Against the current: transboundary water management in small states on two continents

References

• Allan, T., & Nicol, A. (1998). Water resources, prevention of violent conflict and the coherence of EU policies in the Horn of Africa. London: Saferworld.
   Google Scholar
• Arnaiz Burne, S. M. (Ed.) (1993 y 1994). Estudio Integral de la Frontera México–Belice. Chetumal, Mexico: Tomos I y II Centro de Investigaciones de Quintana Roo.
   Google Scholar
• Arter, D. (2000). Small state influence within the EU: The case of Finland’s “Northern Dimension Initiative”. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 38, 677–697. doi:10.1111/1468-5965.00260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Belizean Ministry of Natural Resources and Agriculture. (2009). National adaptation strategy to address climate change in the water sector in Belize. Strategy and action plan. Belmopan, Belize: Caribbean Community Climate Change Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Belsky, J. (1999). Misrepresenting communities: The politics of community-based rural ecotourism in gales point Manatee, Belize. Rural Sociology, 64(4), 641–666. doi:10.1111/j.1549-0831.1999.tb00382.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benítez, J. A. (2010). Situación actual de las cuencas de los Ríos Candelaria y Hondo. In H. Cloter Ávalo (coord.), Las cuencas hidrográficas de México. Diagnóstico y Priorización. Mexico, DF: Instituto Nacional de Ecología y Cambio Climático (INECC). Retrieved from http://www2.inecc.gob.mx/publicaciones/libros/639/rcandelaria.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, V., & Herzog, L. (2000). U.S.–Mexico borderland water conflicts and institutional change: A commentary. Natural Resources Journal, 40, 973–988.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishop, M. (2012). The political economy of small states: Enduring vulnerability? Review of International Political Economy, 19(5), 942–960. doi:10.1080/09692290.2011.635118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blatter, J., & Ingram, H. (Eds.). (2001). Reflections on water: New approaches to transboundary conflicts and cooperation. American and comparative environmental policy (1st ed.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briguglio, L., Cordina, G., Vella, S., & Vigilance, C. (Eds.). (2010). Profiling vulnerability and resilience: A manual for small states. London: Commonwealth Secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, J., & Hall, J. (2009). National identity and the political economy of small states. Review of International Political Economy, 16(4), 547–572. doi:10.1080/09692290802620378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castillo, M., Toussaint, M., y Vázquez, M. (2006). Espacios diversos, historia en común: México, Guatemala y Belice, la construcción de una frontera. Mexico, DF: Secretaría de Relaciones Exteriores. Colección México y sus fronteras.
   Google Scholar
• CIA. (2007). The CIA world factbook. New York, NY: Skyhorse Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Clément, F. (2013). La représentation sociopolitique des travailleurs au Luxembourg et dans l’espace de la Grande Région. Regions & Cohesion, 3(2), 1–21. doi:10.3167/reco.2013.030201
   Google Scholar
• Conca, K. (2006). Governing water: Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cortéz-Lara, A. (2012). No longer strong social cohesion: Lessons from two transboundary water conflicts in the Mexicali Valley, México. Regions and Cohesion, 2(2), 30–56. doi:10.3167/reco.2012.020203
   Google Scholar
• Daibes-Murad, F. (2005). A new legal framework for managing the world’s shared groundwaters. Water law and policy series. London, UK: International Water Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dourojeanni, A., y Jouravlev, A. (2002), Evolución de las políticas hídricas en América Latina y el Caribe, CEPAL, Serie 51, Recursos Naturales e Infraestructura, Santiago de Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, R. (2000). Shadow players: Ecotourism, development, corruption and state politics in Belize. Third World Quarterly, 21(3), 549–565. doi:10.1080/713701038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Earle, A., Jägerskog, A., & Öjendal, J. (2010). Transboundary water management. Principles and practice. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Easterly, W., y Kraay, A. (2000, November). Small states, small problems? Income, growth, and volatility in small states. World Development, 28(11), 2013–2027. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(00)00068-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2007). COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL Towards sustainable water management in the European Union – First stage in the implementation of the Water Framework Directive 2000/60/EC – [SEC(2007) 362] [SEC(2007) 363]. (Retrieved online at WFD website: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:52007DC0128:EN:NOT on April 2, 2012).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Report on the Implementation of the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/EC). DG Environment-WFD, November 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Galbreath, D. (2006). Latvian foreign policy after enlargement: Continuity and change. Cooperation and Conflict, 41(4), 443–462. doi:10.1177/0010836706069613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gargallo, F., & Santana, A. (Eds.). (1993). Belice: Sus fronteras y destino. Mexico, DF: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
   Google Scholar
• Ghiotti, S. (2011). La directive cadre sur l’eau (DCE) et les pays méditerranéens de l’union européenne. Une simple question de ressources en eau? Pôle Sud, 2011/2(35), 21–42.
