Non-decisions are also decisions: power interplay between Bangladesh and India over the Brahmaputra River

References

• Alley, K. D. (2016). Governance, connectivity, and knowledge transparency in the Brahmaputra basin. In K. S. Farrell & S. Ganguly (Eds.), Heading East: Security, trade, and environment between India and Southeast Asia. Oxford University press.
   Google Scholar
• Angen, M. J. (2000). Evaluating interpretive inquiry: Reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue. Qualitative Health Research, 10(3), 378–395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1963). Decisions and nondecisions: An analytical framework. American Political Science Review, 57(3), 632–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. S. (1975). Power and its two faces revisited: A reply to Geoffrey Debnam. American Political Science Review, 69(3), 900–904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baghel, R., & Nüsser, M. (2010). Discussing large dams in Asia after the World Commission on Dams: Is a political ecology approach the way forward?. Water Alternatives, 3, 2.
   Google Scholar
• Barua, A., & Vij, S. (2018). Treaties can be a non-starter: A multi-track and multilateral dialogue approach for Brahmaputra basin. Water Policy, 20(5), 1027-1041.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barua, A., Vij, S., & Zulfiqur Rahman, M. (2018). Powering or sharing water in the Brahmaputra River basin. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 34(5), 829-843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baruah, S. (2017). Whose river is it, anyway? The political economy of hydropower in the Eastern Himalayas. In K. J. Joy et al. (Eds.), Water Conflicts in Northeast India (pp. 140–168). India: Routledge
   Google Scholar
• Bassett, T. J., & Fogelman, C. (2013). Déjà vu or something new? The adaptation concept in the climate change literature. Geoforum, 48, 42–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berenskoetter, F., & Williams, M. J. (2007). Thinking about power. In F. Berenskoetter & M. J. Williams (Eds.), Power in world politics (pp. 11–32). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biswas, A. K. (2011). Cooperation or conflict in transboundary water management: Case study of South Asia. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 56(4), 662–670.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cascão, A. E. (2009). Changing power relations in the Nile river basin: Unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Alternatives, 2(2), 245.
   Google Scholar
• Cascão, A. E., & Zeitoun, M. (2010). Power, hegemony and critical hydropolitics. Transboundary Water Management. Principles and Practice, 27, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. A. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215.
   Google Scholar
• Daoudy, M. (2009). Asymmetric power: Negotiating water in the Euphrates and Tigris. International Negotiation, 14(2), 361–391.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, M., Xu, J., Shrestha, A. B., Vaidya, R. A., Santosh, N., & Sandström, K. (2009). The changing Himalayas: Impact of climate change on water resources and livelihoods in the greater Himalayas. Kathmandu: International centre for integrated mountain development (ICIMOD).
   Google Scholar
• Evans, G., & Newnham, J. (1998). The Penguin dictionary of international relations (pp. 235–236). London: Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Falkenmark, M., Lundqvist, J., & Widstrand, C. (1989, November). Macro‐scale water scarcity requires micro‐scale approaches: Aspects of vulnerability in semi‐arid development. Natural Resources Forum, 13(4), 258–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., Pietroń, J., Bring, A., Thorslund, J., & Jarsjö, J. (2017). Present to future sediment transport of the Brahmaputra River: Reducing uncertainty in predictions and management. Regional Environmental Change, 17(2), 515–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ford, J. D., Berrang-Ford, L., Bunce, A., McKay, C., Irwin, M., & Pearce, T. (2015). The status of climate change adaptation in Africa and Asia. Regional Environmental Change, 15(5), 801–814.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, D., & Glaab, K. (2011). Material power and normative conflict in global and local agrifood governance: the lessons of ‘golden rice’ in india. Food Policy, 36(6), 729–735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gain, A. K., & Wada, Y. (2014). Assessment of future water scarcity at different spatial and temporal scales of the Brahmaputra River basin. Water Resources Management, 28(4), 999–1012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gleason, C. J., & Hamdan, A. N. (2017). Crossing the (watershed) divide: Satellite data and the changing politics of international river basins. The Geographical Journal, 183(1), 2–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanasz, P. (2017). Muddy waters: International actors and transboundary water cooperation in the Ganges-Brahmaputra problemshed. Water Alternatives, 10(2), 459–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, D. P. (2013). Trans-boundary water resources and uneven development: Crisis within and beyond contemporary India. South Asia: Journal of South Asian Studies, 36(2), 243–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho, S. (2016). ‘Big brother, little brothers’: comparing China’s and India’s transboundary river policies. Water Policy, wp2016103.
   Google Scholar
• Huda, M. S. (2017). Envisioning the future of cooperation on common rivers in South Asia: A cooperative security approach by Bangladesh and India to the Tipaimukh Dam. Water International, 42(1), 54–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hussain, W. (2014).The Naxal spread and its local linkages. IPCS special report, 157
   Google Scholar
• Immerzeel, W. (2008). Historical trends and future predictions of climate variability in the Brahmaputra basin. International Journal of Climatology, 28(2), 243–254.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Immerzeel, W. W., Van Beek, L. P., & Bierkens, M. F. (2010). Climate change will affect the Asian water towers. Science, 328(5984), 1382–1385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Islam, S. (2017). Complexity and contingency: Understanding and managing complex water problems. Water Diplomacy in Action: Contingent Approaches to Managing Complex Water Problems, 1, 3.
   Google Scholar
• Joint Rivers Commission, (2018). About JRC, retrieved from http://jrcb.gov.bd/new/
   Google Scholar
• Joy, K. J., Das, P. J., Chakraborty, G., Mahanta, C., Paranjape, S., & Vispute, S. (Eds.). (2017). Water conflicts in Northeast India. New Delhi: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jung, H. C., Hamski, J., Durand, M., Alsdorf, D., Hossain, F., Lee, H., … Hoque, A. K. M. (2010). Characterization of complex fluvial systems using remote sensing of spatial and temporal water level variations in the Amazon, Congo, and Brahmaputra Rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(3), 294–304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y. (2015). Transboundary water cooperation on the YarlungZangbo/Brahmaputra–A legal analysis of riparian state practice. Water International, 40(2), 354–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power and the battle for hearts and minds. Millennium, 33(3), 477–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luttwak, E. N. (1990). From geopolitics to geo-economics: Logic of conflict, grammar of commerce. The National Interest, 20, 17–23.
   Google Scholar
• Lutz, A. F., Immerzeel, W. W., Shrestha, A. B., & Bierkens, M. F. P. (2014). Consistent increase in High Asia’s runoff due to increasing glacier melt and precipitation. Nature Climate Change, 4(7), 587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lwasa, S. (2015). A systematic review of research on climate change adaptation policy and practice in Africa and South Asia deltas. Regional Environmental Change, 15(5), 815–824.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCalla-Chen, D. (2000). Towards an understanding of the concept of non-decision making and its manifestation in the school sector. Educational Management & Administration, 28(1), 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. (2008). Securitization and the construction of security. European Journal of International Relations, 14(4), 563–587.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menga, F. (2016a). Domestic and international dimensions of transboundary water politics. Water Alternatives, 9(3), 704–723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menga, F. (2016b). Reconceptualizing hegemony: The circle of hydro-hegemony. Water Policy, 18(2), 401–418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, A., Bunclark, L., Conway, D., & Adger, W. N. (2013). Assessment of institutional capacity to adapt to climate change in transboundary river basins. Climatic Change, 121(4), 755–770.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirumachi, N., & Allan, J. A. (2007, November). Revisiting transboundary water governance: Power, conflict cooperation and the political economy. Proceedings from CAIWA international conference on adaptive and integrated water management: Coping with scarcity (Vol. 1215). Basel, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Montville, J. V. (1991). Transnationalism and the role of track-two diplomacy. Approaches to Peace: an Intellectual Map, 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Mosselman, E. (2006). Bank protection and river training along the braided Brahmaputra-Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Braided Rivers: Process, Deposits, Ecology and Management, 36, 279–287.
   Google Scholar
• Nishat, A., & Faisal, I. M. (2000). An assessment of the institutional mechanisms for water negotiations in the Ganges-Brahmaputra-Meghna system. International Negotiation, 5(2), 289–310.
   Google Scholar
• Nye, J. S., Jr. (2009). Get smart: Combining hard and soft power. Foreign Affairs,  88(4),160–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen-Perlman, J. D., & Fischhendler, I. (2018). The weakness of the strong: Re-examining power in transboundary water dynamics. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(2), 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: the logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rahaman, M. M., & Varis, O. (2009, February). Integrated water management of the Brahmaputra basin: Perspectives and hope for regional development. Natural Resources Forum, 33(1), 60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Rajshekhar, M. (2013, April 30). Hydelgate: Why Arunachal Pradesh’s hydel boom is going bust. The Economic Times. Retrieved from https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/industry/energy/power/hydelgate-why-arunachal-pradeshs-hydel-boom-is-going-bust/articleshow/19790466.cms
   Google Scholar
• Rasul, G. (2014). Food, water, and energy security in South Asia: A nexus perspective from the Hindu Kush Himalayan region☆. Environmental Science & Policy, 39, 35–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, P. A., Yang, Y. C. E., Wi, S., Khalil, A., Chatikavanij, V., & Brown, C. (2015). Room for improvement: Hydroclimatic challenges to poverty-reducing development of the Brahmaputra River basin. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 64–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robertson, S., & Beresford, Q. (1996). Coordination in youth affairs: The politics of non‐decision‐making. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 55(1), 23–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rose, R., & Davies, P. L. (1994). Inheritance in public policy: change without choice in Britain. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saran, S. (2017). How India sees the world: Kautilya to the 21st century. New Delhi: Juggernaut Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schattschneider, E. (1975). The semi-sovereign people. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(1), 76–84.
   Google Scholar
• Susskind, L., & Islam, S. (2012). Water diplomacy: Creating value and building trust in transboundary water negotiations. Science & Diplomacy, 1(3), 1–7.
   Google Scholar
• Thakkar, H. (2003). Opposition to India’s river-linking scheme grows. World Rivers Review, 18(5), 3.
   Google Scholar
• Tilleard, S., & Ford, J. (2016). Adaptation readiness and adaptive capacity of transboundary river basins. Climatic Change, 137(3–4), 575–591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turton, A. R., & Ashton, P. J. (2008). Basin closure and issues of scale: The southern African hydropolitical complex. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 24(2), 305–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vij, S., Moors, E., Ahmad, B., Uzzaman, A., Bhadwal, S., Biesbroek, R., … Saeed, B. A. (2017). Climate adaptation approaches and key policy characteristics: Cases from South Asia. Environmental Science & Policy, 78, 58–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vörösmarty, C. J., Douglas, E. M., Green, P. A., & Revenga, C. (2005). Geospatial indicators of emerging water stress: an application to Africa. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human environment, 34(3), 230-236.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Wang, X., Wang, C., Miao, L., Hou, J., & Yuan, Q. (2017). Shift in bacterioplankton diversity and structure: Influence of anthropogenic disturbances along the YarlungTsangpo River on the Tibetan Plateau, China. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 12529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J., Mirumachi, N., Farnum, R. L., Grandi, M., Menga, F., & Zeitoun, M. (2017). Transboundary ‘hydro‐hegemony’: 10 years later. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(6), e1242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J., & Zawahri, N. (2012). Hegemony and asymmetry: Multiple-chessboard games on transboundary rivers. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 12(3), 215–229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wijngaard, R. R., Lutz, A. F., Nepal, S., Khanal, S., Pradhananga, S., Shrestha, A. B., & Immerzeel, W. W. (2017). Future changes in hydro-climatic extremes in the Upper Indus, Ganges, and Brahmaputra River basins. PloS one, 12(12), e0190224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting interpretive policy analysis (Vol. 47). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Goulden, M., & Tickner, D. (2013). Current and future challenges facing transboundary river basin management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4(5), 331–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., Mirumachi, N., & Warner, J. (2011). Transboundary water interaction II: The influence of ‘soft’power. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 11(2), 159–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeitoun, M., & Warner, J. (2006). Hydro-hegemony–A framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy, 8(5), 435–460.
   Google Scholar