The human right to water and foreign investment: friends or foes?

References

• Aguas del Tunari. Aguas del Tunari S.A. v Bolivia. ICSID Case No. ARB/02/3.
   Google Scholar
• Allen, D. (2010).“This Business Will Never Hold Water:” International Investment Arbitration on Public–Private Water Service Provision – A Comment on Biwater Gauff (Tanzania) Limited v. United Republic of Tanzania. Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1540256 [Accessed 10 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Azurix Award. Azurix Corp. v. Argentina, ICSID Case No. ARB/01/12, Award.
   Google Scholar
• Barlow, M., & Clarke, T. (2002, September, 2). Who owns water? Retrieved from http://www.ratical.org/co-globalize/whoOwnsWater.html [Accessed 16 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• BiWater Award. BiWater Gauff Limited v United Republic of Tanzania, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/22, Award.
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2002). 29th Session, General Comment No. 15: The Right to Water (Arts. 11 and 12 of the Covenant), UN Doc E/C.12/2002/11 (20 Jan 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Commission on Human Rights. (2003). Report of the High Commissioner for Human Rights on Human Rights, Trade and Investment, United Nations Economic and Social Council, Commission on Human Rights, E/CN.4/Sub.2/2003/9, 2 July 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, I. (1999). The privatization of residential water supply and sanitation services: Social equity issues in the California and international contexts. Berkeley Planning Journal, 13, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• HRC (Human Rights Council). (2010). Report of the independent expert on the issue of human rights obligations related to access to safe drinking water and sanitation, Catarina de Albuquerque, A/HRC/15/31, 15th Session, June 29, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Leb, C. (2012). The right to water in a transboundary context: Emergence of seminal trends. Water International, 37(6), 640–653. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.710950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. (1992). A human right to water: Domestic and international implications. Georgetown International Environmental L aw Review, 5(1), 1–24.
   Google Scholar
• Metalclad. Metalclad v. Mexico, ICSID Case No. ARB(AF)/97/1.
   Google Scholar
• Methanex. The Methanex Corporation v. United States of America, UNCITRAL, 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Mylamma. (2007).Kerala’s Anti-Coke Crusader. Plachimada, May, 2007. Retrieved from http://www.irenees.net/bdf_fiche-acteurs-332_en.html [Accessed 8 October 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, L. E. Human Rights and Bilateral Investment Treaties: Mapping the role of human rights law within investor-state arbitration, Rights and Democracy, International Centre for Human Rights and Democratic Development.
   Google Scholar
• Petrova, V. (2006). At the frontiers of the rush for blue gold: Water privatization and the human right to water. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 31, 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Porten, S. (2007). Aguas del Tunari in bolivia: The water war, September 2007. Retrieved from http://www.caseplace.org/d.asp?d=1456 [Accessed 20 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Report of the Walkerton Inquiry: A Strategy for Safe Drinking Water, Vol. 2. Toronto: Queen’s Printer for Ontario. (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Schultz, J. (2000). Bolivia’s water war victory. Earth Island Journal, Autumn 2000. Retrieved from http://thirdworldtraveler.com/South_America/Bolivia_WaterWarVictory.html [Accessed 20 August 2014].
   Google Scholar
• Solanes, M., & Jouravlev, A. (2007, November 2007). Revisiting privatization, foreign investment, international arbitration, and water, United Nations. CEPAL. SERIE Recursos naturales infraestructura. Retrieved 8 January 2015 from http://www.iatp.org/files/451_2_101503.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• State v. Martin. 168 Ohio St. 37, 151 N.E.2d 7 (1958).
   Google Scholar
• Suez and Vivendi Decision. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A v. Argentine Republic, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19, the Decision on Liability.
   Google Scholar
• Suez and Vivendi Order. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Vivendi Universal S.A v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/19), Order in response to a Petition for Transparency and Participation as Amicus Curiae (19 May 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Suez Decision. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Agua S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17, Decision on Liability.
   Google Scholar
• Suez Order. Suez, Sociedad General de Aguas de Barcelona S.A. and Interagua Servicios Integrales de Agua S.A. v. Argentine Republic (ICSID Case No. ARB/03/17), Order in Response to a Petition for Participation as Amicus Curiae.
   Google Scholar
• TED Case Studies, US–Canada water case. Retrieved from http://www1.american.edu/TED/water.htm [Accessed 12 September 2014].
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2014). Investor–State Dispute Settlement: A sequel – UNCTAD Series on Issues in International Investment Agreements II, UNCTAD/DIAE/IA/2013/2, 23 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• UNGA Resolution. (2010). UN General Assembly, The human right to water and sanitation, Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on 28 July 2010, A/RES/64/292, 3 August, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Weiss, E. (2009). The Evolution of International Water Law, Collected courses of the hague academy of International Law 331. The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Withanage, H. (n.d.) Water; an economic good or a Public good. Retrieved from www.elaw.org/system/files/sri+lanka.water+a+public+good.doc. [Accessed 20 January 2015].
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. (2014 September 10). Wells, doctors and railways – Stories by Chinese People in the African Desert. Retrieved from http://www.doc88.com/p-2169066600031.html
   Google Scholar