The governance of wetland ecosystems and the promotion of transboundary water cooperation – opportunities presented by the Ramsar Convention

References

• Bianchi, A. (2011). The fight for inclusion: Non-state actors and international law. In U. Fastenrath, R. Geiger, D. Khan, A. Paulus, S. Von Schorlemer, & C. Vedder (Eds.), From bilateralism to community interest: Essays in honour of Judge Bruno Simma (pp. 39–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blumenfeld, S., Lu, C., Christophersen, T., & Coates, D. (2009). Water, wetlands and forests. A review of ecological, economic and policy linkages (CBD Technical Series No. 47). Montreal and Gland: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity and Secretariat of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands.
   Google Scholar
• Boisson De Chazournes, L. (2013). Fresh water in international law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bonells, M., & Zavagli, M. (2011). National Ramsar/Wetlands Committees across the six Ramsar regions: Diversity and benefits. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Johnston, J., & Pansky, D. (2006). Governance of protected areas. In M. Lockwood, G. Worboys, & A. Kothari (Eds.), Managing protected areas: A global guide (pp. 116–145). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Broude, T. (2008). Principles of normative integration and the allocation of international authority: The WTO, the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and the Rio Declaration. Loyola University Chicago International Law Review, 6(1), 173–208.
   Google Scholar
• Brunnée, J. (2005). Reweaving the fabric of international law? Patterns of consent in environmental framework agreements. In R. Wolfrum & V. Röben (Eds.), Developments of international law in treaty making. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Caponera, D. A. (1985). Patterns of cooperation in international water law: Principles and institutions. Natural Resources Journal, 25, 563–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• China Water Risk (2012, February 9). Geopolitical risks: Transboundary rivers. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from http://chinawaterrisk.org/resources/analysis-reviews/geopolitical-risks-transboundary-rivers/
   Google Scholar
• Davidson, J., Lockwood, M., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2006). Governance principles for regional natural resource management (Report No. 1 of the Project “Pathways to Good Practice in Regional NRM Governance”). Tasmania: School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania.
   Google Scholar
• Desai, B. H. (2010). Multilateral environmental agreements. Legal status of the secretariats. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Esty, D. C. (2006). Good governance at the supranational scale: Globalizing administrative law. The Yale Law Journal, 115(7), 1490–1562. doi:10.2307/20455663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrier, D., & Tucker, L. (2000). Wise use of wetlands under the Ramsar Convention: A challenge for meaningful implementation of international law. Journal of Environmental Law, 12(1), 21–42. doi:10.1093/jel/12.1.21
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gehring, T. (2008). Treaty-making and treaty evolution. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, J. (2003). Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century prepared for the fifth World Parks Congress, Durban, South Africa. Ontario: Institute on Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P. (2012). The Ramsar Convention: A new window for environmental diplomacy. Burlington: Institute for Environmental Diplomacy and Security, University of Vermont.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, P., & Ali, S. H. (2014). Managing transboundary wetlands: The Ramsar Convention as a means of ecological diplomacy. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 4, 230–239. doi:10.1007/s13412-014-0173-0
   Google Scholar
• Groombridge, B. (1999). Shared wetlands and river basins of the world: Preliminary findings of a GIS analysis. World Conservation Monitoring Centre. Report prepared in support of Ramsar COP 7 Technical Session V (Ramsar COP 7 DOC.20.1).
   Google Scholar
• Hey, E. (2008). International institutions. In D. Bodansky, J. Brunnée, & E. Hey (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• ICJ (2011). Certain activities carried out by Nicaragua in the border area (Costa Rica v. Nicaragua). (Judgment of 8 March 2011) ICJ Report 6. (“San Juan River” case).
   Google Scholar
• ICJ (2013). Certain activities carried out by Nicaragua in the border area (Costa Rica v Nicaragua), construction of a road in Costa Rica along the San Juan River (Nicaragua v Costa Rica) (Judgment of 22 November 2013).
   Google Scholar
• International Bureau of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (Ed.). (2003). Resolution of international water disputes. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice (ICJ) (1996). Legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons (Advisory Opinion of 8 July 1996).
   Google Scholar
• Kingsford, R. (2011). Conservation management of rivers and wetlands under climate change – A synthesis. Marine and Freshwater Research, 62, 217–222. doi:10.1071/MF11029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kramer, A., & Wolf, A. T. (2013). The key to managing conflict and cooperation over water. World of Science, 11(1), 4–12.
   Google Scholar
• Leb, C. (2013). Cooperation in the law of transboundary water resources. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, J. (2014). Preservation of ecosystems of international watercourses and the integration of relevant rules: An interpretative mechanism to address the fragmentation of international law. Leiden, Boston: Brill/Nijhoff.
   Google Scholar
• McIntyre, O. (2014). The protection of freshwater ecosystems revisited: Towards a common understanding of the ‘ecosystems approach’ to the protection of transboundary water resources. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law, 23(1), 88–95. doi:10.1111/reel.12068
   Google Scholar
• Mithen, S. (2013). Thirst: Water and power in the ancient world. Phoenix: London.
   Google Scholar
• Natarajan, U., & Khoday, K. (2014). Locating nature: Making and unmaking international law. Leiden Journal of International Law, 27(3), 573–593. doi:10.1017/S0922156514000211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavoni, R. (2010). Mutual supportiveness as a principle of interpretation and law-making: A watershed for the ‘WTO-and-Competing-Regimes’ debate? The European Journal of International Law, 21(3), 649–679. doi:10.1093/ejil/chq046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Population Institute (undated). 2030: The ‘perfect storm’ scenario. Retrieved September 12, 2014, from http://www.populationinstitute.org/external/files/reports/The_Perfect_Storm_Scenario_for_2030.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1971). Convention on wetlands of international importance especially as waterfowl habitat (adopted 2 Feb 1971, entered into force 21 Dec 1975) United Nations Treaty Series, 996, 245.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1987). Resolution 3.3: Establishment of a standing committee. Regina: COP 3.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1990). Recommendation 4.7: Mechanisms for improved application of the Ramsar Convention. Montreux: COP 4.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1993a). Recommendation 5.7: National committees. Kushiro: COP 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1993b). Resolution 5.4: The record of Ramsar sites where changes in ecological character have occurred, are occurring, or are likely to occur (Montreux Record). Kushiro: COP 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1993c). Resolution 5.5 Establishment of a scientific and technical review panel. Kushiro: COP 5.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1996a). Resolution VI.1: Working definitions of ecological character, guidelines for describing and maintaining the ecological character of listed sites, and guidelines for operation of the Montreux Record. Brisbane: COP 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1996b). Resolution VI.19 Education and public awareness. Brisbane: COP 6.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1999a). Resolution VII.19 Guidelines for international cooperation under the Ramsar Convention. San José: COP 7.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (1999b). Resolution VII.9: The Convention’s Outreach Programme 1999–2002: Actions to promote communication, education, and public awareness to support implementation of the Convention on Wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). San José: COP 7.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2002). Resolution VIII.14: New guidelines for management planning for Ramsar sites and other wetlands. Valencia: COP 8.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2005a). Resolution IX.1 Annex A: A conceptual framework for the wise use of wetlands and the maintenance of their ecological character. Kampala: COP 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2005b). Resolution IX.11 Revised modus operandi of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP). Kampala: COP 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2005c). Resolution IX.18 establishment of an oversight panel for the CEPA activities of the convention. Kampala: COP 9.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2008a). Resolution X.29: Clarifying the functions of agencies and related bodies implementing the convention at the national level. Changwon: COP 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2008b). Resolution X.8: The Convention’s Programme on Communication, Education, Participation, and Awareness (CEPA) 2009–2015. Changwon: COP 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2008c). Resolution X.9: Refinements to the modus operandi of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP). Changwon: COP 10.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2012a). Resolution XI.1: Institutional hosting of the Ramsar Secretariat. Bucharest: COP 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2012b). Resolution XI.18: Adjustments to the modus operandi of the Scientific and Technical Review Panel (STRP) for the 2013–2015 triennium. Bucharest: COP 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2012c). Resolution XI.8 Annex 2: Strategic framework and guidelines for the future development of the list of wetlands of international importance of the convention on wetlands (Ramsar, Iran, 1971) – 2012 Revision. Bucharest: COP 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2012d). Rules of procedure for meetings of the conference of the contracting parties to the Convention on Wetlands of International Importance especially as Waterfowl Habitat (Ramsar, Iran, 1971). Bucharest: COP 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention (2012e). Resolution XI.3 Adjustment to the strategic plan 2009–2015 for the 2013–2015 triennium. Bucharest: COP 11.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsar Convention Secretariat (2010). International cooperation: Guidelines and other support for international cooperation under the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands. Gland: Ramsar Convention Secretariat. Vol. 20 Ramsar Handbook for the Wise Use of Wetlands.
   Google Scholar
• Raustiala, K. (1997). The ‘participatory revolution’ in international environmental law. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 21, 537–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redgwell, C. (2002). Multilateral environmental treaty-making. In V. Gowlland-Debbas (Ed.), Multilateral treaty-making. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Salathe, T., 2004. Transboundary river basin management. (“Integrated Management of Natural Resources in the Transboundary Dniester River Basin”, 16–17 September 2004, Chisinau, Republic of Moldova). Gland: Secretariat of Ramsar Convention.
   Google Scholar
• Sample, I. (2009, March 18). World faces ‘perfect storm’ of problems by 2030, chief scientist to warn. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Simma, B., & Paulus, A. L. (1998). The ‘international community’: Facing the challenge of globalization. The European Journal of International Law, 9, 266–277. doi:10.1093/ejil/9.2.266
   Google Scholar
• Steiner, A., Kimball, L. A., & Scanlon, J. (2003). Global governance for the environment and the role of Multilateral Environmental Agreements in conservation. Oryx, 37(2), 227–237. doi:10.1017/S0030605303000401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN System Task Team on the Post-2015 UN Development Agenda (2013). Global governance and governance of the global commons in the global partnership for development beyond 2015. Thematic Think Piece.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE Convention (1992). UNECE Convention on the Protection and Use of International Watercourses and International Lakes (done at Helsinki, 17 March 1992). International Legal Materials, 31, 1312.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs (UNDESA) (2014). International decade for action ‘Water for Life’ 2005–2015. Retrieved October 25, 2014, from http://www.un.org/waterforlifedecade/transboundary_waters.shtml
   Google Scholar
• UN-Water (2006). Water a shared responsibility. UNESCO-WWAP. UN World Water Development Report 2, World Water Assessment Programme.
   Google Scholar
• UNWC (1997). United Nations Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses (adopted 21 May 1997, entered into force 17 August 2014). International Legal Materials, 36,700.
   Google Scholar
• Verschuuren, J. (2008). The case of transboundary wetlands under the Ramsar Convention: Keep the lawyers out! Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 19(1), 49–127.
   Google Scholar
• Warning, M. J. (2009). Transnational public governance: Networks, law and legitimacy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: The social construction of power politics. International Organization, 46(2), 391–425. doi:10.1017/S0020818300027764
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiersema, A. (2009). The new international law-makers? Conferences of the parties to multilateral environmental agreements. Michigan Journal of International Law, 31, 231–287.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, P. (2013). ‘Dynamic cooperation’ in international law and the shadow of state sovereignty in the context of transboundary waters. Environmental Liability, 3, 88–97.
   Google Scholar
• Young, O. R. (1994). International governance: Protecting the environment in a stateless society. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Mirumachi, N. (2008) Transboundary water interaction I: Reconsidering conflict and cooperation. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, law and Economics, published online 3 September 2008. doi:10.1007/s10784-008-9083-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zsuffa, I., D’Haeyer, T., Douven, W., Schwartz, K., Liersch, S., Debels, P., Cools, J., & Van Der Craats, I. 2010. Enhancing the role of wetlands in integrated water resources management for Twinned River Basins in EU, Africa and South America in support of EU Water Initiatives. WETwin. Newsletter Issue No. 1.
   Google Scholar