Comparative institutional analysis of customary rights and colonial law in spate irrigation systems of Pakistani Punjab

References

• Agrawal, A. (2007). Forests, governance, and sustainability: Common property theory and its contributions. International Journal of the Commons, 1(1), 111–136.
   Google Scholar
• Anderies, J. M., & Janssen, M. A. (2013). Sustaining the commons. Tempe, AZ: Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity; Arizona State University.
   Google Scholar
• Baland, J., & Platteau, J. (1998). Divisions of the commons: A partial assessment of the new institutional economics of land rights. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 80(3), 644–647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastakoti, R., & Shivakoti, G. P. 2011. Rules and collective action: An institutional analysis of the performance of irrigation systems in Nepal. Journal of Institutional Economics, First View Article, 1–22.
   Google Scholar
• Bastakoti, R. C., Shivakoti, G. P., & Lebel, L. (2010). Local irrigation management institutions mediate changes driven by external policy and market pressures in Nepal and Thailand. Environmental Management, 46(3), 411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A systematic approach to institutional analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 63, 523–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckmann, V., & Padmanabhan, M. (2009). Institutions and sustainability: Political economy of agriculture and the environment. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society. The nature and dynamics of social norms. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W. (1994). Changing rules, changing games: Evidence from groundwater systems in Southern California. In E. Ostrom, R. Gardner, & J. Walker (Eds.), Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blomquist, W., & Ostrom, E. (2008). Deliberation, learning, and institutional change: The evolution of institutions in judicial settings. Constitutional Political Economy, 19(3), 180–202.
   Google Scholar
• Bruns, B. (1993). Promoting participation in irrigation: Reflections on experience in Southeast Asia. World Development, 21(11), 1837–1849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruns, B. R., & Meinzen-Dick, R. S. (2000). Negotiating water rights. New Delhi: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M., Arnold, G., & Tomas, S. V. (2010). A review of design principles for community-based natural resource management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A grammar of institutions. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Demsetz, H. (1967). Towards a theory of property rights. American Economic Review, 57(2), 347–359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolsak, N., & Ostrom, E. (2003). The challenges of the commons. In N. Dolsak & E. Ostrom (Eds.), The commons in the new millennium: Challenges and adaptation. London: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florensa, C. M. (2004). Institutional stability and change: A logic sequence for studying institutional dynamics. Paper presented at the 10th Biennial Conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property (IASCP), Oaxaca, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations. (2010). Guidelines on Spate Irrigation. Retrieved July 2, 2011, from http://www.fao.org/docrep/012/i1680e/i1680e.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gadgil, M., & Guha, R. (1992). This fissured land: An ecological history of India. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gazetteer of the Dera Ghazi Khan District. (1893–97). Lahore: Sang-e-Meel Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, D. (1994). Scientific empire and imperial science: Colonialism and irrigation technology in the Indus Basin. Journal of African Studies, 53(4), 1127–1149.
   Google Scholar
• Gilmartin, D. (2003). Water and waste: Nature, productivity and colonialism in the IndusBasin. Economic and Political Weekly, 38(48), 5057–5065.
   Google Scholar
• Government of Punjab. (1905). The Punjab Minor Canals Act. Retrieved March 2, 2011, from http://punjablaws.gov.pk/laws/20.html
   Google Scholar
• Greif, A. (2006). The birth of impersonal exchange: The community responsibility system and impartial justice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(2), 221–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(1968), 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klijn, E. -H., & Kooppenjan, J. F. M. (2006). Institutional design: Changing institutional features of networks. Public Management Review, 8(1), 141–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F. (1998). Governing irrigation systems in Nepal: Institutions, infrastructures, and collective action. Oakland, CA: ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, W. F. (2001). Coping with change: A study of local irrigation institutions in Taiwan. World Development, 29(9), 1569–1592.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston, M. L. (2005). Evaluating changes in water institutions: Methodological issues at the micro and meso levels. Water Policy, 7, 21–34.
   Google Scholar
• Meagher, P., & Kimenyi, M. S. (2004). Institutional design and the governance challenges of plural societies. In P. Meagher and M. S. Kimenyi (Eds.), Devolution and development: Governance prospects in decentralizing states. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Mehari, A., Depeweg, H., & Schultz, B. (2005). Hydraulic performance evaluation of the spate irrigation systems in Eriteria. Irrigation and Drainage, 54(4), 389–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R., & Pradhan, R. (2002). Legal Pluralism and Dynamic Property Rights. CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights. CAPRi Working Paper No. 22. International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Mittenzwei, K., & Bullock, D. S. (2001). Towards a framework for institutional analysis. Paper presented at 16th Annual Congress of the European Economic Association, Lausanne, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (1999). Colonial and contemporary ideologies of community management: The case of tank irrigation development in South India. Modern Asian Studies, 33(2), 303–338.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mustafa, D. (2002). Theory versus practice: The bureaucratic ethos of water resource management and administration in Pakistan. Contemporary South Asia, 11(1), 39–56.
   Google Scholar
• Nemarundwe, N., & Kozanayi, W. (2003). Institutional arrangements for water resource use: A case study from Zimbabwe. Journal of Southern African Studies, 29(1), 193–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C., & Thomas, R. P. (1977). The first economic revolution. Economic History Review, 30(2), 229–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007a). A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(39), 15181–15187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007b). Institutional rational choice: An assessment of the institutional analysis and development framework. In P. A. Sabaiter (Ed.), Theories of the policy process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2008a). Developing a method for analyzing institutional change. In S. Batie & N. Mercuro (Eds.), Alternative institutional structures: evolution and impact. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2008b). Institutions and the environment. Economic Affairs, 28(3), 24–31.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009a). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009b). Design principles for robust property right institutions: What have we learned? In G. K. Ingram & Y. -H. Hong (Eds.), Property rights and land policies. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics, 41, 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 7–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Burger, J., Field, C. B., Norgaard, R. B., & Policansky, D. (1999). Revisiting the commons: Local lessons, global challenges. Science, 284(5412), 278–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., & Walker, J. (1994). Rules, games, and common-pool resources. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Runge, C. F. (1986). Common property and collective action in economic development. World Development, 14(5), 623–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., & Heikkila, T. (2009). Resolving water conflicts: A comparative analysis of interstate river compacts. Policy Studies Journal, 37(3), 367–392.
   Google Scholar
• Schlager, E., & Ostrom, E. (1992). Property right regime and natural resources: A conceptual analysis. Land Economics, 68(3), 249–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schluter, A., & Theesfeld, I. (2010). The grammar of institutions: The challenge of distinguishing between strategies, norms, and rules. Rationality and Society, 22(4), 445–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siy, R. Y. (1982). Community resource management: Lessons from the Zanjera. Quezon City, Philippines: University of the Philippines Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smajgl, A. (2007). Modeling evolving rules for the use of common pool resources in an agent based model. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 5(2), 56–80.
   Google Scholar
• Steed, B. C. (2010). Natural forces, human choices: An over time study of responses to biophysical and human induced disturbance in Los Angeles, California groundwater governance. Thesis (PhD). Indiana University.
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, F. V. (1997). Understanding the sociology of spate irrigation: Cases from Baluchistan. Journal of Arid Environments, 35(2), 349–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, S. Y. (1992). Institutions and collective action: Self-governance in irrigation. San Francisco, CA: Institute of contemporary studies press.
   Google Scholar
• Tesfai, M., & Stroosnijder, L. (2001). The Eritrean spate irrigation system. Agricultural Water Management, 48, 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theesfeld, I. (2004). Constraints on collective action in a transitional economy: The case of Bulgaria’s irrigation sector. World Development, 32(2), 251–271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Punjab Minor Canals ACT. (1905). Punjab Act III of 1905. Retrieved January 26, 2010 from http://punjablaws.gov.pk/laws/20.html
   Google Scholar
• Vatn, A. (2005). Institutions and the environment. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, L. (1995). Hill irrigation: Water and development in mountain irrigation. London: Overseas Development Institute, Intermediate Technology Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Wade, R. (1987). The management of common property resources: Finding a cooperative solution. The World Bank Research Observer, 2(2), 219–234.
   Google Scholar