   Google Scholar
• Ingebritsen, C. (2010). Katzenstein’s legacy 25 years after: Small states in world markets. European Political Science, 9, 359–364. doi:10.1057/eps.2010.23
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, H., Laney, N., & Gillilan, D. (1995). Divided waters: Bridging the U.S.–Mexico border. Arizona: The University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• Just, R., & Netanyahu, S. (Eds.). (1998). Conflict and cooperation on trans-boundary water resources. London: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Kaika, M., & Page, B. (2003). The EU water framework directive: Part 1. European policy-making and the changing topography of lobbying. European Environment, 13(6), 314–327. doi:10.1002/eet.331
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (1985). Small states in world markets. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Katzenstein, P. (2003). Small states and small states revisted. New Political Economy, 8(1), 9–30. doi:10.1080/1356346032000078705
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffer, M. E. (2005). Hidropolítica. ¿Un concepto útil para entender la problemática del agua en la frontera México–Guatemala–Belice. en M. E. Kauffer (Ed.), El agua en la frontera México–Guatemala–Belice (pp. 33–44). México: Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffer, E., y García, A. (2011). Las cuencas compartidas entre México, Guatemala y Belice: Un acercamiento a su delimitación y problemática general. Frontera Norte, 23(43), 131–161. México, enero/junio 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffer, M. E. (2013). Gestión integrada de cuencas transfronterizas y cooperación participativa: Propuestas para la cuenca del río Hondo. Presented at the Foro de investigación científica, desarrollo tecnológico y exposición cultural del sistema hidrológico de la cuenca Península de Yucatán. Merida, Yucatan, 14–15 July, 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Ken, C. (2007). Belize’s northern region: Its economic performance in the post-independence period. en B. Balboni y J. Palacios (Eds.), Taking stock: Belize at 25 years of independence (pp. 76–95). Belize: Cubola Productions.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R. (1969). Lilliputians’ Dilemmas: Small states in international politics. International Organization, 23(2), 291–310. doi:10.1017/S002081830003160X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kranz, N., & Mostert, E. (2010). Governance in transboundary basins – The roles of stakeholders; concepts and approaches in international river basins. In A. Earle, A. Jägerskog, & J. Öjendal (Eds.), Transboundary water management. Principles and practice. London, UK: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lankford, B., Bakker, K., Zeitoun, M., & Conway, D. (2013). Water security: Principles, perspectives and practices. Earthscan Water Text. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Latin American and Caribbean Economic System. (2013). Regional cooperation in the area of border integration: A Caribbean perspective. Caracas, Venezuela: Permanent Secretariat of SELA.
   Google Scholar
• Maes, I., & Verdun, A. (2005). Small states and the creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, pace-setters and gate-keepers. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(2), 327–348. doi:10.1111/j.0021-9886.2005.00558.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maganda, C. (2005). Collateral damage: How the San Diego–Imperial Valley water agreement affects the Mexican side of the border. The Journal of Environment & Development (SAGE Publications), 14(4), 486–506. doi:10.1177/1070496505282668
   Google Scholar
• Maganda, C. (2013). The implementation of the European Water Framework Directive in Luxembourg: Regional compliance vs. cross-border cooperation? International Journal of Water Governance, 1(3), 403–426. June/July 2013. doi:10.7564/13-IJWG15
   Google Scholar
• Magnon, B. C. (2005). La cuenca transfronteriza del río Hondo, un reto: la elaboración de una visión compartida de gestión del agua y de desarrollo sustentable. en M. E. Kauffer (Ed.), El agua en la frontera México–Guatemala–Belice. México: Universidad Autónoma de Chiapas.
   Google Scholar
• Mirumachi, N. (2013). Securitising shared waters: An analysis of the hydropolitical context of the Tanakpur Barrage project between Nepal and India. The Geographical Journal, 179, 309–319. doi:10.1111/geoj.12029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. (2003). Revising the 1944 water treaty: Reflections on the Rio Grande Drought Crises and other matters. Journal of the Southwest, 45(45), 43–68. Winter
   Google Scholar
• Mumme, S., Ibañez, O., & Till, S. M. (2012). Multilevel governance of water on the U.S.–Mexico border. Regions & Cohesion, 2(2), 6–29. doi:10.3167/reco.2012.020202
   Google Scholar
• Norman, E., Cohen, A., & Bakker, K. (Eds.). (2013). Water without borders? Canada, the United States, and shared waters. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norman, E. S., & Bakker, K. (2015). Do good fences make good neighbours? Canada–United States transboundary water governance, the Boundary Waters Treaty, and twenty-first-century challenges. Water International, 40(1), 199–213. doi:10.1080/02508060.2014.978973
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olvera Alarcón, D., Kauffer Michel, E., Inge Schmook, B., & Huicochea, L. (2011). Factores de conflicto en la cooperación por el agua en cuencas compartidas: caso Río Hondo (México–Guatemala–Belice). Estudios Fronterizos, nueva época, vol. 12, núm, 24, julio-diciembre de 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Panke, D. (2010). Small states in the European Union: Structural disadvantages in EU policy-making and counter-strategies. Journal of European Public Policy, 17(6), 799–817. doi:10.1080/13501763.2010.486980
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman, M., y Varis, O. (2005). Integrated water resources management: Evolution, prospects and future challenges. Sustainability; Science, Practice, and Policy, 1(1), 15–21.
   Google Scholar
• Remmer, K. L. (2010). Why do small states have big governments? European Political Science Review, 2(1), 49–71. doi:10.1017/S1755773909990221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romero, M. R., y Benítez, L. J. (coords.). (2010). La agenda de cooperción internacional en la frontera sur de México. México, DF: Bonilla Artigas Editores.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. (2009). Luxembourg dans la « Grande Région ». In P. Bousch, T. Chilla, P. Gerber, O. Klein, C. Schulz, C. Sohn, & D. Wiktorin (Eds.), Der Luxemburg Atlas/Atlas du Luxembourg (pp. 12–13). Köln: Emons Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Schulz, C. (2013). Power topographies in cross-border spatial development policies. En P. Gilles et al (coords.), Theorizing borders through analyses of power relationships (pp. 111–124). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiqui, K. (2010). The political economy of development in Singapore. Research in Applied Economics, 2(2), E4. doi:10.5296/rae.v2i2.524
   Google Scholar
• Sohn, C., & Walther, O. (2008). Géographie des activités économiques métropolitaines au Luxembourg. Population & territoire, N 14/2007 Differdange: CEPS/INSTEAD.
   Google Scholar
• Thill, P., & Thomas, A. (2011). The end of consensus? The effects of the economic crisis on industrial relations in Luxembourg. In B. Mirella & B. Brand (Eds.), Changing labour relations: Between path dependency and global trends (pp. 71–85). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Turton, A. R., & Earle, A. (2005). Public participation in the development of a management plan for an international river basin: The Okavango case. In L. Jansky & J. I. Uitto (Eds.), Enhancing participation and governance in water resources management. Conventional approaches and information technology (pp. 33–52). New York, NY: United Nations University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turton, A. R., Patrick, M. J., & Julien, F. (2006). Transboundary water resources in Southern Africa: Conflict or cooperation? Development, 49(3), 22–31. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100269
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2013). Small states and the global economic crisis: An assessment. European Political Science, 12, 276–293. doi:10.1057/eps.2012.34
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, C. (Forthcoming 2012). Borders, infrastructures and power. In C. Maganda, P. Gilles, H. Koff, & C. Schulz (Eds.), Theorizing borders through analyses of power relationships. Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Walther, O., Schulz, C., & Dorry, S. (2011). Specialized international financial centres and their crisis resilience: The case of Luxembourg. Geographische Zeitschrift, 99(2–3), 123–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wescoat Jr., J. L. (2014). Searching for comparative international water research: Urban and rural water conservation research in India and the United States. Water Alternatives, 7(1), 199–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wester, P., Merrey, D., & de Lange, M. (2003, May). Boundaries of consent: Stakeholder representation in river basin management in Mexico and South Africa. World Development, 31(5), 797–812. doi:10.1016/S0305-750X(03)00017-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Goulden, M., & Tickner, D. (2013). Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony – A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460. doi:10.2166/wp.2006.054
   Google Scholar