Virtual water trade and the contestation of hydrosocial territories

References

• Allan, J. A. (1998). Virtual water: A strategic resource, global solutions to regional deficits. Groundwater, 36(4), 545–546. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.1998.tb02825.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allan, J. A. (2003). Virtual water – The water, food, and trade nexus. Useful concept or misleading metaphor? Water International, 28(1), 106–113. doi:10.1080/02508060.2003.9724812
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amekawa, Y. (2009). Reflections on the growing influence of good agricultural practices in the Global South. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22, 531–557. doi:10.1007/s10806-009-9171-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Awange, J. L., Forootan, E., Kusche, J., Kiema, J. B. K., Omondi, P. A., Heck, B., … Gonçalves, R. M. (2013). Understanding the decline of water storage across the Ramser–Lake Naivasha using satellite-based methods. Advances in Water Resources, 60, 7–23. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baines, J. (2014). Food price inflation as redistribution: Towards a new analysis of corporate power in the world food system. New Political Economy, 19(1), 79–112. doi:10.1080/13563467.2013.768611
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, C. J. (2005). In the image of the market: The Chilean model of water resources management. International Journal of Water, 3(2), 146–165. doi:10.1504/IJW.2005.007283
   Google Scholar
• Blackmore, E., Keeley, J., Pyburn, R., Mangus, E., Chen, L., & Yuhui, Q. (2012). Pro-poor certification: Assessing the benefits of sustainability certification for small-scale farmers in Asia, Natural Resource Issues No. 25. London: IIED. Retrieved from http://www.european-fair-trade-association.org/efta/Doc/Propoorcert-IIED.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., Hoogesteger, J., Swyngedouw, E., Vos, J., & Wester, P. (2016). Hydrosocial territories: A political ecology perspective. Water International, 41(1), 1–14. doi:10.1080/02508060.2016.1134898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boelens, R., & Vos, J. (2012). The danger of naturalizing water policy concepts: Water productivity and efficiency discourses from field irrigation to virtual water trade. Agricultural Water Management, 108, 16–26. doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2011.06.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budds, J. (2009). Contested H2O: Science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum, 40, 418–430. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2008.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, D., & Lawrence, G. (2009). Towards a third food regime: Behind the transformation. Agriculture and Human Values, 26, 267–279. doi:10.1007/s10460-009-9219-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cáceres, D. M. (2015). Accumulation by dispossession and socio-environmental conflicts caused by the expansion of agribusiness in Argentina. Journal of Agrarian Change, 15(1), 116–147. doi:10.1111/joac.12057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, H. (2005). The rise and rise of EurepGAP: The European (re)invention of colonial food relations? International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture, 13(2), 1–19. Retrieved from http://www.ijsaf.org/archive/13/2/campbell.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carolan, M. (2012). The sociology of food and agriculture. Abington: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Castro, J. (2008). Water struggles, citizenship and governance in Latin America. Development, 51(1), 72–76. doi:10.1057/palgrave.development.1100440
   Google Scholar
• Chapagain, A., Hoekstra, A., Savenije, H., & Gautam, R. (2005). The Water Footprint of Cotton Consumption. Value of Water Research Report Series No. 18. Delft: UNESCO-IHE. Retrieved from http://waterfootprint.org/media/downloads/Report18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Chen, Z.-M., & Chen, G. Q. (2013). Virtual water accounting for the globalized world economy: National water footprint and international virtual water trade. Ecological Indicators, 28, 142–149. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.07.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J., & Fuchs, D. (Eds.). (2009). Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Conn, C. (2015, May 12). Mexico’s Yaqui people launch defense of water and territory. Tele Sur. Retrieved from http://www.telesurtv.net/english/news/Mexicos-Yaqui-People-Launch-Defense-of-Water-and-Territory-20150512-0033.html
   Google Scholar
• Cotula, L. (2012). The international political economy of the global land rush: A critical appraisal of trends, scale, geography and drivers. Journal of Peasant Studies, 39(3–4), 649–680. doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.674940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, J., Murray, K., Ashton, P., & Leaner, J. (2009). Agricultural impacts on water quality and implications for virtual water trading decisions. Ecological Economics, 68(4), 1074–1082. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.07.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalin, C., Konar, M., Hanasaki, N., Rinaldo, A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2012). Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(16), 5989–5994. doi:10.1073/pnas.1203176109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dauvergne, P., & Lister, J. (2012). Big brand sustainability: Governance prospects and environmental limits. Global Environmental Change, 22(1), 36–45. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.10.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debbané, A.-M. (2013). Dis/articulations and the hydrosocial cycle: Postapartheid geographies of agrarian change in the Ceres Valley, South Africa. Environment and Planning A, 45(11), 2553–2571. doi:10.1068/a45693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Defries, R. S., Rudel, T., Uriarte, M., & Hansen, M. (2010). Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century. Nature Geoscience, 3(3), 178–181. doi:10.1038/ngeo756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Moral, L., & Do O, A. (2014). Water governance and scalar politics across multiple-boundary river basins: States, catchments and regional powers in the Iberian Peninsula. Water International, 39(3), 333–347. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.878816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Delaney, D. (2008). Territory: A short introduction. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission. (2012). 10 Benefits of trade for developing countries. Retrieved from http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2012/january/tradoc_148991.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2010). Agricultural investment funds for developing countries. Rome: FAO, Hardman. Retrieved from http://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/ags/publications/investment_funds.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., Kalfagianni, A., & Arentsen, M. (2009). Retail power, private standards, and sustainability in the global food system. In J. Clapp & D. Fuchs (Eds.), Corporate power in global agrifood governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fulponi, L. (2007). The globalization of private standards and the agri-food system. In J. Swinnen (Ed.), Global supply chains, standards and the poor. Wallingford, UK: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Gana, A. (2012). The rural and agricultural roots of the Tunisian Revolution: When food security matters. International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 19(2), 201–213. Retrieved from http://www.ijsaf.org/archive/19/2/gana.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gaybor, A. (2011). Acumulación en el campo y despojo del agua en el Ecuador [Capital accumulation and water dispossession in rural Ecuador]. In R. Boelens, M. Zwarteveen, & L. Cremers (Eds.), Justicia Hídrica. Acumulación, Conflictos y Acción Social [Water justice; accumulation, conflicts and social action] (pp. 195–208). Lima: IEP & Fondo Editorial PUCP.
   Google Scholar
• Gibbon, P., & Ponte, S. (2005). Trading down: Africa, value chains, and the global economy. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goger, A., Hull, A., Barrientos, S., Gereffi, G., & Godfrey, S. (2014). Capturing the gains in Africa: Making the most of global value chain participation. Center on Globalization, Governance & Competitiveness, Durham, NC: Duke University.
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. (2012). Squeezing Africa dry: Behind every land grab is a water grab. GRAIN Report June 2012. Retrieved from www.grain.org/e/4516
   Google Scholar
• GRAIN. (2014). The many faces of land grabbing: Cases from Africa and Latin America. EJOLT Report No. 10. Retrieved from http://www.grain.org/fr/article/entries/4908-ejolt-report-10-the-many-faces-of.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hall, R., Edelman, M., Borras, S. M., Scoones, I., White, B., & Wolford, W. (2015). Resistance, acquiescence or incorporation? An introduction to land grabbing and political reactions ‘from below’. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3–4), 467–488. doi:10.1080/03066150.2015.1036746
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazelton, J. (2014). Corporate water accountability – The role of water labels given non-fungible extractions. Pacific Accounting Review, 26(1/2), 8–27. doi:10.1108/PAR-07-2013-0074
   Google Scholar
• Helwege, A. (2015). Challenges with resolving mining conflicts in Latin America. The Extractive Industries and Society, 2, 73–84. doi:10.1016/j.exis.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar
• Hoekstra, A., & Chapagain, A. (2008). Globalization of water: Sharing the planet’s freshwater resources. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Hoogesteger, J., & Verzijl, A. (2015). Grassroots scalar politics: Insights from peasant water struggles in the Ecuadorian and Peruvian Andes. Geoforum, 62, 13–23. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.03.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ICMM – International Council on Mining & Metals. (2014). Sustainable development framework. Retrieved December 9, 2014, from www.icmm.com/our-work/sustainable-development-framework/10-principles
   Google Scholar
• Khan, S., & Hanjra, M. (2009). Footprints of water and energy inputs in food production – Global perspectives. Food Policy, 34, 130–140. doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2008.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• La Via Campesina. (2013). No to WTO and free trade agreements: Deal a decisive blow to Neoliberalism. Retrieved from http://viacampesina.org/en/index.php/actions-and-events-mainmenu-26/10-years-of-wto-is-enough-mainmenu-35/1526-deal-a-decisive-blow-to-neoliberalism
   Google Scholar
• Langan, M. (2011). Uganda’s flower farms and private sector development. Development and Change, 42(5), 1207–1240. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2011.01732.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Bhanduri, A., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Bekchanov, M., Geschke, A., & Foran, B. (2012). The role of scarcity in global VW flows. ZEF-Discussion Papers on Development Policy No. 169.
   Google Scholar
• Lenzen, M., Moran, D., Kanemoto, K., Foran, B., Lobefaro, L., & Geschke, A. (2012). International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature, 486, 109–112. doi:10.1038/nature11145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longo, S., & York, R. (2008). Agricultural exports and the environment: A cross-national study of fertilizer and pesticide consumption. Rural Sociology, 73(1), 82–104. doi:10.1526/003601108783575853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lopez-Gunn, E. (2009). Agua para todos: A new regionalist hydraulic paradigm in Spain. Water Alternatives, 2(3), 370–394.
   Google Scholar
• McMichael, P. (2009). A food regime genealogy. Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(1), 139–169. doi:10.1080/03066150902820354
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehta, L., Veldwisch, G. J., & Franco, J. (2012). Introduction to the special issue: Water grabbing? Focus on the (re)appropriation of finite water resources. Water Alternatives, 5(2), 193–207. Retrieved from http://www.water-alternatives.org/index.php/alldoc/articles/vol5/v5issue2/165-a5-2-1/file
   Google Scholar
• Moreda, T. (2015). Listening to their silence? The political reaction of affected communities to large-scale land acquisitions: Insights from Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 42(3–4), 517–539. doi:10.1080/03066150.2014.993621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, S. (2008). Globalization and corporate concentration in the food and agriculture sector. Development, 51(4), 527–533. doi:10.1057/dev.2008.57
   Google Scholar
• Palau, T., Cabello, D., Naeyens, A., Rulli, J., & Segovia, D. (2007). Los Refugiados del modelo agroexportador. Impactos del monocultivo de soja en las comunidades campesinas paraguayas [The refugees of the agroexport model: Impacts of the soya monoculture on peasant communities in Paraguay]. Asunción, Paraguay: BASE-IS.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, R. (2007). Beyond women workers: Gendering CSR. Third World Quarterly, 28, 731–749. doi:10.1080/01436590701336622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, F. (2011). Acumulación de derechos de agua y justicia hídrica en México: El poder de las élites [Accumulation of water rights and water justice in Mexico: The power of the elites]. In R. Boelens, L. Cremers, & M. Zwarteveen (Eds.), Justicia Hídrica: Acumulación, Conflictos y Acción Social [Water justice: Accumulation, conflicts and social action] (pp. 209–224). Lima: IEP & Fondo Editorial PUCP.
   Google Scholar
• Progressio. (2010). Drop by drop. Understanding the impacts of the UK’s water footprint through a case study of Peruvian Asparagus. London: Progressio, in assoc. with CEPES and WWI.
   Google Scholar
• Quintana, V. (2013). The new global agri-food order and water disputes in Northern Mexico. Apuntes, 40(73), 131–158.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, D., & Warner, J. (2008). Virtual water: Virtuous impact? The unsteady state of virtual water. Agriculture and Human Values, 25, 257–270. doi:10.1007/s10460-007-9096-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. A. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, J. A. (1998). Seeing like a State: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scudder, T. (2005). The future of large dams: Dealing with social, environmental, institutional and political costs. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Seekell, D., D’Odorico, P., & Pace, M. (2011). Virtual water transfers unlikely to redress inequality in global water use. Environmental Research Letters, 6(2). doi:10.1088/17489326/6/2/024017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah, T., Burke, J., & Villholth, K. (2007). Groundwater: A global assessment of scale and significance. In D. Molden (Ed.), Water for food–Water for life. Comprehensive assessment of water management in agriculture (pp. 395–423). London: EarthScan.
   Google Scholar
• Smaller, C., & Mann, H. (2009). A thirst for distant lands: Foreign investment in agricultural land and water. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development (IISD).
   Google Scholar
• Sojamo, S., Keulertz, M., Warner, J., & Allan, J. A. (2012). Virtual water hegemony: The role of agribusiness in global water governance. Water International, 37(2), 169–182. doi:10.1080/02508060.2012.662734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sojamo, S., & Larson, E. A. (2012). Investigating food and agribusiness corporations as global water security, management and governance agents: The case of Nestlé, Bunge and Cargill. Water Alternatives, 5(3), 619–635.
   Google Scholar
• Solanes, M. (2010). Water, water services and international investment agreements. In C. Ringler, et al. (Eds.), Global change: Impacts on water and food security. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Solanes, M., & Jouravlev, A. (2007). Revisiting privatization, foreign investment, international arbitration, and water, ECLAC/CEPAL, Serie Recursos naturales e infrastructura, No. 129.
   Google Scholar
• Sosa, M., & Zwarteveen, M. (2014). The institutional regulation of the sustainability of water resources within mining contexts: Accountability and plurality. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11, 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suweis, S., Konar, M., Dalin, C., Hanasaki, N., Rinaldo, A., & Rodriguez-Iturbe, I. (2011). Structure and controls of the global virtual water trade network. Geophysical Research Letters, 38(10). doi:10.1029/2011GL046837
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2013). Into the sea: Desalination as hydro-social fix in Spain. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(2), 261–270. doi:10.1080/00045608.2013.754688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2007). Development implications of international investment agreements, United Nations conference of trade and development. New York, NY: UNCTAD/WEB/ITE/IIA/2007/2.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2008). The new peasantries. Struggles for autonomy and sustainability in an era of empire and globalization. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Ploeg, J. D. (2010). The food crisis, industrialized farming and the imperial regime. Journal of Agrarian Change, 10(1), 98–106. doi:10.1111/joac.2010.10.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vestergaard, J. (2012). Disciplining the international political economy through finance. In S. Guzzini & I. Neumann (Eds.), The diffusion of power in global governance, international political economy meets Foucault (pp. 172–202). Houndmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, J., & Boelens, R. (2014a). Ríos de oro. La exportación del agua virtual y la responsabilidad social empresarial de las empresas mineras y agro-exportadoras [Rivers of gold: Mining and agro-export companies – Exportation of virtual water versus corporate social responsibility]. In T. Perreault (Ed.), Mineria, agua y justicia social en los Andes: Experiencias comparativas de Perú y Bolivia (pp. 203–230). Cusco, Peru: CBC.
   Google Scholar
• Vos, J., & Boelens, R. (2014b). Sustainability standards and the water question. Development and Change, 45(2), 205–230. doi:10.1111/dech.12083
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada, Y., Van Beek, L., Van Kempen, C., Reckman, J., Vasak, S., & Bierkens, M. (2010). Global depletion of groundwater resources. Geophysical Research Letters, 37(20), 1–5. doi:10.1029/2010GL044571
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldman, K. B., & Kerr, J. M. (2014). Limitations of certification and supply chain standards for environmental protection in commodity crop production. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 6, 429–449. doi:10.1146/annurev-resource-100913-012432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wichelns, D. (2010). Virtual water: A helpful perspective, but not a sufficient policy criterion. Water Resources Management, 24, 2203–2219. doi:10.1007/s11269-009-9547-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Word, J. (2014). Surrendering our future: Senhuile-Senéthanol plantation destroys local communities and jeopardizes environment. Oakland: Oakland Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Yacoub, C., Blazquez, N., Pérez-Foguet, A., & Miralles, N. (2013). Spatial and temporal trace metal distribution of a Peruvian basin: Recognizing trace metal sources and assessing the potential risk. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 185(10), 7961–7978. doi:10.1007/s10661-013-3147-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zapatta, A., & Mena, P. (2013). Acumulación de agua y floricultura en un mosaico de territorios de riego: el caso Pisque, Ecuador [Accumulation of water and flower production in a mozaic of irrigation territories]. In A. Arroyo & R. Boelens (Eds.), Aguas robadas: despojo hídrico y movilización social (pp. 167–183). Serie Agua y Sociedad, 19, Quito: Justicia Hídrica, IEP & Abya Yala.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Messerschmid, C., & Attili, S. (2009). Asymmetric abstraction and allocation: The Israeli-Palestinian water pumping record. Groundwater, 47, 146–160. doi:10.1111/j.1745-6584.2008.00487.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, J. Z., Liu, W. H., & Deng, H. (2005). The potential role of virtual water in solving water scarcity and food security problems in China. International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology, 12(4), 419–428. doi:10.1080/13504500509469651
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar