Governing water augmentation under the Watercourse Convention

References

• Abderrahman, W. (2001). Energy and water in arid developing countries: Saudi Arabia, a case-study. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 17, 247–255. doi:10.1080/07900620120031306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyth, M. (2007). The red sea and the Mediterranean-dead sea canal project. Desalination, 214, 365–371. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrillo-Guerrero, Y., Flessa, K., Hinojosa-Huerta, O., & López-Hoffman, L. (2013). From accident to management: The Cienega de Santa Clara Ecosystem. Ecological Engineering, 59, 84–92. doi:10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cazurra, T. (2008). Water reuse of South Barcelona’s wastewater reclamation plant. Desalination, 218, 43–51. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.12.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, J. (2014). Water markets and the U.N. watercourses convention. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 27, 179–198.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado River Basin Salinity Control Act. (1974). Pub. L. No. 93-320, 88 Stat. 266.
   Google Scholar
• Cooter, R. (2000). The strategic constitution. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Craig, R. K. (2010). Water supply, desalination, climate change, and energy policy. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 22, 225–255.
   Google Scholar
• Dreizin, Y., Tenne, A., & Hoffman, D. (2008). Integrating large scale seawater desalination plants within Israel’s water supply system. Desalination, 220, 132–149. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, G., & Salman, S. (2015). Concluding thoughts on the implications of the entry into force of the United Nations watercourses convention. Water Policy, 17, 181–186. doi:10.2166/wp.2014.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• El-Sayed, Y. M. (2007). The rising potential of competitive solar desalination. Desalination, 216, 314–324. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischhendler, I. (2008). Ambiguity in transboundary environmental dispute resolution: The Israeli-Jordanian water agreement. Journal of Peace Research, 45, 91–109. doi:10.1177/0022343307084925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Zheng, G., & Jin, D. (2006). A numerical study of cloud seeding by silver iodide and liquid carbon dioxide. Atmospheric Research, 79, 183–226. doi: 10.1016/j.atmosres.2005.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, N. (2010). Interstate water compacts and climate change adaptation. Environmental & Energy Law & Policy, 5, 237–323.
   Google Scholar
• Hauser, R. (2013). Using twentieth-century U.S. weather modification policy to gain insight into global climate remediation governance issues. Weather, Climate, and Society, 5, 180–193. doi:10.1175/WCAS-D-11-00011.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helal, M. S. (2007). Sharing blue gold: The 1997 UN convention on the law of non-navigational uses of international watercourses ten years on. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, 18, 337–378.
   Google Scholar
• International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico. (1973). Minute 242: Permanent and definitive solution to the international problem of salinity of the Colorado River.
   Google Scholar
• International Court of Justice. (1997). Gabčikovo-Nagymaros Project, Hungary v Slovakia, Judgment, Merits, ICJ GL No 92, [1997] ICJ Rep 7, [1997] ICJ Rep 88, (1998) 37 ILM 162, ICGJ 66 (ICJ 1997), 25th September 1997, International Court of Justice [ICJ].
   Google Scholar
• Jensen, E. T. (2005). The international law of environmental warfare: Active and passive damage during armed conflict. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 38, 145–185.
   Google Scholar
• Judkins, G. L., & Larson, K. (2010). The Yuma desalting plant and Cienega de Santa Clara Dispute: A case study review of a workgroup process. Water Policy, 12, 401–415. doi:10.2166/wp.2009.084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karl, T. R., & Trenberth, K. E. (2003). Modern global climate change. Science, 302, 1719–1723. doi:10.1126/science.1090228
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, R. (2012). Innovation and international commons: The case of desalination under international law. Utah Law Review, 2012, 759–813.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. (2013). Orphaned pollution. Arizona State Law Journal, 45, 991–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. (2014). The U.N. Watercourse convention and technological innovation. London Journal of International Law, 1(221). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2279582
   Google Scholar
• Larson, R. (2015). Interstitial federalism. UCLA Law Review, 62, 908–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lattemann, S., & Höpner, T. (2008). Environmental impact and impact assessment of seawater desalination. Desalination, 220, 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2007.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, Z. (2009). Report on the state of cloudseeding for rain enhancement. The Cypress Institute. Retrieved from http://www.cyi.ac.cy/system/files/Report_EEWRC_omformat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lohman, E. (2003). Yuma desalting plant. Southwest Hydrology, 2003, 20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Majzoub, T., Quilleré-Majzoub, F., Abdel Raouf, M., & El-Majzoub, M. (2009). “Cloud Busters”: reflections on the right to water in clouds and a search for international law rules. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, 20, 321–354.
   Google Scholar
• Mason v. Hoyle. (1888). Connecticut Supreme Court Reporter, 56, 255.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, S. (2014). The entry into force of the 1997 watercourses convention. Water Policy, 16, 1202–1203. doi:10.2166/wp.2014.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohsen, M. (2007). Water strategies and potential of desalination in Jordan. Desalination, 203, 27–46. doi:10.1016/j.desal.2006.03.524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molle, F., & Mollinga, P. (2003). Water poverty indicators: Conceptual problems and policy issues. Water Policy, 5, 529–544.
   Google Scholar
• Paul-Wostl, C. (2007). Transition towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resource Management, 21(49–62). doi:10.1007/s11269-006-9040-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rangno, A. L., & Hobbs, P. V. (1995). A new look at the Israeli cloud seeding experiments. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 34(1169–1193), 1995. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1995)034<1169:ANLATI>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Salman, S. (2007). The Helsinki rules, the UN watercourses convention and the Berlin rules: Perspectives on international water law. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 23, 625–640. doi:10.1080/07900620701488562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharon, D. (1978). Rainfall fields in Israel and Jordan and the effect of cloud seeding on them. Journal of Applied Meteorology, 17, 40–48. doi:10.1175/1520-0450(1978)017<0040:RFIIAJ>2.0.CO;2
   Google Scholar
• Simms, V. (2015). Making the rain: Cloud seeding, the imminent freshwater crisis, and international law. The International Lawyer, 44, 915–937.
   Google Scholar
• Southeastern Colorado Water Conservation District v. Shelton Farms, Inc. (1975). Colorado Supreme Court Reporter, 187, 181.
   Google Scholar
• Spagat, E. (2011, October 15). Mexico’s newest export to US may be water. Associated Press. Retrieved from http://archive.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2011/10/15/mexicos_newest_export_to_us_may_be_water/
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D. (2006). Possible lessons from a comparison of the restoration of the Danube and Colorado deltas. Pacific McGeorge Global Business & Development Law Journal, 19, 61–78.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D. (2010). Four challenges for international water law. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 23, 369–408.
   Google Scholar
• Tarlock, A. D., & Wouters, P. (2007). Are shared benefits of international waters an equitable apportionment? Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law & Policy, 18, 523–536.
   Google Scholar
• Treaty of Peace between the State of Israel and the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan. (1995). International Legal Material, 34, 43.
   Google Scholar
• Tsiourtis, N. X. (2001). Desalination and the environment. Desalination, 141, 223–236. doi:10.1016/S0011-9164(01)85001-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1997). Convention on the Law of Non-Navigational Uses of International Watercourses, 1997. UNGA Res. 51/229, Supp. No. 49.
   Google Scholar
• Vick, M. J. (2012). The law of international waters: Reasonable utilization. Chicago-Kent Journal of International & Comparative Law, 12, 141–178.
   Google Scholar
• Voutchkov, N. (2004). Seawater desalination costs cut through power plant co-location. Filtration & Separation, 41, 24–26. doi:10.1016/S0015-1882(04)00317-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wayman v. Murray City. (1969). Pacific Reporter 2d 458, 861.
   Google Scholar
• Yamada, R.R., Laughlin, J.K., & Wood, D.K. (1995). Co-located seawater desalination/power facilities: Practical and institutional issues. Desalination, 102, 279–286. doi: 10.1016/0011-9164(95)00064-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar