Digital Media and Discursive Contestation: The Importance of Feminist Counterpublics Online

References

• Babbie, E., and J. Mouton. 2001. The Practice of Social Research. Cape Town: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatasara, S., and M. K. Chiweshe. 2021. “Women in Zimbabwean Politics Post-November 2017.” Journal of Asian and African Studies 56 (2): 218–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620986576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castells, M. 2011. “A Network Theory of Power.” International Journal of Communication 5: 773–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chari, T. 2013. “New Communication Technologies and Journalism Ethics in Zimbabwe: Practices and Malpractices.” Online Journal of Communication and Media Technologies 3 (2): 112–36. doi: 10.29333/ojcmt/2426
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. 2006. “What’s Good Writing in Feminist Research? What Can Feminist Researchers Learn about Good Writing?.” In Handbook of Feminist Research: Theory and Praxis, edited by S. Hesse-Biber, 443–58. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Chigonda-Banda, R. 2014. “Duplicitous Double Binds: The Search for Womanhood in Zimbabwe.” Thinking Gender (March). Accessed July 29, 2022. https://escholarship.org/content/qt47t3p7qv/qt47t3p7qv.pdf?t=nmsnkg.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, P. H. 1991. Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness and the Politics of Empowerment. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Deuze, M. 2003. “The Web and Its Journalisms: Considering the Consequences of Different Types of Newsmedia Online.” New Media & Society 5 (2): 203–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444803005002004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Gennaro, C., and W. H. Dutton. 2006. “The Internet and the Public: Online and Offline Political Participation in the United Kingdom.” Parliamentary Affairs 59 (2): 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1093/pa/gsl004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felski, R. 1989. Beyond Feminist Aesthetics: Feminist Literature and Social Change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1990. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” Social Text 25–26: 56–80. https://doi.org/10.2307/466240.
   Google Scholar
• Fraser, N. 1992. “Rethinking the Public Sphere: A Contribution to the Critique of Actually Existing Democracy.” In Habermas and the Public Sphere, edited by C. Calhoun, 109–42. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, C. 2014. “Critique of the Political Economy of Informational Capitalism and Social Media.” In Social Media and the Information Society, edited by C. Fuchs and M. Sandoval, 51–65. New York: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203764077.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. 1989. The Social Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hesse-Biber, S., and P. Leavy. 2007. Feminist Research Practice. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412984270.
   Google Scholar
• Hussain, M. M., and P. N. Howard. 2012. “Opening Closed Regimes: Civil Society, Information Infrastructure and Political Islam.” In Digital Media and Political Engagement Worldwide: A Comparative Study, edited by M. Anduiza, J. Jensen, and L. Jorba, 200–220. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139108881.011.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. J., and S. Banaszczyk. 2016. Digital Standpoints: Debating Gendered Violence and Racial Exclusions in the Feminist Counterpublic.” Journal of Communication Inquiry 40 (4): 391–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0196859916667731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., and N. K. Denzin. 2000. “The Seventh Moment: Out of the Past.” In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2d ed., edited by N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, 1047–65. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mabweazara, H. M. 2011. “Between the Newsroom and the Pub: The Mobile Phone in the Dynamics of Everyday Mainstream Journalism Practice in Zimbabwe.” Journalism: Theory, Practice and Criticism 12 (6): 692–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884911405468.
   Google Scholar
• Mama, A. 2011. “What Does It Mean to Do Feminist Research in African Contexts?” Feminist Review 98 (1): e4–e20. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.22.
   Google Scholar
• Mann, C., and F. Stewart. 2000. Internet Communication and Qualitative Research: A Handbook for Researching Online. London: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781849209281.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, D. 2007. “Alternative Media, Diasporas and the Mediation of the Zimbabwe Crisis.” Ecquid Novi: African Journalism Studies 28 (1–2): 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/02560054.2007.9653360.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, D. 2009. “Citizen Journalism and the Parallel Market of Information in Zimbabwe’s 2008 Elections.” Journalism Studies 10 (4): 551–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616700902797291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyo, L., and B. Mutsvairo. 2018. “Can the Subaltern Think? The Decolonial Turn in Communication Research in Africa.” In The Palgrave Handbook of Media and Communication Research in Africa, edited by B. Mutsvairo, 19–40. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70443-2_2.
   Google Scholar
• Moyo, Z., and J. Perumal. 2020. “Systematic Review of Research on Women Leading and Managing Education in Zimbabwe.” Gender and Behaviour 18 (2): 15688–97.
   Google Scholar
• Moustakas, C. 1994. Phenomenological Research Methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu, S. 2016. “Blogging, Feminism and the Politics of Participation: The Case of HerZimbabwe.” In Digital Activism in the Social Media Era: Critical Reflections on Emerging Trends in Sub-Saharan Africa, edited by B. Mutsvairo, 273–341. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu, S. 2017. “Are Untouched Citizens Creating Their Deliberative Democracy Online? A Critical Analysis of Women’s Activist Media in Zimbabwe.” PhD diss., Stellenbosch University.
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu, S. 2018. “Women’s Voices Online and the Emergence of Lived Realities as Distinct Political Behaviour: A Womanist Approach of Selected Zimbabwean Blogs.” African Journalism Studies 39 (1): 4–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2018.1425151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudege, N. N., and C. Kwangari. 2013. “Women and Political Participation in Civil Society: Do Women Get Empowered? The Case of Women in Goromonzi District in Zimbabwe.” Journal of Women, Politics and Policy 34 (3): 238–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2012.722429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinharz, S. 1992. Feminist Method in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Renninger, B. 2015. “‘Where I Can Be Myself … Where I Can Speak My Mind’: Networked Counterpublics in a Polymedia Environment.” New Media and Society 17 (9): 1513–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814530095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmons, J. 2015. Qualitative Online Interviews. 2nd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Seidman Milburn, S., D. R. Carney, and A. M. Ramirez. 2001. “Even in Modern Media, the Picture Is Still the Same: A Content Analysis of Clip Art Images.” Sex Roles: A Journal of Research 44: 277–94. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010977515933.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seymour, W. S. 2001. “In the Flesh or Online? Exploring Qualitative Research Methodologies.” Qualitative Research 1 (2): 147–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/146879410100100203.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. 2011. Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D. 1990. The Conceptual Practises of Power: A Feminist Sociology of Knowledge. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Spivak, G. 1989. “Can the Subaltern Speak?” In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, edited by C. Nelson and L. Grossberg, 271–313. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sprague, J., and M. K. Zimmerman. 1993. “Overcoming Dualisms: A Feminist Agenda for Sociological Methodology.” In Theory on Gender/Feminism on Theory, edited by P. England, 255–80. New York: Aldine De Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Squires, J. 2004. “Politics Beyond Boundaries: A Feminist Perspective.” In What Is Politics? The Activity and Its Study, edited by A. Leftwich, 119–34. London: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Stacey, J. 1991. “Can There Be a Feminist Ethnography?” In Women’s Words: The Feminist Practice of Oral History, edited by S. B. Gluck and D. Patai, 111–19. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stromer-Galley, J. 2002. “New Voices in the Political Sphere: A Comparative Analysis of Interpersonal and Online Talk.” Javnost/The Public 9 (9): 23–42. https://doi.org/10.1080/13183222.2002.11008798.
   Google Scholar
• Tandon, A. 2018. Feminist Methodology in Technology Research: A Literature Review. Bangalore: Centre for Internet and Society.
   Google Scholar
• Toepfl, F., and E. Piwoni. 2015. “Public Spheres in Interaction: Comments Sections of News Websites as Counterpublic Spaces.” Journal of Communication 65 (3): 465–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vacchelli, E., and M. Peyrefitte. 2018. “Telling Digital Stories as Feminist Research Practice: A Two-Day Workshop with Migrant Women in London.” Methodological Innovation 11 (1): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/2059799118768424.
   Google Scholar