.S. Cornelio, E. Ardèvol, P. Alsina and R. Pagès. 2009. Videogame as media practice: An exploration of the intersections between play and audiovisual culture. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 15(1): 89–103.
   Google Scholar
• Schegloff, E. 2007. Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis 1. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schudson, M. 2003. Click here for democracy: A history and critique of an information-based model of citizenship. In Democracy and new media, ed. H. Jenkins and D. Thornburn, 49–60. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuler, D. 2003. Reports of the close relationship between democracy and the Internet may have been exaggerated. In Democracy and new media, ed. H. Jenkins and D. Thornburn, 69–84. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Silverstone, R. 1994. Television and everyday life. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stephenson, W. 1967. The play theory of mass communication. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. 2003a. Cultural citizenship: Cosmopolitan questions. Maidenhead: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stevenson, N. 2003b. Cultural citizenship in the cultural society: A cosmopolitan approach. Citizenship Studies 7(3): 331–348.
   Google Scholar
• Stratton, J. and I. Ang. 1996. On the impossibility of a global cultural studies: ‘British’ cultural studies in an ‘international’ frame. In Stuart Hall: Critical dialogues in cultural studies, ed. D. Morley and K-H. Che, 360–392. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. 2003. The law of group polarization. In Debating deliberative democracy, ed. J. Fishkin and P. Laslett, 80–101. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Sunstein, C. 2006. ‘Citizens’ in Republic.com. In The new media theory reader, ed. R. Hassan and J. Thomas, 203–211. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thelwall, M. 2007. Blog searching: The first general-purpose source of retrospective public opinion in the social sciences? Online Information Review 31(3): 277–289.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toulmin, S. 1990. Cosmopolis: The hidden agenda of modernity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van De Donk, W., B. Loader, P. Nixon and D. Rucht, eds. 2004. Cyberprotest: New media, citizens and social movements. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Voltmer, K. and A. Römmele. 2002. Communicating the message: Theoretical approaches. In Public information campaigns and opinion research, ed. H-D. Klingemann and A. Römmele, 9–20. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, P. 1999. The psychology of the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, K.Y. 2010. Democratic deliberation in online consultation forums: A case study of the casino debate in Singapore. In Cases on online discussion and interaction, ed. L. Shedletsky and J.A. Aitken, 263–281. Hershey: Information Science Reference.
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, C. 2011. Modelling audience interactivity as the gratification-seeking process in online newspapers. Communication Theory 21(1): 67–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar