Specification of a human right to water: a sustainability assessment of access hurdles

References

• Ammermüller, B. M. (2011). Assessing cost recovery: A new comparative framework in line with WFD Article 9. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Baisa, B., Davis, L. W., Salant, S. W., & Wilcox, W. (2010). The welfare costs of unreliable water service. Journal of Development Economics, 92, 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2008.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram, J. (2008). Improving on haves and have-nots. Nature, 452, 283–284. doi:10.1038/452283a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartram, J., & Cairncross, S. (2010). Hygiene, sanitation, and water: Forgotten foundations of health. Plos Medicine, 7, e1000367. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000367
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayrau, A. (2005). Affordability and willingness to pay for improved water supply in urban areas of Ethiopia: Strategy for full cost recovery. S.l. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://de.scribd.com/document/53441558/Alebel-Bayrau-Afford-Ability-amp-Willingness-to-Pay-for-Impro
   Google Scholar
• Becker, G. S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. The Economic Journal, 75, 493–516. doi:10.2307/2228949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, R. A. (1982). Intergenerational equity: The capital-environment trade-off. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 9, 165–185. doi:10.1016/0095-0696(82)90020-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bretschneider, W. (2017). Das Menschenrecht auf Wasser als Allokationsproblem. Versorgungsgerechtigkeit als institutionenökonomisches Konzept zur Umsetzung des Anliegens im Rahmen einer nachhaltigen Trinkwasserwirtschaft. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck. in press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, A. R. (1996). A ‘violations approach’ for monitoring the international covenant on economic, social and cultural rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 18, 23–66. doi:10.1353/hrq.1996.0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (1990). General comment no. 3: The nature of states parties’ obligations ( Adopted on 14 December 1990, United Nations Doc E/1991/23). Retrieved June 18, 2017, from http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838e10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. (2002). General comment no. 15. The right to water ( Adopted on 20 January 2003, United Nations Doc E/C.12/2002/11). Retrieved June 18, 2017, from http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838d11.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Albuquerque, C. (2014). Access to justice for violations of the human rights to water and sanitation. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.refworld.org/pdfid/4538838e10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Albuquerque, C., & Roaf, V. (2012). On the right track: Good practices in realising the right to water and sanitation (United Nations Special Rapporteur). Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Water/BookonGoodPractices_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• de Albuquerque, C., & Winkler, I. T. (2010). Neither friend nor foe – why the commercialization of water and sanitation is not the main issue for the realization of human rights. Brown Journal of World Affairs, 17, 167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Dubreuil, C. (2006). The right to water: From concept to implementation. Marseilles: World Water Council.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis, K., & Feris, L. (2014). The right to sanitation: Time to delink from the right to water. Human Rights Quarterly, 36, 607–629. doi:10.1353/hrq.2014.0038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel, E. (2015). Cost recovery for water services in the EU. Current developments on Article 9 water framework directive. Intereconomics, 50, 40–45. doi:10.1007/s10272-015-0523-5
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E. (2016). Environmental and resource costs under Article 9 water framework directive. Challenges for the implementation of the principle of cost recovery for water services. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2011). Affordability as an institutional obstacle to water-related price reforms. In I. Theesfeld & F. Pirscher (Eds.), Perspectives on institutional change – Water management in Europe (pp. 9–41). Halle/Saale: Leibniz-Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel- und Osteuropa (IAMO).
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2012a). Gehalt und Grenzen eines Rechts auf Wasser - ein Zwischenruf. Archiv des öffentlichen Rechts, 137, 321–359. doi:10.1628/000389112804177919
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2012b). The right to water – An institutional economics perspective. The Ordo Yearbook of Economic and Social Order, 63, 325–363.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2014). Affordability of water and energy pricing – the case of Germany. In T. Fitzpatrick (Ed.), International handbook in social policy & the environment (pp. 123–151). Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., Sigel, K., & Bretschneider, W. (2013). Affordability of water supply in Mongolia: Empirical lessons for measuring affordability. Water Policy, 15, 19–42. doi:10.2166/wp.2012.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2016a). Sustainable access to water for all: How to conceptualize and to implement the human right to water. Journal for European Environmental and Planning Law (JEEPL), I, 190–217.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., & Bretschneider, W. (2016b). Content and implementation of a right to water. An institutional economics approach. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Gorsboth, M., & Wolf, E. (2008). Identifying and addressing violations of the human right to water. Applying the human rights approach. Stuttgart: Brot für die Welt. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.right2water.eu/sites/water/files/violations%20of%20the%20Human%20Right%20to%20Water.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hancock, K. E. (1993). Can pay? Won’t pay?’ or economic principles of ‘affordability. Urban Studies, 30, 127–145. doi:10.1080/00420989320080081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, G., & Bartram, J. (2003). Domestic water quantity: Service level and health. Geneva: World Health Organisation (WHO).
   Google Scholar
• Klassert, C., Sigel, K., Gawel, E., & Klauer, B. (2015). Modeling residential water consumption in Amman: The role of intermittency, storage, and pricing for piped and tanker water. Water, 7, 3643–3670. doi:10.3390/w7073643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kumpel, E., & Nelson, K. L. (2013). Comparing microbial water quality in an intermittent and continuous piped water supply. Water Research, 47, 5176–5188. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2013.05.058
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lancaster, K. J. (1966). A new approach to consumer theory. Journal of Political Economy, 74, 132–157. doi:10.1086/259131
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, C. (2011). Privatization, water access and affordability: Evidence from Malaysian household expenditure data. Economic Modelling, 28, 2121–2128. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2011.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leibenstein, H. (1966). Allocative efficiency and X-efficiency. The American Economic Review, 56, 392–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luh, J., Baum, R., & Bartram, J. (2013). Equity in water and sanitation: Developing an index to measure progressive realization of the human right. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health, 216, 662–671. doi:10.1016/j.ijheh.2012.12.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marvin, S., & Laurie, N. (1999). An emerging logic of urban water management, Cochabamba, Bolivia. Urban Studies, 36, 341–357. doi:10.1080/0042098993637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGraw, G. S. (2011). Defining and defending the RTW at its minimum core: Legal construction and the role of national jurisprudence. Loyola University Chicago International Review, 8, 127–204.
   Google Scholar
• Medema, S. G. (Ed.). (1997). Coasean economics: Law and economics and the new institutional economics. Boston, MA: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Miniaci, R., Scarpa, C., & Valbonesi, P. (2008). Measuring the affordability of basic public utility services in Italy. Giornale degli Economisti e Annali di Economica, 67, 185–230.
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, J. D. (1988). The informal service sector as an administrative resource. In D. A. Rondinelli & G. Shabbir Cheema (Eds.), Urban services in developing countries (pp. 89–111). Hong Kong: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Murthy, S. L. (2013). The human right(s) to water and sanitation: History, meaning, and the controversy over privatization. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 31, 89–147.
   Google Scholar
• N.U. (2015). JMP green paper: Global monitoring of water, sanitation and hygiene post-2015. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from https://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/JMP-Green-Paper-15-Oct-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• North, D. C. (1993). The new institutional economics and development. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www2.econ.iastate.edu/tesfatsi/NewInstE.North.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G., & Toman, M. A. (1997). Sustainability: Ecological and economic perspectives. Land Economics, 73, 553–568. doi:10.2307/3147245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oelmann, M. (2005). Zur Neuausrichtung der Preis- und Qualitätsregulierung in der deutschen Wasserwirtschaft. Köln: Kölner Wissenschaftsverlag.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2009). Managing water for all. An OECD perspective on pricing and financing. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. (2010). Pricing water resources and water and sanitation services. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Reese, M., Gawel, E., & Geyler, St. (2015). Die Nachhaltigkeitsgebote der Siedlungswasserwirtschaft – Kernziele, Grundvoraussetzungen und institutionelle Ansatzpunkte nachhaltiger Wasserver- und Abwasserentsorgung. In E. Gawel (Ed.), Die Governance der Wasserinfrastruktur. Volume 1: Rahmenbedingungen, Herausforderungen und Optionen (pp. 197–289). Berlin: Duncker & Humblot.
   Google Scholar
• Riedel, E. (2006). The human right to water and general comment No. 15 of the committee on economic, social and cultural rights. In E. Riedel & P. Rothen (Eds.), The human right to water (pp. 19–36). Berlin: BWV (Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag).
   Google Scholar
• Roaf, V., Khalfan, A., & Langford, M. (2005). Monitoring implementation of the right to water: A framework for developing indicators (Global Issue Papers No. 14). Berlin: Heinrich-Böll-Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Saleth, R. M., & Dinar, A. (2004). The institutional economics of water. A cross country analysis of institutions and performance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson, P., & Nordhaus, W. (1948, 1998). Economics (16th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, M. (2012). Background note on MDGs, non-discrimination and indicators in water and sanitation. Retrieved November 2, 2015, from http://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/END-Background-Paper_1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Satterthwaite, M. (2014). On rights-based partnerships to measure progress in water and sanitation. 20. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 877–884. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9514-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simpson, R. (2006). Universal access in the water and sanitation sector. In OECD, & The World Bank (Eds.), Liberalisation and universal access to basic services: Telecommunications, water and sanitation, financial services, and electricity (pp. 97-134). Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Srinivasan, V., Gorelick, S. M., & Goulder, L. (2010). Sustainable urban water supply in South India: Desalination, efficiency improvement, or rainwater harvesting? Water Resources Research, 46, W02012. doi:10.1029/2009WR008698
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stigler, G. J. (1976). The Xistence of X-efficiency. The American Economic Review, 66, 213–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sule, S. (2014). ‘Recht auf Wasser‘ – Zur ersten der Europäischen Kommission vorgelegten Europäischen Bürgerinitiative nach dem Lissaboner Vertrag [Right to water. On the first European citizens‘ initiative submitted to the European Commission according to the Lisbon Treaty]. Europäische Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsrecht, 25, 725–729.
   Google Scholar
• Sultana, F., & Loftus, A. (Eds.). (2012). The right to water: Politics, governance and social struggles. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Toman, M. A. (1994). Economics and “sustainability”: Balancing trade-offs and imperatives. Land Economics, 70, 399–413. doi:10.2307/3146637
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. (1966). International covenant on economic, social and cultural rights, 16 December 1966, United Nations (Treaty Series, vol. 993). p. 3. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.refworld.org/docid/3ae6b36c0.html
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2010). Resolution 64/292. The human right to water and sanitation, 3 August 2010 ( United Nations Doc A/RES/64/292). Retrieved June 18, 2017, from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/64/292.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development, 25 September 2015. ( United Nations Doc A/RES/70/1). Retrieved June 18, 2017, from http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Development Programme. (2006). Human development report 2006. Beyond scarcity: Power, poverty and the global water crisis. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations World Water Assessment Programme. (2015). The United Nations world water development report 2015: Water for a sustainable world. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Vairavamoorthy, K., Gorantiwar, S. D., & Pathirana, A. (2008). Managing urban water supplies in developing countries – Climate change and water scarcity scenarios. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, 33, 330–339. doi:10.1016/j.pce.2008.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, I. (2012). The human right to water: Significance legal status and implications for water allocation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Winpenny, J. (2003). Financing water for all. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/world_water_council/documents_old/Library/Publications_and_reports/CamdessusSummary.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2003). World development report 2004: Making services work for poor people. Washington, DC: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2013). Post-2015 WASH targets and indicators. Retrieved May 2, 2017, from https://www.unicef.org/wash/files/4_WSSCC_JMP_Fact_Sheets_4_UK_LoRes.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization & United Nations Children’s Fund. (2015). Methodological note: Proposed indicator framework for monitoring SDG targets on drinking‐water, sanitation, hygiene and wastewater, sine loco. Retrieved May 30, 2017, from https://www.wssinfo.org/fileadmin/user_upload/resources/Statistical-note-on-SDG-targets-for-WASH-and-wastewater_WHO-UNICEF_21September2015_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar