Binational reflections on pathways to groundwater security in the Mexico–United States borderlands

References

• Alley, W. M., Reilly, T. E., & Franke, O. L. (1999). Sustainability of ground-water resources. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1186. U.S. Geological Survey .
   Google Scholar
• Boyce, S. E., Hanson, R. T., Ferguson, I., Schmid, W., Henson, W., Reimann, T., Mehl, S. M., & Earll, M. M. (2020). One-water hydrologic flow model: A MODFLOW based conjunctive-use simulation software. (Techniques and Methods 6–A60). U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6a60.
   Google Scholar
• Callegary, J. B., Megdal, S. B., Villaseñor, E. T., Petersen-Perlman, J. D., Sosa, I. M., Monreal, R., Gray, F., & Noriega, F. G. (2018). Findings and lessons learned from the assessment of the Mexico–United States transboundary San Pedro and Santa Cruz aquifers: The utility of social science in applied hydrologic research. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies, 20, 60–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.08.002
   Google Scholar
• Callegary, J. B., Sosa, I. M., Villaseñor, E. T., Dos Santos, P., Monreal, R., Grijalva Noriega, F., Huth, A., Gray, F., Scott, C., & Megdal, S. B. (2016). Binational study of the transboundary San Pedro aquifer. Binational report. International Boundary and Water Commission. http://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Binational_Study_Transboundary_San_Pedro_Aquifer.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CASGEM. (2021). Groundwater monitoring (CASGEM) https://water.ca.gov/Programs/Groundwater-Management/Groundwater-Elevation-Monitoring-CASGEM
   Google Scholar
• Castle, S. L., Thomas, B. F., Reager, J. T., Rodell, M., Swenson, S. C., & Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). Groundwater depletion during drought threatens future water security of the Colorado River Basin. Geophysical Research Letters, 41(16), 5904–5911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2014GL061055
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, N. S., Wood, A. W., Voisin, N., Lettenmaier, D. P., & Palmer, R. N. (2004). The effects of climate change on the hydrology and water resources of the Colorado River basin. Climatic Change, 62(1), 337–363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/B:CLIM.0000013684.13621.1f
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cital, F., Rivera, A., Rodríguez-Burgueño, E., & Ramírez-Hernández, J. (2021). A governance panorama of an aquifer in a semiarid region, Mexico. In S. H. Choi, E. Shin, A. K. Makarigakis, O. Sohn, C. Clench, & M. Trudeau (Eds.), The role of sound groundwater resources management and governance to achieve water security (pp. 216–238). UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000379093
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, M. A. (2005). El agua en la frontera México-Estados Unidos: Reto político-ambiental. Espacio Abierto, 14(2). https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/122/12214202.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CONAGUA. (2015). Statistics on water in Mexico. 2015. Ministry of the Environment and Natural Resources.
   Google Scholar
• CONAGUA. (2020). Public registry of water rights (REPDA). CONAGUA https://app.conagua.gob.mx/consultarepda.aspx
   Google Scholar
• CRS. (2018). Sharing the Colorado River and the Rio Grande: Cooperation and conflict with Mexico. (No. R45430). Congressional Research Service. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/R45430.html#_Ref521665121
   Google Scholar
• Cuthbert, M., Gleeson, T., Moosdorf, N., Befus, K. M., Schneider, A., Hartmann, J., & Lehner, B. (2019). Global patterns and dynamics of climate–groundwater interactions. Nature Climate Change, 9(2), 137–141. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0386-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danskin, W. (2020). San Diego hydrogeology. California Water Science Center. U.S. Geological Survey. https://ca.water.usgs.gov/projects/sandiego/contact/scientists_current.html
   Google Scholar
• Draper, S. E., & Kundell, J. E. (2007). Impact of climate change on transboundary water sharing. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 133(5), 405–415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9496(2007)133:5(405)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckstein, G. (2017). The international law of transboundary groundwater resources. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Famiglietti, J. S. (2014). The global groundwater crisis. Nature Climate Change, 4(11), 945–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2425
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, I. A., & Llewellyn, D. (2015). Simulation of Rio Grande project operations in the Rincon and Mesilla Basins: Summary of model configuration and results. (Technical Memorandum 86–68210–2015–05). 56. U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Reclamation.
   Google Scholar
• Gleeson, T., Villholth, K., Taylor, R., Perrone, D., & Hyndman, D. (2019). Groundwater: A call to action. Nature, 576(7786), 213. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-03711-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groundwater Protection Council, & Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission. (2011). FracFocus. https://fracfocus.org
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. T., Boyce, S. E., Schmid, W., Hughes, J. D., Mehl, S. M., Leake, S. A., Maddock, T., III, & Niswonger, R. G. (2014). MODFLOW-One-Water Hydrologic Flow Model (OWHM). (Techniques and Methods 6-A51). 122. U.S. Geological Survey.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. T., McLean, J. S., & Miller, R. S. (1994). Hydrogeologic framework and preliminary simulation of ground-water flow in the Mimbres Basin, southwestern New Mexico. (Water-Resources Investigations Report 94-4011). 118. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/wri944011
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. T., Ritchie, A. B., Boyce, S. E., Galanter, A. E., Ferguson, I. A., Flint, L. E., Flint, A., & Henson, W. R. (2020). Rio Grande transboundary integrated hydrologic model and water-availability analysis, New Mexico and Texas, United States, and northern Chihuahua, Mexico. (Scientific Investigations Report 2019–5120). 186. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20195120
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R. T., Schmid, W., Knight, J., & Maddock, T., III. (2013). Integrated hydrologic modeling of a transboundary aquifer system – Lower Rio Grande. Paper presented at MODFLOW and more 2013 – Translating science into practice conference, Golden, CO, June 2–5, 2013. Colorado School of Mines, Integrated Groundwater Modeling Center. 5. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258698983
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, R., Chávez-Guillen, R., Tujchneider, O., Alley, W. M., Rivera, A., Dausman, A., Batista, L., & Espinoza, M. (2015). Enfoques para Implementar la Estrategia Regional. UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Hernández-Espriú, A., Wolaver, B., Arciniega-Esparza, S., Scanlon, B. R., Young, M. H., Nicot, J.-P., Macías-Medrano, S., & Breña-Naranjo, J. A. (2019). A screening approach to improve water management practices in undeveloped shale plays, with application to the transboundary Eagle Ford Formation in northeast Mexico. Journal of Environmental Management, 236, 146–162. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.123
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez, A. (2003). Water law in the Republic of México. US–Mex. Law Journal, 11(1), 15. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25922/0zrx-xr72.
   Google Scholar
• Hesser, J. N. (2011). The nature of interstate groundwater resources and the need for states to effectively manage the resource through interstate compacts. Wyoming Law Review, 11(1), 25. https://scholarship.law.uwyo.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1245&context=wlr .
   Google Scholar
• Heywood, C. E., & Yager, R. M. (2003). Simulated ground-water flow in the Hueco Bolsón, an alluvial-basin aquifer system near El Paso, Texas. (Water-Resources Investigation Report 2002–4108). 73. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/wri024108
   Google Scholar
• Hogeboom, R. J., De Bruin, D., Schyns, J. F., Krol, M. S., & Hoekstra, A. Y. (2020). Capping human water footprints in the world’s river basins. Earth’s Future, 8(2), e2019EF001363. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2019EF001363
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBWC. (1906). Convention between the United States and Mexico – Equitable distribution of the waters of the Rio Grande. International Boundary Water Commission. Gov. Printing Off. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (1973). Minute 242, Permanent and definitive Solution to the International Problem of the Salinity of the Colorado River https://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min242.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2010). Minute 316, utilization of the Wellton-Mohawk bypass drain and necessary infrastructure in the United States for the conveyance of water by Mexico and non-governmental organizations of both countries to the Santa Clara wetland during the Yuma desalting plant pilot run. (https://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min316.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2012). Minute 319, Interim International Cooperative Measures in the Colorado River Basin through 2017 and Extension of Minute 318 Cooperative Measures to Address the Continued Effects of the April 2010 Earthquake in the Mexicali Valley, Baja California. (https://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min319.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2017a). Minute 322, Extension of the Temporary Emergency Delivery of Colorado River Water for Use in Tijuana, Baja California (https://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min322.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2017b). Minute 323, Officials with the International Boundary and Water Commission, United States and Mexico, today announced the conclusion of a new Colorado River Agreement, Minute 323, “Extension of Cooperative Measures and Adoption of a Binational Water Scarcity Contingency Plan in the Colorado River Basin” https://www.ibwc.gov/Files/Minutes/Min323.pdf
   Google Scholar
• IBWC. (2021). Minutes between the United States and Mexican Sections of the IBWC. https://www.ibwc.gov/Treaties_Minutes/Minutes.html
   Google Scholar
• Ikonnikova, S. A., Male, F., Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., & McDaid, G. (2017). Projecting the water footprint associated with shale resource production: Eagle Ford shale case study. Environmental Science & Technology, 51(24), 14453–14461. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b03150
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kalbus, E., Reinstorf, F., & Schirmer, M. (2006). Measuring methods for groundwater–surface water interactions: A review. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 10(6), 873–887. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-873-2006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karandish, F., Hoekstra, A. Y., & Hogeboom, R. J. (2018). Groundwater saving and quality improvement by reducing water footprints of crops to benchmarks levels. Advances in Water Resources, 121, 480–491. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kennedy, J., Rodríguez-Burgueño, J. E., & Ramírez-Hernández, J. (2017). Groundwater response to the 2014 pulse flow in the Colorado River Delta. Ecological Engineering, 106, 715–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.10.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. H., & Jackson, R. B. (2012). A global analysis of groundwater recharge for vegetation, climate, and soils. Vadose Zone Journal, 11(1). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2011.0021RA
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loch, A., Perez-Blanco, C., Carmody, E., Felbab-Brown, V., Adamson, D., & Seidl, C. (2020). Grand theft water and the calculus of compliance. Nature Sustainability, 3(12), 1012–1018. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-020-0589-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukas, J., & Payton, E. (2020). Colorado River Basin climate and hydrology: State of the science. Technical report. Western Water Assessment Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.25810/3hcv-w477
   Google Scholar
• Megdal, S. B., & Scott, C. A. (2011). The importance of institutional asymmetries to the development of binational aquifer assessment programs: The Arizona–Sonora experience. Water, 3(3), 949–963. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w3030949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J., Croskrey, A., Wise, M., & Kalaswad, S. (2014). Brackish groundwater in the Gulf Coast Aquifer, Lower Rio Grande Valley, Texas. Texas Water Development Board. http://www.twdb.Texas.gov/publications/reports/numbered_reports/doc/R383_BrackishGW.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Milly, P. C., & Dunne, K. A. (2020). Colorado River flow dwindles as warming-driven loss of reflective snow energizes evaporation. Science, 367(6483), 1252–1255. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay9187
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milman, A., & Scott, C. A. (2010). Beneath the surface: Intranational institutions and management of the United States – Mexico transboundary Santa Cruz aquifer. Environment and Planning. C, Government & Policy, 28(3), 528–551. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/c0991
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. P. (2000). Minute 242 and beyond: Challenges and opportunities for managing transboundary groundwater on the Mexico–US border. Natural Resources Journal 40 , 341–378 https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/nrj/vol40/iss2/8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mumme, S. P. (2005). Advancing binational cooperation in transboundary aquifer management on the US–Mexico border. Colorado Journal of International Environmental Law and Policy, 16, 77.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, J., Kendy, E., Schlatter, K., Hinojosa-Huertaf, O., Flessa, K. W., Shafroth, P. B., Ramirez-Hernandez, J., Nagler, P. L., & Glenn, E. P. (2017). It takes more than water: Restoring the Colorado River Delta. Ecological Engineering, 106(B), 629–632. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.05.028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez, R. C. (1967). Aspectos legales del agua subterránea en México. Ingeniería Hidráulica en México, 23, 253–255.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie, A. B., Hanson, R. T., Galanter, A. E., Boyce, S. E., Damar, N. A., & Shephard, Z. M. (2018). Digital hydrologic and geospatial data for the Rio Grande transboundary integrated hydrologic model and water-availability analysis, New Mexico and Texas, United States, and Northern Chihuahua, Mexico. (U.S. Geological Survey data release). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5066/P9J9NYND
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, A., Amore, L., Kettelhut, J., Chávez-Guillén, R., Vences Mejía, J. A., Arias, M., & Rivera, A. (Ed.). (2015). Book on Regional Strategy for the Assessment and Management of Transboundary Aquifer Systems (TAS) in the Americas. UNESCO/OEA-ISARM AMERICAS, Book IV (Estrategia Regional para la Gestión de los Sistemas de Acuíferos Transfronterizos (SAT) en las Americas. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000235394?posInSet=7&queryId=32a47d34-c6c2-47d0-bc1c-6a9756cb7847
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L., Sanchez, R., Zhan, H., & Knappett, P. S. (2020). The transboundary nature of the Allende–Piedras Negras aquifer using a numerical model approach. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 56(3), 387–408. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12843
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., & Eckstein, G. (2020a). Groundwater management in the borderlands of Mexico and Texas: The beauty of the unknown, the negligence of the present, and the way forward. Water Resources Research, 56(3), e2019WR026068. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., & Eckstein, G. (2020b). The path towards groundwater management in the borderlands of Mexico and Texas. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 7(1), e1399. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., Kaiser, R., & Giardino, J. R. (2010). Water planning under an unsustainable condition: Challenges for the Laguna Region, Mexico. World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2010: Challenges of Change.
   Google Scholar
• Sanchez, R., Lopez, V., & Eckstein, G. (2016). Identifying and characterizing transboundary aquifers along the Mexico–US border: An initial assessment. Journal of Hydrology, 535, 101–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.01.070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scanlon, B. R., Zhang, Z., Reedy, R. C., Pool, D. R., Save, H., Long, D., Chen, J., Wolock, D. M., Conway, B. D., & Winester, D. (2015). Hydrologic implications of GRACE satellite data in the Colorado River Basin. Water Resources Research, 51(12), 9891–9903. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senate Reports. (2006). Public Law 109-448-Dec.22, 2006. United States–Mexico Transboundary Aquifer Assessment Act. https://www.congress.gov/109/plaws/publ448/PLAW-109publ448.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sweetkind, D. S., Hanson, R. T., Ritchie, A. B., & Hawley, J. W. (2017). Data release of three-dimensional hydrogeologic framework model of the Rio Grande transboundary region of New Mexico and Texas, USA and northern Chihuahua, Mexico. (U.S. Geological Survey data release). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5066/F7JM27T6.
   Google Scholar
• Sweetkind, D. S. (2017). Three-dimensional hydrogeologic framework model of the Rio Grande transboundary region of New Mexico and Texas, USA, and northern Chihuahua, Mexico. (Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5060). 49. U.S. Geological Survey. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175060.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, B., Sax, J., Leshy, J., & Abrams, R. H. (2000). Legal control of water resources. St. Paul: West Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• TWRI. (2019). Transboundary water portal. Texas Water Resources Institute https://transboundary.tamu.edu/
   Google Scholar
• UN Water. (2013). What is water security? Infographic. United Nations. https://www.unwater.org/publications/water-security-infographic/
   Google Scholar
• UNECE & UNESCO. (2021). Progress on transboundary water cooperation – 2021 update. Global status of SDG indicator 6.5.2 and acceleration needs. United Nations. https://www.unwater.org/publications/progress-on-transboundary-water-cooperation-652-2021-update/
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. (2014). Model provisions on transboundary groundwaters.
   Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (2010). Aspectos socioeconomicos, ambientales y Climaticos de los sistemas acuiferos transfronterizos de las Americas.
   Google Scholar
• USBR. (2008). Operating agreement for the Rio Grande project. U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Reclamation. http://www.usbr.gov/uc/albuq/rm/RGP/pdfs/Operating-Agreement2008.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USBR. (2016). Continued implementation of the 2008 operating agreement for the Rio Grande Project, New Mexico and Texas – Final environmental impact statement. United States Bureau of Reclamation. Retrieved March, from https://www.usbr.gov/uc/envdocs/eis/pdf/2008OperatingAgreementRioGrandeEIS_Final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• USBR. (2017). Rio Grande operating agreement environmental impact statement. United States Bureau of Reclamation. Retrieved February, from https://www.usbr.gov/uc/albuq/rm/RGP/EIS/RGOA-EIS-BkgOvervInfo.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wester, P., Hoogesteger, J., & Vincent, L. (2009). Local IWRM organizations for groundwater regulation: The experiences of the Aquifer Management Councils (COTAS) in Guanajuato, Mexico. (Ed.), (Eds.). Natural Resources Forum.
   Google Scholar
• World Resources Institute. (1990). World Resources 1990–1991. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, W.-Y., Lo, M.-H., Wada, Y., Famiglietti, J. S., Reager, J. T., Yeh, P. J.-F., Ducharne, A., & Yang, Z.-L. (2020). Divergent effects of climate change on future groundwater availability in key mid-latitude aquifers. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17581-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar