Developing the transboundary Long Term Vision of the Scheldt Estuary – an untold story

References

• Aukes, E., Bontje, L., & Slinger, J. (2020). Narrative and frame analysis: Disentangling and refining two close relatives by means of a large infrastructural technology case. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 21(2), Art. 28. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-21.2.3422.FQS
   Google Scholar
• Aukes, E., Lulofs, K., & Bressers, H. (2017). Framing mechanisms: The interpretive policy entrepreneur’s toolbox. Critical Policy Studies, 12(4), 406–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2017.1314219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, L., & Hicks, T. (2021). Are policy analogies persuasive? The household budget analogy and public support for austerity. British Journal of Political Science, 2021, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000119
   Google Scholar
• Battistello Espindola, I., & Costa Ribeiro, W. (2020). Transboundary waters, conflicts and international cooperation – Examples of the La Plata basin. Water International, 45(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2020.1734756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bontje, L. (2017). Narrative perspectives on the development of coastal pilot projects [PhD, Environmental Policy]. Delft University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:8fcebd18-5bd0-4b81-9358-147d7963d1c6.
   Google Scholar
• De Deckere, E., & Meire, P. (2000). De ontwikkeling van een streefbeeld voor het Scheldeestuarium op basis van ecosysteemfuncties, benaderd vanuit de functie natuurlijkheid (in Dutch). Antwerp University.
   Google Scholar
• De Vries, J. (2008). Breaking the deadlock: Lessons from cross-border spatial projects in Flanders and the Netherlands. disP – The Planning Review, 44(172), 48–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2008.10557002
   Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Gray, B., Putnam, L., Lewicki, R., Aarts, N., Bouwen, R., & van Woerkum, C. (2009). Disentangling approaches to framing in conflict and negotiation research: A meta-paradigmatic perspective. Human Relations, 62(2), 155–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708100356
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, B., Abazeed, A., Elhatow, L., & Muricho Onencan, A. (2023). Nile basin land and water acquisition research agenda: A policy brief. International Journal of Water Governance (IJWG 2.0), 9, 47–58. https://doi.org/10.25609/ijwg.9.2022.6876
   Google Scholar
• Enserink, B., Bots, P., van Daalen, C., Hermans, L., Kortmann, R., Kwakkel, J., Ruijgh-van der Ploeg, T., Slinger, J., Koppejan, J., & Thissen, W. (2022). Policy analysis of multi-actor systems (2nd ed.). TU Delft Open. https://doi.org/10.5074/T.2022.004
   Google Scholar
• Hassenforder, E., Smajgl, A., & Ward, J. (2015). Towards understanding participatory processes: Framework, application and results. Journal of Environmental Management, 157, 84–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.04.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hovmand, P. (2014). Chapter 2. Group Model Building and community-based system dynamics process. In Community-based system dynamics (pp.17–30). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8763-0
   Google Scholar
• IAHR. (2015 June 28–July 3). Scheldt Estuary physics and integrated management. Special Session. In E-proceedings of the 36th IAHR World Congress (p. 110). https://www.vliz.be/imisdocs/publications/ocrd/273533.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kipyegon Bosuben, D., Wehn, U., & van der Zaag, P. (2022). Lake Victoria water levels declining (2000–2006): The role of absent and uncertain data in a transboundary water controversy. Water International, (2023), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2022.2128299
   Google Scholar
• Lau, R. R., & Schlesinger, M. (2005). Policy frames, metaphorical reasoning, and support for public policies. Political Psychology, 26(1), 77–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2005.00410.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LTV. (2001a). Langetermijnvisie Schelde-estuarium (in Dutch). Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. Directorate Zeeland.
   Google Scholar
• LTV. (2001b). Toelichting bij de Langetermijnvisie Schelde-estuarium (in Dutch). Dutch Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management. Directorate Zeeland.
   Google Scholar
• McEvoy, S. (2019). Planning support tools in urban adaptation practice [Doctoral dissertation]. Delft University of Technology. https://doi.org/10.4233/uuid:48b7649c-5062-4c97-bba7-970fc92d7bbf.
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S. V. (1999). Conflict and cooperation on the Scheldt River basin. A case study of decision making on international Scheldt issues between 1967 and 1997. Environment and Policy Book Series 17. Springer Dordrecht.
   Google Scholar
• Mukuyu, P., Lautze, J., Rieu-Clarke, A., Saruchera, D., & McCartney, M. (2023). Do needs motivate the exchange of data in transboundary waters? Insights from Africa’s shared basins. Water International, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2023.2177075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, H., van Hove, B., Verhallen, A., & Cofino, W. (2007). The Scheldt Estuary case: From conflict to cooperation. In Environmental risk management in large river basins: Overview of current practices in the EU and Russia (pp. 95–100). CABRI-Volga Project Deliverable D3, Nizhny Novgorod State University of Architecture and Civil Engineering. http://www.cabri-volga.org/DOC/CABRI-VolgaDeliverableD3
   Google Scholar
• Petersen-Perlman, J. D., Veilleux, J. C., Aaron, T., & Wolf, A. T. (2017). International water conflict and cooperation: Challenges and opportunities. Water International, 42(2), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2017.1276041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plengsaeng, B., Wehn, U., & van der Zaag, P. (2014). Datasharing bottlenecks in transboundary integrated water resources management: A case study of the Mekong River Commission’s procedures for data sharing in the Thai context. Water International, 39(7), 933–951. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2015.981783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Projectteam LTV. (2000). Samenvattingen onderzoeken, audit en second opinions morfologie, natuurlijkheid, toegankelijkheid en veiligheid Langertermijnvisie Schelde-estuarium (Report RA/00-441A), Resource Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (2003). Out of the closet: The importance of stories and storytelling in planning practice. Planning Theory & Practice, 4(1), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/1464935032000057209
   Google Scholar
• Schlesinger, M., & Lau, R. L. (2000). The meaning and measure of policy metaphors. American Political Science Review, 94(3), 611–626. https://doi.org/10.2307/2585834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinger, J. H. (2000). The link between morphology and ecology in the Long Term Vision for the Schelde Estuary. A conceptual framework and preliminary results (Resource Analysis Report RA/00-430).
   Google Scholar
• Slinger, J. H., Hilders, M., & Juizo, D. (2010). The practice of transboundary decision making on the Incomati River: Elucidating underlying factors and their implications for institutional design. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 1. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art1/.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slinger, J. H., Muller, M., & Hendriks, M. (2007). Exploring local knowledge of the flooding risk of the Scheldt Estuary. Water Science & Technology, 56(4), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.539
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, J., & Whittington, D. (2004). Why have some countries on international rivers been successful negotiating treaties? A global perspective. Water Resources Research, 40(5), W05S06. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary-object. Reflections on the origin of the concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Starr, S. L., & Griesemer, J. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’, and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals on Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Werff ten Bosch, J., Kobes, H., Reijngoud, T., & van de Ven, K. (2000). Beleidswizard (in Dutch). LWI Estuaria & Kusten, October 1999.
   Google Scholar
• van Oudenhoven, A., Aukes, E., Bontje, L., Vikolainen, V., van Bodegom, P., & Slinger, J. (2018). ‘Mind the Gap’ between ecosystem services classification and strategic decision making. Ecosystem Services, 33, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vennix, J. (2000). Group model building – Tackling messy problems. System Dynamics Review, 15(4), 379–401. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1727(199924)15:4<379::AID-SDR179>3.0.CO;2-E
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• VNSC. (2019, April). Systeemanalyse natuur Schelde-estuarium. Gezamenlijk feitenonderzoek van stakeholders, deskundigen en de Vlaams-Nederlandse Scheldecommissie (in Dutch). Implementing Measures for Sustainable Estuaries (IMMERSE), Interreg North Sea region. https://northsearegion.eu/media/14997/ltp-n-systeemanalyse-natuur-schelde-estuarium.pdf
   Google Scholar
• VSNC. (2023). Vlaams-Nederlands Schelde Commissie (in Dutch). Retrieved April 2, 2023, from https://vnsc.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Walker, W. E. (2000). Policy analysis: A systematic approach to supporting policymaking in the public sector. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 9(1–3), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/1099-1360(200001/05)9:1/3<1::AID-MCDA264>3.0.CO;2-3
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, A. T., Yoffe, S. B., & Giordano, M. (2003). International waters: Identifying basins at risk. Water Policy, 5(1), 29–60. https://doi.org/10.2166/wp.2003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Zanting, H. A., Ten Thij, F., Coosen, J., & Claessens, J. (2002, May). Developing a bilateral long term vision for the Scheldt Estuary. In Proceedings IAIA’02, 22nd Annual Conference of the International Association of Impact Assessment ‘Assessing the Impact of Impact Assessment’.
   Google Scholar