Ten building blocks for sustainable water governance: an integrated method to assess the governance of water

References

• Addink, H., Anthony, G., Buyse, A., & Flinterman, C. (2010). Human rights & good Governance. SIM special. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Ambrus, M., Gilissen, H. K., & Van Kempen, J. J. H. (2014). Public values in water law: A case of substantive fragmentation?. Utrecht Law Review 2014, 10(2), 8–30.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, A., & Leroy, P. (2006). Institutional dynamics in environmental change. Houten: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Backes, C., & Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2013). Effective environmental protection: Towards a better understanding of environmental quality standards in environmental legislation. In L. Gipperth and C. Zetterberg, Miljörättsliga perspektiv och tankevändor, Vänbok till Jan Darpö & Gabriel Michanek (pp. 19–50). Uppsala: Iustus Förlag AB. ISBN 9789176788424
   Google Scholar
• Bardach, E., & Kagan, R. A. (1982). Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beijen, B. A., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Tegner Anker, H. (2014). A comparison of monitoring obligations in European environmental directives. Utrecht Law Review 2014, 10(2), 126–135.
   Google Scholar
• Berry, J. M., Portney, K. E., & Thomson, K. (1993). The rebirth of urban democracy. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. K. (2005). Integrated water resources management: A reassessment. In A. K. Biswas,O. Varis, & C. Tortajada, Integrated water resources management in South and South-East Asia. Water Resources Management Series. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bressers, H., & Kuks, S. (2004). Integrated governance and water basin management: Conditions for regime change towards sustainability. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and economy. Property rights and public policy. Oxford UK/Cambridge USA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R. (2013). On the interdisciplinary nature of the study of law. Paper presented at the Methodology Seminar, Faculty of Law, Utrecht 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Brunner, R. D., & Steelman, T. A. (2005). Towards adaptive governance. In Brunner, R. D.,Steelman, T. A. Coe-Juell, L. Cromley, C. M. Edwards, C. M. & Tucker, D. W., Adaptive governance: Integrating science, policy and decision-making (pp. 1–21). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J., & Toope, S.J. (2010). Legitimacy and legality in international law, an interactional account. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buijze, A. W. G. J., Salet, W. G. M., & Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (in press). How central interventions enable contextualized practices of sustainable development.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2000). Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 18(6), 727–748. doi:10.1068/c9905j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coglianese, C., & Kagan, R. A. (2007). Regulation and regulatory processes. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, D. M., & Meijer, A. (2006). Does transparency strenghten legitimacy?. Information Policy, 11, 109–122.
   Google Scholar
• De Burca, G., & Scott, J. (2006). New governance in the EU and USA. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J., Zonneveld, W., & Buijze, A. (in press) Governance and law: It takes two to tango.
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Mancero, M., & Cardenas, G.. 2011. Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: A case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador, in special issue Water Governance, edited by J.
   Google Scholar
• Diver, C. S. (1983). The optimal precision of administrative rules. The Yale Law Journal, 93, 65–109. doi:10.2307/796245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, P. P. J., & Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2011). Normative aspects of climate adaptation policy. Climate Law, 2(4), 1–23.
   Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Teisman, G. R. (2011). Symposium on water governance. Prologue: Water governance as a government’s actions between the reality of fragmentation and the need for integration. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 77(1), 5–30. doi:10.1177/0020852310390090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J. Bressers, N. E. W. & Scholten, P. H. T. (Eds.). (2013). Water governance as connective capacity. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Pritchard, L., Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Svedin, U. (2007). The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: Ten years later. Ecology & Society, 12(4), 201–220.
   Google Scholar
• Fuller, L. L. (1964). The morality of law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Global Water Partnership. (2003). Integrated water resources management toolbox, Version 2, Stockholm, GWP Secretariat, p. 2.
   Google Scholar
• Green, O., Garmestani, A., Van Rijswick, H., & Keessen, A. (2013). EU water governance: Striking the right balance between regulatory flexibility and enforcement? Ecology and Society, 18(2), 10. doi:10.5751/ES-05357-180210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse Coalitions and the institutionalisation of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In Fischer, Frank/Forester, John (Hrsg), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–67). Durham/London: Duke University Press..
   Google Scholar
• Hayek, F. A. (1973–1979). Law, legislation and liberty ( Vol. 3). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, W. (2009). Aspirations and realities under the water framework directive: Proceduralisation, participation and practicalities. Journal of Environmental Law, 21(3), 391–417. doi:10.1093/jel/eqp019
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26. [online] Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art26/
   Google Scholar
• IPCC-WGII. (2007). Climate change 2007: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of the Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Summary for Policy Making. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke M. & Weidner H. (Eds.). (1997). National environmental policies: A comparative study of capacity-building. Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Jolink, A. (2010). Legal implications of introducing economic instruments in the field of European and Dutch water management. Utrecht: Utrecht University.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney, R. L. (1992). Value-focussed thinking, a path to creative decision-making. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kissling-Näf, I. and Kuks, S. (Eds.). (2004). The evolution of national water regimes in Europe. transitions in water rights and water policies towards sustainability. Dordrecht-Boston-London: Springer (Kluwer Academic Publishers).
   Google Scholar
• Keessen, A. M., & Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2012). Adaptation to climate change in European water law and policy. Utrecht Law Review, November 2012, 38–50.
   Google Scholar
• Kok, M., Stijnen, J. W., & Silva, W. 2003. Uncertainty analysis of river flood management in the Netherlands, In T. Bedford & P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder, (Eds.), Safety and Reliability, Proceedings of ESREL 2003–European safety and reliability conference 2003, 15–18 June 2003, Maastricht, The Netherlands, pages 1179–1187, Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhout, P. E. (2012). A wider notion of the scope of water services in EU water law, boosting payment for water-related ecosystem services to ensure sustainable water management? Utrecht Law Review, 8, 86–101. 2012–3.
   Google Scholar
• Lindhout, P. E., & Van den Broek, B. (2014). The polluter pays principle: Guidelines for cost recovery and burden sharing in the case law of the European court of justice. Utrecht Law Review 2014, 10(2), 46–59.
   Google Scholar
• Mees, H. L. P., Dijk, J., Van Soest, D., Driessen, P. P. J., Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Runhaar, H. (2014). A method for the deliberate and deliberative selection of policy instrument mixes for climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 58. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol19/iss2/art58/ doi:10.5751/ES-06639-190258
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S. (2008). Explaining continuity and change in international policies: Issue linkage, venue change, and learning on policies for the river Scheldt estuary 1967–2005. Environment and Planning A, 40(4), 848–866. doi:10.1068/a3911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misiedjan, D., & Gupta, J. (2014). Indigenous communities: Analyzing their right to water under different international legal regimes. Utrecht Law Review 2014, 10(2), 77–90.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D., & Tippett, J. (2007). Social learning in European river basin management: Barriers and supportive mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 19. [online] Retrieved from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art19/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2011). Water governance in OECD countries. A multi-level approach. Paris: OECD publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2014). Water governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the future? Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons. The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2006). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21(1), 49–62. doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perry, P. (2003). Non-state actors and water resources development – An economic perspective. Non-State Actors and International Law, 3( 1), 99–110. doi:10.1163/156771203322428395
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management, American and comparative environmental policy series. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Skelcher, C. (2005). Jurisdictional integrity, polycentrism, and the design of democratic governance. Governance, 18(1), 89–110. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0491.2004.00267.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tortajada, C. (2010). Water governance: A research agenda. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 26(2), 309–316. doi:10.1080/07900621003683322
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2006). Water, a shared responsibility. Barcelona: UNESCO/Bergham Books.
   Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., Driessen, P., Teisman, G., & Van Rijswick, M. (2013). Toward legitimate governance strategies for climate adaptation in the Netherlands: Combining insights from a legal, planning, and network perspective. Regional Environmental Change, doi:10.1007/s10113-013-0448-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Buuren, A., Klijn, E. H., & Edelenbos, J. (2012). Democratic legitimacy of new forms of water management in the Netherlands. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 28(4), 629–645. doi:10.1080/07900627.2011.627756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Doorn-Hoekveld, W. J. (2014). Compensation in flood risk management with a focus on shifts in compensation regimes regarding prevention, mitigation and disaster management. Utrecht Law Review 2014, 10(2), 216–238.
   Google Scholar
• Van Holten, S., & Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2014). The consequences of a governance approach in European Environmental directives for flexibility, effectiveness and legitimacy. In M. Peeters, & R. Uylenburg (Eds.), EU environmental legislation: Legal perspectives on regulatory strategies (pp. 13–47). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2008). Moving water and the law, on the distribution of water rights and water duties within river basins in European and Dutch water law, inaugural address Utrecht University. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W. (2011). De verdeling van schaarse waterrechten [the allocation of scarce water rights). In F. J. van Ommeren, W. den Ouden & C. J. Wolswinkel (Eds.), Schaarse publieke rechten (pp. 133–158). Den Haag: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Havekes, H. J. M. (2012). European and Dutch water law. Groningen: Europa Law Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Salet, W. (2012). Enabling the contextualization of legal rules in responsive strategies to climate change. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 18. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/ES-04895-170218
   Google Scholar
• Van Rijswick, H. F. M. W., & Tappeiner, I. M. (2014). Institutional legal framework for resilient, sustainable regional water management in times of climate change. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Warner, J., & Van Buuren, W. A. (2009). Multi-stakeholder Learning and fighting on the River Scheldt. International Negotiation, 14(2), 419–440. doi:10.1163/157180609X432888
   Google Scholar
• Westerman, P. C. (2007a). Governing by goals: Governance as a legal style. In: Legisprudence: International Journal for the Study of Legislation (pp. 51–72).
   Google Scholar
• Westerman, P. C. (2007b). The Emergency of New Types of Norms. In L. J. Wintgens (Ed.), Legislation in context; essays in legisprudence (pp. 117–133). Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T. (1997). International water conflict resolution: Lessons from comparative analysis. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 13(3), 333–366. doi:10.1080/07900629749728
   Google Scholar
• Young, I. M. (2000). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1982). Resource regimes. Natural resources and social institutions. Berkeley, Los Angeles, London: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar